We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
Neo-functionalist scholarship has made one of the first systematic attempts to explain why and under what circumstances regional organizations act cohesively in global forums. Known as the externalization hypothesis, Schmitter (1969; 1971) and Nye (1967; 1971) have argued that with progressive regional integration member states of a regional grouping tend to develop an interest in becoming a cohesive actor vis-à-vis third states. The motivation to centralize policies towards the extra-regional world is largely defensive: to safe-guard the economic benefits reaped from closer regional cooperation (Haas and Rowe 1973: 4), to reduce external dependence of member states and, at the same time, protect their foreign policy autonomy (ibid. 5). In a mutually reinforcing relationship, externalization is also believed to foster regional integration insofar as developing joint positions towards outsiders creates a need for increased internal consultation, communication, coordination, harmonization and, hence, institutionalization (ibid. 6). Externalization, in other words, has a dual effect: it helps to curtail the “exogenous determination of the external conditions of regional organizations” and, vice versa, creates conducive conditions for deepening regional integration (Schmitter 1971: 244; Jorgensen-Dahl 1977: 36).
In an empirical study Haas and Rowe tested eighteen regional organizations on externalization (Haas and Rowe 1973). In their research design they posited that primarily the material institutional properties such as functional specificity, homogeneity and autonomous central authority would influence the cohesiveness of regional organizations in global forums. The more functionally specific, the more homogenous the membership and the more centralized the organizational structure, they argued, the greater the likelihood is that a regional organization will act cohesively in global forums. By contrast, regional organizations with a broad functional scope, a diverse membership and a decentralized organizational structure are expected to be less united in global institutions. As the measure for cohesiveness they used the voting behavior of regional organizations in the United Nations General Assembly (ibid.).
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
