Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 Preference, Choice, and Rationality
- 2 Ethics and Economics
- 3 Capability and Agency
- 4 Freedom in the Spirit of Sen
- 5 Social Choice Theory and the Informational Basis Approach
- 6 Sen on Sufficiency, Priority, and Equality
- 7 Famine, Poverty, and Property Rights
- 8 Development
- Selected Bibliography
- Index
- References
8 - Development
“A Misconceived Theory Can Kill”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 Preference, Choice, and Rationality
- 2 Ethics and Economics
- 3 Capability and Agency
- 4 Freedom in the Spirit of Sen
- 5 Social Choice Theory and the Informational Basis Approach
- 6 Sen on Sufficiency, Priority, and Equality
- 7 Famine, Poverty, and Property Rights
- 8 Development
- Selected Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
Human capabilities are partly created or undermined by development policies, markets, and other social arrangements. Put differently, human freedom is partly ‘human’-made. Sen's philosophical writings propose the expansion of human capabilities and freedoms as an objective for social arrangements, and argue that this objective satisfies certain considerations better than Rawlsian primary goods or utility measures. In approaching development, the chain of exploration can also be reversed. The policies, practices, analyses, and measures that guide development institutions can be scrutinized to uncover which truly aim at human freedoms, and how true their aim might be. Much of Sen's development writings engage or draw on investigations of this form. By such inspection, the oversights of development theories might be uncovered and corrected. Such work is terribly salient, for lives are at stake. In development, Sen observes, “a misconceived theory can kill” (Sen 1999a: 209).
Sen's writings on development include nine books, eight coauthored books, and more than 100 articles addressing economic development, poverty measurement, famines and hunger, gender inequalities, education, health, employment, population and the environment, written over more than forty years. His best-selling Development as Freedom (1999a) synthesizes previous work and provides an introduction to this approach. Sen has also presented his approach in overview articles, as have others (Sen 1980a, 1983a, 1984, 1985a, 1985b, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990a; Crocker 1992, 1995; Qizilbash 1996; Alkire 2005; Clark 2005; Robeyns 2005).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Amartya Sen , pp. 191 - 220Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
(2005). “Why the Capability Approach?” Journal of Human Development, 6, 115–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008). “The Capability Approach: Mapping Measurement Issues and Choosing Dimensions,” in and (eds), The Many Dimension of Poverty (Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan).Google Scholar
, and (2002). “Individual Motivation, Its Nature, Determinants and Consequences for within Group Behaviour,” in , and (eds.), Group Motivation and Development: Is the Market Destroying Cooperation? (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
, and (2007). “Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measures,” OPHI working paper series.
, , and . (2004). Public Health, Ethics, and Equity (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
, and (1994). Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement (New York: Human Development Report Office, United Nations Development Programme).Google Scholar
(2005). “Sen's Capability Approach and the Many Spaces of Human Well-Being,” Journal of Development Studies, 41, 1339–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). “Functioning and Capabilities: The Foundation of Sen's and Nussbaum's Development Ethic,” Political Theory, 20, 584–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995). “Functioning and Capability: The Foundation of Sen's and Nussbaum's Development Ethic, Part II,” in and (eds.), Women, Culture, and Development (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
(2008). Ethics of Global Development: Agency, Capability, and Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001). “Amartya Sen's 100 Million Missing Women,” Oxford Development Studies, 29, 225–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). The Capability Approach and the Praxis of Development (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001). “Sen's Entitlement Approach: Critiques and Counter-Critiques,” Oxford Journal of Development Studies, 29, 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1990). The Political Economy of Hunger (Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
, and (2002). India, Development and Participation (New Delhi: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1977). The Basic-Needs Approach to Development: Some Issues Regarding Concepts and Methodology (Geneva: International Labour Office).Google Scholar
(2003). “Gender, Discrimination, and Capability,” Journal of Religious Ethics, 30, 1, 140–53.Google Scholar
, and (2008b). Quantitative Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1785). Grundlegung Zur Metaphysik De Sitten.
(1909). “Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals,” in (ed.), Critique of Practical Reason and Other Works on the Theory of Ethics (London: Longmans).Google Scholar
, and (2002). “A Turning Point in Gender Bias in Mortality? An Update on the Number of Missing Women,” Population & Development Review, 28, 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003). “‘Missing Women’: Revisiting the Debate,” Feminist Economics, 9, 263–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996). “Capabilities, Well-Being and Human Development: A Survey,” Journal of Development Studies, 33, 143–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005). “The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey,” Journal of Human Development, 6, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1967). “The Nature and Classes of Prescriptive Judgments,” Philosophical Quarterly, 17, 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976). “Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement,” Econometrica, 44, 219–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977). “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 317–44.Google Scholar
(1979). “Informational Analysis of Moral Principles,” in (ed.), Rational Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
(1980a). “Equality of What?” in (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 1 (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press).Google Scholar
(1981). Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation (Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
(1983b). “Evaluator Relativity and Consequential Evaluation,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12, 113–32.Google Scholar
(1985a). Commodities and Capabilities(Amsterdam: North-Holland; New York: Elsevier Science).Google Scholar
(1985b). “Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984,” Journal of Philosophy, 82, 169–221.Google Scholar
(1987). “The Standard of Living,” in (ed.), The Standard of Living (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988). “The Concept of Development,” in and (eds.), Handbook of Development Economics (Amsterdam: North-Holland; New York: Elsevier Science).Google Scholar
(1989). “Development as Capability Expansion,” Journal of Development Planning, 19, 41–58.Google Scholar
(1990a). “Development as Capability Expansion,” in and (eds.), Human Development and the International Development Strategy for the 1990s (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
(1990b). “More Than 100 Million Women Are Missing,” New York Review of Books, 37, 20 (20 December).Google Scholar
(1991). “Wars and Famines: On Divisions and Incentives,” Suntory-Toyota International Centre Discussion Paper No. 33 (London School of Economics, Development Economics Research Program).
(1994). “Population: Delusion and Reality,” New York Review of Books, 41, 15 (22 September).Google Scholar
(1997). “From Income Inequality to Economic Inequality,” Southern Economic Journal, 64, 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). “Mahbub Ul Haq: The Courage and Creativity of His Ideas,” text of speech at the Memorial Meeting for Mahbub ul Haq at the United Nations, New York, October 15, 1998.
(1999b). “Economics and Health,” Lancet (North American Edition), 354, SIV20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1999c). “Health in Development,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 77, 619.Google ScholarPubMed
(2000). “Consequential Evaluation and Practical Reason,” Journal of Philosophy, 97, 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002a). “Health: Perception Versus Observation,” British Medical Journal, 324, 860–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2003a). “Development as Capability Expansion,” in (ed.), Readings in Human Development (New Delhi: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
(2003b). “Missing Women Revisited,” British Medical Journal, 327, 1297–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2003c). “Development, Rights and Human Security,” Box 1.3, pp. 8–9 in Human Security Now (Report of the Commission on Human Security) (New York: United Nations).Google Scholar
(2004). “Elements of a Theory of Human Rights,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 234, 315–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). “What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice,” Journal of Philosophy, 53, 5, 215–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2003). “Continuing the Conversation,” Feminist Economics, 9, 319–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1997). On Economic Inequality (Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
, , et al. (1987). (ed.), The Standard of Living (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985). Basic Needs in Developing Countries (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
, and (1981). First Things First: Meeting Basic Human Needs in the Developing Countries (New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank).Google Scholar
(2004). Human Development Report 2004: Cultural Liberty in Today's Diverse World (New York: United Nations Development Programme).Google Scholar
(2003). “Comment on Amartya Sen's ‘Why Health Equity,’” Health Economics, 12, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3
- Cited by