Book contents
- Between Market Economy and State Capitalism
- Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law
- Between Market Economy and State Capitalism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Foreword
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Abbreviations
- 1 China, State Capitalism and the World Trading System
- 2 The Evolution of China’s Reforms of State-Owned Enterprises (1978–2020)
- 3 State Capitalism in China’s Accession to the WTO
- 4 The Limits of General WTO Rules
- 5 The Potential of WTO Rules on Industrial Subsidies and China-Specific Obligations
- 6 Emerging Approaches to Regulating State-Owned Enterprises
- 7 Tackling China’s State Capitalism
- 8 Conclusion
- Index
7 - Tackling China’s State Capitalism
WTO Litigation and Trade Negotiation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2022
- Between Market Economy and State Capitalism
- Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law
- Between Market Economy and State Capitalism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Foreword
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Abbreviations
- 1 China, State Capitalism and the World Trading System
- 2 The Evolution of China’s Reforms of State-Owned Enterprises (1978–2020)
- 3 State Capitalism in China’s Accession to the WTO
- 4 The Limits of General WTO Rules
- 5 The Potential of WTO Rules on Industrial Subsidies and China-Specific Obligations
- 6 Emerging Approaches to Regulating State-Owned Enterprises
- 7 Tackling China’s State Capitalism
- 8 Conclusion
- Index
Summary
Chapter 7 is dedicated to a more focused discussion of how to tackle China’s state capitalism in the WTO. The first option is utilising existing WTO rules, especially those China-specific provisions, to bring cases against China, which so far has not happened. This is partly due to the perception that WTO litigation does not work against China, an argument which we refute by referring to China’s good compliance record with WTO decisions. At the same time, we do agree that a more strategic approach should be taken in bringing such cases and proceed to suggest the types of cases that should be brought and how the evidentiary burden could be met. The second option is through trade negotiations. While bilateral negotiations such as the US–China Phase One deal do not really work, there is great potential in multilateral negotiations. Here, we caution against those advocating the exclusion of China in such rule-making efforts and argue that China should be engaged to make the negotiation fruitful. To make the discussions more productive, we also suggest certain guidelines to make sure that China will be more constructively engaged.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Between Market Economy and State CapitalismChina's State-Owned Enterprises and the World Trading System, pp. 154 - 184Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022