Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:02:57.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2022

Edited by
David Ebrey  and
Richard Kraut
David Ebrey
Affiliation:
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Richard Kraut
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Plato , pp. 559 - 591
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, M. H. 1953. The Mirror and the Lamp. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Acerbi, F. 2003. “On the Shoulders of Hipparchus: A Reappraisal of Ancient Greek Combinatorics,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 57: 465–502.Google Scholar
Acerbi, F 2008. “In What Proof Would a Geometer Use the Πoδίαια?” Classical Quarterly 58: 120–6.Google Scholar
Adam, J. 1902. The Republic of Plato, 2 vols.: Text and Commentary. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, M. 2019. “Plato’s Theory of Punishment and Penal Code in the Laws,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ademollo, F. 2011. The Cratylus of Plato. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ademollo, F. 2018. “On Plato’s Conception of Change,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 55: 35–83.Google Scholar
Adkins, A. W. H. 1960. Merit and Responsibility. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adkins, A. W. H. 1970. “Clouds, Mysteries, Socrates and Plato,” Antichthon 4: 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adkins, A. W. H. 1978. “Problems in Greek Popular Morality,” Classical Philology 73: 143–58.Google Scholar
Ahbel-Rappe, S. 2009. Socrates: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ahbel-Rappe, S 2018. Socratic Ignorance and Platonic Knowledge in the Dialogues of Plato. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Allen, R. E. 1965. Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 1975. “On the Intermediates,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 57: 146–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J 1981. An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Annas, J 1982. “Plato on the Triviality of Literature,” in Moravcsik, J. and Temko, P. (eds.), Plato on Beauty, Wisdom, and the Arts (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield), 1–28.Google Scholar
Annas, J 1986. “Classical Greek Philosophy,” in Boardman, J., Griffin, J., and Murray, O. (eds.), The Oxford History of the Classical World (Oxford University Press ), 234–54.Google Scholar
Annas, J 2012. “Virtue and Law in the Republic,” in Patterson, R., Karasmanis, V., and Hermann, A. (eds.), Presocratics and Plato: Festschrift at Delphi in Honor of Charles Kahn (Las Vegas: Parmenides), 165–82.Google Scholar
Annas, J 2017. Virtue and Law in Plato and Beyond. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anton, J. (ed.) 1980. Science and the Sciences in Plato. New York: Eidos.Google Scholar
Apolloni, D. 1996. “Plato’s Affinity Argument for the Immortality of the Soul,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34(1): 5–32.Google Scholar
Archer-Hind, R. D. 1973. The Timaeus of Plato. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. 2004. “After the Ascent: Plato on Becoming Like God,” Oxford Studies In Ancient Philosophy 26: 170–83.Google Scholar
Arnim, H. von 1912. “Sprachliche Forschungen zur Chronologie der platonischen Dialogue,” Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien: Philos. Hist. Klasse 169(1): 1–210.Google Scholar
Arruzza, C. 2019. A Wolf in the City: Tyranny and the Tyrant in Plato’s Republic. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arsen, H. 2012. “A Case for the Utility of the Mathematicals,” Philosophia Mathematica 20: 200–23.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. 1986. “Psychagôgia in Plato’s Phaedrus,” Illinois Studies in Classical Philology 11: 153–72.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. 2015. “Art and Morality,” in Destrée, P. and Murray, P. (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Aesthetics (Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell), 486–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, E. 2010. “Prudence and the Fear of Death in Plato’s Apology,” Ancient Philosophy 30: 39–55.Google Scholar
Austin, E 2013. “Corpses, Self-Defense, and Immortality: Callicles’ Fear of Death in the Gorgias,” Ancient Philosophy 33: 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, D. 2014. “Platonic Causes Revisited,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 52: 15–32.Google Scholar
Baima, N. 2016. “Persuasion, Falsehood, and Motivating Reason in Plato’s Laws,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 33: 117–34.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1979. The Presocratics, Vol. 2. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (ed.) 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barney, R. 2006. “The Sophistic Movement,” in L. Gill, M. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell), 77–97.Google Scholar
Barney, R 2021. “Technē as a Model for Virtue in Plato, ” in Johansen, T. K. (ed.), Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy: The Concept of Techne (Cambridge University Press), 62–85.Google Scholar
Barney, R., Brennan, T., and Brittain, C. (eds.) 2012. Plato and the Divided Self. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, C. 1897. “Contributions à la chronologie des dialogues de Platon,” Revue des Etudes grecques 10: 264–78.Google Scholar
Bartninkas, V. 2019. “Traditional Gods and Civic Religion in Plato’s Later Dialogues.” PhD dissertation. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Battin, M. P. 1977. “Plato on True and False Poetry,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36: 163–74.Google Scholar
Belfiore, E. 1984. “A Theory of Imitation in Plato’s Republic,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 114: 121–46.Google Scholar
Belfiore, E 2012. Socrates’ Daimonic Art: Love for Wisdom in Four Platonic Dialogues. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, H. H. (ed.) 1992. Essays on the Philosophy of Socrates. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benson, H. H. 2000. Socratic Wisdom. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benson, H. H. 2013a. “The Priority of Definition,” in Bussanich and Smith 2013, 136–55.Google Scholar
Benson, H. H. 2013b. “What Should Euthyphro Do?” History of Philosophy Quarterly 30: 115–46.Google Scholar
Benson, H. H. 2015. Clitophon’s Challenge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. 2007. “L’âme après la mort: modèles orphiques et transposition platonicienne,” Études Platoniciennes 4: 25–44.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A 2011. Platón y el orfismo: diálogos entre religión y filosofía. Madrid: Abada Editores.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. and Casadesús, F. 2008. Orfeo y la tradición órfica: Un reencuentro. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. and Jiménez San Cristóbal, A. I. 2008. Instructions for the Netherworld: the Orphic Gold Tablets. Brill: Leiden.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2009. “What Makes a Myth eikôs? Remarks inspired by Myles Burnyeat’s EIKÔS MYTHOS,” in Mohr and Sattler 2009, 213–24.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2013. “Socrate et Archélaos dans les Nuées,” in Laks, A. and Cottone, R. Saetta (eds.), Comédie et Philosophie (Paris: Éditions Rue d’Ulm), 87–106.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2018. “Cosmic and Human Cognition in the Timaeus,” in Sisko, J. (ed.), Philosophy of Mind in Antiquity (Routledge: London), 120–40.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2020. “The Ingredients of the Soul in Plato’s Timaeus,” in Leigh, F. (ed.), Themes in Plato, Aristotle and Hellenistic Philosophy: Keeling Lectures 2011–18, BICS Supplement 141 (London: Institute of Classical Studies), 83–104.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. (unpublished) “Plato and the Origins of the Concept of Body.”Google Scholar
Bett, R. 2006. “Socrates and Skepticism,” in Ahbel-Rappe, S. and Kamtekar, R. (eds.), A Companion to Socrates (Oxford: Blackwell), 298–311.Google Scholar
Beversluis, J. 1974. “Socratic Definition,” American Philosophical Quarterly 11: 331–6.Google Scholar
Beversluis, J 2000. Cross-Examining Socrates. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Billig, L. 1920. “Clausulae and Platonic Chronology,” Journal of Philology 35: 225–56.Google Scholar
Blank, D. L. 1993. “The Arousal of Emotion in Plato’s Dialogues,” Classical Quarterly 43: 428–39.Google Scholar
Blass, F. 1874. Die attische Beredsamkeit, Vol. 2. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Blondell, R. 2002. The Play of Character in Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bobonich, C. 1991. “Persuasion, Compulsion and Freedom,” Classical Quarterly 41: 365–88.Google Scholar
Bobonich, C. 2002. Plato’s Utopia Recast: His Later Ethics and Politics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bobonich, C. (ed.) 2010. Plato’s Laws: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bobonich, C. 2011. “Socrates and Eudaimonia,” in Morrison 2011, 292–322.Google Scholar
Bond, G. W. (ed.) 1981. Euripides: Heracles. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bordt, M. 2006. Platons Theologie. Freiburg: Verlag Karl Alber.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. 1892. A History of Aesthetic. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Bostock, D. 1984. “Plato on ‘Is not’,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2: 89–119.Google Scholar
Bostock, D 1986. Plato’s Phaedo. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bostock, D 1990. “Plato and Nominalism: Critical Notice of Terry Penner, The Ascent from Nominalism,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 8: 259–74.Google Scholar
Boter, G. 1989. The Textual Tradition of Plato’s Republic. Supplement to Mnemosyne. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bowden, H. 2010. Mystery Cults in the Ancient World. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Bowen, A. and Goldstein, B. 1988. “Meton of Athens and Astronomy in the Late Fifth Century, B.C.,” in Leichty, E., Dej Ellis, M, and Gerardi, P. (eds.), Scientific Humanist: Studies in Memory of Abraham Sachs (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum), 39–81.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. and Rowe, C. (ed. and trans.). 2013. The Circle of Socrates. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Brandwood, L. 1990. The Chronology of Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 2014. Initiation into the Mysteries of the Ancient World. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brickhouse, T. C. and Smith, N. D. 1989. Socrates on Trial. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brickhouse, T. C. and Smith, N. D. 1994. Plato’s Socrates. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brickhouse, T. C. and Smith, N. D. 2000. The Philosophy of Socrates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Brickhouse, T. C. and Smith, N. D. 2010. Socratic Moral Psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 1994. Le Même et l’Autre dans la Structure Ontologique du Timée de Platon. Sankt Augustin: Akademia Verlag.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 1997. “Plato’s Theory of Sense Perception in the Timaeus: How it Works and What it Means,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 13: 147–76.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 2011. Platon: Parménide, 3rd ed. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 2012. Nature and Divinity in Plato’s Timaeus. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brock, R., 1990. “Plato and Comedy,” in Craik 1990, 39–50.Google Scholar
Bronstein, D. 2010. “Meno’s Paradox in Posterior Analytics 1.1,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 38: 115–41.Google Scholar
Bronstein, D. and Schwab, W. 2019 . “Is Plato an Innatist in the Meno?,” Phronesis 64(4): 392–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, E. 2000a. “Justice and Compulsion for Plato’s Philosopher-Rulers,” Ancient Philosophy 20: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, E 2000b. “Socrates the Cosmopolitan,” Stanford Agora: An Online Journal of Legal Perspectives 1: 74–87.Google Scholar
Brown, E 2009. “False Idles: The Politics of the ‘Quiet Life’,” in Balot, R. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), 485–500.Google Scholar
Brown, E 2017. “Plato’s Ethics and Politics in The Republic,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/Fall2017/entries/plato-ethics-politics/Google Scholar
Brown, L. 1994. “The Verb ‘to be’ in Greek Philosophy: Some Remarks,” in Everson, S. (ed.), Companions to Ancient Thought: Language (Cambridge University Press), 212–36.Google Scholar
Brown, L. 1999. “Being in the Sophist,” in Fine, G. (ed.), Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology (Oxford University Press), 455–78.Google Scholar
Brown, L. 2008. Review of Scott 2006, Philosophical Review 117: 468–71.Google Scholar
Buccioni, E. 2007. “Revising the Controversial Nature of Persuasion in Plato’s Laws,” Polis 24: 262–83.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1960. “Platon oder Pythagoras? Zum Ursprung des Wortes ‘Philosophie’,” Hermes 88: 159–77.Google Scholar
Burkert, W 1985. Greek Religion. Trans. J. Raffan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burkert, W 1987. Ancient Mystery Cults. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burnet, J. 1901–1907. Platonis Opera, Vols. 2–5. Oxford Classical Texts. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Burnet, J. 1911. Plato’s Phaedo Edited with Introduction and Notes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Burnet, J. 1924. Plato: Euthyphro, Apology of Socrates and Crito. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1971. “Virtues in Action,” in Vlastos 1971, 209–34.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1977a. “Examples in Epistemology,” Philosophy 52: 381–98.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1977b. “Socratic Midwifery, Platonic Inspiration,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 24: 7–16. Reprinted in Benson 1992, 53–65.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1985. “Sphinx Without a Secret,” New York Review of Books 32 (May 30): 30–6.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1987. “Platonism and Mathematics: A Prelude to a Discussion,” in Graeser, A. (ed.), Mathematics and Metaphysics in Aristotle (Bern: Haupt), 213–40.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. ed. 1990. Plato’s Theaetetus. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1992. “Utopia and Fantasy: The Practicability of Plato’s Ideally Just City,” in Hopkins, J. and Savile, A. (eds.), Psychoanalysis, Mind and Art (Oxford: Blackwell), 175–87.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1997. “The Impiety of Socrates,” Ancient Philosophy 17: 1–12.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 2000. “Plato on Why Mathematics is Good for the Soul,” Proceedings of the British Academy 103: 1–81.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 2003. “Socrates, Money, and the Grammar of ΓΙΓΝΕΣΘΑΙ,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 123: 1–25.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 2005. “Eikôs muthos,” Rhizai 2: 143–65. Reprinted in Partenie 2009.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 2012. Explorations in Ancient and Modern Philosophy, Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F., and Frede, M. (eds.) 1997. The Original Sceptics: A Controversy. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F., and Frede, M. 2015. The Pseudo-Platonic Seventh Letter, ed. Scott, D.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bury, R. G. 1897. The Philebus of Plato. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bury, R. G. 1932. The Symposium of Plato. Cambridge: Heffner and Sons.Google Scholar
Bussanich, J. and Smith, N. D. (eds.) 2013. The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Calcidius 2016. On Plato’s Timaeus, ed. and trans. Magee, J.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Callard, A. 2017. “Everyone Desires the Good: Socrates’ Protreptic Theory of Desire,” Review of Metaphysics 70(4): 617–44.Google Scholar
Calvo, T. and Brisson, L. (eds.) 1997. Interpreting the Timaeus-Critias (Proceedings of the IV Symposium Platonicum: Selected Papers). Sankt Anton: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. 1867. The Sophistes and Politicus of Plato. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Carone, G. R. 2005a. Plato’s Cosmology and Its Ethical Dimensions. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carone, G. R. 2005b. “Mind and Body in Late Plato,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87: 227–70.Google Scholar
Carpenter, A. 2008. “Embodying Intelligence: Animals and Us in Plato’s Timaeus,” in Zovko, J. and Dillon, J. (eds.), Platonism and Forms of Intelligence (Berlin: Akademie Verlag), 39–58.Google Scholar
Carpenter, A 2010. “Embodied, Intelligent (?) Souls: Plants in Plato’s Timaeus,” Phronesis 55: 281–303.Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. A. 1993. The Greeks: A Portrait of Self and Others, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. A. 1997. “Deep Plays: Theatre as Process in Greek Civic Life,” in Easterling, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy (Cambridge University Press), 3–35.Google Scholar
Casadesús Bordoy, F. 2013. “On the Origin of the Orphic-Pythagorean Notion of the Immortality of the Soul,” in Cornelli, G., McKirahan, R. D., and Macris, C. (eds.), On Pythagoreanism (Berlin: De Gruyter), 153–76.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. 2018. Review of Fine 2014, Philosophical Review 127: 225–8.Google Scholar
Chance, T. H. 1992. Plato’s Euthydemus: Analysis of What Is and What Is Not Philosophy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2006. “Types of Definition in the Meno,” in Judson, L. and Karasmanis, V. (eds.), Remembering Socrates: Philosophical Essays (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 110–28.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2010. “The Paradox in the Meno and Aristotle’s Attempts to Solve It,” in Charles, D. (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy (Oxford University Press), 115–50.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. 1932. “On Plato’s Republic X 597B,” American Journal of Philology 53: 233–42.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H 1933. Review of Field 1930. American Journal of Philology 54: 79–83. Reprinted in Selected Papers (Leiden: Brill, 1977).Google Scholar
Cherniss, H 1944. Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy, Vol. 1. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H 1945. The Riddle of the Early Academy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H 1947. “Some War-Time Publications Concerning Plato. II,” American Journal of Philology 68: 225–65.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H 1957. “The Relation of the Timaeus to Plato’s Later Dialogues,” The American Journal of Philology 78: 225–66.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N 1980. Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N 1988. Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clay, D. 1983. “The Tragic and Comic Poet of the Symposium,” in Anton, J. P. and Preus, A. (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Vol. 2 (Albany, NY: SUNY Press), 186–202.Google Scholar
Clinton, K. 1992. Myth and Cult: the Iconography of the Eleusinian Mysteries (the Nilsson, Martin P. lectures on Greek religion, delivered 19–21 November 1990 at the Swedish Institute at Athens). Stockholm: Svenska institutet i Athen.Google Scholar
Clinton, K 2005. Eleusis, the Inscriptions on Stone: Documents of the Sanctuary of the Two Goddesses and Public Documents of the Deme. Athens: Archaeological Society at Athens.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. M. 1971. “The Logic of the Third Man,” Philosophical Review 80: 448–75.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. 1925. “Plato’s Philosophy of Art,” Mind 34, 154–72.Google Scholar
Cook Wilson, J. 1904. “On the Platonist Doctrine of the ἀσύμβλητοι ἀριθμοί,” Classical Review 18: 247–60.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 1973. “Plato’s Theory of Human Good in the Philebus,” The Journal of Philosophy 74: 327–49. Reprinted in Reason and Emotion: Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory (Princeton University Press, 1999), 150–64.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 1977. “The Psychology of Justice in Plato,” American Philosophical Quarterly 14: 151–7.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 1984. “Plato’s Theory of Human Motivation,” History of Philosophy Quarterly: 3–21.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (ed.) 1997a. Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 1997b. “Plato’s Statesman and Politics,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 13: 71–103.Google Scholar
Cope, E. M. 1854. “The Sophists,” Journal of Philology 1: 145–88.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. 1937. Plato’s Cosmology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Reprinted: Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1997.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. 1939. Plato and Parmenides. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. 1971. “The Doctrine of Eros in Plato’s Symposium,” in Vlastos, G. (ed.), Plato II: Ethics, Politics, and Philosophy of Art and Religion (Garden City: Doubleday), 119–32.Google Scholar
Coulton, J. J. 1977. Ancient Greek Architects at Work: Problems of Structure and Design. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Coventry, L. 1990. “The Role of the Interlocutor in Plato’s Dialogues,” in Pelling, C. B. R. (ed.), Characterization and Individuality in Greek Literature (Oxford University Press), 174–96.Google Scholar
Craik, E. M. (ed.) 1990. Owls to Athens. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Creed, J. L. 1973. “Moral Values in the Age of Thucydides,” Classical Quarterly 23: 213–31.Google Scholar
Crombie, I. M. 1963. An Examination of Plato’s Doctrines, Vol. 2. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cross, R. C. and Woozley, A. D. 1964. Plato’s Republic: A Philosophical Commentary. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Curd, P. 2007. Anaxagoras of Clazomenae: Fragments and Testimonia. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Dancy, R. 2004. Plato’s Introduction of Forms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delcomminette, S. 2006. Le Philèbe de Platon: Introduction à l’agathologie Platonicienne. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Demos, R. 1984. “A Fallacy in Plato’s Republic?,” Philosophical Review 73: 395–8.Google Scholar
