Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:58:15.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - More Than a Thing

Figuring Hybridity in Archaic Poetry and Art

from Part I - Blended Bodies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

Maria Gerolemou
Affiliation:
Center for Hellenic Studies, Washington
George Kazantzidis
Affiliation:
University of Patras, Greece
Get access

Summary

This chapter starts by exploring the familiar scene at the end of Iliad 18, where the Homeric poet describes a sequence of artefacts that Hephaestus has manufactured: first the self-moving twenty golden tripods that he is in the process of completing, now fitting them out with ‘ears’, then the golden girls, automata, who are filled with ‘voice and strength’, then twenty self-blowing bellows that keep the fire strong, and finally Achilles’ wondrous shield, filled with individuals, animals and other elements that move, speak, sing and grow before our eyes for all (as the poet takes pains to remind us) that they are metal-forged. The Odyssey introduces another set of Hephaestus-forged animated metal goods, the guard dogs standing on the threshold of Alcinous and described in book 7.91–4. The second part of the chapter explores some of the vivified objects that populate archaic hexameter poetry, hybrids that stand at the interstices between the living and inanimate and among which the Hesiodic Pandora claims a place together with several other Hesiodic beings. The discussion’s second half focuses on the late archaic and early classical period, and on a number of figures that appear in Pindaric poetry.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benveniste, E. 1971. ‘The Notion of “Rhythm” in Its Linguistic Expression’, in E. Benveniste, Problems in General Linguistics (Florida), 281–9.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. 1997/8. ‘πινύσκω and Its Cognates: A Note on Simonides, Fr. 508 Page’, Glotta, 74: 135–42.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. 1991. The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume v. Books 17–20 (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frontisi-Ducroux, F. 2002. ‘“Avec son diaphragme visionnaire: Ἰδυίῃσι πραπίδεσσι”, Iliade xviii, 481. À propos du bouclier d’Achille’, Revue des études grecques, 115: 463–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, D. E. 1982. Pindar’s Olympian One: A Commentary (Toronto).Google Scholar
Howie, J. G. 1983. ‘The Revision of Myth in Pindar Olympian One: The Death and Revival of Pelops (25–27, 36–66)’, Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar, 4: 277313.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. 1987. ‘The Cooking of Pelops: Pindar and the Process of Mythological Revisionism’, Helios, 11: 321.Google Scholar
Karvouni, M. 1999. ‘Demas: The Human Body as a Tectonic Construct’, in Pérez-Gómez, A. and Parcell, S., eds., Intervals in the Philosophy of Architecture (Montreal), 103–24.Google Scholar
Köhnken, A. 1974. ‘Pindar as Innovator: Poseidon Hippios and the Relevance of the Pelops Story in Olympian 1’, Classical Quarterly, 24: 199206.Google Scholar
Köhnken, A. 1983. ‘Time and Event in Pindar O. 1.25–33’, Classical Antiquity, 2: 6676.Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B. 2013. ‘Broken Rhythms in Plato’s Laws: Materialising Social Time in the Chorus’, in Peponi, A.-E. (ed.), Performance and Culture in Plato’s Laws (Cambridge), 171211.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. 2015. ‘Pindar’s Material Imaginary: Dedications and Politics in Olympian 7’. UCL Housman Lecture.Google Scholar
Langdon, S. 2008. Art and Identity in Dark Age Greece (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Lissarrague, F. 1990. The Aesthetics of the Greek Banquet: Images of Wine and Ritual, transl. A. Szegedy-Maszak (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Neer, R. 2002. Style and Politics in Athenian Vase-Painting (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Onians, R. B. 1988. The Origins of European Thought: About the Body, the Mind, the Soul, the World, Time and Fate (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Papalexandrou, N. 2005. The Visual Poetics of Power: Warriors, Youths, and Tripods in Early Greece (Lanham, MD).Google Scholar
Payne, H. 1971. Necrocorinthia: A Study of Corinthian Art in the Archaic Period (College Park, PA).Google Scholar
Petersen, E. A. H. 1917. Rhythmus. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Philologisch-historische Klasse 16.5 (Göttingen).Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. 1974. The Ancient View of Greek Art: Criticism, History, and Terminology (New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
Power, T. 2011. ‘Cyberchorus: Pindar’s Κηληδόνες and the Aura of the Artificial’, in Athanassaki, L. and Bowie, E., eds., Archaic and Classical Choral Song: Performance, Politics and Dissemination (Berlin), 67114.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. A. 2018. The Language of Ruins: Greek and Latin Inscriptions on the Memnon Colossus (Oxford).Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. 2001. Pindar’s Paeans: A Reading of the Fragments with a Survey of the Genre (Oxford).Google Scholar
Starobinski, J. 1975. ‘The Inside and the Outside’, The Hudson Review, 28: 333–51.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. T. 1998. ‘Moving Images: Fifth-Century Victory Monuments and the Athlete’s Allure’, Classical Antiquity, 17: 123–49.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. T. 2001. Images in Mind: Statues in Archaic and Classical Greek Literature and Thought (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Steiner, D. T. 2013. ‘The Priority of Pots: Pandora’s Pithos Re-viewed’, Mètis, 11: 207–34.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. T. 2014. ‘From the Demonic to the Divine: Cauldrons, Choral Dancers and Encounters with the Gods’, in Estienne, S., Huet, V., Lissarrague, F. and Prost, F., eds., Figures de dieux: Construire le divin en images (Rennes), 155–74.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. T. 2021. Choral Constructions in Greek Culture: The Idea of the Chorus in the Poetry, Art and Social Practices of the Archaic and Early Classical Periods (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topper, K. 2007. ‘Perseus, the Maiden Medusa and the Imagery of Abduction’, Hesperia, 76: 73105.Google Scholar
Topper, K. 2010. ‘Maidens, Fillies and the Death of Medusa on a Seventh-Century Pithos’, Journal of Hellenic Studies, 130: 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlig, A. 2020. ‘Birth by Hammer: Pandora and Somatic Construction’, in Dyer, J. and Surtees, A., eds., Exploring Gender Diversity in the Ancient World (Edinburgh), 5466.Google Scholar
Walsh, D. 2009. Distorted Ideals in Greek Vase-Painting: The World of Mythological Burlesque (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Weiss, N. A. 2016. ‘The Choral Architecture of Pindar’s Eight Paean’, Transactions of the American Philological Association, 146: 237–55.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. 1996. Playing the Other: Gender and Society in Classical Greek Literature (Chicago).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×