Book contents
- Building BonesBone Formation and Development in Anthropology
- Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology
- Building Bones
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 What Is a Biological ‘Trait’?
- 2 The Contribution of Angiogenesis to Variation in Bone Development and Evolution
- 3 Association of the Chondrocranium and Dermatocranium in Early Skull Formation
- 4 Unique Ontogenetic Patterns of Postorbital Septation in Tarsiers and the Issue of Trait Homology
- 5 Exploring Modern Human Facial Growth at the Micro- and Macroscopic Levels
- 6 Changes in Mandibular Cortical Bone Density and Elastic Properties during Growth
- 7 Postcranial Skeletal Development and Its Evolutionary Implications
- 8 Combining Genetic and Developmental Methods to Study Musculoskeletal Evolution in Primates
- 9 Using Comparisons between Species and Anatomical Locations to Discover Mechanisms of Growth Plate Patterning and Differential Growth
- 10 Ontogenetic and Genetic Influences on Bone’s Responsiveness to Mechanical Signals
- 11 The Havers–Halberg Oscillation and Bone Metabolism
- 12 Structural and Mechanical Changes in Trabecular Bone during Early Development in the Human Femur and Humerus
- Appendix to Chapter 3: Detailed Anatomical Description of Developing Chondrocranium and Dermatocranium in the Mouse
- References (not included in citations for Chapter 3)
- Index
- 12 Plate section
- References
Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2017
Book contents
- Building BonesBone Formation and Development in Anthropology
- Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology
- Building Bones
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 What Is a Biological ‘Trait’?
- 2 The Contribution of Angiogenesis to Variation in Bone Development and Evolution
- 3 Association of the Chondrocranium and Dermatocranium in Early Skull Formation
- 4 Unique Ontogenetic Patterns of Postorbital Septation in Tarsiers and the Issue of Trait Homology
- 5 Exploring Modern Human Facial Growth at the Micro- and Macroscopic Levels
- 6 Changes in Mandibular Cortical Bone Density and Elastic Properties during Growth
- 7 Postcranial Skeletal Development and Its Evolutionary Implications
- 8 Combining Genetic and Developmental Methods to Study Musculoskeletal Evolution in Primates
- 9 Using Comparisons between Species and Anatomical Locations to Discover Mechanisms of Growth Plate Patterning and Differential Growth
- 10 Ontogenetic and Genetic Influences on Bone’s Responsiveness to Mechanical Signals
- 11 The Havers–Halberg Oscillation and Bone Metabolism
- 12 Structural and Mechanical Changes in Trabecular Bone during Early Development in the Human Femur and Humerus
- Appendix to Chapter 3: Detailed Anatomical Description of Developing Chondrocranium and Dermatocranium in the Mouse
- References (not included in citations for Chapter 3)
- Index
- 12 Plate section
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Ackermann, R. and Grovitz, G. (2002). Common patterns of facial ontogeny in the hominid lineage. Anatomical Record, 269, 142–147.Google Scholar
Armelagos, G., Brown, P. and Turner, B. (2005). Evolutionary, historical and political economic perspectives on health and diseaase. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 755–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastir, M., O’Higgins, P. and Rosas, A. (2007). Facial ontogeny in Neanderthals and modern humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 1125–1132.Google Scholar
Bastir, M. and Rosas, A. (2004). Comparative ontogeny in humans and chimpanzees: similarities, differences and paradoxes in postnatal growth and development of the skull. Annals of Anatomy, 186, 503–509.Google Scholar
Berge, C. and Penin, X. (2004). Ontogenetic allometry, heterochrony, and interspecific differences in the skull of African apes, using tridimensional Procrustes analysis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 124, 124–138.Google Scholar
Boldsen, J. L., Milner, G. R. and Weise, S. (2015). Cranial vault trauma and selective mortality in medieval to early modern Denmark. Proceedings of the National Academy of Scencesi USA, 112, 1721–1726.Google Scholar
Bonner, J. (1982). Evolution and Development. Report of the Dahlem Workshop on Evolution and Development Berlin 1981, May 10–15. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Boughner, J. and Dean, M. (2008). Mandibular shape, ontogeny and dental development in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Evolutionary Biology, 35, 296–308.Google Scholar
Braasch, I., Gehrke, A. R., Smith, J. J., et al. (2016). The spotted gar genome illuminates vertebrate evolution and facilitates human–teleost comparisons. Nature Genetics, 48, 427–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buikstra, J. (1981). Mortuary practices, paleodemography and paleopathology: a case study from the Koster site (Illinois). In: Chapman, R., Kinnes, I. and Randsborg, K. (eds.) Archaeology of Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buikstra, J. E., Frankenberg, S. R. and Konigsberg, L. W. (1990). Skeletal biological distance studies in American physical anthropology: recent trends. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 82, 1–7.Google Scholar
Bulygina, E., Mitteroecker, P. and Aiello, L. (2006). Ontogeny of facial dimorphism and patterns of individual development within one human population. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 131, 432–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carrol, S., Grenier, J. and Weatherbee, S. (2001). From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design. Oxford: Blackwell Sciences.Google Scholar
Cheverud, J., Lewis, J. L., Bachrach, W. and Lew, W. D. (1983). The measurement of form and variation in form: an application of three-dimensional quantitative morphology by finite-element methods. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 62, 151–165.Google Scholar
Chiu, C. and Hamrick, M. (2002). Evolution and development of the primate limb skeleton. Evolutionary Anthropology, 11, 94–107.Google Scholar
Hager, R., Cheverud, J. and Wolf, J. (2009). Relative contribution of additive, dominance, and imprinting effects on phenotypic variation in body size and growth between divergent selection lines of mice. Evolution, 63, 1118–1128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallgrímsson, B., Jamniczky, H., Young, N.M., et al. (2009). Deciphering the palimpsest: studying the relationship between morphological integration and phenotypic covariation. Evolutionary Biology, 36, 355–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallgrímsson, B. and Lieberman, D.E. (2008). Mouse models and the evolutionary developmental biology of the skull. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 48, 373–384.Google Scholar