Denyer, N. 2007. “The Phaedo’s Final Argument,” in Scott, Dominic (ed.), Maieusis: Essays in ancient philosophy in honour of Myles Burnyeat (Oxford University Press), 87–96.Google Scholar
Denyer, N (ed.) 2019. Plato and Xenophon: Apologies of Socrates. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1981. “Plato’s Pharmacy,” in Dissemination, tr. Johnson, Barbara (University of Chicago Press), 61–171.Google Scholar
Des Places, E. 1964. “Platon et la Langue des Mystères,” Annales de la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines d’Aix 38.1: 9–23.Google Scholar
Destrée, P. 2011. “The Speech of Alcibiades,” in Horn, C. (ed.), Platon: Symposion (Berlin: Akademie Verlag), 191–205.Google Scholar
Destrée, P. and Giannopoulou, Z. (eds.) 2017. Plato’s Symposium: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Destrée, P., and Smith, N. D. (eds.) 2005. Socrates’ Divine Sign: Religion, Practice and Value in Philosophy (Apeiron 38,2).Google Scholar
Devereux, D. 1978. “Nature and Teaching in Plato’s Meno,” Phronesis 23: 118–26.Google Scholar
Devereux, D. 1992. “The Unity of the Virtues in Plato’s Protagoras and Laches,” Philosophical Review 101: 765–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereux, D. 1994. “Separation and Immanence in Plato’s Theory of Forms,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 12: 63–90.Google Scholar
Devereux, D. 1995. “Socrates’ Kantian Conception of Virtue,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 33: 318–408.Google Scholar
Díaz Tejera, A. 1961. “Ensayo de un metodo lingüístico para cronologia de Platón,” Emerita 29: 241–86.Google Scholar
Diels, H. and Kranz, W. 1954. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 7th edn. Dublin and Zürich: Weidemann.Google Scholar
Diès, A. 1941. Platon: Oeuvres Complètes: Philèbe. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 2003. The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dimas, P. 2003. “Recollecting Forms in the Phaedo,” Phronesis 48: 175–214.Google Scholar
Dimas, P. 2014. “Knowing and Wanting in the Hippias Minor,” Philosophical Inquiry 38: 106–18.Google Scholar
Dimas, P., Lane, M., and Meyer, S. (eds.) 2021. Plato’s Statesman: A Philosophical Discussion. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dinkelaar, B. M. 2020. “Plato and the Language of Mysteries,” Mnemosyne 73: 36.Google Scholar
Dittenberger, W. 1881. “Sprachliche Kriterien fur die Chronologie der platonischen Dialoge,” Hermes 16: 321–45.Google Scholar
Dixsaut, M. 1991. Platon: Phédon. Paris.Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. 2011. “The Rise and Fall of the Socratic Problem,” in Morrison 2011, 1–23.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1965. “The Date of Plato’s Symposium,” Phronesis 10: 2–20.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (ed.) 1968. Aristophanes’ Clouds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1974. Greek Popular Morality. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1978. Greek Homosexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (ed.) 1980. Plato’s Symposium. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (ed.) 1993. Aristophanes: Frogs. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 1980. “Grades in the Eleusinian Mysteries,” Revue de l’histoire des religions 197: 409–27.Google Scholar
Duke, E. A. et al. (eds.) 1995. Platonis Opera, Vol. 1: Tetralogias I–II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ebert, T. 2004. Phaidon: Übersetzung und Kommentar. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Ebrey, D. 2014a. “Making Room for Matter: Material Causes in the Phaedo and the Physics,” Apeiron 47.2: 245–65.Google Scholar
Ebrey, D. 2014b. “Meno’s Paradox in Context,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22: 1–21.Google Scholar
Ebrey, D. 2017a. “Plato’s Phaedo,” Oxford Bibliographies in Classics. DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780195389661-0272 .Google Scholar
Ebrey, D. 2017b. “The Asceticism of the Phaedo: Pleasure, Purification, and the Soul’s Proper Activity,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 99: 1–30.Google Scholar
Ebrey, D. 2017c. “Socrates on Why We Should Inquire,” Ancient Philosophy 37: 1–17.Google Scholar
Ebrey, D. 2023. Plato’s Phaedo: Forms, Death, and the Philosophical Life. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Echterling, T. 2018. “What Did Glaucon Draw?: a Diagrammatic Proof for Plato’s Divided Line,” Journal for the History of Philosophy 56: 1–15.Google Scholar
Edmonds, R. G. 2004. Myths of the Underworld Journey: Plato, Aristophanes, and the “Orphic” Gold Tablets. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edmonds, R. G. 2011. The “Orphic” Gold Tablets and Greek Religion: Further Along the Path. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edmonds, R. G. 2013. Redefining Ancient Orphism: a Study in Greek Religion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edmonds, R. G. 2017. “Alcibiades the Profane: Images of the Mysteries,” in Destrée and Giannopoulou 2017, 194–215.Google Scholar
El Murr, D. 2014. Savoir et Gouverner: Essai sur la Science Politique Platonicienne. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. 1989. “Plato and Poetry,” in Kennedy, G. A. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism (Cambridge University Press), 92–148.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. 1991. “Moral Fecundity: A Discussion of A.W. Price, Love and Friendship in Plato and Aristotle,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 9: 169–84.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. 1992. “Platonic Love,” in Kraut 1992, 248–76.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (ed.) 2007. Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic. (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Field, G. C. 1930. Plato and his Contemporaries. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Fine, G. 1978. “Knowledge and Belief in Republic V,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 60: 121–39.Google Scholar
Fine, G 1984. “Separation,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2: 31–87.Google Scholar
Fine, G 1986. “Imminence,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 4: 71–97.Google Scholar
Fine, G 1988. “Plato on Perception,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy supp. vol.: 15–28.Google Scholar
Fine, G 1990. “Knowledge and Belief in Republic V–VII,” in Everson, S. (ed.), Companions to Ancient Thought I: Epistemology (Cambridge University Press), 85–115.Google Scholar
Fine, G 1993. On Ideas: Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fine, G (ed.) 1999a. Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fine, G (ed.) 1999b. Plato 2: Ethics, Politics, Religion and the Soul. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fine, G 2004. “Knowledge and True Belief in the Meno,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 27: 41–81.Google Scholar
Fine, G 2007. “Enquiry and Discovery,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32: 331–67.Google Scholar
Fine, G 2008. “Does Socrates Claim to Know that He Knows Nothing?,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 35: 49–88.Google Scholar
Fine, G 2014. The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fine, G (ed.) 2019. Oxford Handbook of Plato, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, E. 2016. “Aisthēsis, Reason and Appetite in the Timaeus,” Phronesis 61: 397–434.Google Scholar
Foley, R. 2008. “Plato’s Undividable Line: Contradiction and Method in Republic VI,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 46: 1–23.Google Scholar
Forster, M. N. 2006. “Socrates’ Demand for Definitions,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 31: 1–47.Google Scholar
Forster, M. N. 2007. “Socrates’ Profession of Ignorance,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32: 1–35.Google Scholar
Fossheim, H. 2013. “The prooimia, Types of Motivation, and Moral Psychology,” in Horn, C (ed.), Plato: Gezetze/Nomoi (Munich: Akademie Verlag), 87–104.Google Scholar
Foster, M. B. 1937. “A Mistake of Plato’s in the Republic,” Mind 46: 386–93.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. 1999. The Mathematics of Plato’s Academy, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, D 2000. “Eudoxus: Parapegmata and Proportionality,” in Suppes et al. 2000, 33–48.Google Scholar
Frajese, A. 1963. “Platone e la matematica nel mondo antico,” Testi e Documenti 4: 59–218.Google Scholar
Frances, B. 1996. “Plato’s Response to the Third Man Argument in the Paradoxical Exercise of the Parmenides,” Ancient Philosophy 16: 47–64.Google Scholar
Franklin, L. 2001. “The Structure of Dialectic in the Meno,” Phronesis 26: 413–39.Google Scholar
Franklin, L. 2012. “Inventing Intermediates: Mathematical Discourse and Its Objects in Republic VII,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 50: 483–506.Google Scholar
Frede, D. 1978. “The Final Proof of the Immortality of the Soul in Plato’s Phaedo 102a–107a,” Phronesis 23: 27–41.Google Scholar
Frede, D 1993. Plato: Philebus. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Frede, D 1997. Platon: Philebos. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1967. Prädikation und Existenzaussage, Hypomnemata 18. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Frede, M 1980. “The Original Notion of Cause”, in Schofield, M. et al. (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism (Oxford University Press), 217–49.Google Scholar
Friberg, J. 2007. Amazing Traces of a Babylonian Origin in Greek Mathematics. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
Friedländer, P. 1964: Plato: The Dialogues, Vol. 2, trans. Meyerhoff, H.. New York: Bollingen Series.Google Scholar
Fronterotta, F. 2007. “Carone on the Mind–Body Problem in Late Plato,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89: 231–6.Google Scholar
Furley, D. 1976. “Anaxagoras in Response to Parmenides,” in R. Shiner and J. King-Farlow (eds.), New Essays in Plato and the Presocratics (Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2, suppl.), 61–85.Google Scholar
Furth, M. 1974. “Elements of Eleatic Ontology,” in Mourelatos, A. P. D. (ed.), The Presocratics (Garden City, NY: Doubleday), 241–70.Google Scholar
Gallop, D. 1975. Plato: Phaedo. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gazziero, L. 2014. “‘ἐὰν ὡσαύτως τῇ ψυχῇ ἐπὶ πάντα ἴδῃς’ (Platonis Parmenides, 132a1–132b2). Voir les Idées avec son âme et le ‘Troisième homme’ de Platon,” Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 32.Google Scholar
Geach, P. T. 1956. “The Third Man Again,” Philosophical Review 65: 72–82.Google Scholar
Geach, P. T. 1966. “Plato’s Euthyphro: An Analysis and Commentary,” Monist 50: 369–82.Google Scholar
Gentzler, J. 1994. “Recollection and ‘The Problem of the Socratic Elenchus’,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 10: 257–95.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. 2013. From Plato to Platonism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gifford, E. H. (ed.) 1905. Euthydemus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 2000. “The Body’s Fault? Plato’s Timaeus on Psychic Illness,” in Wright, M. R. (ed.), Reason and Necessity: Essays on Plato’s Timaeus (London: Duckworth), 58–84.Google Scholar
Gill, C 2006. “The Platonic Dialogue,” in L. Gill, M. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell), 136–50.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. 2012. Philosophos: Plato’s Missing Dialogue. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, F. 1996. “Propositions or Objects? A Critique of Gail Fine on Knowledge and Belief in Republic V,” Phronesis 41: 245–75.Google Scholar
