Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T02:48:33.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Michael A. Long ,
Paul B. Stretesky ,
Kenneth J. Berry ,
Janis E. Johnston  and
Michael J. Lynch
Michael A. Long
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University
Paul B. Stretesky
Affiliation:
Northumbria University, Newcastle
Kenneth J. Berry
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Janis E. Johnston
Affiliation:
USDA
Michael J. Lynch
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Applying Benford's Law for Assessing the Validity of Social Science Data , pp. 196 - 203
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adcock, R., & Collier, D. (2001). Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 529–546.Google Scholar
Adiguzel, F. S., Cansunar, A., & Corekcioglu, G. (2020). Truth or dare? Detecting systematic manipulation of COVID-19 statistics. Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy, 1(4), 543–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adolph, C., Amano, K., Bang-Jensen, B., Fullman, N., & Wilkerson, J. (2021). Pandemic politics: Timing state-level social distancing responses to COVID-19. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 46(2), 211–233.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S. K. S. A., Ajisola, M., Azeem, K., Bakibinga, P., Chen, Y-F., Choudhury, N. N. et al. (2020). Impact of the societal response to COVID-19 on access to healthcare for non-COVID-19 health issues in slum communities of Bangladesh, Kenya, Nigeria and Pakistan: Results of pre-COVID and COVID-19 lockdown stakeholder engagements. BMJ Global Health, 5(8), e003042. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, C., & Kazemian, L. (2018). Reliability and validity of cross-national homicide data: A comparison of UN and WHO data. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 42(4), 287–302.Google Scholar
Badal-Valero, E., Alvarez-Jareño, J. A., & Pavía, J. M. (2018). Combining Benford’s law and machine learning to detect money laundering: An actual Spanish court case. Forensic Science International, 282, 24–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baglivo, J., Olivier, D., & Pagano, M. (1992). Methods for exact goodness-of-fit tests. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 464–469.Google Scholar
Bandalos, D. L. (2018). Measurement theory and applications for the social sciences. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Beber, B., & Scacco, A. (2012). What the numbers say: A digit-based test for election fraud. Political Analysis, 20(2): 211–234.Google Scholar
Beiglou, P. H. B., Gibbs, C., Rivers, L., Adhikari, U., & Mitchell, J. (2017). Applicability of Benford’s law to compliance assessment of self-reported wastewater treatment plant discharge data. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 19(4). DOI: 10.1142/S146433321750017X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belhabib, D., Da Silva, D. H., Allison, E. H., Zeller, D., & Pauly, D. (2016). Filling a blank on the map: 60 years of fisheries in Equatorial Guinea. Fisheries Management and Ecosystems 23(2), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benford, F. (1938). The law of anomalous numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78, 551–572.Google Scholar
Berry, K. J., Johnston, J. E., & Mielke, P. W. (2018). The measurement of association. Cham, CH: Springer.Google Scholar
Berry, K. J., & Mielke, P. W. (1997). Measuring the joint agreement between multiple raters and a standard. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 527–530.Google Scholar
Berry, K. J., Mielke, P. W., & Johnston, J. E. (2016). Permutation statistical methods: An integrated approach. Cham, CH: Springer.Google Scholar
Bickel, P. J., Hammel, E. A., & O’Connell, J. W. (1975). Sex bias in graduate admissions: Data from Berkeley. Science, New Series, 187(4175), 398–404.Google Scholar
Biswas, R. K., Afiaz, A., & Huq, S. (2020). Underreporting COVID-19: The curious case of the Indian subcontinent. Epidemiology & Infection, 148. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268820002095.Google Scholar
Blicher, B., Joshipura, K., & Eke, P. (2005). Validation of self-reported periodontal disease: A systematic review. Journal of Dental Research, 84(10), 881–890.Google Scholar
Box, G. E. P., & Andersen, S. L. (1955). Permutation theory in the derivation of robust criteria and the study of departures from assumption. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 17, 1–34.Google Scholar
Breunig, C., & Goerres, A. (2011). Searching for electoral irregularities in an established democracy: Applying Benford’s law tests to Bundestag elections in Unified Germany. Electoral Studies, 30(3), 534–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. J. C. (2005). Benford’s law and the screening of analytical data: The case of pollutant concentrations in ambient air. Analyst, 130(9), 1280–1285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burke, J., & Kincanon, E. (1991). Benford’s Law and physical constants: The distribution of initial digits. American Journal of Physics, 59, 952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US. (2021). Interim clinical guidance for management of patients with confirmed coronavirus disease (COVID-19). https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/clinical-guidance-management-patients.html.Google Scholar
Cerqueti, R., & Lupi, C. (2021). Some new tests of conformity with Benford’s law. Stats, 4, 745–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, L. L., & Idris, N. (2017). Validity and reliability of the instrument using exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(10), 400–410.Google Scholar
Clausen, R., & Clark, B. (2005). The metabolic rift and marine ecology: An analysis of the ocean crisis within capitalist production. Organization & Environment, 18(4), 422–444.Google Scholar
Clausen, R., & York, R. (2008). Global biodiversity decline of marine and freshwater fish: A cross-national analysis of economic, demographic, and ecological influences. Social Science Research, 37(4), 1310–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304–1312.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. A., Maddison, D. J., & Zhang, L. (2020). Testing the emission reduction claims of CDM projects using the Benford’s law. Climatic Change, 160(3), 407–426.Google Scholar
Coracioni, A-T. (2020). Testing of published information on greenhouse gas emissions: Conformity analysis with the Benford’s law method. Audit Financier, 18(4), 821–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowles, M. (2001). Statistics in psychology: An historical perspective (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.Google Scholar
de Marchi, S., & Hamilton, J. T. (2006). Assessing the accuracy of self-reported data: An evaluation of the toxics release inventory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 32(1), 57–76.Google Scholar
de Vries, P., & Murk, A. J. (2013). Compliance of LC50 and NOEC data with Benford’s law: An indication of reliability? Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 98, 171–178.Google Scholar
Deckert, J., Myagkov, M., & Ordeshook, P.C. (2011). Benford’s law and the detection of election fraud. Political Analysis, 19(3), 245–268.Google Scholar
Diekmann, A. (2007). Not the first digit! Using Benford’s law to detect fraudulent scientific data. Journal of Applied Statistics, 34(3), 326–329.Google Scholar
Drake, P. D., & Nigrini, M. J. (2000). Computer assisted analytical procedures using Benford’s Law. Journal of Accounting Education, 18, 127–146.Google Scholar
Dubrow, J. K. (2021). Local data and upstream reporting as sources of error in the administrative data undercount of Covid 19. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2021.1909337.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues 56(3), 425–442.Google Scholar
Fazekas, M., & Kocsis, G. (2020). Uncovering high-level corruption: Cross-national objective corruption risk indicators using public procurement data. British Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (2011). Applied longitudinal analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, A. J., Bingham, K. S., & Iaboni, A. (2020). Effect of COVID-19 on the mental health care of older people in Canada. International Psychogeriatrics, 32(10), 1113–1116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
French, C. C. (2020). Covid-19 business interruption insurance losses: The cases for and against coverage. Connecticut Insurance Law Journal, 27, 1–33.Google Scholar
Frunza, M. (2015). Solving modern crime in financial markets: Analytics and case studies. Cambridge, MA, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gandi, M., & Noble, J. (2022). We need to rethink COVID-19 restrictions. Time, January 31–February 7, 2022, pp. 26–27.Google Scholar
Garg, M., Garrison, L., Leeman, L., Hamidovic, A., Borrego, M., Rayburn, W. F., & Bakhireva, L. (2016). Validity of self-reported drug use information among pregnant women. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 20(1), 41–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geary, R. C. (1927). Testing for normality. Biometrika, 34, 209–242.Google Scholar
