Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:44:20.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2022

Edited by
Knud Haakonssen  and
Ian Hunter
Knud Haakonssen
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Ian Hunter
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Pufendorf , pp. 386 - 413
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Alberti, Valentin. Compendium juris naturae, orthodoxae theologiae conformatum. Leipzig, 1676.Google Scholar
Alberti, Valentin. Eros Lipsicus. Leipzig, 1687.Google Scholar
Althusius, Johannes. Politica methodice digesta [1605], 3rd ed. n.p., 1614.Google Scholar
Amyraldus (Amyraut), Moses. Brief traité de la predestination. Saumur, 1634.Google Scholar
Arnisaeus, Henning. De republica; seu relectionis politicae libri duo. Frankfurt am Main, 1615.Google Scholar
Barbeyrac, Jean. ‘An historical and critical account of the science of morality’, preface to Pufendorf, Of the Law of Nature and Nations. Eight Books (see above).Google Scholar
Barbeyrac, Jean. Jugement d’un Anonyme [Leibniz] sur l’original de cet abrégé avec des reflexions du traducteur, in appendix to Samuel Pufendorf, Les devoirs de l’homme et du citoyen, trans. J. Barbeyrac. Amsterdam, 1718. English translation: ‘The judgment of an anonymous writer on the original of this abridgment’, in Pufendorf, The Whole Duty of Man, According to the Law of Nature, trans. Andrew Tooke (1691), ed. Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David, [with] Two Discourses and a Commentary by Jean Barbeyrac, trans. David Saunders. Indianapolis, IN, 2003, 267–305.Google Scholar
Becman, Johann Christoph. Meditationes politicae XXIV [1672]. Frankfurt a. d. Oder, 1674.Google Scholar
[Beck, Christian August]. Recht und Verfassung des Reiches in der Zeit Maria Theresias. Die Vorträge zum Unterricht des Erzherzogs Joseph im Natur- und Völkerrecht sowie im Deutschen Staats- und Lehnrecht, ed. Conrad, Hermann et al. Cologne and Opladen, 1964.Google Scholar
[Beckmann, Nikolaus, and Schwartz, Josua]. Index quarandum novitatum quas Dominus Samuel Puffendorff libro suo De jure naturae et gentium, contra orthodoxa fundamenta Londini edidit. Lund, 1673.Google Scholar
Besold, Christoph. Dissertatio politico-juridica de politica maiestate. Tübingen, 1625.Google Scholar
Bibliotheca Barbeyraciana, sive catalogus exquisitissimæ supellectilis librariæ, qua usus est vir præclarus, atque omni doctrina perpolitus J. Barbeyracius Jctus … Groningen, 1744.Google Scholar
Boecler, Johann Heinrich. In Hugonis Grotii Jus belli et pacis, ad Illustrissimum Baronem Boineburgium commentatio. Straßburg, 1663.Google Scholar
Boecler, Johann Heinrich. In Hugonis Grotii Juris belli et pacis Lib. II cap. priora VII. Ad Illustrissimum Baronem Boineburgium commentatio. Straßburg, 1664.Google Scholar
Boecler, Johann Heinrich. Historia belli Danici, Annis MDCXLIII, MDCXLIV, MDCXLV gesti. Stockholm, 1676 (reprinted Strasburg 1679 as Historia belli Sveco-Danici).Google Scholar
Budde(us), Johann Franz. Historia juris naturalis aucta et ad hanc aetatem usque continuata. Halle, 1717.Google Scholar
Budde(us), Johann Franz. Institutiones Theologiae dogmaticae [1723], in Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 7.1, ed. Friedrike, Nüssel. Hildesheim and New York, 1999.Google Scholar
Budde(us), Johann Franz. Isagoge historico-theologica ad theologiam universam singulasque eius partes [1727, ²1730] in Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 8, ed. Hell, Leonhard. Hildesheim, New York, 1999.Google Scholar
Calixt, Georg. Epitomes theologiae moralis […]. Helmstedt, 1634, ²1662.Google Scholar
Calixt, Georg. De tolerantia Reformatorum circa quaestiones inter ipsos et Augustanam Confessionem professos controversas consultatio. Helmstedt, 1658.Google Scholar
Calixt, Georg. Werke in Auswahl, ed. Mager, Inge. 5 vols. Göttingen 1970–82.Google Scholar
Carmichael, Gershom. Natural Rights on the Threshold of the Scottish Enlightenment. The Writings of Gershom Carmichael, ed. and trans. Moore, James and Silverthorne, Michael. Indianapolis, IN, 2002.Google Scholar
Chemnitz, Bogislaw Philipp von. Königlichen Schwedischen in Teutschland geführten Krieg erster Theil. Stettin, 1648.Google Scholar
Chemnitz, Bogislaw Philipp von. Königlichen Schwedischen in Teutschland geführten Krieg zweiter Theil. Stockholm, 1653.Google Scholar
Cocceji, Samuel / Cocceji, Heinrich, Disputatio juridica inauguralis de principio juris naturalis unico, vero, et adaequato. Frankfurt a. d. Oder [1699], 1712.Google Scholar
[Cocceji, Samuel]. The Frederician Code; Or, A Body of Law for the Dominions of the King of Prussia. Founded on Reason, and the Constitutions of the Country, trans. anon, 2 vols. Edinburgh, 1761.Google Scholar
Cocceji, Samuel. Justitiae naturalis, et Romanae novum systema in quo praemisso principio generali omnia justitiae naturalis praecepta complectente, demonstrantur [1740], in Samuel Cocceji, Introductio Ad Henrici L. B. De Cocceii Grotium illustratum; Continens dissertationes prooemiales XII. Halle, 1748, 227–510.Google Scholar
Coccejus, Johannes. Summa doctrinae de foedere et testamento Dei. Leiden, 1654. Frankfurt am Main, ²1689.Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann. De pace perpetua Protestantibus danda consultatio catholica [anon. 1648]. Helmstedt, 1657.Google Scholar
Dürr, Johann Conrad. Enchiridion theologiae moralis, in quo virtutes et officia hominis Christiani tum in genere tum in certis vitae statibus considerati explicantur. Nuremberg, 1662.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. De sarcenda ecclesiae concordia deque sedandis opinionibus dissidiis. Basel, 1534.Google Scholar
Forcellini, Aegidio. Lexicon totius Latinitatis [1688–1768], ed. Furlanetto, Joseph and updated by Corradini, Francisco and Perin, Joseph, 5 vols. Padua, 1940. Online at www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/25_90_1688-1768-_Forcellini_Aeg.html (accessed 4 May 2022).Google Scholar
Frederick the Great. Mémoires pour servis à l’histoire de maison de Brandenbourg. Berlin, 1751.Google Scholar
Gerhard, Johann. Centuria quaestionum politicarum, Coronis: An diversae religiones in bene constituta Respublica tolerandae? Jena, 1608.Google Scholar
Glafey, Adam Friedrich. Vollständige Geschichte des Rechts der Vernunft … nebst einer Bibliotheca Juris Naturae et Gentium [1739]. Aalen, 1962.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. The Rights of War and Peace [1625], ed. Tuck, Richard. Indianapolis, IN, 2005.Google Scholar
Gundling, Nicolaus Hieronymus. ‘Preliminär-Discours’, in Erläuterung über Samuelis Pufendorfii zwey Bücher De officio hominis & civis secundum legem naturalem, aus dessen Academischen Discoursen …, ed. Ayrmann, Christoph Friedrich. Hamburg, 1744.Google Scholar
Heineccius, Johann Gottlieb. A Methodical System of Universal Law: Or, The Laws of Nature and Nations, trans. George Turnbull [1741]. Indianapolis, IN, 2008.Google Scholar
Heineccius, Johann Gottlieb. Praelectiones academicae in Hugonis Grotii De Ivre Belli Et Pacis Libros III. Berlin, 1744.Google Scholar
Hertius, Joannis Nicolai. ‘Benevolo Lectori’, in Samuel Pufendorf, De jure naturae et gentium libri octo, cum annotatis Joannis Nicolai Hertii, editio nova. Frankfurt am Main, 1706.Google Scholar
Heumann, Christoph August. Acta philosophorum, das ist gründliche Nachrichten aus dem Historia philosophica. Halle, 1715–26.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard. Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, 3 vols., ed. Malcolm, Noel. Oxford, 2012.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, Richard, trans. Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar
Holberg, Ludvig. Introduktion til naturens og folkerettens kundskab. Uddraget af de fornemste juristers, besynderlig Grotii, Pufendorfs og Thomasii skrifter … [1716], introd. Haakonssen, Knud. Copenhagen, 2018.Google Scholar
Horn, Johann Friedrich. Politicorum pars architectonica de civitate. Utrecht, 1664.Google Scholar
Hufeland, Gottlieb. Versuch über den Grundsatz des Naturrechts. Leipzig, 1785.Google Scholar