Gosling, J. C. B. 1975. Plato: Philebus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gosling, J. C. B. and Taylor, C. C. W. 1982. The Greeks on Pleasure. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, J. 1955. The Development of Plato’s Ethics. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
Graf, F. 2004. “Trick or Treat? On Collective Epiphanies in Antiquity,” Illinois Classical Studies 29: 111–30.Google Scholar
Graf, F 2006. “Mysteries,” in Brill’s New Pauly (online).Google Scholar
Graf, F. and Johnston, S. I. 2013. Ritual Texts for the Afterlife: Orpheus and the Bacchic Gold Tablets. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. 2010. The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy, 2 vols. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grams, L. 2009. “Medical Theory in Plato’s Timaeus,” Rhizai 6 (2): 161–92.Google Scholar
Greene, W. C. 1920. “The Spirit of Comedy in Plato,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 31: 63–123.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 1999. “Sophocles and the Democratic City,” in Griffin, J (ed.), Sophocles Revisited (Oxford University Press), 73–94.Google Scholar
Grote, G. 1867. Plato and the Other Companions of Socrates, 2nd ed., 3 vols. London.Google Scholar
Grote, G. 1888. A History of Greece, 6th ed., 10 vols. London.Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A., 2002. Plato: Five Dialogues, rev. Cooper, J, 2nd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A. (trans.) and Reeve, C. D. C. (revised). 1992. Plato’s Republic. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Gulley, N. 1968. The Philosophy of Socrates. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1956. Plato: Protagoras and Meno. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1969. History of Greek Philosophy, Vols. 2–4. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1978. History of Greek Philosophy, Vol. 5. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hackforth, R. 1936. “Plato’s Theism,” Classical Quarterly 30: 4–9. Reprinted in R. E. Allen (ed.), Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics (London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1965), 439–47.Google Scholar
Hackforth, R. 1950. “Immortality in Plato’s Symposium,” The Classical Review 64: 43–5.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 2002. What is Ancient Philosophy? Trans. Michael Chase. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hahn, R. 1983. “A Note on Plato’s Divided Line,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 21: 235–7.Google Scholar
Halperin, D. M. 1990. One Hundred Years of Homosexuality and Other Essays on Greek Love. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harte, V. 2002. Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Harte, V. 2018. “Some ‘Value of Knowledge’ Problems in Plato’s Philebus,” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 92.1: 27–48.Google Scholar
Harte, V. 2019. “The Dialogue’s Finale: Philebus 64c–67b,” in Dimas, P., Jones, R., and Lear, G. (eds.), Plato’s Philebus (Oxford University Press), 253–68.Google Scholar
Harte, V. forthcoming. “Plato’s Butcher: Realism and Platonic Classification,” in Bronstein, D., Johansen, T., and Peramatzis, M. (eds.), Aristotelian Metaphysics, Ancient and Modern: Essays in honour of David Charles (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Haselberger, L. 1997. “Architectural Likenesses: Models and Plans of Architecture in Classical Antiquity,” Journal of Roman Archeology 10: 77–94.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. 1963. Preface to Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hawtrey, R. S. W. 1981. Commentary on Plato’s Euthydemus. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Heiberg, I. L. 1904. “Mathematisches zu Aristoteles,” Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 18: 1–49.Google Scholar
Heidel, W. A. (ed.) 1902. Plato’s Euthyphro. New York: American Book Co.Google Scholar
Hitz, Z. 2009. “Plato on the Sovereignty of Law,” in Balot, R. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought (Oxford: Blackwell), 367–81.Google Scholar
Hoerber, R. G. 1962. “Plato’s Lesser Hippias,” Phronesis 7: 121–31.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. 2011. The Greek World 479–323 BC, 4th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Howland, R. L. 1937. “The Attack on Isocrates in the Phaedrus,” Classical Quarterly 31: 551–9.Google Scholar
Høyrup, J. 2002. Lengths, Widths, Surfaces: a Portrait of Old Babylonian Algebra and Its Kin. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. 1999. “Limite et illimité chez les premiers philosophes grecs,” in Dixsaut, M. (ed.), La fêlure du plaisir: études sur le Philèbe de platon 2: contextes (Paris: Vrin), 11–31.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2004. Plato’s Symposium. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hussey, E. L. 1985. “Thucydidean History and Democritean Theory,” in Cartledge, P. and Harvey, F. D. (eds.), Crux: Essays Presented to G. E. M. de Ste Croix (London: Duckworth), 118–38.Google Scholar
Imhausen, A. 2016. Mathematics in Ancient Egypt: a Contextual History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ionescu, C. 2007. “The Transition from the Lower to the Higher Mysteries of Love in Plato’s Symposium,” Dialogue 46: 27–42.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1977. Plato’s Moral Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, T 1986. “Socrates the Epicurean?,” Illinois Classical Studies 11: 85–112. Reprinted in Benson 1992, 198–219.Google Scholar
Irwin, T 1989. Classical Thought. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, T 1995a. Plato’s Ethics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, T 1995b. “Plato’s Objections to the Sophists,” in Powell, A. (ed.), The Greek World (London: Routledge), 568–90.Google Scholar
Irwin, T 1999. “Plato’s Theory of Forms,” in Fine 1999a, 143–70.Google Scholar
Irwin, T 2005. “Was Socrates Against Democracy?,” in Kamtekar, R. (ed.), Plato’s Euthyphro, Apology, and Crito (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield), 127–49.Google Scholar
Irwin, T 2009. “The Inside Story of the Seventh Platonic Letter: a Sceptical Introduction,” Rhizai 6: 7–40.Google Scholar
Irwin, T 2010. “Morality as Law and Morality in the Laws,” in Bobonich 2010, 92–107.Google Scholar
Irwin, T 2019. “The Platonic Corpus,” in Fine 2019, 69–92.Google Scholar
Jackson, H. 1882. “On Plato’s Republic VI 506D sqq.,” Journal of Philology 10: 132–50.Google Scholar
Janell, G. 1901. “Quaestiones Platonicae,” Jahrbücher für classische Philologie, Supp. 26: 263–336.Google Scholar
Jebb, R. C. 1893. The Attic Orators, Vol. 1. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jenkins, M. 2016. “Plato’s Godlike Philosopher,” Classical Philology 111: 330–52.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2004. Plato’s Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus-Critias. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. M. 1957. Athenian Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jones, R. E. 2016. “Socrates’ Bleak View of the Human Condition,” Ancient Philosophy 36: 97–105.Google Scholar
Jones, R. and Sharma, R. 2017 . “The Wandering Hero of the Hippias Minor: Socrates on Virtue and Craft,” Classical Philology 112: 113–37.Google Scholar
Jones, R. and Sharma, R. 2020. “Xenophon’s Socrates on Justice and Well-being: Memorabilia iv 2,” Ancient Philosophy 40: 19–40.Google Scholar
Joseph, H. W. B. 1971. Essays in Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press.Google Scholar
Jowett, B. 1953. The Dialogues of Plato, Vol. 2, 4th ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Judson, L. 2019. “The Meno,” in Fine 2019, 161–82.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1979. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1981. “Some Philosophical Uses of ‘to be’ in Plato,” Phronesis 26: 105–34.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1987. “Plato’s Theory of Desire,” Review of Metaphysics 41: 77–103.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1996. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 2001. Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 2003. “On Platonic Chronology,” in Annas, J. and Rowe, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Plato, Modern and Ancient (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 93–128.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 2004. “A Return to the Theory of the Verb Be and the Concept of Being,” Ancient Philosophy 24: 381–405.Google Scholar
Kaluscha, W. 1904. “Zur Chronologie der platonischen Dialoge,” Weiner Studien 26: 190–204.Google Scholar
Kamtekar, R. 2016. “The Soul’s (After-)Life,” Ancient Philosophy 36: 115–32.Google Scholar
Kamtekar, R. 2017. Plato’s Moral Psychology: Intellectualism, the Divided Soul, and the Desire for the Good. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelsey, Sean. 2000. “Recollection in the Phaedo,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 16: 91–121.Google Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. 1981. The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keyt, D. 1992. Review of John Malcolm, Plato on the Self-Predication of Forms: Early and Middle Dialogues, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 1992.01.08, http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/1992/1992.01.08.html.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. 1990. “The Case of Homicide in Plato’s Euthyphro,” in Craik 1990, 213–21.Google Scholar
Kindt, J. 2012. Rethinking Greek Religion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. 1962. Songs of Homer. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M. 1983. The Presocratic Philosophers.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirwan, C. A. 1965. “Glaucon’s Challenge,” Phronesis 10: 162–73.Google Scholar
Klosko, G. 2006. The Development of Plato’s Political Theory, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knorr, W. R. 1975. The Evolution of the Euclidean Elements: a Study of the Theory of Incommensurable Magnitudes and its Significance for Early Greek Geometry. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Knorr, W. R. 1990. “Plato and Eudoxus on the Planetary Motions,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 21: 313–29.Google Scholar
Kosman, L. A. 1976. “Platonic Love,” in Werkmeister, W. H. (ed.), Facets of Plato’s Philosophy (Assen: Van Gorcum), 53–69.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. 1973a. “Egoism, Love and Political Office in Plato,” The Philosophical Review 82: 330–44.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. 1973b. “Reason and Justice in Plato’s Republic,” in Lee, E. N., Mourelatos, A. P. D., and Rorty, R. M. (eds.), Exegesis and Argument (Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum and Co.), 207–24.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. 1984. Socrates and the State. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. 1990. Review of Reeve 1988, Political Theory 18: 492–6.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. (ed.) 1992. The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. 1999. “Return to the Cave: Republic 519–521,” in Fine 1999b, 235–54.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. 2008. “Plato on Love,” in Fine, G. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Plato (Oxford University Press), 286–310.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. 2017. “Eudaimonism and Platonic Eros,” in Destrée and Giannopoulou 2017, 235–52.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
LaBarge, S. 2005. “Socrates and Moral Expertise,” in Rasmussen, Lisa (ed.), Ethics Expertise: History, Contemporary Perspectives, and Applications (Dordrecht: Springer), 15–38.Google Scholar
Lacey, A. R. 1971. “Our Knowledge of Socrates,” in Vlastos 1971, 22–49.Google Scholar
Laks, A. 1990. “Legislation and Demiurgy: On the Relationship Between Plato’s Republic and Laws,” Classical Antiquity 9: 209–29.Google Scholar
Laks, A. 2000. “The Laws,” in Rowe, C. and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge), 258–92.Google Scholar
Laks, A. forthcoming. Beyond the Republic: An Essay on Plato’s Laws. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Laks, A. and Most, G. W. 2016. Early Greek Philosophy, 9 vols. (Loeb Classical Library) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lane, M. 1998. Method and Politics in Plato’s “Statesman”. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lane, M. 2013. “Founding as Legislating: The Figure of the Lawgiver in Plato’s Republic,” in Nōtomi, N. and Brisson, L. (eds.), Dialogues on Plato’s Politeia (Republic): Selected papers from the ninth Symposium Platonicum (Sankt Augustin: Academia) (= International Plato Studies vol. 31), 104–13.Google Scholar
Lane, M. 2018. “Plato on the Value of Knowledge in Ruling”, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 92.1: 49–67.Google Scholar
Lang, M. and Crosby, M. 1964. Weights, Measures and Tokens. The Athenian Agora, vol. 10. Princeton, NJ: American School of Classical Studies at Athens.Google Scholar
Lasserre, F. 1987. De Léodamas de Thaso à Philippe d’Oponte: Témoignage et fragments. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Laum, B. 1928. Das alexandrinische Akzentuationssystem. Paderborn: Schöning.Google Scholar
Lautner, P. 2005. “The Timaeus on Sounds and Hearing and Some Implications for Plato’s General Account of Sense Perception,” Rhizai 2: 235–53.Google Scholar
Lautner, P. 2011. “Plato’s Account of Diseases of the Soul in Timaeus 86b1–87b9,” Apeiron 44: 22–39.Google Scholar
Lear, G. R. 2006. “Permanent Beauty and Becoming Happy in Plato’s Symposium,” in Lesher, Nails, and Sheffield 2006, 96–123.Google Scholar
Lear, G. R. 2011. “Mimesis and Psychological Change in Republic III,” in Destrée, P. and Herrmann, F.-G. (eds.), Plato and the Poets (Leiden: Brill), 195–216.Google Scholar
Ledger, G. R. 1989. Re-counting Plato. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, D. 2008. Plato: Timaeus and Critias, with introduction and annotations by T. Johansen. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Lefka, E. 2013. Tout est Plein de Dieux: Les Divinités Traditionnelles dans l’Oeuvre de Platon. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. 1981. New Essays on Human Understanding, tr. and ed. P. Remnant and J. Bennett. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. 1989. “Meditations on Knowledge, Truth, and Ideas,” in Philosophical Essays, trans. R. Ariew and D. Garber (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett), 23–7.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. 1987. “Socrates’ Disavowal of Knowledge,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 25: 275–88.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H., Nails, D. and Sheffield, F. C. C. (eds.) 2006. Plato’s Symposium: Issues in Interpretation and Reception. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. M. 1990. “The Political Background of Democritus,” in Craik 1990, 151–4.Google Scholar
Linforth, I. M. 1946. The Corybantic Rites in Plato. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1992. “The ‘Meno’ and the Mysteries of Mathematics,” Phronesis 37: 166–83.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1970. “Morals and Values in Homer,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 90: 121–39.Google Scholar
Lorenz, H. 2006. The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lutoslawski, W. 1897. The Origin and Growth of Plato’s Logic. London.Google Scholar
Mabbott, J. D. 1937. “Is Plato’s Republic Utilitarian?,” Mind 46: 468–74.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, M. M. 1981. Plato on Punishment. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Madigan, A., S.J. 1999. Aristotle: Metaphysics Books B and K 1–2. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, T. 2005. “Moral Virtue and Assimilation to God in Plato’s Timaeus,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 28: 77–91.Google Scholar
Mann, W. 2000. The Discovery of Things: Aristotle’s Categories and their Context. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marianetti, M. C. 1993. “Socratic Mystery‐Parody and the Issue of ἀσέβεια in Aristophanes’ Clouds,” Symbolae Osloenses 68: 5–31.Google Scholar
Mayhew, R. 2010. “The Theology of the Laws,” in Bobonich 2010, 197–216.Google Scholar
McCabe, M. M. 2009. “Escaping One’s Own Notice Knowing: Meno’s Paradox Again,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 19: 233–56. Reprinted in Platonic Conversations (Oxford University Press, 2015), 190–207.Google Scholar
McCoy, M. 2008. Plato on the Rhetoric of Philosophers and Sophists. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCready-Flora, I. 2018. “Affect and Sensation: Plato’s Embodied Cognition,” Phronesis 63: 117–47.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1983. “Falsehood and Not-being in Plato’s Sophist,” in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. (eds.), Language and Logos (Cambridge University Press), 115–34.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. N. 2010. An Image of the Soul in Speech: Plato and the Problem of Socrates. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
McPartland, K. 2013. “Socratic Ignorance and Types of Knowledge” in Bussanich and Smith (2013), 94–135.Google Scholar
McPherran, M. L. 1996. The Religion of Socrates. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
McPherran, M. L. 2006. “Medicine, Magic and Religion in Plato’s Symposium,” in Lesher, Nails, and Sheffield (2006), 71–95.Google Scholar
Meinwald, C. 1991. Plato’s Parmenides. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meinwald, C. 1998. “Prometheus’s Bounds: Peras and Apeiron in Plato’s Philebus,” in Gentzler, J. (ed.), Method in Ancient Philosophy (Oxford University Press), 165–80.Google Scholar
Meinwald, C. 2005. “Literary Elements and Dialogue Form in Plato’s Parmenides,” in Havlicek, A. and Karfik, F. (eds.), Plato’s Parmenides: Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium Platonicum Pragense (Prague), 9–20.Google Scholar
Meinwald, C. 2014a. “How Does Plato’s Exercise Work?,” Dialogue 53: 465–94.Google Scholar
Meinwald, C. 2014b. Review of M. L. Gill, Philosophos, Journal of Hellenic Studies 53: 288–9.Google Scholar
Meinwald, C. 2016. Plato. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mendell, H. 1984. “Two Geometrical Examples from Aristotle’s Metaphysics,” Classical Quarterly 34: 359–72.Google Scholar
Mendell, H 1998a. “Making Sense of Aristotelian Demonstration,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 16: 160–225.Google Scholar
Mendell, H 1998b. “Reflections on Eudoxus, Callippus and their Curves: Hippopedes and Callippopedes,” Centaurus 40: 177–275.Google Scholar
Mendell, H 2000. “The Trouble with Eudoxus,” in Suppes et al. 2000, 59–138.Google Scholar
Mendell, H 2008. “Plato by the Numbers,” in Føllesdal, D. and Woods, J. (eds.), Logos and Language: Essays in Honour of Julius Moravcsik (London: College Publications), 141–76.Google Scholar
Mendell, H 2018. “Why did the Greeks Develop Proportion Theory: a Conjecture,” in Sialaros, M. (ed.), Revolutions and Continuity in Greek Mathematics (Berlin: De Gruyter), 189–233.Google Scholar
Menn, S. 1995. Plato on Nous. Journal of the History of Philosophy Monograph Series.Google Scholar
Menn, S. 1998. “Collecting the Letters,” Phronesis 43.4: 291–305.Google Scholar
Menza, V. 1972. Poetry and the Technē Theory. PhD dissertation. Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Meyer, S. 2006. “Plato on the Law,” in Benson, H. (ed.), A Companion to Plato (Oxford: Blackwell), 373–87.Google Scholar
Mohr, R. and Sattler, B. (eds.) 2009. One Book, The Whole Universe: Plato’s Timaeus Today. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Moore, C. 2015. Socrates and Self-Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, C 2020. Calling Philosophers Names: On the Origin of a Discipline. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, J. M. E. 1972. “Reason and Eros in the ‘Ascent’-Passage of the Symposium,” in Anton, J. P. and Kustas, G. L. (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy (Albany, NY: SUNY Press), 285–302.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, J. M. E. 1978. “Learning as Recollection,” in Vlastos, G. (ed.), Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology (University of Notre Dame Press; orig. pub. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1971), 53–69.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, J. M. E. 1992. Plato and Platonism: Plato’s Conception of Appearance and Reality in Ontology, Epistemology, and Ethics, and its Modern Echoes. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, J. M. E. 2000. “Plato on Numbers and Mathematics,” in Suppes et al. 2000, 177–96.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. L. 1990. Platonic Piety. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, D. 2003. “Happiness, Rationality, and Egoism in Plato’s Socrates,” in Yu, Y. and Gracia, J. J. E. (eds.), Rationality and Happiness: From the Ancients to the Medievals (University of Rochester Press), 17–34.Google Scholar
Morrison, D (ed.) 2011. The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morrow, G. R. 1954. “The Demiurge in Politics,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association 27: 5–23.Google Scholar
Morrow, G. R. 1960. Plato’s Cretan City: a Historical Interpretation of the Laws. Princeton University Press. Reprinted 1993.Google Scholar
Morrow, G. R. 1962. Plato’s Epistles, 2nd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Moss, J. 2007. “What is Imitative Poetry and Why Is It Bad?,” in Ferrari, G. R. F. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic (Cambridge University Press), 415–44.Google Scholar
Moss, J 2012. “Soul-leading: The Unity of the Phaedrus, Again,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43: 1–23.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. 1980. “Plato’s ‘Real Astronomy’,” in Anton 1980, 33–73.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A 2016. “‘Limitless’ and ‘Limit’ in Xenophanes’ Cosmology and in His Doctrine of Epistemic ‘Construction’ (dokos),” Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 19: 16–37.Google Scholar
Mueller, I. 1980. “Astronomy and Harmonics in Republic VII,” in Anton 1980, 103–22.Google Scholar
Mueller, I. 1986. “On Some Academic Theories of Mathematical Objects,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 106: 111–20.Google Scholar
Mulhern, J. J. 1968. “Tropos and polytropia in Plato’s Hippias Minor,” Phoenix 22: 283–8.Google Scholar
Muniz, F. and Rudebusch, G. 2018. “Dividing Plato’s Kinds,” Phronesis 63.4: 392–407.Google Scholar
Murdoch, I. 1977. The Fire and the Sun. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, N. R. 1951. The Interpretation of Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1993. Early Greece, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, P. 1981. “Poetic Inspiration in Early Greece,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 101: 87–100.Google Scholar
Murray, P 1992. “Inspiration and Mimēsis in Plato,” Apeiron 25.4: 27–46.Google Scholar
Murray, P (ed.) 1996. Plato on Poetry. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mylonas, G. E. 1961. Eleusis and the Eleusinian Mysteries. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1974. “Linguistics and Epistemology,” in Harmon, G. (ed.), On Noam Chomsky: Critical Essays (Garden City, NJ: Anchor Books), 219–28.Google Scholar
Nails, D. 1995. Agora, Academy, and the Conduct of Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Nails, D 2002. The People of Plato: A Prosopography of Plato and Other Socratics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 1975a. “Plato on the Imperfection of the Sensible World,” American Philosophical Quarterly 12: 105–17.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 1975b. “Confusing Universals and Particulars in Plato’s Early Dialogues,” Review of Metaphysics 29: 287–306.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 1979. “Self-Predication and Plato’s Theory of Forms,” American Philosophical Quarterly 16: 93–103.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 1982. “Plato on Imitation and Poetry in Republic 10,” in Moravcsik, J. and Temko, P. (eds.), Plato on Beauty, Wisdom, and the Arts (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield), 296–323.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 1985. “Meno’s Paradox and Socrates as a Teacher,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 3: 1–30.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 1987. “Socratic Intellectualism,” in Cleary, J. J. (ed.), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, vol. 2 (Lanham, MD: University Press of America), 275–316.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 1990. “Eristic, Antilogic, Sophistic, Dialectic: Plato’s Demarcation of Philosophy from Sophistry,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 7: 3–16.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 1992. “What Did Socrates Teach and to Whom Did He Teach It?,” Review of Metaphysics 46: 279–306.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 2017. Only a Promise of Happiness: The Place of Beauty in a World of Art. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. and Woodruff, P. 1989. Plato: Symposium. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. and Woodruff, P. 1995. Plato: Phaedrus. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Nettleship, R. 1962. Lectures on the Republic of Plato, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Netz, R. 1999. The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: a Study in Cognitive History. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Netz, R 2010. “What did Greek Mathematicians Find Beautiful?,” Classical Philology 105: 426–44.Google Scholar
Neumann, H. 1965. “Diotima’s Concept of Love,” The American Journal of Philology 86.1: 33–59.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. 1995. Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. 1999. “Plato’s Lawcode in Context: Rule by Written Law in Athens and Magnesia,” Classical Quarterly 49: 100–22.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. 2004. Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in its Cultural Context. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. 2005. “The Philosopher at the Festival: Plato’s Transformation of Traditional Theoria,” in Elsner, J. and Rutherford, I. (eds.), Pilgrimage in Graeco-Roman and Early Christian Antiquity: Seeing the Gods (Oxford University Press), 151–82.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. 2017. “The Mortal Soul and Immortal Happiness,” in Destrée and Giannopoulou 2017, 142–59.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. 2018 . “Divine Epiphany and Pious Discourse in Plato’s Phaedrus,” Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics 26: 61–94.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. 2021. Philosophy and Religion in Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. 1967. “The Last Argument of Plato’s Phaedo. I,” Classical Quarterly 17: 189–231.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. 1968. “The Last Argument of Plato’s Phaedo. II,” Classical Quarterly 18: 95–106.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. 1997. “Perception et intelligence dans le Timêe,” in Calvo and Brisson 1997, 291–305.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M. J. 1984. “Becoming Immortal in Plato’s Symposium,” in Gerber, D. E. (ed.), Greek Poetry and Philosophy (Chico: Scholars Press), 185–205.Google Scholar
Obdrzalek, S. 2010. “Moral Transformation and the Love of Beauty in Plato’s Symposium,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 48.4: 415–44.Google Scholar
Obdrzalek, S. 2013. “Socrates on Love,” in Bussanich and Smith 2013, 210–32.Google Scholar
Ober, J. 1989. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1953. “The Place of the Timaeus in Plato’s Dialogues,” Classical Quarterly 47: 79–95.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1957. “A Proof in the Peri Ideôn,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 77: 103–11.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1965. “Aristotle on the Snares of Ontology,” in Bambrough, R. (ed.), New Essays on Plato and Aristotle (London: Routledge and Keegan Paul), 69–95.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1970. “Plato on Not-Being,” in Vlastos, G. (ed.), Plato 1 (Garden City, NY: Anchor), 223–67.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1986. Logic, Science and Dialectic, ed. Nussbaum, Martha. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Parker, R. 1983. Miasma. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, R. 1995. “Early Orphism,” in Powell, A. (ed.), The Greek World. London: Routledge, 483–510.Google Scholar
Parker, R. 1996. Athenian Religion: A History. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Parker, R. 2005. Polytheism and Society at Athens. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, R. A. 1972. Demotic Mathematical Papyri. Brown Egyptological Studies VII. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Partenie, C. (ed.) 2009. Plato’s Myths. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, R. 1985. Image and Reality in Plato’s Metaphysics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Peacock, H. 2017. “The Third Man and the Coherence of the Parmenides,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 52: 113–76.Google Scholar
Pelletier, J. and Zalta, E. 2000. “How to Say Goodbye to the Third Man,” Nous 34: 165–202.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 1997. “Conclusion,” in Pelling, C. B. R. (ed.), Greek Tragedy and the Historian (Oxford University Press), 213–36.Google Scholar
Penner, T. 1971. “Thought and Desire in Plato,” in G. Vlastos (ed.), Plato: A Collection of Critical Essays, vol. 2 (Garden City, NY: Anchor Books), 96–118.Google Scholar
Penner, T 1973a. “Socrates on Virtue and Motivation,” in Lee, E. N., Mourelatos, A. P. D., and Rorty, R. M. (eds.), Exegesis and Argument (Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum and Co.), 133–51.Google Scholar
Penner, T 1973b. “The Unity of Virtue,” Philosophical Review 82: 35–68. Reprinted in Benson 1992, 162–84.Google Scholar
Penner, T 1987. The Ascent from Nominalism. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Penner, T 2011. “Socratic Ethics and the Socratic Psychology of Action: A Philosophical Framework,” in Morrison 2011, 260–92.Google Scholar
Penner, T. and Rowe, C. 2005. Plato’s Lysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Sandra. 1973. “A Reasonable Self-Predication Premise for the Third Man Argument,” Philosophical Review 82: 451–70.Google Scholar
Peterson, Sandra 1996. “Plato’s Parmenides: A Principle of Interpretation and Seven Arguments,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34: 167–92.Google Scholar
Peterson, Sandra 2011. Socrates and Philosophy in the Dialogues of Plato. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Sandra 2017. “Notes on Lovers,” in Stavru, A. and Moore, C. (eds.), Socrates and the Socratic Dialogue (Leiden: Brill), 412–31.Google Scholar
Peterson, Sandra 2019. “Plato’s Parmenides: A Reconsideration of Forms,” in Fine 2019, 231–62.Google Scholar
Petridou, G. 2013. “‘Blessed is he, who has seen’: The Power of Ritual Viewing and Ritual Framing in Eleusis,” Helios 40: 309–41.Google Scholar
Petridou, G 2015. Divine Epiphany in Greek Literature and Culture. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pitteloud, L. 2019. “Why is the World Soul Composed of Being, Sameness, and Difference?,” in Pitteloud, L. and Keeling, E. (eds.), Psychology and Ontology in Plato (Philosophical Studies Series, Dordrecht: Springer), 85–108.Google Scholar
Platt, V. J. 2011. Facing the Gods: Epiphany and Representation in Graeco-Roman Art, Literature and Religion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plutarch, 1976. “De Animae Procreatione in Timaeo,” in Plutarch’s Moralia, vol. 13 pt. 1, trans. H. Cherniss (Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library).Google Scholar
Prauscello, L. 2014. Performing Citizenship in Plato’s Laws. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Price, A. W. 1989. Love and Friendship in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Price, A. W. 2017. “Generating in Beauty for the Sake of Immortality: Personal Love and the Goals of the Lover,” in Destrée and Giannopoulou 2017, 176–93.Google Scholar
Prince, B. D. 2014. “The Metaphysics of Bodily Health and Disease in Plato’s Timaeus,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (5): 908–28.Google Scholar
Prior, W. 1985. Unity and Development in Plato’s Metaphysics. LaSalle, IL: Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar
Prior, W 2019. Socrates. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Pritchard, P. 1995. Plato’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Sankt Augustin: Akademia Verlag.Google Scholar
Proclus, 1987. Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides, trans. Morrow, G. R. and Dillon, J. M.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Proclus, 2007. Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Vol. 1, ed. Tarrant, H.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Proclus, 2008a. Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Vol. 2, ed. D. Runia and M. Share. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Proclus, 2008b. Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Vol. 3, ed. D. Baltzly. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Proclus, 2009. Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Vol. 4, ed. Baltzly, D.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Proclus, 2016. Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Vol. 5, ed. Baltzly, D.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Proclus, 2017. Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Vol. 6, ed. Tarrant, H.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1975. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’,” in Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2 (Cambridge University Press), 215–71.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. 2009. “Aristophanes and the Socrates of the Phaedo,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 36: 107–36.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999. “Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical,” in Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, S. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 388–414.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 1988. Philosopher-Kings: The Argument of Plato’s Republic. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 1989. Socrates in the Apology: An Essay on Plato’s Apology of Socrates. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 1992. “Telling the Truth about Love: Plato’s Symposium,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 8: 89–114.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 2006. “Plato on Eros and Friendship,” in Benson, H. H., A Companion to Plato (Oxford: Blackwell), 294–307.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 2013. Blindness and Reorientation: Problems in Plato’s Republic. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, J. 2021. “Changing the Laws of the Laws,” Ancient Philosophy 41: 413–41.Google Scholar