Goodman, W. (2016). The promises and pitfalls of Benford’s law. Significance, 13(3), 38–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, L. D. (1999). The role of factor analysis in the estimation of construct validity. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 3(2), 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorber, S. C., Schofield-Hurwitz, S., Hardt, J., Levasseur, G., & Tremblay, M. (2009). The accuracy of self-reported smoking: A systematic review of the relationship between self-reported and cotinine-assessed smoking status. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 11(1), 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, J. (1997). Mathematics: From the birth of numbers. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Hardy, G. H., & Ramanujan, S. (1918). Asymptotic formulæ in combinatory analysis. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 17, 75–115.Google Scholar
Hays, W. L. (1988). Statistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Hickman, M. J., & Rice, S. K. (2010). Digital analysis of crime statistics: Does crime conform to Benford’s law? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(3), 333–349.Google Scholar
Jamain, A. (2001). Benford’s law. Master’s thesis, Imperial College, London.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. E., Berry, K. J., & Mielke, P. W. (2006). Measures of effect size for chi-squared and likelihood-ratio goodness-of-fit tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 103, 412–414.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. E., Berry, K. J., & Mielke, P. W. (2007). Permutation tests: Precision in estimating probability values. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105, 915–920.Google Scholar
Judge, G., & Schechter, L. (2009). Detecting problems in survey data using Benford’s law. Journal of Human Resources, 44(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Kadane, J. (2011). Principles of uncertainty. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Khullar, D. (2022). Omicron by the numbers. New Yorker, January 24, 2022, pp. 11–12.Google Scholar
Kim, H., Apio, C., Ko, Y., Han, K., Goo, Y., Heo, G. et al. (2021). Which national factors are most influential in the spread of COVID-19? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kline, P. An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Koch, C., & Okamura, K. (2020). Benford’s law and COVID-19 reporting. Economics Letters, 196. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109573.Google Scholar
Kokkevi, A., Rotsika, V., Arapaki, A., & Richardson, C. (2012). Adolescents’ self‐reported suicide attempts, self‐harm thoughts and their correlates across 17 European countries. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(4), 381–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Konar, S., & Cohen, M. A. (1997). Information as regulation: The effect of community right-to-know laws on toxic emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, 109–124.Google Scholar
Kossovsky, A. E. (2021). On the mistaken use of the chi-square test in Benford’s Law. Stats, 4, 419–453 (DOI: 10.3390/stats4020027.Google Scholar
Kuiper, N. H. (1960). Tests concerning random points on a circle. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Series A, 63, 38–47.Google Scholar
Kuncel, N. R., Credé, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 63–82.Google Scholar
Lau, H., Khosrawipour, T., Kocbach, P., Ichii, H., Bania, J., & Khosrawipour, V. (2021). Evaluating the massive underreporting and undertesting of COVID-19 cases in multiple global epicenters. Pulmonology, 27(2), 110–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3, 635–694.Google Scholar
Logan, J. L., & Goudsmit, S. A. (1978). The first digit phenomenon. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 122, 193–197.Google Scholar
Long, M. A., Stretesky, P. B., & Barrett, K. L. (2019). Longitudinal methods for analyzing green crime. In Lynch, M. J. & Pires, S. F. (Eds.), Quantitative studies in green and conservation criminology: The measurement of environmental harm and crime (pp. 198–217). Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J. (2007). Big prisons, big dreams: Crime and the failure of the US prison system. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J., Stretesky, P. B., & Long, M. A. (2015). Defining crime: A critique of the concept and its implications. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Macedo, A., Gonçalves, N., & Febra, C. (2021). COVID-19 fatality rates in hospitalized patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Epidemiology, 57, 14–21.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1844 [1959]). The economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1845 [1968]). A critique of the German ideology. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Mathieu, E., Ritchie, H., Rodés-Guirao, L., Appel, C., Gavrilow, D. et al. (2022). Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). Published online at OurWorldInData.org and retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus.Google Scholar
Matthews, R. (2016). Beautiful, but dangerous. Significance, 13, 30–31.Google Scholar
Maxim, P. S. (1999). Quantitative research methods in the social sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayo, D. G. (2018). Statistical inference as severe testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meehl, P. E. (1967). Theory testing in psychology and physics: A methodological paradox. Philosophy of Science, 34, 103–115.Google Scholar
Merem, E. C., Twumasi, Y., Wesley, J., Alsarari, M., Fageir, S., Crisler, M. et al. (2019). Analyzing the tragedy of illegal fishing on the West African coastal region. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Engineering, 9(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 56–63.Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In Linn, R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mielke, P. W., & Berry, K. J. (1993). Exact goodness-of-fit probability tests for analyzing categorical data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 707–710.Google Scholar
Mielke, P. W., Berry, K. J., & Johnson, E. S. (1976). Multi-response permutation procedures for a priori classifications. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, A5, 1409–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mir, T. (2012). The law of leading digits and the world religions. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 391, 792–798.Google Scholar
Mir, T. (2014). The Benford law behavior of religious activity data. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 408, 1–9.Google Scholar
Newcomb, S. (1881). Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers. American Journal of Mathematics, 4(1), 39–40.Google Scholar
Nguyen, H., & Loughran, T. A. (2017). On the reliability and validity of self‐reported illegal earnings: Implications for the study of criminal achievement. Criminology, 55(3), 575–602.Google Scholar
Nigrini, M. J. (1996). A taxpayer compliance application of Benford’s law. Journal of the American Taxpayer Association, 18, 72–91.Google Scholar
Nigrini, M. J. (2012). Benford’s law: Applications for forensic accounting, auditing, and fraud detection. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
OECD-FAO. (2020). Agricultural outlook, 2019–2028. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/agriculture-and-food/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-2019-2028_agr_outlook-2019-en.Google Scholar
Okereke, M., Ukor, N. A., Adebisi, Y. A., Ogunkola, I. O., Iyagbaye, E. F., Owhor, G. A. et al. (2021). Impact of COVID‐19 on access to healthcare in low‐and middle‐income countries: Current evidence and future recommendations. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 36(1), 13–17.Google Scholar
Oran, D. P., & Topol, E. J. (2021). The proportion of SARS-CoV-2 infections that are asymptomatic: A systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 174(5), M20–6976.Google Scholar
Pearce, A., Haas, M., Viney, R., Pearson, S.-A., Haywood, P., Brown, C., & Ward, R. (2017). Incidence and severity of self-reported chemotherapy side effects in routine care: A prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE, 12(10), e0184360.Google Scholar
Pearson, K., Lee, A., & Bramley-Moore, L. (1899). Genetic (reproductive) selection: Inheritance of fertility in man, and of fecundity in thoroughbred racehorses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 192, 257–330.Google Scholar
Petrossian, G. A. (2018). A micro-spatial analysis of opportunities for IUU fishing in 23 Western African countries. Biological Conservation, 225, 31–41.Google Scholar
Petrossian, G. A., & Clarke, R. V. (2020). Disaggregating illegal fishing losses for the 22 countries of the West African Coast. Maritime Studies, 19(4), 445–455.Google Scholar