Hülsemann, Johannes. Calvinismus irreconciliabilis. Seu delineatio caussarum, earumque applicatio ad Calvinismum propter quas Josephus Hallus, Exoniensis Episcopus Papismum censuit esse irreconciliabilem. Wittenberg, 1641, ³1667.Google Scholar
Hülsemann, Johannes. Extensio breviarii theologici, exhibentis praecipuas et recentiores Christianae fidei controversias. Leipzig, 1648, Heilbronn, 51667.Google Scholar
Hunnius, Nikolaus. [Diaskepsis] theologica de fundamentali dissensu doctrinae Evangelicae-Lutheranae, et Calvinianae. Wittenberg, 1626, ²1663.Google Scholar
Hunnius, Nikolaus. Epitome credendorum, oder Kurtzer Inhalt dessen, was ein Christ von göttlichen und geistlichen Dingen zu wissen und zu gleuben bedürftig. Frankfurt am Main and Leipzig, 1625.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. An Inquiry into the Original of our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue in Two Treatises [1725], ed. Leidhold, Wolfgang. Indianapolis, IN, ²2008.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. A System of Moral Philosophy [1755], ed. Haakonssen, Knud and Maurer, Christian. Indianapolis, IN, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Index librorum prohibitorum 1600–1966 (Index de livres interdits, vol. XI), ed. de Bujanda, J. M.. Montréal, 2002.Google Scholar
Jablonski, Daniel Ernst. Kurtze Vorstellung der Einigkeit und des Unterscheids im Glauben beyder Evangelischen so genandten Lutherischen und Reformirten Kirchen. Berlin, 1697.Google Scholar
Jablonski, Daniel Ernst. De decreto absoluto. [Berlin], 1698.Google Scholar
Jurieu, Pierre. De pace inter Protestantes ineunda consultatio. Utrecht, 1688.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. ‘Idea for a universal history with a cosmopolitan aim’ [1784], in Anthropology, History, and Education, in the Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, ed. and trans. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B.. Cambridge, 2007, 107–20.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. ‘Towards perpetual peace’ [1795], in Immanuel Kant, Practical Philosophy, ed. and trans. Gregor, M. J.. Cambridge, 1996, 311–52.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Hermann. Respublica ad disputationis aciem methodice revocata (1608). Marburg, ²1614.Google Scholar
Klinger, Gottfried, see Rolleti, Johannis.Google Scholar
König, Johann Friedrich. Theologia positiva acroamatica, synoptice tractata […]. [1664; 141719], ed. Stegmann, Andreas. Tübingen, 2006.Google Scholar
Lange, Joachim. Lebenslauf […] von ihm selbst verfaßet. Halle and Leipzig, 1744.Google Scholar
Lauremberg, Johannes. Graecia antiqua, ed. Pufendorf, Samuel. Amsterdam, 1660.Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean. Review of Pufendorf, Jus feciale divinum, in: Bibliothèque Choisie (1705): 391–401.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. ‘Epistola ad Amicum super exercitationes posthumas Samuelis Pufendorfii De consensu et dissensu Protestantium’, in Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, IV.6. Berlin, 2008, 326–35.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Essais de théodicée sur la bonté de Dieu, la liberté de l’homme et l’origine du mal. Amsterdam, 1710.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. ‘Meditation on the common concept of justice’ [c. 1702–3], in The Political Writings of Leibniz, ed. and trans. Patrick Riley (Cambridge, 1972), 45–64.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. ‘Monita quaedam ad principia Pufendorfiani operis De officio hominis et civis’, in Opera omnia, 6 vols., ed. Dutens, Ludovici. Geneva, 1768, vol. IV.3, 275–83.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. ‘Neue Methode Jurisprudenz zu lernen und zu lehren’ [1667], in Frühe Schriften zum Naturrecht, ed. and trans. Busche, Hubertus. Hamburg, 2003.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. ‘Opinion on the principles of Pufendorf’ [1706], in The Political Writings of Leibniz, ed. and trans. Patrick Riley (Cambridge, 1972), 65–75.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. The Political Writings of Leibniz, ed. and trans. Riley, Patrick. Cambridge, 2 1988.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, (Akademie Ausgabe), I.4. Berlin, Leipzig, 1990.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. ‘Sur Thomasius, Utrum hæresis sit crimen’ [c. 1698], in G. W. Leibniz: Textes Inédits, 2 vols., ed. Grua, Gaston. Paris, 1948, 210–12.Google Scholar
Lessing, Theophil. Disputatio de religionum tolerantia [1669], Lat./Ger., ed. Gawlick, Günter. Göttingen, 1991.Google Scholar
Loccenius, Johannes. Historiæ rerum Svecicarum, A primo rege Sveciæ usque ad Caroli Gustavi Regis Sveciæ obitum deductæ, libri novem. Uppsala, 1662.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government [1690], ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge, 1988, 2 2000.Google Scholar
Ludovici, Jacob Friedrich. Delineatio historiae juris divini naturalis et positivi universalis. Halle, 1701.Google Scholar
Mascovius, Gottfridus. ‘Lectori Benevolo’, in Samuel Pufendorf, De jure naturae et gentium libri octo …, ed. Gottfridus Mascovius, 2 vols. Frankfurt & Leipzig, 1744, vol. I, i–xx.Google Scholar
Meijer, Ludwig. Philosophia S. Scripturae interpres. 1666.Google Scholar
Meisner, Balthasar. [Anthropologias] sacrae, in qua status naturae humanae, et eo spectantes articuli exponuntur, Decas prima [secunda, tertia]. Wittenberg, 1619, ³1663.Google Scholar
Meisner, Balthasar. Dissertatio de legibus, in quattuor libellos distributa. Wittenberg, 1616.Google Scholar
Meisner, Balthasar. Philosophia sobria, hoc est pia consideratio quaestionum philosophicarum in controversiis theologicis, quas Calviniani moverunt Orthodoxis, subinde occurentium. Pars prima. Wittenberg 1611, 71655; Secunda pars […] in controversiis Papisticis […]. Wittenberg 1613, 101655; Tertia pars […]. Wittenberg, 1623, 41655.Google Scholar
Meursius, Johannes. Ceramicus geminus, sive de ceramici Atheniensium utriusque antiquitatibus, liber singularis, ed. Pufendorf, Samuel. Utrecht, 1663.Google Scholar
Meursius, Johannes. Miscellanea Laconica, sive variarum antiquitatum Laconicarum libri IV, ed. Pufendorf, Samuel. Amsterdam, 1661.Google Scholar
Molanus, Gerhard Wolter and Hermann Barckhausen. Methodus reducendae unionis ecclesiasticae inter Romanenses et Protestantes [1682], in Commercium litterarium clarorum virorum. Braunschweig, 1737–8, vol. 2, 327–42.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, , de Secondat, Charles-Louis, la Brède, Baron de et de, Meine Reisen in Deutschland 1728–1729, ed. and intr. Jürgen Overhoff, trans. Hans W. Schumacher, postscript by Vanessa de Senarclens. Stuttgart, 2014.Google Scholar
Musaeus, Johannes. Introductio in theologiam, qua de natura theologiae naturalis, et revelatae, itemque de theologiae revelatae principio cognoscendi primo, Scriptura Sacra, agitatur. Jena, 1679.Google Scholar
Neumann, J. F. W. Bibliotheca iuris Imperantium quadripartita. Nuremberg, 1727.Google Scholar
Pareus, David. Irenicum sive de unione et synodo Evangelicorum concilianda liber votivus, paci Ecclesiae et desideriis pacificorum dicatus. Heidelberg, 1614.Google Scholar
Pictet, Benedict. De consensu ac dissensu inter Reformatos, et Augustanae confessionis fratres, dissertatio. Amsterdam, 1697.Google Scholar
Rachel, Samuel. De jure naturae et gentium dissertationes [1676], ed. Bar, Carl Ludwig, trans. Bate, John Pawley, 2 vols. Washington, DC, 1916.Google Scholar
Rechenberg, Adam. Lineamenta philosophiae civilis. Leipzig, 1693.Google Scholar
Rolleti, Johannis [pseudonym for Gottfried Klinger]. Discussio Calumniarum quas Absurdissimas de Illustri Viro Samuele Pufendorfio, Relegatus e Suecia nequam Nicolaus Beckmannus … non ita pridem in vulgus sparsit. Mannheim, 1677.Google Scholar
Rolleti, Johannis. Scarenschmidus vapulans. Stralsund, 1678.Google Scholar
Rosenkrantz, Gunde. Dissertatio juridico-politica de Legato-Suecico durante obsidione Hafniensi a Rege Daniæ jure detento. n.p., 1659.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Second Discourse, in The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, ed. Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge, 1997, 111–222.Google Scholar
Rojas y Spinola, Cristoforo. Regulae circa Christianorum omnium ecclesiasticam reunionem, in Publicorum negotiorum sylloge, ed. Lünig, J. C.. Frankfurt am Main and Leipzig, 1694, 1092–1124.Google Scholar
Schmauss, Johann Jacob. Neues Systema des Rechts der Natur. Göttingen, 1754.Google Scholar
Schurzfleisch, K. S. Epistolae arcanae. Halle, 1711.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Josua. Dissertatio epistolica ad eximium unum juvencum Severinum Wildschyssium. Schleswig [for Leipzig], 1688.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Josua. under pseudonym of Severinus Wildschütz, Discussio calumniarum Samuelis Pufendorfii. Slesvig, 1687.Google Scholar
[Schwartz, J. and Beckmann, N.], Index quarundam novitatum quas Dominus Samuel Pufendorff libro suo De Iure Naturae et Gentium contra orthodoxa fundamenta Londini edidit. Giessen, 1673.Google Scholar
Selden, John. De iure naturali et gentium, iuxta disciplinam Ebraeorum, libri septem. London, 1640.Google Scholar
Spener, Philipp Jakob. Schriften. Korrespondenz, ed. Beyreuther, Erich and Dietrich, Blaufuß. 16 vols. Hildesheim, 1979–2010:Google Scholar
‘Die Evangelische Glaubens-Lehre, …’ [1688], Vol. III.1. Ed. Beyreuther, Erich, Hildesheim, 1986.Google Scholar
‘Unmaßgebliche gedancken’ [1702], vol. XV/1 (1), pp. 286–95. Ed. Dietrich, Blaufuß. Hildesheim, 1987.Google Scholar
Spinola, see Rojas y Spinola, CristoforoGoogle Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict de. Theological-Political Treatise, in The Collected Works of Spinoza, 2 vols., ed. and trans. Edwin Curley. Princeton, NJ, 1985–2016, vol. II, 43–354.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict de. Tractatus theologico-politicus. Amsterdam, 1670.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco. Disputationes metaphysicae (1866), 2 vols. Hildesheim, 1998.Google Scholar
Svenska riksrådets protokoll. X. 1643, 1644, ed. Bergh, Severin. Stockholm, 1905.Google Scholar
Svenska riksrådets protokoll. XVI. 1654–1656, ed. Sondén, Per. Stockholm, 1923.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Christian. Dreyfache Rettung des Rechts Evangelischer Fürsten in Kirchen-Sachen [… ed. Gottfried Zeidler]. Frankfurt am Main, 1701.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Christian. Einleitung zur Hoff-Philosophie, oder, kurtzer Entwurff und die ersten Linien von der Klugheit zu Bedencken und vernünfftig zu schliessen, trans. P. D. Berlin & Leipzig, 1712.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Christian. ‘Von der Historie des Rechts der Natur bis auf Grotius’, Vorrede in Hugo Grotius, Vom Recht des Krieges und des Friedens. Halle, 1707.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Christian. Institutiones iurisprudentiae divinae. Frankfurt and Leipzig, 1688.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Christian. Institutes of Divine Jurisprudence with Selections from Foundations of the Law of Nature and Nations, ed. and trans. Thomas Ahnert. Indianapolis, IN, 2011.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Christian. Introductio ad philosophiam aulicam, seu lineae primae libri de prudentia cogitandi et ratiocinandi (1688). Halle, Magdeburg, 1702.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Christian. Paulo plenior historia iuris naturalis. [1719], Tübingen, 1972.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Christian. Vollständige Erläuterung der Kirchen-Rechts-Gelahrtheit, Oder Gründliche Abhandlung vom Verhältniß der Religion gegen den Staat, Ueber Samuelis Puffendorffii Tract. de Habitu Religionis Christianae ad vitam civilem. Frankfurt and Leipzig, 1740.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Jacob. Disputatio politica de patria potestate. s.l. [Leipzig], 1673.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Jacob. Erotemata metaphysica pro incipientibus (1670). 2nd ed. Leipzig, 1678.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de. The Law of Nations, or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, with Three Early Essays on the Origin and Nature of Natural Law and on Luxury, eds. Kapossy, Bela and Whatmore, Richard, trans. Thomas Nugent and T. J. Hochstrasser. Indianapolis, IN, 2008.Google Scholar
Weigel, Erhard. Analysis Aristotelica ex Euclide restituta [1658], ed. Thomas Behme. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, 2008.Google Scholar
Weigel, Erhard. Arithmetische Beschreibung der Moral-Weißheit von Personen und Sachen. [1674], ed. Behme, Thomas. Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt, 2008.Google Scholar
Wildschütz, Severinus, see [Schwartz, Josua].Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. Jus naturae methodo scientifica pertractatum, 8 vols. Leipzig, 1740–8.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. The Law of Nations treated according to the Scientific Method, trans. Joseph Horace Drake (rev. Thomas Ahnert), ed. Ahnert, Thomas. Indianapolis, IN, 2017.Google Scholar
Ahnert, Thomas. ‘Problematische Bindugswirkung: Zum “Epikureismus” im Naturrecht der deutschen Frühaufkläring’, in Das Naturrecht der Geselligkeit. Anthropologie, Recht und Politik im 18. Jahrhundert, ed. Fiorillo, Vanda and Grunert, Frank. Berlin, 2009, 39–54.Google Scholar
Ahnert, Thomas. ‘Samuel Pufendorf and religious intolerance in the early Enlightenment’, in Natural Law and Toleration in the Early Enlightenment, ed. Parkin, Jon and Stanton, Tim. Oxford, 2013, 15–33.Google Scholar
Ahnert, Thomas. Religion and the Origins of the German Enlightenment: Faith and the Reform of Learning in the Thought of Christian Thomasius. Rochester, NY, 2006.Google Scholar
Albrecht, Michael. Eklektik. Eine Begriffsgeschichte mit Hinweis auf die Philosophie- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Leipzig and Munich, 1994.Google Scholar
Aretin, Karl Otmar von. ‘Das Reich, eine Föderation?’, in Faszinierende Frühneuzeit. Reich, Frieden, Kultur und Kommunikation 1500–1800. Festschrift für Johannes Burkhardt zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. Weber, Wolfgang E. J. and Dauser, Regina. Berlin, 2008, 15–26.Google Scholar
Behme, Thomas. ‘Einleitung’, in Erhard Weigel, Analysis Aristotelica ex Euclide restituta, ed. Behme, Thomas. Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt, 2008, ix–lxv.Google Scholar
Behme, Thomas. ‘Einleitung’, in Erhard Weigel: Arithmetische Beschreibung der Moral-Weißheit von Personen und Sachen, ed. Behme, Thomas. Stuttgart–Bad Canstatt, 2008, vii–xxviii.Google Scholar
Behme, Thomas. ‘Die fictio contrarii als methodisches Werkzeug in Pufendorfs Naturrechtslehre’, in Begriffe, Metaphern und Imaginationen in Philosophie und Wissenschaftsgeschichte, ed. Danneberg, L., Spoerhase, C. and Werle, D.. Wiesbaden, 2009, 266–86.Google Scholar
Behme, Thomas. ‘Introduction’, in Samuel Pufendorf, Two Books of the Elements of Universal Jurisprudence, ed. Thomas Behme, trans. William Abbott Oldfather, rev. Thomas Behme. Indianapolis, IN, 2009, ix–xvii.Google Scholar
Behme, Thomas. ‘Samuel Pufendorf als Weigel-Schüler’, in Erhard Weigel (1625–1699) und seine Schüler, ed. Habermann, Katharina and Herbst, Klaus-Dieter. Göttingen, 2016, 85–112.Google Scholar
Behme, Thomas. Samuel von Pufendorf: Naturrecht und Staat. Eine Analyse und Interpretation seiner Theorie, ihrer Grundlagen und Probleme. Göttingen, 1995.Google Scholar
Behrendt, Walter. Lehr-, Wehr- und Nährstand. Haustafelliteratur und Dreiständelehre im 16. Jahrhundert. Berlin, 2009.Google Scholar
Betz, Hans D., Browning, Don S., Janowski, Bernd and Jüngel, Eberhard (eds.). Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (RGG), 8 vols. Tübingen, 1998–2005. English trans. as database: https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/browse/religion-past-and-present.Google Scholar
Biskup, Gerhard. Die landesfürstlichen Versuche zum wirtschaftlichen Wiederaufbau der Kurpfalz nach dem 30jährigen Kriege (1648–74). Ein Beitrag zur Wirtschaftsgeschichte der Pfalz. Frankfurt am Main, 1932.Google Scholar
Blanning, Tim. ‘The Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation past and present’, Historical Research, 85 (2012): 57–70.Google Scholar
Blickle, Peter. Von der Leibeigenschaft zu den Menschenrechten. Eine Geschichte der Freiheit in Deutschland. Munich, 2003.Google Scholar
Bobbio, Norberto. ‘Leibniz e Pufendorf’, Rivista di filosofia, 38 (1947): 118–29.Google Scholar
Boucher, David and Kelly, Paul (eds.). The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls. London and New York, 1994.Google Scholar
Breuer, Dieter (ed.). Religion und Religiosität im Zeitalter des Barock. Wiesbaden, 1995.Google Scholar
Buchholz, Stephan. ‘Erunt quattuor in carne una: Aspekte der neuzeitlichen Polygamiediskussion’, in Zur Geschichte des Familien- und Erbrechts, ed. Mohnhaupt, Heinz. Frankfurt am Main, 1987, 71–91.Google Scholar
Buchholz, Stephan. Recht, Religion und Ehe. Orientierungswandel und gelehrte Kontroversen im Übergang vom 17. zum 18. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt am Main, 1988.Google Scholar
Buckle, Stephen. Natural Law and the Theory of Property: Grotius to Hume. Oxford, 1991.Google Scholar
Burgdorf, Wolfgang. Protokonstitutionalismus: Die Reichsverfassung in den Wahlkapitulationen der römisch-deutschen Könige und Kaiser 1519–1792. Göttingen, 2015.Google Scholar
Cairncross, John. After Polygamy Was Made a Sin: The Social History of Christian Polygamy. London, 1974.Google Scholar
Cairns, John. ‘Stoicism, slavery, and law. Grotian jurisprudence and its reception’, Grotiana, 21/22 (2001): 198–231.Google Scholar
Catana, Leo. The Historiographical Concept ‘System of Philosophy’. Its Origin, Nature, Influence, and Legitimacy. Leiden and Boston, MA, 2008.Google Scholar
Christov, Theodore. Before Anarchy: Hobbes and his Critics in Modern International Thought. Cambridge, 2015.Google Scholar
Clark, R. Scott. ‘Christ and covenant: federal theology in orthodoxy’, in Reformed Orthodoxy, ed. Selderhuis, Herman J.. Leiden, 2013, 403–28.Google Scholar
Consortium of European Research Libraries. CERL Thesaurus: https://data.cerl.org/thesaurus/cnp01340889 (accessed on 2 October 2021).Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. ‘Autonomy in modern natural law’, in New Essays on the History of Autonomy, ed. Brender, Natalie and Krasnoff, Larry. Cambridge, 2004, 110–29.Google Scholar
Dawson, Hannah. ‘The normativity of nature in Pufendorf and Locke’, Historical Journal, 63 (2020): 528–58.Google Scholar
De Angelis, Simone. ‘Pufendorf und der Cartesianismus’, Internationales Archiv für Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur, 29 (2004): 129–72.Google Scholar
Dellsperger, Rudolf. ‘Der Beitrag der “vernünftigen Orthodoxie” zur innerprotestantischen Ökumene’, in Union-Konversion-Toleranz, ed. Duchhardt, Heinz and May, Gerhard. Mainz, 2000, 289–300.Google Scholar
Denzer, Horst. Moralphilosophie und Naturrecht bei Samuel Pufendorf: Eine geistes- und wissenschaftsgeschichtliche Untersuchung zur Geburt des Naturrechts aus der Praktischen Philosophie. Munich, 1972.Google Scholar
Diesselhorst, Malte. Die Lehre des Hugo Grotius vom Versprechen. Cologne, 1959.Google Scholar
Dixon, Suzanne. ‘Family’, in The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society, ed. du Plessis, Paul J., Ando, Clifford and Tuori, Kaius. Oxford, 2016, 461–72.Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef. ‘Biographisches zu Samuel von Pufendorf’, in Samuel Pufendorf und seine Wirkungen bis auf die heutige Zeit, ed. Geyer, B. and Goerlich, H.. Baden-Baden, 1996, 23–37.Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef. ‘Erhard Weigels Zeit an der Universität Leipzig (1647 bis 1653)’, in Erhard Weigel 1625 bis 1699. Baroker Erzvater der deutschen Frühaufklärung, ed. Schielicke, Reinhard E., Herbst, Klaus-Dieter and Kratochwil, Stefan. Frankfurt am Main, 1999, pp. 69–90.Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef. Frühaufklärung und obrigkeitliche Zensur in Brandenburg: Friedrich Wilhelm Stosch und das Verfahren gegen sein Buch ‘Concordia rationis et fidei’. Berlin, 1995.Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef. Pufendorf-Studien. Beiträge zur Biographie Samuel von Pufendorfs und zu seiner Entwicklung als Historiker und theologischer Schriftsteller. Berlin, 1992.Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef. ‘Samuel von Pufendorf and toleration’, in Beyond the Persecuting Society: Toleration before the Enlightenment, ed. Laursen, John Christian and Nederman, Cary J.. Philadelphia, PA, 1997, 178–96.Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef. Samuel Pufendorf in der Welt des 17. Jahrhunderts: Untersuchungen zur Biographie Pufendorfs und zu seinem Wirken als Politiker und Theologe. Frankfurt am Main, 2012:Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef. ‘Die Kritik Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz an Samuel von Pufendorf. Eine Auseinandersetzung im Vorfeld der Aufklärung’, 309–38. Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef. ‘Das Lebensende von Samuel Pufendorf’, 155–80. Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef. ‘Die Privatbibliothek Samuel von Pufendorfs’, 339–57. Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef. ‘Samuel Pufendorf als Student in Leipzig’, 1–43. Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef. ‘Samuel von Pufendorf als Verfasser politischer Gutachten und Streitschriften’, 181–223. Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef. ‘Samuel von Pufendorfs Berufung nach Brandenburg-Preuβen’, 131–54. Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef. ‘Samuel Pufendorf und die Heidelberger Universität in der Mitte des 17. Jahrhunderts’, 45–77. Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef. ‘Die Universität Leipzig im Zeitalter der Aufklrung. Geschichte, Stand und Perspektiven der Forschung’, Historisches Jahrbuch, 122 (2002): 413–61. Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef. ‘Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der theologischen und religionspolitischen Vorstellungen Samuel von Pufendorfs’, in Religion und Religiosität im Zeitalter des Barock, ed. D. Breuer et al. Wiesbaden, 1995, 873–82. Google Scholar
Drakopoulou, Maria. ‘Samuel Pufendorf, feminism and the question of “women and law”’, in Feminist Encounters with Legal Philosophy, ed. Drakopoulou, Maria. London, 2013, 66–91.Google Scholar
Dreitzel, Horst. ‘Zur Entwicklung und Eigenart der eklektischen Philosophie’, Zeitschrift für historische Forschung, 18 (1991): 281–343.Google Scholar
Dreitzel, Horst. ‘Naturrecht als politische Philosophie’, in Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Band 4: Das heilige Römische Reich deutscher Nation, Nord- und Ostmitteleuropa, ed. Holzhey, Helmut and Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm. Basel, 2001, 836–48.Google Scholar
Dreitzel, Horst. ‘The reception of Hobbes in the political philosophy of the early German Enlightenment’, History of European Ideas, 29 (2003): 255–89.Google Scholar
Dreitzel, Horst. ‘Samuel Pufendorf’, in Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Band 4: Das heilige Römische Reich deutscher Nation, Nord- und Ostmitteleuropa, ed. Holzhey, Helmut and Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm. Basel, 2001, 757–812.Google Scholar
Droysen, Johann Gustav. ‘Zur Kritik Pufendorfs’ [1864], Abhandlungen zur neueren Geschichte. Leipzig, 1876, 307–86.Google Scholar
Dufour, Alfred. ‘L’influence de la méthodologie des sciences physiques et mathématiques sur les fondateurs de l’école du droit naturel moderne (Grotius, Hobbes, Pufendorf)’, in Grotius, ed. John Dunn and Ian Harris. Lyme, NH, 1997, 93–110. (Originally in Grotiana 1, n.s. (1980): 33–52).Google Scholar
Dufour, Alfred. Le mariage dans l’école allemande du droit naturel moderne au XVIIIe siècle. Paris, 1972.Google Scholar
Dufour, Alfred. ‘Pufendorf’, in The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H., Goldie, M.. Cambridge, 1991, 561–88.Google Scholar
Edelstein, Dan. On the Spirit of Rights. Chicago, IL, 2019.Google Scholar
Fleming, Julia A. Defending Probabilism, the Moral Theology of Juan Caramuel. Washington, DC, 2006.Google Scholar
Formigari, Lia. A History of Language Philosophies. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA, 2004.Google Scholar
Franke, Bernd. Sklaverei und Unfreiheit im Naturrecht des 17. Jahrhunderts. Hildesheim, 2009.Google Scholar
Friedeburg, Robert von. Luther’s Legacy. The Thirty Years War and the Modern Notion of ‘State’ in the Empire, 1530s to 1790s. Cambridge, 2016.Google Scholar
Friedeburg, Robert von and Seidler, Michael J.. ‘The Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation’, in European Political Thought 1450–1700: Religion, Law and Philosophy, ed. Lloyd, Howell A., Burgess, Glenn and Hodson, Simon. New Haven, CT and London, 2008, 102–72.Google Scholar
Friedenthal, Meelis, Marti, Hanspeter and Seidel, Robert (eds.). Early Modern Disputations and Dissertations in an Interdisciplinary and European Context. Boston, MA, 2020.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Peter. ‘Karl I. Ludwig’, Neue Deutsche Biographie, 11 (1977), 246–9, available at www.deutsche-biographie.de/pnd118560182.html, accessed 12 January 2019.Google Scholar
Gallati, Frieda. ‘Der Königlich Schwedische in Teutschland geführte Krieg’ des Bogislav Philipp von Chemnitz und seine Quellen. Frauenfeld, 1902.Google Scholar
Gángó, Gábor. ‘Ernst König’, in Natural Law 1625–1850: Database, ed. Jensen, Mikkel Munthe, (Erfurt, Gotha, Jena: ThULB, 2019–), [Online Database at http://naturallawdatabase.thulb.uni-jena.de].Google Scholar
Gángó, Gábor. ‘Johann Christian von Boineburg, Samuel Pufendorf, and the foundation myth of modern natural law’, History of European Ideas, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/01916599.2022.2099044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Aaron. ‘Seventeenth century moral philosophy: self-help, self-knowledge, and the devil’s mountain’, in The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics, ed. Crisp, Roger. Oxford, 2013, 229–79.Google Scholar
Garrett, Aaron. ‘Spinoza as natural lawyer’, Cardozo Law Review, 25 (2003): 627–41.Google Scholar
Gelderen, Martin van. ‘Aristotelians, monarchomachs and republicans: sovereignty and respublica mixta in Dutch and German political thought, 1580–1650’, in Republicanism. A Shared European Heritage, ed. van Gelderen, M. and Skinner, Q., 2 vols. Cambridge, 2002, vol. 1: 195–217.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. ‘Humanism and political theory’, in The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H. and Goldie, M.. Cambridge, 1991, 9–29.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. Defenders of the Text: The Traditions of Scholarship in an Age of Science, 1450–1800. Cambridge, MA, 1991.Google Scholar
Groenland, Juliette A. ‘Humanism in the classroom’, in The Making of the Humanities, Volume I: Early Modern Europe, ed. Bod, R., Maat, J. and Weststeijn, T.. Amsterdam, 2010, 199–229.Google Scholar
Gross, Hanns. Empire and Sovereignty: A History of the Public Law Literature in the Holy Roman Empire, 1599–1804. Chicago, IL, 1973.Google Scholar
Grunert, Frank. ‘“Handel mit Herrn Hector Gottfried Masio.” Zur Pragmatik des Streits in den Kontroversen mit dem Kopenhagener Hofprediger’, in Appell an das Publikum. Die öffentliche Debatte in der deutschen Aufklärung 1687–1796, ed. Goldenbaum, Ursula, Berlin, 2004, 119–74.Google Scholar
Grunert, Frank. ‘Das Recht der Natur als Recht des Gefühls: Zur Naturrechtslehre von Johann Jacob Schmauss’, Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik. Annual Review of Law and Ethics, 12 (2004): 139–53.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. ‘Christian Wolff (1679–1754)’, in The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, ed. Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne. Oxford, 2012, 1106–9.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. ‘The English context of a Scotsman’s translation of German natural law: Turnbull and Heineccius’, in Love as the Principle of Natural Law, ed. Grunert, Frank and Haakonssen, Knud. Leiden, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. ‘German natural law’, in The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought, ed. Goldie, Mark and Wokler, Robert. Cambridge, 2006, 251–90.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. ‘Holberg’s Law of Nature and Nations’, in Ludvig Holberg (1684–1754). Learning and Literature in the Nordic Enlightenment, ed. Haakonssen, Knud and Olden-Jørgensen, Sebastian. London, 2017, 59–79.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. ‘Natural jurisprudence and the identity of the Scottish Enlightenment’, in Philosophy and Religion in Enlightenment Britain: New Case Studies, ed. Savage, R.. Oxford, 2012, 258–77.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. ‘Protestant natural-law theory: a general interpretation’, in New Essays on the History of Autonomy: A Collection Honoring J. B. Schneewind, ed. Brender, N. and Krasnoff, L.. Cambridge, 2004, 92–109.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud (ed.). Grotius, Pufendorf and Modern Natural Law. Aldershot, 1999.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. Natural Law and Moral Philosophy. From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar
Haara, Heikki. ‘Pufendorf on passions and sociability’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 77 (2016): 423–44.Google Scholar
Haara, Heikki and Stuart-Buttle, Tim. ‘The problem of sociability after Hobbes: Pufendorf and Locke and the politics of recognition’, in Passions, Politics and the Limits of Society, ed. Haara, Heikki, Stapelbroek, Koen and Immanen, Mikko. Oldenbourg, 2020, 177–94.Google Scholar
Haas, Julia. Die Reichstheorie in Pufendorfs ‘Severinus de Monzambano’: Monstrositätsthese und Reichsdebatte im Spiegel der politisch-juristischen Literatur von 1667 bis heute. Berlin, 2006.Google Scholar
Habermann, Katharina and Herbst, Klaus-Dieter (eds.). Erhard Weigel (1625–1699) und seine Schüler. Göttingen, 2016.Google Scholar
Häfner, Ralph. ‘Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philologie um 1700. Zum Verhältnis von Polymathie und Aporetik bei Jacob Friedrich Reimman, Christian Thomasius und Johann Albert Fabricius’, in Philologie und Erkenntnis: Beiträge zu Begriff und Problem frühneuzeitlicher ‘Philologie’, ed. Häfner, Ralph. Tübingen, 2001, 95–128.Google Scholar
Hammerstein, Notker. ‘Zum Fortwirken von Pufendorfs Naturrechtslehre an den Universitäten des Heiligen Römisches Reiches Deutscher Nation während des 18. Jahrhunderts’, in Samuel von Pufendorf 1632–1982, ed. Modéer, Kjell Å.. Lund, 1986, 31–51.Google Scholar
Hammerstein, Notker. ‘Relations with authority’, in A History of the University in Europe, Volume II: Universities in Early Modern Europe (1500–1800), ed. Ridder-Symoens, Hilda de. Cambridge, 1996, 114–54.Google Scholar
Hammerstein, Notker. ‘Samuel Pufendorf’, in Staatsdenker im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert: Reichspublizistik – Politik – Naturrecht, ed. Stolleis, Michael. Frankfurt am Main, 1987, 172–96.Google Scholar
Hammerstein, Notker. ‘Universitäten – Territorialstaaten – Gelehrte Räte’, in Die Rolle der Juristen bei der Enstehung des modernen Staates, ed. Schnur, R.. Berlin, 1986, 687–735.Google Scholar
Hartung, Gerald. ‘Von Grotius zu Pufendorf. Die Herkunft des säkularisierten Strafrechts aus dem Kriegsrecht der Frühen Neuzeit’, in Samuel Pufendorf und die europäische Frühaufklärung, ed. Palladini, Fiammetta and Hartung, Gerald. Berlin, 1996, 123–36.Google Scholar
Heckel, Martin. ‘Itio in partes: Zur Religionsverfassung des Heiligen Römischen Reiches Deutscher Nation’, in Heckel, Martin, Gesammelte Schriften: Staat, Kirche, Recht, Geschichte, vol. 2, ed. Schlaich, Klaus. Tübingen, 1989, 636–736.Google Scholar
Heppe, Heinrich. Reformierte Dogmatik. Neu dargestellt und aus den Quellen belegt. Neukirchen, 1935.Google Scholar
Heydt, Colin. Moral Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Britain: God, Self, and Other. Cambridge, 2018.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. ‘Hobbes on the family’, in The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, ed. Martinich, A. P. and Kinch, Hoechstra. Oxford, 2016, 242–63.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. and Wright, Joane H. (eds.). Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes. University Park, PA, 2012.Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, T. J. ‘The claims of conscience: natural law theory, obligation, and resistance in the Huguenot diaspora’, in New Studies in the Political Thought of the Huguenots of the Refuge, ed. Laursen, J. C.. Leiden, 1995, 15–51.Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, T. J.. ‘Conscience and reason – the natural law theory of Jean Barbeyrac’, Historical Journal, 36 (1993): 289–308 [reprinted in Grotius, Pufendorf and Modern Natural Law, ed. K. Haakonssen. Aldershot, 1999, 381–400].Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, T. J.. Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment. Cambridge, 2000.Google Scholar
Holland, Ben. ‘Pufendorf’s theory of facultative sovereignty: on the configuration of the soul of the state’, History of Political Thought, 33 (2012): 427–54.Google Scholar
Holland, Ben. The Moral Person of the State: Pufendorf, Sovereignty and Composite Polities. Cambridge, 2017.Google Scholar
Holzhey, Helmut. ‘Philosophie als Eklektik’, Studia Leibnitiana, XV (1983): 19–29.Google Scholar
Holzhey, Helmut and Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm (eds.). Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Band 4: Das Heilige Römische Reich Deutscher Nation, Nord- und Ostmitteleuropa. Basel, 2001.Google Scholar
Holzhey, Helmut and Zurbuchen, Simone. ‘Christian Thomasius’, in Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Band 4: Das heilige Römische Reich deutscher Nation, Nord- und Ostmitteleuropa, ed. Holzhey, Helmut and Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm. Basel, 2001, 1165–1202.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan. Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA, 2005.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan. Politics in Commercial Society: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Adam Smith. Cambridge, MA, 2015.Google Scholar
Hüning, Dieter. ‘“Is not the power to punish essentially a power that pertains to the state?” The different foundations of the right to punish in early modern natural law doctrines’, in Politisches Denken, Jahrbuch 2004, ed. Graf Ballestrem, K., Gerhardt, V., Ottmann, H. and Thompson, M. P.. Berlin, 2004, 43–60.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian. ‘The invention of human nature: the intention and reception of Pufendorf’s entia moralia doctrine’, History of European Ideas, 45 (2019): 933–52.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian. ‘Johann Jakob Moser and Immanuel Kant on public law and the German religious constitution’, in Kant and his German Contemporaries, Volume II: Aesthetics, History, Politics, and Religion, ed. Dahlstrom, Daniel O.. Cambridge, 2018, 150–69.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian. ‘Kant and Vattel in context: cosmopolitan philosophy and diplomatic casuistry’, History of European Ideas, 39 (2013): 477–502.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian. ‘The law of nature and nations’, in The Routledge Companion to Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, ed. Garrett, Aaron. Abingdon, 2015, 559–92.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian. ‘Natural law as political philosophy’, in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe, ed. Clark, Desmond and Wilson, Catherine. Oxford, 2011, 475–99.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian. ‘Public law and the limits of philosophy: German idealism and the religious constitution’, Critical Inquiry, 44 (2018): 528–53.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian. ‘Secularization: the birth of a modern combat concept’, Modern Intellectual History, 12 (2015): 1–32.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian. Rival Enlightenments: Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern Germany. Cambridge, 2001.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian. The Secularisation of the Confessional State. The Political Thought of Christian Thomasius. Cambridge, 2007.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan I. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford, 2001.Google Scholar
Jägerskjöld, S. ‘Samuel von Pufendorf in Schweden 1668–1688. Einige neue Beiträge’, in Satvra Roberto Feenstra sexagesimum qvintum annvm aetatis complenti ab alvmnis collegis amicis oblata, ed. Ankum, J. A., Spruit, J. E., Wubbe, F. B. J.. Fribourg, 1985, 557–70.Google Scholar
Jensen, Mads Langballe. ‘Serving Danish foreign policy: Andreas Hojer’s De eo quod iure belli licet in minores (1735)’, in The Law of Nations and Natural Law 1625–1850, ed. Zurbuchen, Simone. Leiden, 2019, 39–59.Google Scholar
Jones, Tom. ‘Theories of language in the eighteenth century’, in Literature, Literary Studies 1701–1800, Oxford Handbooks Online (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935338.013.100.Google Scholar
Jong, W. R. D. de and Betti, A.. ‘The classical model of science: a millennia-old model of scientific rationality’, Synthese, 174 (2010): 185–203.Google Scholar
Jounannet, Emmanuelle. ‘Emer De Vattel (1714–1767)’, in The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, ed. Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne. Oxford, 2012, 1118–21.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Thomas. Konfession und Kultur. Lutherischer Protestantismus in der zweiten Hälfte des Reformationsjahrhunderts. Tübingen, 2020.Google Scholar
Kelley, Donald R. ‘Eclecticism and the history of ideas’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 62 (2001): 577–92.Google Scholar
Kelly, Kristin A. ‘Private family, private individual: John Locke’s distinction between paternal and political power’, Social Theory and Practice, 28 (2002): 361–80.Google Scholar
Kersting, Wolfgang. Die politische Philosophie des Gesellschaftsvertrags. Darmstadt, 1996.Google Scholar
Kischkel, Thomas. Die Spruchtätigkeit der Giessener Juristenfakultät. Grundlagen, Verlauf, Inhalt. Hildesheim etc., 2016.Google Scholar
Klippel, Diethelm (ed.). Naturrecht im 19. Jahrhundert. Kontinuität, Inhalt, Funktion, Wirkung. Goldbach, 1997.Google Scholar
Knott, Martin Otero. ‘Cocceji on sociality’, History of European Ideas, 48 (2022): 351–66.Google Scholar
Knott, Martin Otero. ‘Samuel Cocceji on the foundations of natural law’, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2015.Google Scholar
Korkmann, Petter. ‘Voluntarism and moral obligation: Barbeyrac’s defence of Pufendorf revisited’, in Early Modern Natural Law Theories: Contexts and Strategies in Early Enlightenment, ed. Hochstrasser, T. J. and Schröder, P.. Dordrecht, 2003, 195–225.Google Scholar
Krawczuk, Wojciech. Samuel Pufendorf and Some Stories of the Northern War 1655–1660. Kraków, 2014.Google Scholar
Kraye, Jill. ‘Conceptions of moral philosophy’, in The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, ed. Garber, Daniel and Ayers, Michael, 2 vols. Cambridge, 1998, vol. 2, 1279–1316.Google Scholar
Kraye, Jill. ‘Philologists and Philosophers’, in The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Humanism, ed. Kraye, Jill. Cambridge, 1996, 142–60.Google Scholar
Krieger, Leonard. ‘History and law in the seventeenth century: Pufendorf’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 21 (1960): 198–210.Google Scholar
Krieger, Leonard. ‘Samuel Pufendorf’, in Deutsche Historiker, vol. 9, ed. Wehler, Hans-Ulrich. Göttingen, 1982, 7–22.Google Scholar
Krieger, Leonard. The German Idea of Freedom. History of a Political Tradition. Chicago, IL, 1957.Google Scholar
Krieger, Leonard. The Politics of Discretion: Pufendorf and the Acceptance of Natural Law. Chicago, IL, 1965.Google Scholar
Lehmann-Brauns, Sicco. Weisheit in der Weltgeschichte: Philosophiegeschichte zwischen Barok und Aufklärung. Tübingen, 2004.Google Scholar
Levitin, Dmitri. ‘From sacred history to the history of religion: Paganism, judaism, and Christianity in European historiography from Reformation to “Enlightenment”’, The Historical Journal, 55 (2012): 1117–60.Google Scholar
Levitin, Dmitri. Ancient Wisdom in the Age of the New Science: Histories of Philosophy in England, c. 1640–1700. Cambridge, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Wenchao, Poser, Hans and Rudolph, Hartmut (eds.). Leibniz und die Ökumene. Wiesbaden, 2013.Google Scholar
Lifschitz, Avi. ‘The arbitrariness of the linguistic sign: variations on an Enlightenment theme’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 73 (2012): 537–57.Google Scholar
Link, Christoph, ‘Johann Stephan Pütter’, in Staatsdenker im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert: Reichspublizistik – Politik – Naturrecht, ed. Stolleis, Michael. Frankfurt am Main, 1987, 310-31.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Bernd. Die Wiederentdeckung des Epikureischen Naturrechts. Zu Thomas Hobbes’ philosophischer Entwicklung von De Cive zum Leviathan im Pariser Exil 1640–1651. Frankfurt am Main, 1998.Google Scholar
Luig, Klaus. ‘Zur Verbreitung des Naturrechts in Europa’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, 60 (1972): 539–57.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Noel. ‘Hobbes and Spinoza’, in Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford, 2002, 27–52.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Noel. ‘Hobbes’s science of politics and his theory of science’, in Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford, 2002, 146–55.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Noel. ‘Hobbes’s theory of international relations’, in Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford, 2002, 432–56.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Noel. Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford, 2002.Google Scholar
Malmström, Oscar. Samuel Pufendorf och hans arbeten i Sveriges historia. Stockholm, 1899.Google Scholar
Maryks, Robert Aleksander. Saint Cicero and the Jesuits. The Influence of the Liberal Arts on the Adoption of Moral Probabilism. Burlington, VT, 2008.Google Scholar
Meinecke, Friedrich. Die Idée der Staatsräson in der neueren Geschichte. Berlin and Munich, 1924.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. ‘The metaphysics of the Theological-Political Treatise’, in Spinoza’s ‘Theological-Political Treatise’: A Critical Guide, ed. Melamed, Yitzhak Y. and Rosenthal, Michael A.. Cambridge, 2010, 128–42.Google Scholar
Moore, James and Silverthorne, Michael. ‘Gershom Carmichael and the natural jurisprudence tradition in eighteenth-century Scotland’, in Wealth and Virtue. The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. Hont, Istvan and Ignatieff, Michael. Cambridge, 1983, 73–87.Google Scholar
Moore, James and Silverthorne, Michael. ‘Natural sociability and natural rights in the moral philosophy of Gershom Carmichael’, in Philosophers of the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. Hope, Vincent. Edinburgh, 1984, 1–12.Google Scholar
Moss, Ann. ‘Monita et exempla politica as example of a genre’, in (Un)masking the Realities of Power. Justus Lipsius and the Dynamics of Political Writing in Early Modern Europe, ed. Bom, Erik de, Janssens, Marijke, Van Houdt, Toon and Papy, Jan. Leiden, 2011, 97–114.Google Scholar
Mulsow, Martin. ‘Christian Humanism in the age of critical philology: Ralph Häfner’s Gods in Exile’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 70 (2009): 659–67.Google Scholar
Mulsow, Martin. ‘Eclecticism or skepticism? A problem of the early enlightenment’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 58 (1997): 465–77.Google Scholar
Mulsow, Martin. Radikale Frühaufklärung in Deutschland 1680–1720, 2 vols. Göttingen, 2018. Vol. 2: Clandestine Vernunft.Google Scholar
Nanz, Klaus-Peter. Die Entstehung des allgemeinen Vertragsbegriffs im 16. und 18. Jahrhundert. Munich, 1985.Google Scholar
Niléhn, Lars. ‘On the use of natural law. Samuel Pufendorf as royal Swedish state historian’, in Samuel von Pufendorf 1632–1982. Et rätshistoriskt symposium i Lund 15–16 januari 1982, ed. Modéer, Kjell Å.. Stockholm, 1986, 52–70.Google Scholar
Nischan, Bodo. ‘The exorcism controversy and baptism in the late Reformation’, Sixteenth Century Journal, 18 (1987): 31–52.Google Scholar
Nischan, Bodo. Prince, People, and Confession: The Second Reformation in Brandenburg. Philadelphia, PA, 1994.Google Scholar
Nokkala, Ere. From Natural Law to Political Economy: J. H. G. von Justi on State, Commerce and International Order. Münster, 2019.Google Scholar
Oakley, Francis. Natural Law, Laws of Nature, Natural Rights: Continuity and Discontinuity in the History of Ideas. New York, 2005.Google Scholar
Oestreich, Gerhard. ‘Die antike Literatur als Vorbild der praktischen Wissenschaften im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert’, in Classical Influences on European Culture A. D. 500–1500, ed. Bolgar, R. R.. Cambridge, 1971, 315–24.Google Scholar
Oestreich, Gerhard. ‘Die Bedeutung des niederländischen Späthumanismus für Brandenburg-Preußen’, in Humanismus und Naturrecht in Berlin-Brandenburg-Preussen, ed. Thieme, H.. Berlin, 1979, 16–28.Google Scholar
Olsthoorn, Johann. ‘Grotius and Pufendorf’, in Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Ethics, ed. Angier, Tom. Cambridge, 2019, 51–70.Google Scholar
Paasch, Kathrin. Die Bibliothek des Johann Christian von Boineburg (1622–1672). Berlin, 2005.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta. ‘Die Bibliothek Samuel Pufendorfs’, in Samuel Pufendorf und die europäische Früaufklarung: Werk und Einfluß eines deutschen Bürgers der Gelehrtenrepublik nach 300 Jahren (1694–1994), ed. Palladini, F. and Hartung, G.. Berlin, 1996, 29–39.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta. ‘Le due lettere di Pufendorf al Barone di Boineburg: quella nota e quella “perduta”’, Nouvelles de la république des lettres, 1 (1984): 119–44.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta. ‘Jean Barbeyrac’, in Natural Law 1625–1850: Database, ed. Jensen, Mikkel Munthe. Erfurt, Gotha, Jena: ThULB, 2019–. [Online Database], online at https://naturallawdatabase.thulb.uni-jena.de/item/natlaw_198.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta. ‘Pufendorf on Milton and divorce’, Neulateinisches Jahrbuch, 3 (2001): 117–24.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta. ‘S. Pufendorf lettore di Guicciardini’, La Cultura. Rivista de Filosofia Letteratura e Storia, XXII (1984): 44-93.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta. Die Berliner Huguenotten und der Fall Barbeyrac. Orthodoxe und ‘Sozinianer’ im Refuge (1685-1720). Leiden and Boston, MA, 2011.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta. La biblioteca di Samuel Pufendorf. Catalogo dell’asta di Berlin del settembre 1697. Wiesbaden, 1999.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta. Discussioni seicentesche su Samuel Pufendorf. Scritti Latini: 1663–1700. Bologna, 1978.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta. Samuel Pufendorf discepolo di Hobbes. Per una reinterpretazione del giusnaturalismo moderno. Bologna, 1990.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta. Samuel Pufendorf, Disciple of Hobbes: For a Reinterpretation of Modern Natural Law, trans. David Saunders. Leiden, 2019.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, CA, 1988.Google Scholar
Petersen, Hans. ‘Johann Christian von Boineburg und die Mainzer Irenik des 17. Jahrhunderts’, in Union-Konversion-Toleranz, ed. Duchhardt, Heinz and May, Gerhard. Mainz, 2000, 105–18.Google Scholar
Petersen, Peter. Geschichte der Aristotelischen Philosophie im Protestantischen Deutschland. Hamburg, 1921.Google Scholar
Piirimäe, Eva and Schmidt, Alexander. ‘Introduction: between morality and anthropology – sociability in enlightenment thought’, History of European Ideas, 41 (2015): 571–88.Google Scholar
Piirimäe, Pärtel. ‘Politics and history: an unholy alliance? Samuel Pufendorf as official historiographer’, in Rund um die Meere des Nordens. Festschrift für Hain Rebas, ed. Engelbrecht, Michael, Hanssen-Decker, Ulrike and Höffker, Daniel. Heide, 2008, 237–52.Google Scholar