Reshotko, N. 2006. Socratic Virtue: Making the Best of the Neither-Good-Nor-Bad. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rickless, S. 2007. Plato’s Forms in Transition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riedweg, C. 1987. Mysterienterminologie bei Platon, Philon und Klemens von Alexandrien. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rijksbaron, A. (ed.) 2007. Ion. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ritter, C. 1888. Untersuchungen über Platon. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ritter, C. 1910. Platon. Munich.Google Scholar
Ritter, C. 1935. “Unterabteilungen innerhalb der zeitlich ersten Gruppe platonischer Schriften,” Hermes 70: 1–30.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. 1988. “The Problem about Being in the Sophist,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 3: 229–43.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. 1953. Plato’s Earlier Dialectic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Robson, E. 2008. Mathematics in Ancient Iraq: a Social History. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Romilly, J. de. 1975. Magic and Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roochnik, D. 1996. Of Art and Wisdom: Plato’s Understanding of Techne. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1955. Aristotelis Fragmenta Selecta. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1986. Plato: Phaedrus. Oxford: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1993. Plato: Phaedo. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1995. Plato: Statesman. Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1998a. Plato: Symposium. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1998b. “Socrates and Diotima: Eros, Immortality and Creativity,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 14: 239–59.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 2000. “The Politicus and Other Dialogues,” in Rowe, C. and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought (Cambridge University Press), 233–357.Google Scholar
Rowett, C. 2018. Knowledge and Truth in Plato: Stepping Past the Shadow of Socrates. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rudebusch, G. 2009. Socrates. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rutherford, R. B. 1995. The Art of Plato. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. 1966. Plato’s Progress. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. 1976. “Many Things are Odd about our Meno,” Paideia 5: 1–9.Google Scholar
Sachs, D. 1963. “A Fallacy in Plato’s Republic,” Philosophical Review 72: 141–58.Google Scholar
Samaras, T. 2002. Plato on Democracy. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Santas, G. X. 1979. Socrates: Philosophy in Plato’s Early Dialogues. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Santas, G. X. 1983. “The Form of the Good in Plato’s Republic,” in, Anton, J. P. and Preus, A. (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Vol. 2 (Albany, NY: SUNY Press), 232–63.Google Scholar
Santas, G. X. 1988. Plato and Freud: Two Theories of Love. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Santas, G. X. 1989. “Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Form of the Good: Ethics without Metaphysics?,” Philosophical Papers 18: 137–60.Google Scholar
Santas, G. X. 2001. Goodness and Justice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sattler, B. M. 2013. “The Eleusinian Mysteries in Pre-platonic Thought: Metaphor, Practise and Imagery for Plato’s Symposium,” in Adluri, V. (ed.), Philosophy and Salvation in Greek Religion (Berlin: de Gruyter), 151–90.Google Scholar
Saunders, T. 1991. Plato’s Penal Code. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sayre, K. M. 1983. Plato’s Late Ontology: A Riddle Resolved. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sayre, K. M. 1996. Parmenides’ Lesson. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J. 2016. “The Metaphysics of Causation,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall ed.).Google Scholar
Schanz, M. 1886. “Zur Entwicklung des platonischen Stils,” Hermes 21: 439–59.Google Scholar
Schiefsky, M. J. 2005. Hippocrates: On Ancient Medicine: Translated with Introduction and Commentary. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2003. “The Presocratics,” in Sedley, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Philosophy (Cambridge University Press), 42–72.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2006. Plato: Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2019. “Plato in his Time and Place,” in Fine 2019, 41–68.Google Scholar
Schwab, W. 2015, “Explanation in the Epistemology of the Meno,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 48: 1–36.Google Scholar
Scott, D. 1995. Recollection and Experience. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, D. 2006. Plato’s Meno. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, D. 2011. “Plato, Poetry and Creativity,” in Destrée, P. and Herrmann, F.-G. (eds.), Plato and the Poets (Leiden: Brill), 131–54.Google Scholar
Scott, D. 2015. Levels of Argument: A Comparative Study of Plato’s Republic and Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, G. A. 2000. Plato’s Socrates as Educator. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Scott, G. A ed. 2002. Does Socrates Have a Method? Rethinking the Elenchus in Plato’s Dialogues and Beyond. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1998. “Platonic Causes,” Phronesis 43: 114–32.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1999a. “The Ideal of Godlikeness,” in Fine 1999b, 309–28.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1999b. “Parmenides and Melissus,” in Long, A. A. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy (Cambridge University Press), 113–33.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2003. Plato: Cratylus. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2004. The Midwife of Platonism: Text and Subtext in Plato’s Theaetetus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2007a. Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2007b. “Philosophy, the Forms, and the Art of Ruling,” in Ferrari, G. R. F. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic (Cambridge University Press), 256–83.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2007c. “Equal Sticks and Stones,” in Scott, D. (ed.), Maieusis: Essays in Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat (Oxford University Press), 68–86.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2009. “Three Kinds of Platonic Immortality,” in Frede, D. and Reis, B. (eds.), Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 147–61.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2016. “An Introduction to Plato’s Theory of Forms,” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 78: 3–22.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2018. “The Phaedo’s Final Proof of Immortality,” in Cornelli, G., Robinson, T., and Bravo, F. (eds.), Plato’s Phaedo: Select Papers from the Eleventh Symposium Platonicum (Baden Baden: Akademia Verlag), 210–20.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2019. “Plato’s Theology,” in Fine 2019, 627–44.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. and Long, A. 2010. Plato: Meno and Phaedo. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. 1955. “Vlastos and the Third Man,” Philosophical Review 64: 405–37.Google Scholar
Senn, S. J. 2013. “Ignorance or Irony in Plato’s Socrates?: A Look Beyond Avowals and Disavowals of Knowledge,” Plato Journal 13: 77–108.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 1985. Plato: Meno. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. C. 2011. “Socrates and the True Political Craft,” Classical Philology 106: 187–207.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. C 2015. Plato’s Anti-hedonism and the Protagoras. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sheffield, F. C. C. 2001. “Psychic Pregnancy and Platonic Epistemology,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 20: 1–33.Google Scholar
Sheffield, F. C. C. 2006. Plato’s Symposium: the Ethics of Desire. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sheffield, F. C. C. 2012. “The Symposium and Platonic Ethics: Plato, Vlastos, and a Misguided Debate,” Phronesis 57.2: 117–41.Google Scholar
Sheffield, F. C. C. 2017. “Eros and the Pursuit of Form,” in Destrée and Giannopoulou 2017, 125–41.Google Scholar
Shorey, P. 1890. “Plato. Republic 532B,” Classical Review 4: 480.Google Scholar
Shorey, P 1895. “The Idea of the Good in Plato’s Philosophy,” Studies in Classical Philology 1: 188–239.Google Scholar
Shorey, P 1903. The Unity of Plato’s Thought. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shorey, P 1927. “Ideas and Numbers Again.” Classical Philology 22: 213–18.Google Scholar
Shorey, P 1933. What Plato Said. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. 1905. Lectures on the Philosophy of Kant and Other Philosophical Lectures and Essays. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Siebeck, H. 1888. Untersuchungen zur Philosophie der Griechen. Halle.Google Scholar
Silverman, A. 2002. The Dialectic of Essence: A Study of Plato’s Metaphysics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Silverthorne, M. J. 1975. “Laws, Preambles and the Legislator in Plato,” Humanities Association Review 26: 10–20.Google Scholar
Singpurwalla, R. 2006. “Reasoning with the Irrational: Moral Psychology in the Protagoras,” Ancient Philosophy 26: 243–58.Google Scholar
Slings, S. R. (ed.) 2003. Platonis Rempublicam. Oxford Classical Texts. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, N. 1981. “The Objects of ‘Dianoia’ in Plato’s Divided Line,” Apeiron 15: 129–37.Google Scholar
Smith, N 2016. “Socrates on the Human Condition,” Ancient Philosophy 36: 81–95.Google Scholar
Smith, N 2018. “Aristotle on Socrates,” in Stavru, A. and Moore, C. (eds.), Socrates and the Socratic Dialogue (Leiden: Brill), 601–22.Google Scholar
Smith, N. D., and Woodruff, P. (eds.) 2000. Reason and Religion in Socratic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1975. Intellectual Experiments of the Greek Enlightenment. Princeton.Google Scholar
Sorensen, A. D. 2016. Plato on Democracy and Political Technē. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 1995. “Reading” Greek Death: To the End of the Classical Period. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C 2000. “What is Polis Religion?,” in Buxton, R. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Greek Religion. Oxford University Press, 13–37.Google Scholar