Hlusko, L. J., Suwa, G., Kono, R. T. and Mahaney, M. C. (2004). Genetics and the evolution of primate enamel thickness: a baboon model. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 124, 223–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holly, B. (1992). The physiological age of KNM-WT 15000. In: Walker, A. and Leakey, R. (eds.) The Homo erectus Skeleton from Nariokotome. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.Google Scholar
Kjosness, K., Hines, J., Lovejoy, C. and Reno, P. (2014). The pisiform growth plate is lost in humans and supports a role for Hox in growth plate formation. Journal of Anatomy, 225, 527–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamason, R. L., Mohideen, M. P. K., Mest, J. R., et al. (2005). SLC24A5, a putative cation exchanger, affects pigmentation in zebrafish and humans. Science, 310(5755), 1782–1786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, F. (2012). Building strong bones: molecular regulation of the osteoblast lineage. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 13, 27–38.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, C. O., Cohn, M. J. and White, T. D. (1999). Morphological analysis of the mammalian postcranium: a developmental perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Scencesi USA, 96, 13247–13252.Google Scholar
Mcnulty, K. P., Frost, S. R. and Strait, D. S. (2006). Examining affinities of the Taung child by developmental simulation. Journal of Human Evolution, 51, 274–296.Google Scholar
Meyer, M., Arsuaga, J. L., De Filippo, C., et al. (2016). Nuclear DNA sequences from the Middle Pleistocene Sima de los Huesos hominins. Nature, 531, 504–507.Google Scholar
Pearson, O. M. and Lieberman, D. E. (2004). The aging of Wolff’s “law”: ontogeny and responses to mechanical loading in cortical bone. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Suppl 39, 63–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perelman, P., Johnson, W.E., Roos, C., et al. (2011). A molecular phylogeny of living primates. PLoS Genetics, 7(3), 1–17.Google Scholar
Raichlen, D. A., Gordon, A. D., Foster, A. D., et al. (2015). An ontogenetic framework linking locomotion and trabecular bone architecture with applications for reconstructing hominin life history. Journal of Human Evolution, 81, 1–12.Google Scholar
Reno, P. L. (2014). Genetic and developmental basis for parallel evolution and its significance for hominoid evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 23, 188–200.Google Scholar
Reno, P.L., McCollum, M.A., Cohn, M.J., et al. (2008). Patterns of correlation and covariation of anthropoid distal forelimb segments correspond to Hoxd expression territories. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Mol Dev Evol), 310, 240–258.Google Scholar
Richtsmeier, J., Cheverud, J. and Lele, S. (1992). Advances in anthropological morphometrics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 283–305.Google Scholar
Richtsmeier, J., Corner, B., Grausz, H., Cheverud, J. and Danahey, S. (1993). The role of postnatal growth pattern in the production of facial morphology. Systematic Biology, 42, 307–330.Google Scholar
Richtsmeier, J. T. and Lele, S. (1993). A coordinate-free approach to the analysis of growth patterns: models and theoretical considerations. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 68, 381–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolian, C. (2014). Genes, development, and evolvability in primate evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 23, 93–104.Google Scholar
Ruff, C. (2008). Biomechanical analyses of archaeological human skeletons. In: Katzenberg, M. and Saunders, S. (eds.) Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton, 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Ruff, C. B. and Hayes, W. C. (1983). Cross-sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae – a biomechanical investigation: I. Method and general patterns of variation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 60, 359–381.Google Scholar
Ryan, T. and Shaw, C. (2014). Gracility of the modern Homo sapiens skeleton is the result of decreased biomechanical loading. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 112, 372–377.Google Scholar
Serrat, M. A. (2013). Allen’s rule revisited: temperature influences bone elongation during a critical period of postnatal development. The Anatomical Record, 296, 1534–1545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slice, D. (2007). Geometric morphometrics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 261–281.Google Scholar
Smith, B. and Tompkins, R. (1995). Toward a life history of the Hominidae. Annual Review of Anthropology, 257–279.Google Scholar
Strait, D. S., Wang, Q., Dechow, P. C., et al. (2005). Modeling elastic properties in finite-element analysis: how much precision is needed to produce an accurate model? The Anatomical Record. Part A, Discoveries in Molecular Cellular and Evolutionary Biology, 283, 275–287.Google Scholar
Strait, D. S., Richmond, B. G., Spencer, M. A., et al. (2007). Masticatory biomechanics and its relevance to early hominid phylogeny: an examination of palatal thickness using finite-element analysis. Journal of Human Evolution, 52, 585–599.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. (1942). Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature, 3811, 563–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washburn, S. L. (1951). The new physical anthropology. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 13, 298–304.Google Scholar
Wolfe, N. D., Dunavan, C. P. and Diamond, J. (2007). Origins of major human infectious diseases. Nature, 447, 279–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, J., Milner, G., Harpending, H. and Weiss, K. (1992). The osteological paradox: problems of inferring prehistoric health from skeletal samples. Current Anthropology, 33, 343–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, N. M., Chong, H. J., Hu, D., Hallgrímsson, B. and Marcucio, R. S. (2010). Quantitative analyses link modulation of sonic hedgehog signaling to continuous variation in facial growth and shape. Development, 137, 3405–3409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed