Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-8gtf8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-01T00:49:01.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Policy Responses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

Edited by
Frank Biermann  and
Rakhyun E. Kim
Frank Biermann
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Rakhyun E. Kim
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Architectures of Earth System Governance
Institutional Complexity and Structural Transformation
 , pp. 181 - 296
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abazaj, J., Moen, Ø., & Ruud, A. (2016). Striking the balance between renewable energy generation and water status protection: hydropower in the context of the European Renewable Energy Directive and Water Framework Directive. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26 (5), 409–21.Google Scholar
Adelle, C., & Russel, D. (2013). Climate policy integration: A case of déjà vu? Environmental Policy and Governance, 23 (1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alons, G. (2017), Environmental policy integration in the EU’s common agricultural policy: Greening or greenwashing? Journal of European Public Policy, 24 (11), 1–19.Google Scholar
Ansong, J., Gissi, E., & Calado, H. (2017). An approach to ecosystem-based management in maritime spatial planning process. Ocean and Coastal Management, 141, 65–81.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Davies, O., & van der Grijp, N. (2009). Environmental policy integration and the architecture of global environmental governance. International Environmental Agreements, 9 (4), 351–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizikova, L., Metternicht, G., & Yarde, T. (2018). Environmental mainstreaming and policy coherence: Essential policy tools to link international agreements with national development. A case study of the Caribbean region. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20 (3), 975–95.Google Scholar
Brendehaug, E., Aall, C., & Dodds, R. (2016). Environmental policy integration as a strategy for sustainable tourism planning: Issues in implementation. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25 (9), 1257–74.Google Scholar
Buizer, M., Arts, B., & Westerink, J. (2016). Landscape governance as policy integration ‘from below’: A case of displaced and contained political conflict in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34 (3), 448–62.Google Scholar
Dyrhauge, H. (2014). The road to environmental policy integration is paved with obstacles: Intra- and inter-organizational conflicts in EU transport decision-making. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52 (5), 985–1001.Google Scholar
Dunlop, C. A., Maggetti, M., Radaelli, C. M., & Russel, D. (2012). The many uses of regulatory impact assessment: A meta-analysis of EU and UK cases. Regulation and Governance, 6, 23–45.Google Scholar
Dupont, C., & Oberthür, S. (2012). Insufficient Climate Policy Integration in EU energy policy: The importance of the long-term perspective. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 8 (2), 228–47.Google Scholar
European Commission (2016). Environmental integration. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/integration.htm. Accessed: 17 June 2019.Google Scholar
European Environment Agency (2005). Environmental policy integration in Europe: Administrative culture and practices. Available at: www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/Ann1120649962. Accessed: 17 June 2019.Google Scholar
Fertel, C., Bahn, O., Vaillancourt, K., & Waaub, J.-P. (2013). Canadian energy and climate policies: A SWOT analysis in search of federal/provincial coherence. Energy Policy, 63, 1139–50.Google Scholar
Geeraert, A. (2016). It’s not that easy being green: The environmental dimension of the European Union’s sports policy. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 40 (1), 62–81.Google Scholar
Giordano, T. (2014). Multi-level integrated planning and greening of public infrastructure in South Africa. Planning Theory and Practice, 15 (4), 480–504.Google Scholar
Goria, A., Sgobbi, A., & Von Homeyer, I. (2010) (eds.). Governance for the environment: A comparative analysis of environmental policy integration. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertin, J., & Berkhout, F. (2003). Analysing institutional strategies for environmental policy integration: The case of EU enterprise policy. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 5 (1), 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogl, K., Kvarda, E., Nordbeck, R., & Pregernig, M. (2012). Effectiveness and legitimacy of environmental governance synopsis of key insights. In Hogl, K, Kvarda, E, Nordbeck, R, & Pregernig, M (eds.), Environmental governance: The challenge of legitimacy and effectiveness (pp. 280–304). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Huttunen, S. (2015). Farming practices and experienced policy coherence in agri-environmental policies: The case of land clearing in Finland. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 17 (6), 573–92.Google Scholar
International Council for Science (2017). A guide to SDG interactions: from science to implementation. Paris: International Council for Science.Google Scholar
Jacob, K., Volkery, A., & Lenschow, A. (2008). Instruments for environmental policy integration in 30 OECD countries. In Jordan, A & Lenschow, A (eds.), Innovation in environmental policy? Integrating the environment for sustainability (pp. 24–45). Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. J., & Lenschow, A. (2008). Innovation in environmental policy? Integrating the environment for sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2000), ‘Greening’ the European Union: What can be learned from the ‘leaders’ of EU environmental policy? European Environment, 10 (3), 109–210.Google Scholar
Jordan, A., Schout, A., & Unfried, M. (2008). The European Union. In Jordan, A, & Lenschow, A (eds.), Innovation in environmental policy? Integrating the environment for sustainability (pp. 159–79). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2010). Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20, 147–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalaba, F. K., Quinn, C. H., & Dougill, A. J. (2014). Policy coherence and interplay between Zambia’s forest, energy, agricultural and climate change policies and multilateral environmental agreements. International Environmental Agreements, 14 (2), 181–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanie, N., & Biermann, F. (2017) (eds.). Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kivimaa, P., & Mickwitz, P. (2006). The challenge of greening technologies: Environmental policy integration in Finnish technology policies. Research Policy, 35 (5), 729–44.Google Scholar
Knudsen, J. K., & Lafferty, W. M. (2016). Environmental policy integration: The importance of balance and trade-offs. In Fisher, D (ed.), Research handbook on fundamental concepts in environmental law (pp. 337–68). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Lafferty, W. M., & Hovden, E. (2003). Environmental policy integration: Towards an analytical framework. Environmental Politics, 12 (3), 1–22.Google Scholar
Lafferty, W. M. (ed.) (2004). Governance for sustainable development: The challenge of adapting form to function. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafferty, W. M., Knudsen, J., & Larsen, O. M. (2007). Pursuing sustainable development in Norway: The challenge of living up to Brundtland at home. European Environment, 17 (3), 177–88.Google Scholar
Lenschow, A. (1997). Variation in EC environmental policy integration: Agency push within complex institutional structures. Journal of European Public Policy, 4 (1), 109–27.Google Scholar
Lenschow, A. (2002). Greening the European Union: An introduction. In Lenschow, A (ed.), Environmental policy integration: Greening sectoral policies in Europe (pp. 3–21). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
McCauley, D. (2015). Sustainable development in energy policy: A governance assessment of environmental stakeholder inclusion in waste-to-energy. Sustainable Development, 23 (5), 273–84.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, J., Langhelle, O., & Ruud, A. (eds.) (2012). Governance, democracy and sustainable development: Moving beyond the impasse. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, J., & Fiorino, D. J. (eds.) (2017). Conceptual innovation in environmental policy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mickwitz, P., Aix, F., Beck, S. et al. (2009). Climate policy integration, coherence and governance. Helsinki: Partnership for European Environmental Research.Google Scholar
Mullally, G., & Dunphy, N. P. (2015). State of play review of environmental policy integration literature. Dublin: National Economic and Social Council.Google Scholar
Negev, M. (2016). Interagency aspects of environmental policy: The case of environmental health. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26 (3), 205–19.Google Scholar
Nilsson, M. (2005). Learning, frames and environmental policy integration: The case of Swedish energy policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23 (2), 207–26.Google Scholar
Nilsson, M. Eklund, M., & Tyskeng, S. (2009). Environmental integration and policy implementation: Competing governance modes in waste management decision making. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27 (1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Nilsson, M., & Persson, Å. (2017). Policy note: Lessons from environmental policy integration for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. Environmental Science and Policy, 78, 36–39.Google Scholar
Nunan, F., Campbell, A., & Foster, E. (2012). Environmental mainstreaming: The organisational challenges of policy integration. Public Administration and Development, 32 (3), 262–77.Google Scholar
Oberthür, S. (2009). Interplay management: Enhancing environmental policy integration among international institutions. International Environmental Agreements, 9 (4), 371–91.Google Scholar
Ortolano, L., & Shepherd, A. (1995). Environmental impact assessment: Challenges and opportunities. Impact Assessment, 13 (1), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, M. S., & Youn, Y.-C. (2017). Reforestation policy integration by the multiple sectors toward forest transition in the Republic of Korea. Forest Policy and Economics, 76, 45–55.Google Scholar
Persson, Å., Runhaar, H., Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., Mullally, G., Russel, D., & Widmer, A. (2018). Editorial: Environmental policy integration: Taking stock of policy practice in different contexts. Environmental Science and Policy, 85, 113–15.Google Scholar
Persson, Å. (2004). Environmental policy integration: An introduction. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute.Google Scholar
Persson, Å., Eckerberg, K., & Nilsson, M. (2016). Institutionalization or wither away? Twenty-five years of environmental policy integration under shifting governance models in Sweden. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34 (3), 478–95.Google Scholar
Persson, Å. (2009). Environmental policy integration and bilateral development assistance: Challenges and opportunities with an evolving governance framework. International Environmental Agreements, 9 (4), 409–29.Google Scholar
Regina, K., Budiman, A., Greve, M. H. et al. (2015). GHG mitigation of agricultural peatlands requires coherent policies. Climate Policy, 16 (4), 522–41.Google Scholar
Revell, A. (2005). Ecological modernization in the UK: Rhetoric or reality? European Environment, 15 (6), 344–61.Google Scholar
Rosendal, G. K. (2012). Adjusting Norwegian agricultural policy to the WTO through multifunctionality: Utilizing the environmental potential? Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 14 (2), 209–27.Google Scholar
Ruddy, T. F., & Hilty, L. M. (2008). Impact assessment and policy learning in the European Commission. Environmental Impact Assessment, 28, 90–105.Google Scholar
Runhaar, H. (2016). Tools for integrating environmental objectives into policy and practice: What works where? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 59, 1–9.Google Scholar
Runhaar, H., Wilk, B., Persson, Å., Uittenbroek, C., & Wamsler, C. (2018). Mainstreaming climate adaptation: Taking stock about ‘what works’ from empirical research worldwide. Regional Environmental Change, 18 (4), 1201–10.Google Scholar
Runhaar, H., Driessen, P., & Uittenbroek, C. (2014). Towards a systematic framework for the analysis of environmental policy integration. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24 (4), 233–46.Google Scholar
Runhaar, H., Driessen, P., & Soer, L. (2009). Sustainable urban development and the challenge of policy integration. An assessment of planning tools for integrating spatial and environmental planning in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 36 (3), 417–31.Google Scholar
Schout, A., & Jordan, A. (2005). Coordinated European governance: Self-organizing or centrally steered? Public Administration, 83 (1), 201–20.Google Scholar
Scobie, M. (2016), Policy coherence in climate governance in Caribbean small island developing states. Environmental Science and Policy, 58, 16–28.Google Scholar
Selianko, I., & Lenschow, A. (2015). Energy policy coherence from an intra-institutional perspective: Energy security and environmental policy coordination within the European Commission. European Integration Online Papers 19 (2), 1–29.Google Scholar
Simeonova, V., & van der Valk, A. (2010). The role of an area-oriented approach in achieving environmental policy integration in the Netherlands, and its applicability in Bulgaria. European Planning Studies, 18 (9), 1411–43.Google Scholar
Simeonova, V., & van der Valk, A. (2016). Environmental policy integration: Towards a communicative approach in integrating nature conservation and urban planning in Bulgaria. Land Use Policy, 57, 80–93.Google Scholar
Söderberg, C. (2011). Institutional conditions for multi-sector environmental policy integration in Swedish bioenergy policy. Environmental Politics, 20 (4), 528–46.Google Scholar
Söderberg, C. (2014). What drives sub-national bioenergy development? Exploring cross-level implications of environmental policy integration in EU and Swedish bioenergy policy. European Journal of Government and Economics, 3 (2), 119–37.Google Scholar
Söderberg, C. (2016). Complex governance structures and incoherent policies: Implementing the EU water framework directive in Sweden. Journal of Environmental Management, 183, 90–97.Google Scholar
Stakeholder Forum (2016). Seeing the whole: Implementing the SDGs in an integrated and coherent way. London: Stakeholder Forum.Google Scholar
Storbjörk, S., Lähteenmäki-Smith, K., & Hilding-Rydevik, T. (2009). Conflict or consensus: The challenge of integrating environmental sustainability into regional development programming. European Journal of Spatial Development, 34, 1–22.Google Scholar
Storbjörk, S., & Isaksson, K. (2014). Learning is our Achilles heel: Conditions for long-term environmental policy integration in Swedish regional development programming. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57 (7), 1023–42.Google Scholar
Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017). Policy integration: Mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38 (6), 553–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tosun, J., & Peters, B. G. (2018). Intergovernmental organizations’ normative commitments to policy integration: The dominance of environmental goals. Environmental Science and Policy, 82, 90–99.Google Scholar
Uittenbroek, C., Janssen-Jansen, L., Spit, T., & Runhaar, H. (2014). Organizational values and the implications for mainstreaming climate adaptation in Dutch municipalities: Using Q methodology. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 5 (3), 443–56.Google Scholar
Van Asselt, H., Rayner, T., & Persson, Å. (2015). Climate policy integration. In Bäckstrand, K, & Lövbrand, E (eds.), Research handbook on climate governance (pp. 388–99). Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar.Google Scholar
Van Stigt, R., Driessen, P., & Spit, T. (2013). Compact city development and the challenge of environmental policy integration: A multi-level governance perspective. Environmental Policy and Governance, 23 (4), 221–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velázquez Gomar, J. O. (2014). Environmental policy integration among multilateral environmental agreements: The case of biodiversity. International Environmental Agreements, 16 (4), 525–41.Google Scholar
Watson, M., Bulkeley, H., & Hudson, R. (2008). Unpicking environmental policy integration with tales from waste management. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26 (3), 481–98.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Abbott, K. W., Green, J. F., & Keohane, R. O. (2016). Organizational ecology and institutional change in global governance. International Organization, 70 (2), 247–77.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2010). International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration. Review of International Organizations, 5 (3), 315–44.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, V. K. (1983). The unraveling of the multi-fiber arrangement, 1981: An examination of international regime change. International Organization, 37 (4), 617–45.Google Scholar
Alter, K. J., & Meunier, S. (2009). The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics, 7 (1), 13–24.Google Scholar
Andresen, S. (2007). The effectiveness of UN environmental institutions. International Environmental Agreements, 7 (4), 317–36.Google Scholar
Axelrod, M. (2011). Savings clauses and the ‘Chilling Effect’: Regime interplay as constraints on international governance. In Oberthür, S, & Stokke, O. S. (eds.), Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (pp. 87–114). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Balton, D. A. (1996). Strengthening the law of the sea: The new agreement on straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks. Ocean Development & International Law, 27 (1–2), 125–51.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S. (2000). Ideas, social structure and the compromise of liberal institutionalism. European Journal of International Relations, 1, 347–71.Google Scholar
Betsill, M., Dubash, N. K., Paterson, M., van Asselt, H., Vihma, A., & Winkler, H. (2015). Building productive links between the UNFCCC and the broader global climate governance landscape. Global Environmental Politics, 15 (2), 1–10.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9 (4), 14–40.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. (2008). Earth system governance: A research agenda. In Young, O. R., King, L, & Schroeder, H (eds.), Institutions and environmental change: Principal findings, applications and research frontiers (pp. 277–301). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. (2014). Earth system governance: World politics in the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (2009). Managers of global change: The influence of international environmental bureaucracies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F. et al. (2006). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100 (14), 8086–91.Google Scholar
Chayes, A., & Chayes, A. H. (1993). On compliance. International Organization, 47 (2), 175–205.Google Scholar
DeSombre, E. R. (2005). Fishing under flags of convenience: Using market power to increase participation in international regulation. Global Environmental Politics, 5 (4), 73–94.Google Scholar
Downie, D. L., & Fenge, T. (2003). Northern lights against POPs: Combatting toxic threats in the Arctic. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
FAO. (1984). Report of the FAO world conference on fisheries management and development. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Franck, T. M. (1990). The power of legitimacy among nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garcia, S. M., & Newton, C. H. (1996). Responsible fisheries: An overview of FAO policy developments (1945–1994). Marine Pollution Bulletin, 29 (6–12), 528–36.Google Scholar
Gehring, T. (2011). The institutional complex of trade and environment: Toward an interlocking governance structure and a division of labor. In Oberthür, S, & Stokke, O. S. (eds.), Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (pp. 227–54). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gehring, T., & Faude, B. (2013). The dynamics of regime complexes: Microfoundations and systemic effects. Global Governance, 19 (1), 119–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2009). The emergence and effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council. Marine Policy, 33 (4), 654–60.Google Scholar
Gulbrandsen, L. H., & Auld, G. (2016). Contested accountability logics in evolving nonstate certification for fisheries sustainability. Global Environmental Politics, 16 (2), 42–60.Google Scholar
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82 (5), 929–64.Google Scholar
Hickmann, T. (2017). The reconfiguration of authority in global climate governance. International Studies Review, 19 (3), 430–51.Google Scholar
Ivanova, M. (2010). UNEP in global environmental governance: Design, leadership, location. Global Environmental Politics, 10 (1), 30–59.Google Scholar
Jinnah, S. (2014). Post-treaty politics: Secretariat influence in global environmental governance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Juda, L. (2002). Rio plus ten: The evolution of international marine fisheries governance. Ocean Development & International Law, 33 (2), 109–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungcurt, S. (2011). The role of expert networks in reducing regime conflict: Contrasting cases in the management of plant genetic resources. In Oberthür, S, & Stokke, O. S. (eds.), Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (pp. 171–98). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kent, A. (2014). Implementing the principle of policy integration: institutional interplay and the role of international organizations. International Environmental Agreements, 14 (3), 203–24.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9 (1), 7–23.Google Scholar
Kim, R. E. (2013). The emergent network structure of the multilateral environmental agreement system. Global Environmental Change, 23 (5), 980–91.Google Scholar
Kvalvik, I. (2012). Managing institutional overlap in the protection of marine ecosystems on the high seas. The case of the North East Atlantic. Ocean and Coastal Management, 56, 35–43.Google Scholar
Leebron, D. W. (2002). Linkages. American Journal of International Law, 96 (1), 5–27.Google Scholar
Margulis, M. E. (2013). The regime complex for food security: Implications for the global hunger challenge. Global Governance, 19 (1), 53–67.Google Scholar
Molenaar, E. J. (2007). Port state jurisdiction: Towards comprehensive, mandatory and global coverage. Ocean Development & International Law, 38 (1–2), 225–57.Google Scholar
Morin, J. F., & Orsini, A. (2014). Policy coherency and regime complexes: The case of genetic resources. Review of International Studies, 40 (2), 303–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marine Stewardship Council (2017). Annual Report 2016–17: The MSC at 20. Wild, certified, sustainable. London: Marine Stewardship Council.Google Scholar
Newell, P., Pattberg, P., & Schroeder, H. (2012). Multiactor governance and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 365–87.Google Scholar
O’Neill, K., Weinthal, E., Suiseeya, K. R. M., Bernstein, S., Cohn, A., Stone, M. W., & Cashore, B. (2013). Methods and global environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 38, 441–71.Google Scholar
Oberthür, S. (2009). Interplay management: Enhancing environmental policy integration among international institutions. International Environmental Agreements, 9 (4), 371–91.Google Scholar
Oberthür, S., Dupont, C., & Matsumoto, Y. (2011). Managing policy contradictions between the Montreal and Kyoto protocols: The case of fluorinated greenhouse gases. In Oberthür, S, & Stokke, O. S. (eds.), Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (pp. 115–41). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Oberthür, S., & Gehring, T. (eds.) (2006). Institutional interaction in global environmental governance: Synergy and conflict among international and EU policies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Oberthür, S., & Stokke, O. S. (eds.) (2011). Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochieng, R. M., Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., & Nketiah, K. S. (2013). Interaction between the FLEGT-VPA and REDD+ in Ghana: Recommendations for interaction management. Forestry Policy and Economics, 32, 32–9.Google Scholar
Orsini, A., Morin, J. F., & Young, O. R. (2013). Regime complexes: A buzz, a boom, or a boost for global governance? Global Governance, 19, 27–39.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284 (5412), 278–82.Google Scholar
Pattberg, P. (2005). The institutionalization of private governance: How business and on-profit organizations agree on transnational rules. Governance, 18 (4), 589–610.Google Scholar
Pratt, T. (2018). Deference and hierarchy in international regime complexes. International Organization, 72 (3), 561–90.Google Scholar
Raustiala, K., & Victor, D. G. (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization, 58 (2), 277–309.Google Scholar
Rosendal, G. K. (2001). Overlapping international regimes: The case of the Intergovernmental Forum on Forests (IFF) between climate change and biodiversity. International Environmental Agreements, 1 (4), 447–68.Google Scholar
Rothwell, D. R., & Stephens, T. (2016). The international law of the sea. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Runhaar, H., Driessen, P., & Uittenbroek, C. (2014). Towards a systematic framework for the analysis of environmental policy integration. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24 (4), 233–46.Google Scholar
Scott, K. N. (2011). International environmental governance: Managing fragmentation through institutional connection. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 12 (1), 177–216.Google Scholar
Skjærseth, J. B. (2006). Protecting the North-East Atlantic: Enhancing synergies by institutional interplay. Marine Policy, 30 (2), 157–66.Google Scholar
Spijkers, J., & Boonstra, W. J. (2017). Environmental change and social conflict: The Northeast Atlantic mackerel dispute. Regional Environmental Change, 17 (6), 1835–51.Google Scholar
Stokke, O. S. (ed.) (2001a). Governing high seas fisheries: The interplay of global and regional regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stokke, O. S. (2001b). The interplay of international regimes: Putting effectiveness theory to work. Lysaker: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute.Google Scholar
Stokke, O. S. (2004). Trade measures and climate compliance: Interplay between WTO and the Marrakesh Accords. International Environmental Agreements, 4 (4), 339–57.Google Scholar
Stokke, O. S. (2009). Trade measures and the combat of IUU fishing: Institutional interplay and effective governance in the Northeast Atlantic. Marine Policy, 33 (2), 339–49.Google Scholar
Stokke, O. S. (2011a). Environmental security in the Arctic: The case for multilevel governance. International Journal, 66 (4), 835–48.Google Scholar
Stokke, O. S. (2011b). Interplay management, niche selection and Arctic environmental governance. In Oberthür, S, & Stokke, O. S. (eds.), Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (pp. 143–70). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stokke, O. S. (2012). Disaggregating international regimes: A new approach to evaluation and comparison. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stokke, O. S. (2013). Regime interplay in Arctic shipping governance: Explaining regional niche selection. International Environmental Agreements, 13, 65–85.Google Scholar
Stokke, O. S. (2019). Management options for high seas fisheries: Making regime complexes more effective. In Caddell, J. R., & Molenaar, E. J. (eds.), Strengthening international fisheries law in an era of changing oceans (pp. 51–79). London: Hart Publishers.Google Scholar
Stokke, O. S., & Oberthür, S. (2011). Introduction: Institutional interaction in global environmental change. In Oberthür, S, & Stokke, O. S. (eds.), Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (pp. 1–24). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (2016). Programme of work and budget for the biennium 2018–2019. UN Doc. UNEP/EA.2/16.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly (1972). Institutional and financial arrangements for environmental cooperation. UN Doc. A/RES/2997(XXVII).Google Scholar
Van Asselt, H. (2011). Legal and political approaches in interplay management: Dealing with the fragmentation of global climate governance. In Oberthür, S, & Stokke, O. S. (eds.), Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (pp. 59–85). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Van Asselt, H. (2014). The fragmentation of global climate governance: Consequences and management of regime interactions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Van de Graaf, T., & De Ville, F. (2013). Regime complexes and interplay management. International Studies Review, 15 (4), 568–71.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (2018). The environment: A specific concern. Available at: www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/bey2_e.htm. Accessed: 17 June 2019.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (1996). Institutional linkages in international society: Polar perspectives. Global Governance, 2 (1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Zelli, F., Gupta, A., & van Asselt, H. (2013). Institutional interactions at the crossroads of trade and environment: The dominance of liberal environmentalism? Global Governance, 19 (1), 105–18.Google Scholar
Zürn, M., & Faude, B. (2013). On fragmentation, differentiation, and coordination. Global Environmental Politics, 13 (3), 119–30.Google Scholar

References

Abbott, K. W. (2012a). The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30 (4), 571–90.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W. (2012b). Engaging the public and the private in global sustainability governance. International Affairs, 88 (3), 543–64.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W. (2014). Strengthening the transnational regime complex for climate change. Transnational Environmental Law, 3 (1), 57–88.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W. (2015). Orchestration. In Pattberg, P. H., & Zelli, F (eds.), Encyclopedia of global environmental governance and politics (pp. 487–95). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W. (2017). Orchestrating experimentation in nonstate environmental commitments. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 738–63.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W. (2018). Orchestration: Strategic ordering in polycentric governance. In Jordan, A, Huitema, D, van Asselt, H, & Forster, J (eds.), Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? (pp. 188–209). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W., & Bernstein, S. (2015). The High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development: Orchestration by default and design. Global Policy, 6 (3), 222–33.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W., & Faude, B. (2019). Choosing low-cost institutions in global governance. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2015a). Orchestration: Global governance through intermediaries. In Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P, Snidal, D, & Zangl, B (eds.), International organizations as orchestrators (pp. 3–36). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2015b). Orchestrating global governance: From empirical findings to theoretical implications. In Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P, Snidal, D, & Zangl, B (eds.), International organizations as orchestrators (pp. 349–79). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2016). Two logics of indirect governance: Delegation and orchestration. British Journal of Political Science, 46 (4), 719–29.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2019). Competence versus control: The governor’s dilemma. Regulation & Governance, in press.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W., & Hale, T. (2014). Orchestrating global solutions networks: A guide for organizational entrepreneurs. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 9 (1–2), 195–212.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W., Levi-Faur, D., & Snidal, D. (2017). Theorizing regulatory intermediaries. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670 (1), 14–35.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2009a). Strengthening international regulation through transnational new governance: Overcoming the orchestration deficit. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 42, 501–78.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2009b). The governance triangle: Regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state. In Mattli, W, & Woods, N (eds.), In whose benefit? Explaining regulatory change in global politics (pp. 49–84). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2010). International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration. Review of International Organizations, 5 (3), 315–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2013). Taking responsive regulation transnational: Strategies for international organizations: Taking RR transnational. Regulation & Governance, 7 (1), 95–113.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K., & Kuyper, J. W. (2017). The democratic legitimacy of orchestration: The UNFCCC, nonstate actors, and transnational climate governance. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 764–88.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K., Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B. O., & Lövbrand, E. (2017). Nonstate actors in global climate governance: From Copenhagen to Paris and beyond. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 561–79.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K., & Kylsäter, M. (2014). Old wine in new bottles? The legitimation and delegitimation of UN public–private partnerships for sustainable development from the Johannesburg Summit to the Rio+20 Summit. Globalizations, 11 (3), 331–47.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S. (2011). Legitimacy in intergovernmental and nonstate global governance. Review of International Political Economy, 18 (1), 17–51.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S. (2005). Legitimacy in global environmental governance. Journal of International Law and International Relations, 1 (1–2), 139–66.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S. (2017). The United Nations and the governance of Sustainable Development Goals. In Kanie, N, & Biermann, F (eds.), Governance through goals: New strategies for global sustainability (pp. 213–39). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Best, J. (2017). The rise of measurement-driven governance: The case of international development. Global Governance, 23 (2), 163–81.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Betsill, M. M., Gupta, J. et al. (2009). Earth system governance: People, places and the planet. Science and implementation plan of the Earth System Governance Project. Bonn: Earth System Governance Project.Google Scholar
Boas, I., Biermann, F., Kanie, N. (2016). Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: Towards a nexus approach. International Environmental Agreements, 16 (3), 449–64.Google Scholar
Broome, A., Homolar, A., & Kranke, M. (2018). Bad science: International organizations and the indirect power of global benchmarking. European Journal of International Relations, 24 (3), 514–39.Google Scholar
Burch, S., Gupta, A., Inoue, C. Y. A. et al. (2019). New directions in earth system governance research. Earth System Governance, 1.Google Scholar
Chan, S., van Asselt, H., Hale, T. et al. (2015). Reinvigorating international climate policy: A comprehensive framework for effective nonstate action. Global Policy, 6 (4), 466–73.Google Scholar
Chan, S., Brandi, C., & Bauer, S. (2016). Aligning transnational climate action with international climate governance: The road from Paris. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25 (2), 238–47.Google Scholar
Chan, S., Ellinger, P., & Widerberg, O. (2018). Exploring national and regional orchestration of nonstate action for a < 1.5 C world. International Environmental Agreements, 18 (1), 135–52.Google Scholar
Chan, S., Falkner, R., Goldberg, M., & van Asselt, H. (2018). Effective and geographically balanced? An output-based assessment of nonstate climate actions. Climate Policy, 18 (1), 24–35.Google Scholar
Chan, S., & Pauw, P. (2014). A global framework for climate action (GFCA): Orchestrating nonstate and subnational initiatives for more effective global climate governance. Bonn: German Development Institute.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S. (2017). The meanings of life for nonstate actors in climate politics. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 789–99.Google Scholar
Earth System Governance (2018). Earth system governance: Science and implementation plan of the Earth System Governance Project. Utrecht: Earth System Governance Project.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. J. (2016). The politics of accountability in networked urban climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 16 (2), 82–100.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. J., & Johnson, C. A. (2017). The orchestration of global urban climate governance: Conducting power in the post-Paris climate regime. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 694–714.Google Scholar
Graham, E. R., & Thompson, A. (2015). Efficient orchestration? In Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P, Snidal, D, & Zangl, B (eds.), International organizations as orchestrators (pp. 114–38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, J. F. (2017). Transnational delegation in global environmental governance: When do non-state actors govern? Regulation & Governance, 12 (2), 263–76.Google Scholar
Hale, T., & Roger, C. (2014). Orchestration and transnational climate governance. Review of International Organizations, 9 (1), 59–82.Google Scholar
Hanrieder, T. (2015). WHO orchestrates? Coping with competitors in global health. In Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P, Snidal, D, & Zangl, B (eds.), International organizations as orchestrators (pp. 3–36). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henriksen, La. F. (2015). The global network of biofuel sustainability standards-setters. Environmental Politics, 24 (1), 115–37.Google Scholar
Henriksen, L. F., & Ponte, S. (2017). Public orchestration, social networks, and transnational environmental governance: Lessons from the aviation industry: Public orchestration in aviation. Regulation & Governance, 12 (1), 23–45.Google Scholar
Henriksen, L. F., & Seabrooke, L. (2016). Transnational organizing: Issue professionals in environmental sustainability networks. Organization, 23 (5), 722–41.Google Scholar
Hermwille, L. (2018). Making initiatives resonate: How can nonstate initiatives advance national contributions under the UNFCCC? International Environmental Agreements, 18 (3), 447–66.Google Scholar
Hermwille, L., Obergassel, W., Ott, H. E., & Beuermann, C. (2017). UNFCCC before and after Paris: What’s necessary for an effective climate regime? Climate Policy, 17 (2), 150–70.Google Scholar
Hickmann, T. (2016). Rethinking authority in global climate governance: How transnational climate initiatives relate to the international climate regime. Routledge Research in Global Environmental Governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hickmann, T., Widerberg, O., Lederer, M., & Pattberg, P. (2019). The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat as an orchestrator in global climate policymaking. International Review of Administrative Sciences, in press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M. J. (2011). Climate governance at the crossroads: Experimenting with a global response after Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hsu, A., Höhne, N., Kuramochi, T. et al. (2019). A research roadmap for quantifying nonstate and subnational climate mitigation action. Nature Climate Change, 9 (1), 11–17.Google Scholar
Hsu, A., Moffat, A. S., Weinfurter, A. J., & Schwartz, J. D. (2015). Towards a new climate diplomacy. Nature Climate Change, 5 (6), 501–3.Google Scholar
Kanie, N., & Biermann, F. (eds.) (2017). Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B. O., & Schroeder, H. (2018). Nonstate actors in hybrid global climate governance: Justice, legitimacy, and effectiveness in a post-Paris era: Nonstate actors in hybrid global climate governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9 (1), e497.Google Scholar
Lelieveldt, H. (2018). Out of tune or well tempered? How competition agencies direct the orchestrating state: Directing the orchestrating state. Regulation & Governance, in press.Google Scholar
Lister, J., Poulsen, R. T., & Ponte, S. (2015). Orchestrating transnational environmental governance in maritime shipping. Global Environmental Change, 34, 185–95.Google Scholar
McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. R. (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3 (2), 243–77.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. (1991). Polycentricity: The structural basis of self-governing systems. In Ostrom, V (ed.), The meaning of American federalism: Constituting a self-governing society (pp. 233–44). San Francisco: ICS Press.Google Scholar
Pattberg, P. H. (2017). The emergence of carbon disclosure: Exploring the role of governance entrepreneurs. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35 (8), 1437–55.Google Scholar
Pattberg, P. H., Biermann, F., & Mert, A. (eds.) (2012). Public–private partnerships for sustainable development: Emergence, influence and legitimacy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Paulo, S., & Klingebiel, S. (2016). New approaches to development cooperation in middle-income countries: Brokering collective action for global sustainable development. Bonn: German Development Institute.Google Scholar
Pegram, T. (2015). Global human rights governance and orchestration: National human rights institutions as intermediaries. European Journal of International Relations, 21 (3), 595–620.Google Scholar
Rayner, J. M., Buck, A., & Katila, P. (eds.) (2010). Embracing complexity: Meeting the challenges of international forest governance. A global assessment report. Vienna: International Union of Forest Research Organizations.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. G. (2014). Global governance and ‘New Governance Theory’: Lessons from business and human rights. Global Governance, 20 (1), 5–17.Google Scholar
Schleifer, P. (2013). Orchestrating sustainability: The case of European Union biofuel governance: Orchestrating sustainability. Regulation & Governance, 7 (4), 533–46.Google Scholar
Shoji, M. (2019). The UN Global compact for transnational business and peace: A need for orchestration? In Mahmudur Rahim, M (ed.), Code of conduct on transnational corporations: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 89–110). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Tallberg, J., Bäckstrand, K., & Scholte, J. A. (eds.) (2018). Legitimacy in global governance: Sources, processes, and consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. UN Doc. A/RES/70/1.Google Scholar
Van der Lugt, C., & Dingwerth, K. (2015). Governing where focality is low. In Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P, Snidal, D, & Zangl, B (eds.), International organizations as orchestrators (pp. 237–61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Ven, H., Bernstein, S., & Hoffmann, M. (2017). Valuing the contributions of nonstate and subnational actors to climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 17 (1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Widerberg, O. (2017). The ‘black box’ problem of orchestration: How to evaluate the performance of the Lima-Paris action agenda. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 715–37.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay and scale. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

References

Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (eds.) (2015). International organizations as orchestrators. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W., & Bernstein, S. (2015). The High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development: Orchestration by default and design. Global Policy, 6, 222–33.Google Scholar
Abshagen, M. L., Cavazzini, A., Graen, L., & Obenland, W. (2018). Hijacking the SDGs? The private sector and the Sustainable Development Goals. Berlin: Brot für die Welt.Google Scholar
Allen, C., Metternicht, G., & Wiedmann, T. (2018). Initial progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A review of evidence from countries. Sustainability Science, 13 (5), 1453–67.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K. (2006a). Multi‐stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. European Environment, 16 (5), 290–306.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K. (2006b). Democratizing global environmental governance? Stakeholder democracy after the World Summit on Sustainable Development. European Journal of International Relations, 12 (4), 467–98.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K., Campe, S., Chan, S., Mert, A., & Schäferhoff, M. (2012). Transnational public–private partnerships. In Biermann, F, & Pattberg, P (eds.), Global environmental governance reconsidered (pp. 123–47). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K., & Kylsäter, M. (2014). Old wine in new bottles? The legitimation and delegitimation of UN public–private partnerships for sustainable development from the Johannesburg Summit to the Rio+20 Summit. Globalizations, 11 (3), 331–47.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S. (2017). The United Nations and the governance of Sustainable Development Goals. In Kanie, N, & Biermann, F (eds.), Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation (pp. 213–40). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. (2014). Earth system governance: World politics in the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9 (4), 14–40.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., & Gupta, A. (2011). Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A research framework. Ecological Economics, 70, 1856–64.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Chan, S., Pattberg, P., & Mert, A. (eds.) (2012). Multistakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Emergence, influence and legitimacy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kim, R. E. (2017). Global governance by goal-setting: The novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 26–31.Google Scholar
Bitzer, V., Francken, M., & Glasbergen, P. (2008). Intersectoral partnerships for a sustainable coffee chain: Really addressing sustainability or just picking (coffee) cherries? Global Environmental Change, 18 (2), 271–84.Google Scholar
Bodansky, D. (2010). The Copenhagen conference: A post-mortem. American Journal of International Law, 104 (2), 232–3.Google Scholar
Bodansky, D. (2016). The legal character of the Paris Agreement. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25 (2), 142–50.Google Scholar
Briant Carant, J. (2017). Unheard voices: A critical discourse analysis of the Millennium Development Goals’ evolution into the Sustainable Development Goals. Third World Quarterly, 38 (1), 16–41.Google Scholar
Bridgewater, P., Kim, R. E., & Bosselmann, K. (2014). Ecological integrity: A relevant concept for international environmental law in the Anthropocene? Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 25, 61–78.Google Scholar
Chasek, P. S., Wagner, L. M, Leone, F., Lebada, A. M., & Risse., N. (2016). Getting to 2030: Negotiating the post-2015 sustainable development agenda. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25, 5–14.Google Scholar
Chasek, P. S., & Wagner, L. M. (2016). Breaking the mold: A new type of multilateral sustainable development negotiation. International Environmental Agreements, 16, 397–413.Google Scholar
Deacon, B. (2016). Assessing the SDGs from the point of view of global social governance. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 32 (2), 116–30.Google Scholar
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1907–12.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S., & Pickering, J. (2017). Deliberation as a catalyst for reflexive environmental governance. Ecological Economics, 131, 353–60.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S. (2014). Institutions for the Anthropocene: Governance in a changing earth system. British Journal of Political Science, 46 (4), 937–56.Google Scholar
Easterly, W. (2009). How the Millennium Development Goals are unfair to Africa. World Development, 37 (1), 26–35.Google Scholar
Eckersley, R. (2004). Green state: Rethinking democracy and sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Elder, M., & Olsen, S. H. (2019). The design of environmental priorities in the SDGs. Global Policy, 10 (S1), 70–82.Google Scholar
Elliott, L. (2005). The United Nations’ record on environmental governance: An assessment. In Biermann, F, & Bauer, S (eds.), A world environment organization: Solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? (pp. 27–56). Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Elliott, L. (2017). Cooperation on transnational environmental crime: Institutional complexity matters. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 26, 107–17.Google Scholar
Falk, R. A. (1966). On the quasi-legislative competence of the General Assembly. American Journal of International Law, 60 (4), 782–91.Google Scholar
Feindt, P. H., & Weiland, S. (2018). Reflexive governance: Exploring the concept and assessing its critical potential for sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20 (6), 661–74.Google Scholar
Fernández-Blanco, C. R., Burns, S. L., & Giessen, L. (2019). Mapping the fragmentation of the international forest regime complex: Institutional elements, conflicts and synergies. International Environmental Agreements, 19 (2), 187–205.Google Scholar
Franck, T. M. (1990). The power of legitimacy among nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2010). Reducing inequality – The missing MDG: A content review of PRSPs and bilateral donor policy statements. IDS Bulletin, 41 (1), 26–35.Google Scholar
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2014). Global goals as a policy tool: Intended and unintended consequences. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15 (2–3), 118–31.Google Scholar
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2016). From the Millennium Development Goals to the Sustainable Development Goals: Shifts in purpose, concept and politics of global goal setting for development. Gender and Development, 24 (1), 43–52.Google Scholar
Fukuda‐Parr, S., & McNeill, D. (2019). Knowledge and politics in setting and measuring the SDGs. Global Policy, 10 (S1), 5–15.Google Scholar
Fukuda-Parr, S., Yamin, A. E., & Greenstein, J. (2014). The power of numbers: A critical review of Millennium Development Goal targets for human development and human rights. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15 (2–3), 105–17.Google Scholar
Galli, A., Durović, G., Hanscom, L., & Knežević, J. (2018). Think globally, act locally: Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals in Montenegro. Environmental Science and Policy, 84, 159–69.Google Scholar
Gasper, D., Shah, A., & Tankha, S. (2019). The framing of sustainable consumption and production in SDG 12. Global Policy, 10 (S1), 83–95.Google Scholar
Gellers, J. C. (2016). Crowdsourcing global governance: Sustainable Development Goals, civil society and the pursuit of democratic legitimacy. International Environmental Agreements, 16, 415–32.Google Scholar
Glasbergen, P., Biermann, F., & Mol, A. P. J. (eds.) (2007). Partnerships, governance and sustainable development: Reflections on theory and practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. L., & Posner, E. A. (2005). The limits of international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griggs, D. J., Nilsson, M., Stevance, A., & McCollum, D. (2017). A guide to SDG interactions: From science to implementation. Paris: International Council for Science.Google Scholar
Gupta, J., & Vegelin, C. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals and inclusive development. International Environmental Agreements, 16, 433–48.Google Scholar
Hailu, D., & Tsukada, R. (2011). Achieving the Millennium Development Goals: A measure of progress. Brasilia: International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.Google Scholar
Hajer, M., Nilsson, M., Raworth, K. et al. (2015). Beyond cockpit-ism: Four insights to enhance the transformative potential of the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 7, 1651–60.Google Scholar
Hill, P. S., Ghulam, F. M., & Claudio, F. (2010). Conflict in least-developed countries: Challenging the Millennium Development Goals. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88 (8), 562.Google Scholar
Honniball, A., & Spijkers, O. (2014). MDGs and SDGs – Lessons learnt from global public participation in the drafting of the UN Development Goals. Vereinte Nationen: German Review of the United Nations, 62 (6), 251–6.Google Scholar
Huck, W., & Kurkin, C. (2018). The UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the transnational multilevel system. Heidelberg Journal of International Law, 2, 375.Google Scholar
Hulme, D. (2010). Lessons from the making of the MDGs: Human development meets results-based management in an unfair world. IDS Bulletin, 41 (1), 15–25.Google Scholar
Ivanova, M. H. (2013). Reforming the institutional framework for environment and sustainable development: Rio+20’s subtle but significant impact. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 12 (3), 211–31.Google Scholar
Jordan, A., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., & Forster, J. (eds.) (2018). Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kabeer, N. (2010). Can the MDGs provide a pathway to social justice? The challenge of intersecting inequalities. New York: Institute of Development Studies and MDG Achievement Fund.Google Scholar
Kamau, M., Chasek, P., & O’Connor, D. (2018). Transforming multilateral diplomacy: The inside story of the sustainable development goals. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kanie, N., & Biermann, F. (eds.) (2017). Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kanie, N., Bernstein, S., Biermann, F., & Haas, P. M. (2017). Introduction: Global governance through goal setting. In Kanie, N, & Biermann, F (eds.), Governance through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O. (2011). Global governance and legitimacy. Review of International Political Economy, 18 (1), 99–109.Google Scholar
Kim, R. E., & Bosselmann, K. (2015). Operationalizing sustainable development: Ecological integrity as a Grundnorm of international law. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 24, 194–208.Google Scholar
Kim, R. E., & Bosselmann, K. (2013). International environmental law in the Anthropocene: Towards a purposive system of multilateral environmental agreements. Transnational Environmental Law, 2, 285–309.Google Scholar
Kim, R. E. (2016). The nexus between international law and the Sustainable Development Goals. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25 (1), 15–26.Google Scholar
Koehler, G. (2015). Seven decades of ‘development’, and now what? Journal of International Development, 27 (6), 733–51.Google Scholar
Langford, M., & Winkler, I. (2014). Muddying the water? Assessing target-based approaches in development cooperation for water and sanitation. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15 (2–3), 247–60.Google Scholar
Langford, M. (2010). A poverty of rights: Six ways to fix the MDGs. IDS Bulletin, 41 (1), 83–91.Google Scholar
Le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards integration at last? The Sustainable Development Goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development, 23, 176–87.Google Scholar
Lodefalk, M., & Whalley, J. (2002). Reviewing proposals for a world environmental organisation. The World Economy, 25, 601–17.Google Scholar
MacFeely, S. (2019). The big (data) bang: Opportunities and challenges for compiling SDG indicators. Global Policy, 10 (S1), 121–33.Google Scholar
Merry, S. E. (2019). The Sustainable Development Goals confront the infrastructure of measurement. Global Policy, 10 (S1), 146–8.Google Scholar
Meuleman, L., & Niestroy, I. (2015). Common but differentiated governance: A metagovernance approach to make the SDGs work. Sustainability, 7, 12295–321.Google Scholar
Patel, Z., Greyling, S., Simon, D., Arfvidsson, H., Moodley, N., Primo, N., & Wright, C. (2017). Local responses to global sustainability agendas: Learning from experimenting with the urban Sustainable Development Goal in Cape Town. Sustainability Science, 12 (5), 785–97.Google Scholar
Pattberg, P., & Widerberg, O. (2016). Transnational multistakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Conditions for success. AMBIO, 45 (1), 42–51.Google Scholar
Pedersen, C. S. (2018). The UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) are a great gift to business! Procedia CIRP, 69, 21–4.Google Scholar
Persson, Å., Weitz, N., Nilsson, M. (2016). Follow-up and review of the Sustainable Development Goals: Alignment vs. internalization. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25, 59–68.Google Scholar
Poddar, A., Narula, S. A., & Zutshi, A. (2019). A study of corporate social responsibility practices of the top Bombay Stock Exchange 500 companies in India and their alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 1–22.Google Scholar
Raustiala, K. (2005). Form and substance in international agreements. American Journal of International Law, 99 (3), 581–92.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. D. (2012). From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals. The Lancet, 379, 2206–11.Google Scholar
Sarwar, M. B., & Nicolai, S. (2018). What do analysis of Voluntary National Reviews for Sustainable Development Goals tell us about ‘leaving no one behind’? London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Scheyvens, R., Banks, G., & Hughes, E. (2016). The private sector and the SDGs: The need to move beyond ‘business as usual’. Sustainable Development, 24 (6), 371–82.Google Scholar
Solberg, E. (2015). From MDGs to SDGs – The political value of common global goals. Harvard International Review, 37 (1), 58–61.Google Scholar
Spangenberg, J. H. (2017). Hot air or comprehensive progress? A critical assessment of the SDGs. Sustainable Development, 25 (4), 311–21.Google Scholar
Stevens, C., & Kanie, N. (2016). The transformative potential of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). International Environmental Agreements, 16, 393–6.Google Scholar
UNCTAD (2014). Investing in the SDGs: An action plan. UNCTAD: World Investment Report 2014.Google Scholar
Underdal, A., & Kim, R. E. (2017). The Sustainable Development Goals and multilateral agreements. In Kanie, N, & Biermann, F (eds.), Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation (pp. 241–58). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly (2012). The future we want. UN Doc. A/RES/66/288.Google Scholar