Southeast-European Association for Ancient Philosophy 2005. Rhizai: Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, Vol. 2, No. 2. Sofia, Bulgaria: East-West Publishers.Google Scholar
Sprague, R. K. 1962. Plato’s Use of Fallacy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stalley, R. F. 1983. An Introduction to Plato’s Laws. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Stalley, R. F. 1994. “Persuasion in Plato’s Laws,” History of Political Thought 15: 157–77.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. 1996. “For Love of a Statue: A Reading of Plato’s Symposium 215A–B,” Ramus 25: 89–111.Google Scholar
Stokes, M. 1992. “Socrates’ Mission,” in Gower, B. S. and Stokes, M. C. (eds.), Socratic Questions: New Essays on the Philosophy of Socrates and its Significance (London: Routledge), 26–81.Google Scholar
Stokes, M 1997. Plato: Apology. Oxford: Aris & Phillips.Google Scholar
Strang, C. 1963. “The Physical Theory of Anaxagoras,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 45: 101–18.Google Scholar
Strang, C. and Rees, D. A. 1963. “Plato and the Third Man,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 37: 147–76.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. 1952. Persecution and the Art of Writing. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Striker, G. 1970. Peras und Apeiron: Das Problem der Formen in Platons Philebos. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Striker, G. 1986. “Antipater, or the Art of Living,” in Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (eds.), The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics (Cambridge University Press), 185–204.Google Scholar
Strycker, E. de, and Slings, S. R. 1994. Plato’s Apology of Socrates: A Literary and Philosophical Study with a Running Commentary. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Suppes, P., Moravcsik, J., and Mendell, H. (eds.). 2000. Ancient and Medieval Traditions in the Exact Sciences: Essays in Memory of Wilbur Knorr. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Tait, W. W. 1986. “Plato’s Second Best Method,” Review of Metaphysics 39: 455–82.Google Scholar
Tait, W. W. 2002. “Noēsis: Plato on Exact Science,” in Malament, D. (ed.), Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics (Chicago, IL: Open Court), 11–31.Google Scholar
Tarán, L. 1981. Speusippus of Athens: A Critical Study with a Collection of the Related Texts and Commentary. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Tarán, L 1991. “Ideas, Numbers, and Magnitudes: Remarks on Plato, Speusippus, and Aristotle,” Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 9: 199–231.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. E. 1911. Varia Socratica. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. E. 1928. A Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. E. 1937. Plato, the Man and His Work. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. 1967. “Pleasure, Knowledge, and Sensation in Democritus,” Phronesis 12: 6–27.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. 1982. “The End of the Euthyphro,” Phronesis 27: 109–18.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. 1990. “Popular Morality and Unpopular Philosophy,” in Craik 1990, 233–43.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. 1998. Socrates. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. 1999. The Atomists. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. 2019. “Plato’s Epistemology,” in Fine 2019, 429–54.Google Scholar
Thakkar, J. 2018. Plato as Critical Theorist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thesleff, H. 1982. Studies in Platonic Chronology. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. S. 1901. Plato’s Meno. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. H. (ed.) 1868. Phaedrus. London.Google Scholar
Tor, S. 2017. Mortal and Divine in Early Greek Epistemology: a Study of Hesiod, Xenophanes, and Parmenides. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuozzo, T. M. 2011. Plato’s Charmides: Positive Elenchus in a “Socratic” Dialogue. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuozzo, T. M. 2018. “Appearing Equal at Phaedo 74b4–c6: an Epistemic Interpretation,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 54: 1–26.Google Scholar
Unguru, S. 2008. Review of Friberg 2007, Isis 99: 221–2.Google Scholar
Van Riel, G. 2013. Plato’s Gods. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Vasiliou, I. 2008. Aiming at Virtue in Plato. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. 1958. “Notes on Plato’s ‘Phaedo’,” Mnemosyne 11: 193–243.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1954. “The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides,” Philosophical Review 63: 319–49.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1956. Plato: Protagoras. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1965. “Anamnesis in the Meno,” Dialogue 4: 143–67.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1969. “Reasons and Causes in the Phaedo,” Philosophical Review 78: 291–325.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (ed.) 1971. The Philosophy of Socrates: A Collection of Critical Essays. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1975. Plato’s Universe. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1980. “Observation in Plato’s Astronomy,” in Anton 1980, 1–31.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1981. Platonic Studies, 2nd ed. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1983. “The Socratic Elenchus,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1: 27–58. Revised and expanded in Vlastos 1994, 1–37.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1985. “Socrates’ Disavowal of Knowledge,” Philosophical Quarterly 35: 1–31. Revised in Vlastos 1994, 39–66.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1988. “Elenchus and Mathematics: A Turning-Point in Plato’s Philosophical Development,” The American Journal of Philology 109(3): 362–96.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1991. Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1994. Socratic Studies, ed. Burnyeat, M. F.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1995. Studies in Greek Philosophy, vol. 1, ed. Graham, D. W.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. 1985. “The Problem of Greek Nationality,” in Selected Papers (Cambridge University Press), 1–19.Google Scholar
Wardy, R. 1986. The Birth of Rhetoric: Gorgias, Plato and their Successors. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wasmuth, E. 2015. “ΩΣΠΕΡ ΟΙ ΚΟΡYΒΑΝΤΙΩΝΤΕΣ: The Corybantic Rites in Plato’s Dialogues,” Classical Quarterly 65: 69–84.Google Scholar
Waterfield, R. 2008. Timaeus and Critias, with introduction and notes by Gregory, A.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waterfield, R. A. H. 1980. “The Place of the Philebus in Plato’s Dialogues,” Phronesis 25: 270–305.Google Scholar
Wedberg, A. 1955. Plato’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. 1981. “Ὁ Ἀγαθός as Ὁ Δυνατός in the Hippias Minor,” Classical Quarterly 31: 287–304.Google Scholar
Weiss, R 2001. Virtue in the Cave: Moral Inquiry in Plato’s Meno. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, R 2006. The Socratic Paradox and its Enemies. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Whewell, W. 1856. “Of the Intellectual Powers According to Plato,” Transactions of the Cambridge Philological Society, 598–604.Google Scholar
White, F. C. 1989a. “Love and Beauty in Plato’s Symposium,” The Journal of Hellenic Studies 109: 149–57.Google Scholar
White, F. C. 2004. “Virtue in Plato’s Symposium,” Classical Quarterly 54: 366–78.Google Scholar
White, N. P. 1979. A Companion to Plato’s Republic. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
White, N. P. 1984. “The Classification of Goods in Plato’s Republic,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 22: 393–421.Google Scholar
White, N. P. 1986. “The Ruler’s Choice,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 68: 34–41.Google Scholar
White, N. P. 1989b. “Happiness and External Contingencies in Plato’s Republic,” in Starr, W. C. and Taylor, R. C. (eds.), Moral Philosophy (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press), 1–21.Google Scholar
White, N. P. 1992. “Plato’s Metaphysical Epistemology,” in Kraut 1992, 277–310.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, Harvey. 2000. Arguments and Icons: Divergent Modes of Religiosity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. 1971. “Sentence Meaning, Negation, and Plato’s Problem of Not-being,” Vlastos, G. (ed.), Plato 1 (Garden City, NY: Anchor), 268–303.Google Scholar
Wilburn, J. 2013. “Moral Education and the Spirited Part of the Soul in Plato’s Laws,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 45: 63–102.Google Scholar
Wishart, D. and Leach, S. V. 1970. “A Multivariate Analysis of Platonic Prose Rhythm,” Computer Studies in the Humanities and Verbal Behavior 3: 90−9.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D. 2004. “Socrates’ Avowals of Knowledge,” Phronesis 49: 75–142.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D 2008. Trials of Reason: Plato and the Crafting of Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D 2013. “Socratic Philosophizing,” in Bussanich and Smith 2013, 34–67.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. 1982. “What Could Go Wrong with Inspiration? Why Plato’s Poets Fail,” in Moravcsik, J. and Temko, P. (eds.), Plato on Beauty, Wisdom, and the Arts (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield), 137–50.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. 1990. “Plato’s Early Theory of Knowledge,” in Everson, S. (ed.), Companions to Ancient Thought 1: Epistemology (Cambridge University Press), 60–84. Reprinted in Benson 1992, 86–106.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (ed.) 2000. Reason and Necessity: Essays on Plato’s Timaeus. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Yunis, H. 2011. Plato: Phaedrus. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zeyl, D. 1982. “Socratic Virtue and Happiness,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 64: 225–38.Google Scholar
Zeyl, D 2000. Plato: Timaeus. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Ziff, P. 1960. Semantic Analysis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Zuntz, G. 1971. Persephone: Three Essays on Religion and Thought in Magna Graecia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by David Ebrey, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Richard Kraut, Northwestern University, Illinois
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Plato
  • Online publication: 21 July 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108557795.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by David Ebrey, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Richard Kraut, Northwestern University, Illinois
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Plato
  • Online publication: 21 July 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108557795.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by David Ebrey, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Richard Kraut, Northwestern University, Illinois
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Plato
  • Online publication: 21 July 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108557795.019
Available formats
×