Pinkham, R. S. (1961). On the distribution of first significant digits. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 1223–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata, vol. 1: Continuous responses (3rd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Roberson, L. A., Watson, R. A., & Klein, C. J. (2020). Over 90 endangered fish and invertebrates are caught in industrial fisheries. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. S. (1957). The statistical measurement of agreement. American Sociological Review, 22(1), 17–24.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. S. (1959). The geometric measurement of agreement. American Sociological Review, 24(3), 338–345.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Y., Watson, R. A., Blanchard, J. L., & Fulton, E. A. (2019). Defining global artisanal fisheries. Marine Policy, 108, 103634.Google Scholar
Sah, P., Fitzpatrick, M. C., Zimmer, C. F., Abdollahi, E., Juden-Kelly, L., Moghadas, S. M. et al. (2021). Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(34), e2109229118.Google Scholar
Sambridge, M., Tkalčić, H., & Jackson, A. (2010). Benford’s law in the natural sciences. Geophysical Research Letters, 37, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandron, F. (2002). Do populations conform to the law of anomalous numbers? Population, 57, 755–761.Google Scholar
Schar, D., Klein, E. Y., Laxminarayan, R., Gilbert, M., & Van Boeckel, T.P. (2020). Global trends in antimicrobial use in aquaculture. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Scovill, D. (2013). What’s really going on with crime rates: Crime stats are used to judge the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies, but hardly anyone is questioning their validity or accuracy. Police Magazine, October 9.Google Scholar
Seidman, D., & Couzens, M. (1974). Getting the crime rate down: Political pressure and crime reporting. Law & Society Review, 8(3), 457–493.Google Scholar
Sherry, B., Jefferds, M. E., & Grummer-Strawn, L. M. (2007). Accuracy of adolescent self-report of height and weight in assessing overweight status: A literature review. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161(12), 1154–1161.Google Scholar
Shewade, H. D., Parameswaran, G. G., Mazumder, A., & Gupta, M. (2021). Adjusting reported COVID-19 deaths for the prevailing routine death surveillance in India. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 641991.Google Scholar
Silva, L., & Filho, D. F. (2021). Using Benford’s law to assess the quality of COVID-19 register data in Brazil. Journal of Public Health, 43(1), 107–110.Google Scholar
Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 13(2), 238–241.Google Scholar
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, S. M. (1980). Stigler’s law of eponymy. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 39, 147–158.Google Scholar
Tam Cho, W. K., & Gaines, B. J. (2007). Breaking the (Benford) law: Statistical fraud detection in campaign finance. American Statistician, 61(3), 218–223.Google Scholar
United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization. (2020). The State of the World’s Fisheries and Aquaculture, Sustainability in Action. Rome: UNFAO. http://www.fao.org/3/ca9229en/ca9229en.pdf.Google Scholar
Urbina, I. (2021). The smell of money. New Yorker, March 8, 2021, pp. 25–29.Google Scholar
Watson, R. A., Pang, L., & Pauly, D. (2001). The marine fisheries of China: Development and reported catches. University of British Columbia, Open Collection.Google Scholar
Watson, R. A., & Tidd, A. (2018). Mapping nearly a century and a half of global marine fishing: 1869–2015. Marine Policy, 93, 171–177.Google Scholar
Wen, M., & Kowaleski-Jones, L. (2012). Sex and ethnic differences in validity of self-reported adult height, weight and body mass index. Ethnicity & Disease, 22(1), 72.Google Scholar
World Bank. (2017). Life below water. World Bank. https://datatopics.worldbank.org/sdgatlas/archive/2017/SDG-14-life-below-water.html.Google Scholar
Yule, G. U. (1903). Notes on the theory of association of attributes in statistics. Biometrika, 2(2), 121–134.Google Scholar
Zahran, S., Iverson, T., Weiler, S., & Underwood, A. (2014). Evidence that the accuracy of self-reported lead emissions data improved: A puzzle and discussion. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 49, 235–257.Google Scholar
Zanichelli, V., Tebano, G., Gyssens, I. C., Vlahović-Palčevski, V., Monnier, A. A., Stanić Benić, M., Harbarth, S. Hulscher, M., Pulcini, C., & Huttner, B. D. (2019). Patient-related determinants of antibiotic use: A systematic review. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 25(1), 48–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeller, D., & Pauly, D. (2016). Catch reconstruction: Concepts, methods, and data sources. Available at http://www.seaaroundus.org/catch-reconstruction-and-allocation-methods.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×