United Nations Global Compact (2019). United Nations Global Compact. Available at: www.unglobalcompact.org. Accessed: 17 June 2019.Google Scholar
Van der Hoeven, R. (2014). Full employment target: What lessons for a Post-2015 Development Agenda? Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15 (2–3), 161–75.Google Scholar
Van Zanten, J. A., & van Tulder, R. (2018). Multinational enterprises and the Sustainable Development Goals: An institutional approach to corporate engagement. Journal of International Business Policy, 1 (3–4), 208–33.Google Scholar
Victor, D. G., Raustiala, K., & Skolnikoff, E. B. (eds.) (1998). The implementation and effectiveness of international environmental commitments: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., & Verkooijen, P. (2013). The practice of interaction management: Enhancing synergies among multilateral REDD+ Institutions. Forest and Nature Governance World Forests, 14, 133–49.Google Scholar
Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., Arts, B., & Glasbergen, P. (2011). Interaction management by partnerships: The case of biodiversity and climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 11 (4), 89–107.Google Scholar
Voß, J.-P., & Kemp, R. (2006). Sustainability and reflexive governance: Introduction. In Voß, J, Bauknecht, D, & Kemp, R (eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 3–30). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Weber, H. (2017). Politics of ‘leaving no one behind’: Contesting the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals agenda. Globalizations, 14 (3), 399–414.Google Scholar
Yamada, T. (2017). Corporate water stewardship: Lessons for goal-based hybrid governance. In Kanie, N & Biermann, F (eds.), Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation (pp. 187–209). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (2017). Conceptualization: Goal setting as a strategy for earth system governance. In Kanie, N, & Biermann, F (eds.), Governance through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation (pp. 31–52). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zelli, F., Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., & van Asselt, H. (2010). The consequences of a fragmented climate governance architecture: A policy appraisal. In Biermann, F, Pattberg, P, & Zelli, F (eds.), Global climate governance beyond 2012. Architecture, agency and adaptation (pp. 25–34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Aguila, Y., & Viñuales, J. (2019). A Global Pact for the Environment: Conceptual foundations. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 29, 3–12.Google Scholar
Alston, P. (1984). Conjuring up new human rights: A proposal for quality control. American Journal of International Law, 78, 607–21.Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. E. (2005). International organizations as law-makers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Andresen, S. (2007). Key actors in UN environmental governance: Influence, reform and leadership. International Environmental Agreements, 7 (4), 457–68.Google Scholar
Axelrod, M. (2011). Savings clauses and the ‘chilling effect’: Regime interplay as constraints on international governance. In Oberthür, S, & Stokke, O. S. (eds.), Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (pp. 87–114). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Benvenisti, E., & Downs, G. W. (2007). The empire’s new clothes: Political economy and the fragmentation of international law. Stanford Law Review, 60, 595–631.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. (2000). The case for a world environment organization. Environment, 42 (9), 22–32.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. (2001). The emerging debate on the need for a world environment organization: A commentary. Global Environmental Politics, 1, 45–55.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. (2014). Earth system governance: World politics in the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Davies, O., & van der Grijp, N. (2009). Environmental policy integration and the architecture of global environmental governance. International Environmental Agreements, 9 (4), 351.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kim, R. E. (2017). Global governance by goal-setting: The novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 26–31.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., & Pattberg, P. (2008). Global environmental governance: Taking stock, moving forward. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 277–94.Google Scholar
Biniaz, S. (2017). 10 questions to ask about the proposed ‘Global Pact for the Environment’. New York: Sabin Centre for Climate Change Law.Google Scholar
Bodansky, D. (2006). Does one need to be an international lawyer to be an international environmental lawyer? American Society of International Law Proceedings, 100, 303–7.Google Scholar
Bodansky, D. (2009). Is there an international environmental constitution? Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 16, 565–84.Google Scholar
Bosselmann, K. (2015). Global environmental constitutionalism: Mapping the terrain. Widener Law Review, 21, 171–85.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. E. (1999). Some reflections on the relationship of treaties and soft law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 48, 901–13.Google Scholar
Broude, T., & Shany, Y. (eds.) (2011). Multi-sourced equivalent norms in international law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S. (2012). Organizing for the green economy: What an international green economy organization could add. Journal of Environment and Development, 21 (1), 44–7.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., McGlade, J., Lovins, H., & Kubiszewski, I. (2015). An overarching goal for the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Solutions, 5, 13–16.Google Scholar
De Wet, E., & Vidmar, J. (2012). Introduction. In De Wet, E, & Vidmar, J (eds.), Hierarchy in international law: The place of human rights (pp. 1–13). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dingwerth, K., & Pattberg, P. (2006). Global governance as a perspective on world politics. Global Governance, 12, 185–203.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S., Bächtiger, A., & Milewicz, K. (2011). Toward a deliberative global citizens’ assembly. Global Policy, 2, 33–42.Google Scholar
Duit, A., Galaz, V., Eckerberg, K., & Ebbesson, J. (2010). Governance, complexity, and resilience. Global Environmental Change, 20, 363–8.Google Scholar
Earth Negotiations Bulletin (2019). Summary of the third substantive session of the Ad Hoc Open-ended Working Group towards a Global Pact for the Environment: 20–22 May 2019. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 35, 1–12.Google Scholar
Fischer, J., Manning, A. D., Steffen, W. et al. (2007). Mind the sustainability gap. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22, 621–4.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., & Teubner, G. (2004). Regime collisions: The vain search for legal unity in the fragmentation of global law. Michigan Journal of International Law, 25, 999–1073.Google Scholar
Friedrich, J. (2013). International environmental ‘soft law’. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2014). Global Goals as a policy tool: Intended and unintended consequences. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15, 118–31.Google Scholar
Galaz, V., Olsson, P., Hahn, T., Folke, C., & Svedin, U. (2008). The problem of fit between governance systems and environmental regimes. In Young, O. R., King, L. A., & Schroeder, H (eds.), Institutions and environmental change: Principal findings, applications and research frontiers (pp. 147–86). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Griggs, D., Stafford-Smith, M., Gaffney, O. et al. (2013). Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature, 495, 305–7.Google Scholar
Haas, P. M. (2007). Turning up the heat on global environmental governance. The Forum, 5.Google Scholar
Hajer, M., Nilsson, M., Raworth, K. et al. (2015). Beyond cockpit-ism: Four insights to enhance the transformative potential of the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 7, 1651–60.Google Scholar
Halevy, N., Y Chou, E., Galinsky, A. D. (2011). A functional model of hierarchy. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 32–52.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1994). The concept of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoare, A., & Tarasofsky, R. (2007). International environmental governance. London: Chatham House.Google Scholar
International Law Commission (2006). Fragmentation of international law: Difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law. UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682.Google Scholar
International Law Commission (2019). Peremptory norms of general international law (jus cogens). UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.936.Google Scholar
Ivanova, M. H. (2007). Designing the United Nations Environment Programme: A story of compromise and confrontation. International Environmental Agreements, 7 (4), 337–61.Google Scholar
Ivanova, M. H. (2013). Reforming the institutional framework for environment and sustainable development: Rio+20’s subtle but significant impact. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 12 (3), 211–31.Google Scholar
Ivanova, M. H., & Roy, J. (2007). The architecture of global environmental governance: Pros and cons of multiplicity. In Swart, L, & Perry, E (eds.), Global environmental governance: Perspectives on the current debate (pp. 48–66). New York: Center for UN Reform Education.Google Scholar
Jordan, A., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., & Forster, J. (eds.) (2018). Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kanie, N. (2007). Governance with multilateral environmental agreements: A healthy or ill-equipped fragmentation? In Swart, L, & Perry, E (eds.), Global environmental governance: Perspectives on the current debate (pp. 67–86). New York: Center for UN Reform Education.Google Scholar
