Institutions

doi:10.1017/9781108863957.008

8 - Institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 June 2021

Kate Power

Edited by

Stephen Pihlaja

Show author details

Stephen Pihlaja: Affiliation:
Newman University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Discusses the role of institutions in the development of religious belief and practice, discussing how power operates in different ways, and how governance models like elections mix both secular and religious politics, with broader social contexts influencing who comes to power within an individual institution.

Keywords

religion language belief institutions Anglican Church of Canada Discourse Historical Approach governance democracy

Type: Chapter
Information: Analysing Religious Discourse , pp. 126 - 143

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108863957.008 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

8.5 References

Albertson, B. L. (2015). Dog-whistle politics: Multivocal communication and religious appeals. Political Behaviour, 37, 3–26.Google Scholar

Angry Anglicans. (2008). The Economist, 386 (8573).Google Scholar

Anthonissen, C. (2003). Interaction between visual and verbal communication: changing patterns in the printed media. In Weiss, G. & Wodak, R. (eds.), Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity (pp. 297–311). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bailey, I. (2014). Q&A Rev. Melissa Skelton: A bishop with business sense. The Globe and Mail, January 2, 2014. www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/a-bishop-with-business-sense/article16182397/Google Scholar

Bebbington, D. W. (1989). Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History from the 1730s to the 1980s. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Benson, I. (2000). Notes towards a (re)definition of the “secular”. University of British Columbia Law Review, 33(3), 519–549.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1979). Symbolic power. Critique of Anthropology, 4(13–14), 77–85.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Genesis and structure of the religious field. Comparative Social Research, 13, 1–44.Google Scholar

Breeze, R. (2011). Critical Discourse Analysis and its critics. Pragmatics, 21(4), 493–525.Google Scholar

Calfano, B. R., & Djupe, P. A. (2008). God talk: Religious cues and electoral support. Political Research Quarterly, 62(2), 329–339.Google Scholar

Charles, M. (2006). The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 492–518.Google Scholar

Christopherson, R. W. (1994). Calling and career in Christian ministry. Review of Religious Research, 35(3), 219–237.Google Scholar

Commonwealth of Australia. (2017). Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au.Google Scholar

Ehrman, B. D. (2003). Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faith We Never Knew. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Everitt, J. (2015). Gender and sexual diversity in provincial election campaigns. Canadian Political Science Review, 9(1), 177–192.Google Scholar

Fehige, Y. (2013). Sexual diversity and divine creation: A tightrope walk between Christianity and science. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 48(1), 35–59. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01314.xGoogle Scholar

Klassen, P. E. (2011). Spirits of Protestantism: Medicine, healing, and liberal Christianity. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Kotwal, A., & Power, K. (2015). Eating words: A discourse historical analysis of the public debate over India’s 21013 National Food Security Act. On the Horizon, 23(3), 174–189.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (1999). Grace: The logogenesis of freedom. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 29–56. doi:10.1177/1461445699001001003CrossRef Google Scholar

Obeng, S. G. (1997). Language and politics: Indirectness in political discourse. Discourse & Society, 8(1), 49–83.Google Scholar

Power, K. (2015). Religion, power and public self-representation. In Jule, A. (ed.), Shifting Visions: Gender and Discourses (pp. 49–68). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

A Profile of the Anglican Diocese of New Westminster. (2013). Vancouver. www.vancouver.anglican.ca/Portals/0/Downloads/DiocesanProfilePublicationforweb10-10–2013.pdf.Google Scholar

Sibley, R. (2008, September 27). One Nation under God. Ottawa Citizen.Google Scholar

ter Borg, M. B. (2018). Religion and power. In Clarke, P. B. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Religion (pp. 194–209). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

The General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada. (2019). Five Marks of Mission. www.anglican.ca/ask/faq/marks-of-mission/.Google Scholar

Todd, D. (2017, March 26). B.C. breaks records when it comes to religion and the lack thereof. Vancouver Sun. https://vancouversun.com/news/staff-blogs/b-c-breaks-records-when-it-comes-to-religion-and-the-lack-thereof.Google Scholar

UNESCO Institute of Statistics. (2020). Religious Institutions. http://uis.unesco.org/en/glossary-term/religious-institutions.Google Scholar

van Dijk, T. A. (2005). Contextual knowledge management in discourse production: A CDA perspective. In Wodak, R. & Chilton, P. (eds.), A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity (pp. 71–100). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Wagner, I., & Wodak, R. (2006). Performing success: Identifying strategies of self-presentation in women’s biographical narratives. Discourse and Society, 17(3), 385–411.Google Scholar

Weber, C., & Thornton, M. (2012). Courting Christians: How political candidates prime religious considerations in campaign ads. The Journal of Politics, 74(2), 400–13. doi:10.1017/s0022381611001617Google Scholar

Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 63–94). London: SAGE.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wodak, R. (2007). What Is Critical Discourse Analysis? Conversation with Gavin Kendall. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8 (2). www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/255/561.Google Scholar

Wodak, R. (2009). The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (eds.). (2009). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.Google Scholar