Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T22:28:33.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Semiotic social spaces and affinity spaces: from The Age of Mythology to today's schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2009

By
James Paul Gee
Edited by
David Barton  and
Karin Tusting
James Paul Gee
Affiliation:
Tashia Morgridge Professor of Reading, University of Wisconsin, Madison
David Barton
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Karin Tusting
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION: FROM GROUPS TO SPACES

In this paper, I consider an alternative to the notion of a “community of practice” (Lave and Wenger 1991; Wenger 1998). This alternative focuses on the idea of a space in which people interact, rather than on membership in a community. I want to consider this alternative because I believe that the notion of what I will later call an “affinity space” is a particularly important contemporary social configuration with implications for the future of schools and schooling.

The notion of a “community of practice” has been a fruitful one. However, it has given rise to several problems, some of which are:

  • The idea of “community” can carry connotations of “belongingness” and close-knit personal ties among people which do not necessarily always fit classrooms, workplaces or other sites where the notion of a community of practice has been used.

  • The idea of “community” seems to bring with it the notion of people being “members”. However, “membership” means such different things across different sorts of communities of practice, and there are so many different ways and degrees of being a member in some communities of practice that it is not clear that membership is a truly helpful notion.

  • While Wenger (see Wenger, McDermott and Snyder 2002) has tried to be careful in delineating just what is and what is not a community of practice, distinguishing it from other sorts of affiliations, the notion has been used by others to cover such a wide array of social forms that we may be missing the trees for the forest.

Type
Chapter
Information
Beyond Communities of Practice
Language Power and Social Context
 , pp. 214 - 232
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, U. (1999) World Risk Society. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. L. (1994) The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher 23: 4–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J., Collins, A. and Duguid, P. (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18 (1) 32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
diSessa, A. A. (2000) Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2000–2001) Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education 25 99–125Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2003) What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. New York: Palgrave/MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. P., Hull, G. and Lankshear, C. (1996) The New Work Order: Behind the Language of the New Capitalism. Boulder: WestviewGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rifkin, J. (2000) The Age of Access: The New Culture of Hypercapitalism Where All of Life Is a Paid-for Experience. New York: Jeremy Tarcher/PutnamGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. and Snyder, W. M. (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×