Kanie, N., & Biermann, F. (eds.) (2017). Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1960). Reine Rechtslehre. Vienna: Deuticke.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9, 7–23.Google Scholar
Kim, R. E. (2016). The nexus between international law and the Sustainable Development Goals. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25, 15–26.Google Scholar
Kim, R. E., & Bosselmann, K. (2013). International environmental law in the Anthropocene: Towards a purposive system of multilateral environmental agreements. Transnational Environmental Law, 2, 285–309.Google Scholar
Kim, R. E., & Bosselmann, K. (2015). Operationalizing sustainable development: Ecological integrity as a Grundnorm of international law. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 24, 194–208.Google Scholar
Klabbers, J. (1996). The redundancy of soft law. Nordic Journal of International Law, 65, 167–82.Google Scholar
Knox, J. H. (2019). The Global Pact for the Environment: At the crossroads of human rights and the environment. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 29, 40–7.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., & Leino, P. (2002). Fragmentation of international law? Postmodern anxieties. Leiden Journal of International Law, 15, 553–79.Google Scholar
Kotzé, L. J. (2012). Arguing global environmental constitutionalism. Transnational Environmental Law, 1, 199–233.Google Scholar
Kotzé, L. J. (2015). Constitutional conversations in the Anthropocene: In search of environmental jus cogens norms. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 46, 241–71.Google Scholar
Kotzé, L. J. (2016). Global environmental constitutionalism in the Anthropocene. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Kotzé, L. J. (2018). In search of a right to a healthy environment in international law. In Knox, J, & Pejan, R (eds.), The human right to a healthy environment (pp. 136–54). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kotzé, L. J. (2019a). A global environmental constitution for the Anthropocene? Transnational Environmental Law, 8, 11–33.Google Scholar
Kotzé, L. J. (2019b). International environmental law’s lack of normative ambition: An Opportunity for the Global Pact for the Environment? Journal of European Environmental and Planning Law, 16, 213–36.Google Scholar
Kotzé, L. J., & French, D. (2018). A critique of the Global Pact for the Environment: A stillborn initiative or the foundation for Lex Anthropocenae? International Environmental Agreements, 18, 811–38.Google Scholar
Kotzé, L. J, & Muzangaza, W. (2018). Constitutional international environmental law for the Anthropocene? Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 27, 278–292.Google Scholar
Lafferty, W., & Hovden, E. (2003). Environmental policy integration: Towards an analytical framework. Environmental Politics, 12, 1–22.Google Scholar
Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 212–47.Google Scholar
Lehmen, A. (2015). The case for the creation of an international environmental court: Non-state actors and international environmental dispute resolution. Colorado Natural Resources, Energy, and Environmental Law Review, 26, 179–217.Google Scholar
Liivoja, R. (2008). The scope of the supremacy clause of the United Nations Charter. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 57, 583–612.Google Scholar
Linnér, B. O., & Selin, H. (2013). The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development: Forty years in the making. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31 (6), 971–87.Google Scholar
Lodefalk, M., & Whalley, J. (2002). Reviewing proposals for a world environmental organisation. The World Economy, 25, 601–17.Google Scholar
Mawdsley, E. (2018). ‘From billions to trillions’: Financing the SDGs in a world ‘beyond aid’. Dialogues in Human Geography, 8, 191–5.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, J. (2007). Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9 (3–4), 299–314.Google Scholar
Meyer-Ohlendorf, N., & Knigge, M. (2007). A United Nations Environment Organization. In Swart, L, & Perry, E (eds.), Global environmental governance: Perspectives on the current debate (pp. 124–41). New York: Center for UN Reform Education.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. B. (2003). International environmental agreements: A survey of their features, formation, and effects. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 429–461.Google Scholar
Morseletto, P., Biermann, F., & Pattberg, P. (2017). Governing by targets: Reductio ad unum and evolution of the two-degree climate target. International Environmental Agreements, 17, 655–76.Google Scholar
Murphy, S. D. (1999). Does the world need a new international environmental court? George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, 32, 333–49.Google Scholar
Najam, A. (2003). The case against a new international environmental organization. Global Governance, 9, 367–84.Google Scholar
Najam, A. (2005). Neither necessary, nor sufficient: Why organizational tinkering won’t improve environmental governance. In Biermann, F, & Bauer, S (eds.), A world environment organization: Solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? (pp. 235–56). Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Nilsson, M., Griggs, D., & Visbeck, M. (2016). Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature, 534, 320–2.Google Scholar
Oberthür, S., & Gehring, T. (2004). Reforming international environmental governance: An institutionalist critique of the proposal for a world environment organisation. International Environmental Agreements, 4, 359–81.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20, 550–7.Google Scholar
Palmer, G. (1992). New ways to make international environmental law. American Journal of International Law, 86, 259–83.Google Scholar
Paulus, A. (2005). Jus cogens in a time of hegemony and fragmentation: An attempt at a reappraisal. Nordic Journal of International Law, 74, 297–334.Google Scholar
Pedersen, O. W. (2012). An international environmental court and international legalism. Journal of Environmental Law, 24, 547–58.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. D. (2015). Goal-based development and the SDGs: Implications for development finance. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 31, 268–78.Google Scholar
Sand, P. H., & Wiener, J. B. (2016). Towards a new international law of the atmosphere. Tulsa Law Review, 7, 195–223.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Z. (2018). The art of ‘not undermining’: Possibilities within existing architecture to improve environmental protections in areas beyond national jurisdiction. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 75, 405–16.Google Scholar
Selin, H. (2010). Global governance of hazardous chemicals: Challenges of multilevel management. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shelton, D. (2006). Normative hierarchy in international law. American Journal of International Law, 100, 291–323.Google Scholar
Stafford-Smith, M., Griggs, D., Gaffney, O. et al. (2016). Integration: The key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability Science, 13, 1–9.Google Scholar
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J. et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347, 1259855.Google Scholar
Steinberg, R. (1998). Der ökologische Verfassungsstaat. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Stevens, C. (2018). Scales of integration for sustainable development governance. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 25, 1–8.Google Scholar
Stevens, C., & Kanie, N. (2016). The transformative potential of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). International Environmental Agreements, 16, 393–6.Google Scholar
Underdal, A., & Kim, R. E. (2017). The Sustainable Development Goals and multilateral agreements. In Kanie, N, & Biermann, F (eds.), Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation (pp. 241–58). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly (2018). Towards a global pact for the environment. UN Doc. A/RES/72/277.Google Scholar
Vidmar, J. (2012). Norm conflicts and hierarchy in international law: Towards a vertical international legal system? In De Wet, E, & Vidmar, J (eds.), Hierarchy in international law: The place of human rights (pp. 13–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vijge, M. J. (2013). The promise of new institutionalism: Explaining the absence of a W orld or United Nations Environment Organisation. International Environmental Agreements, 13 (2), 153–76.Google Scholar
Von Moltke, K. (2005). Clustering international environmental agreements as an alternative to a world environment organization. In Biermann, F, & Bauer, S (eds.), A world environment organization: Solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wiersema, A. (2009). The new international law-makers? Conferences of the parties to multilateral environmental agreements. Michigan Journal of International Law, 31, 231–87.Google Scholar
Wolfrum, R., & Matz, N. (2003). Conflicts in international environmental law. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (2008). The architecture of global environmental governance: Bringing science to bear on policy. Global Environmental Politics, 8 (1), 14–32.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (2017). Conceptualization: Goal setting as a strategy for earth system governance In Kanie, N, & Biermann, F (eds.), Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation (pp. 31–52). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zelli, F., & van Asselt, H. (2013). The institutional fragmentation of global environmental governance: Causes, consequences, and responses. Global Environmental Politics, 13 (3), 1–13.Google Scholar
Zürn, M., & Faude, B. (2013). On fragmentation, differentiation, and coordination. Global Environmental Politics, 13, 119–30.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×