Pink, Thomas. ‘Natural law and the theory of moral obligation’, in Psychology and Philosophy: Inquiries into the Soul from Late Scholasticism to Contemporary Thought, ed. Heinämaa, Sara and Reuter, Martina. Dordrecht, 2009, 97–114.Google Scholar
Pomata, Gianna and Siraisi, Nancy G.. ‘Introduction’, in Historia: Empiricism and Erudition in Early Modern Europe, ed. Pomata, Gianna and Siraisi, Nancy G.. Cambridge, MA, 2005, 1–38.Google Scholar
Pomata, Gianna and Siraisi, Nancy G. (eds.). Historia: Empiricism and Erudition in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA, 2005.Google Scholar
Ranke, Leopold von. ‘Analekten II. Nachträglich zum dritten Buche. Über Chemnitz und Pufendorf, mit einigen Bemerkungen zur Schlacht von Fehrbellin’, in Zwölf Bücher preuβischer Geschichte. Leipzig, 1874, vols. 3–4 [books 5–9], 594–606.Google Scholar
Ranum, Orest. Artisans of Glory. Writers and Historical Thought in Seventeenth-Century France. Chapel Hill, NC, 1980.Google Scholar
Reill, Hanns Peter. The German Enlightenment and the Rise of Historicism. Berkeley, CA, 1975.Google Scholar
Remer, Gary. ‘Justus Lipsius, morally acceptable deceit and prudence in the Ciceronian tradition’, History of Political Thought, 37 (2016): 238–70.Google Scholar
Röd, Wolfgang. ‘Erhard Weigels Lehre von den entia moralia’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 51 (1969): 58–84.Google Scholar
Röd, Wofgang. Geometrischer Geist und Naturrecht. Methodengeschichtliche Untersuchungen zur Staatsphilosophie im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert. Munich, 1970.Google Scholar
Röding, Hans. Pufendorf als Historiker und Politiker in den ‘Commentarii de rebus gestis Friderici Tertii’. Halle, 1912.Google Scholar
Roeck, Bernd. Reichssystem und Reichsherkommen: Die Diskussion über die Staatlichkeit des Reiches in der politischen Publizistik des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart, 1984.Google Scholar
Rørvik, Thor Inge. ‘The law of nations at the Naval Academy in Copenhagen around 1800: the lectures of Christian Krohg’, in The Law of Nations and Natural Law, 1625-1800, ed. Zurbuchen, Simone. Leiden, 2019, 60–88.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, Helena. Rousseau and Geneva. From the First Discourse to the Social Contract, 1749–1762. Cambridge, 1997.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Donald. ‘Spinoza’s conception of law: metaphysics and ethics’, in Spinoza’s ‘Theological-Political Treatise’: A Critical Guide, ed. Melamed, Yitzhak Y. and Rosenthal, Michael A.. Cambridge, 2010, 143–67.Google Scholar
Saastamoinen, Kari. ‘Pufendorf and the stoic model of natural law’, Grotiana, 20/21 (1999/2000): 257–70.Google Scholar
Saastamoinen, Kari. The Morality of the Fallen Man: Samuel Pufendorf on Natural Law. Helsinki, 1995.Google Scholar
Sagar, Paul. ‘Of mushrooms and method: history and the family in Hobbes’s science of politics’, European Journal of Political Theory, 14 (2015): 98–117.Google Scholar
Sagar, Paul. The Opinion of Mankind: Sociability and the Theory of the State from Hobbes to Smith. Princeton, NJ, 2018.Google Scholar
Salatowsky, Sascha. ‘Dic cur hic? Die philosophische Ethik der Lutheraner im frühen 17. Jahrhundert’, Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch 11 (2006): 103–58.Google Scholar
Salatowsky, Sascha. De Anima. Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Psychologie im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA, 2006.Google Scholar
Salzer, Ernst. Der Übertritt des Grossen Kurfürsten von der schwedischen auf die polnische Seite während des ersten nordischen Krieges in Pufendorfs ‘Carl Gustav’ und ‘Friedrich Wilhelm’. Heidelberg, 1904.Google Scholar
Scattola, Merio. ‘Das Naturrecht der Triebe, oder das Ende des Naturrechts: Johann Jakob Schmauß und Johann Christian Claproth’, in Das Naturrecht der Geselligkeit: Anthropologie, Recht und Politik im 18. Jahrhundert, ed. Fiorillo, Vanda and Grunert, Frank. Berlin, 2009, 231–50.Google Scholar
Scattola, Merio. ‘“Ein Stein des Anstosses”: Thomas Hobbes und die deutsche Naturrechtslehre des siebzehnten und achtzehnten Jahrhunderts’, in Der lange Schatten des Leviathan. Hobbes’ politische Philosophie nach 350 Jahren, ed. Hüning, Dieter. Berlin, 2005, 331–54.Google Scholar
Schaab, Meinrad, Geschichte der Kurpfalz, 2 vols. Stuttgart, 1988–92. Vol. 2: Neuzeit.Google Scholar
Schindling, Anton. ‘Schulen und Universitäten im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert. Zehn Thesen zu Bildungsexpansion, Laienbildung und Konfessionalisierung nach der Reformation’, in Ecclesia Militans. Studien zur Konzilien- und Reformationsgeschichte Remigius Bäumer zum 70. Geburtstag gewidmet, ed. W. Brandmüller, H. Immenkötter and E. Iserloh. Paderborn, 1988, 561–70.Google Scholar
Schlaich, Klaus. Kollegialtheorie: Kirche, Recht und Staat in der Aufklärung. Munich, 1969.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Alexander. ‘Unsociable sociability and the crisis of natural law: Michael Hissmann (1752–1784) on the state of nature’, History of European Ideas, 41 (2015): 619–39.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. ‘Pufendorf’s place in the history of ethics’, Synthese, 72 (1987): 123–55.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B.. The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar
Schneider, Bernd Christian. Ius reformandi: Die Entwicklung eines Staatskirchenrechts von seinen Anfängen bis zum Ende des Alten Reiches. Tübingen, 2001.Google Scholar
Schneider, Hans-Peter. ‘Christliches Naturrecht’, in Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Band 4: Das heilige Römische Reich deutscher Nation, Nord- und Ostmitteleuropa, ed. Holzhey, Helmut and Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm. Basel, 2001, 813–35.Google Scholar
Schneider, Hans-Peter. Justitia Universalis. Quellenstudien zur Geschichte des ‘Christlichen Naturrechts’ bei Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Frankfurt am Main, 1967.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ulrich Johannes. ‘Eclecticism and the history of philosophy’, in History and the Disciplines, ed. Donald R. Kelley. Rochester, NY, 1997, 83–102.Google Scholar
Schnettger, Matthias. Kaiser und Reich: Eine Verfassungsgeschichte (1500–1806). Stuttgart, 2020.Google Scholar
Scholz, Luca. ‘Leibeigenschaft rechtfertigen: Kontroversen um Ursprung und Legitimität der Leibeigenschaft im Wildfangstreit’, Zeitschrift für historische Forschung, 45 (2018): 41-81.Google Scholar
Schröder, Jan. ‘The concept of (natural) law in the doctrine of law and natural law of the early modern era’, in Natural Law and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Europe: Jurisprudence, Theology, Moral and Natural Philosophy, ed. Daston, Lorraine and Stolleis, Michael. Farnham, 2008, 57–71.Google Scholar
Schröder, Jan. ‘Naturrecht in den Tübinger Konsilien von Wolfgang Adam Schöpf’, in Naturrecht und Staat in der Neuzeit. Diethelm Klippel zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Eisfeld, J., Otto, M., Pahlow, L. and Zwanzger, M.. Tübingen, 2013, 101–12.Google Scholar
Schröder, Jan and Pielemeier, Ines. ‘Naturrecht als Lehrfach an den deutschen Universitäten des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts’, in Naturrecht – Spätaufklärung – Revolution, ed. Dann, Otto and Klippel, Diethelm. Hamburg, 1995, 255–69.Google Scholar
Schröder, Peter. ‘The constitution of the Holy Roman Empire after 1648: Samuel Pufendorf’s assessment in his Monzambano’, The Historical Journal, 42 (1990): 961–83.Google Scholar
Schubert, Anselm. Das Ende der Sünde. Anthropologie und Erbsünde zwischen Reformation und Aufklärung. Göttingen 2002.Google Scholar
Schultze, Johannes. ‘Der Geschichtsschreiber Samuel von Pufendorf. Eine Episode’, Forschungen zur brandenburgischen und preuβischen Geschichte, 55 (1944): 169–80.Google Scholar
Schwab, Dieter. ‘Der Staat im Naturrecht der Scholastik’, in Naturrecht und Staat: Politische Funktionen des europäischen Naturrechts (17.–19. Jahrhundert), ed. Klippel, Diethelm and Elisabeth, Müller-Luckner. Munich, 2006, 1–18.Google Scholar
Seidler, Michael J. ‘Economising natural law: Pufendorf on moral quantities and sumptuary legislation’, in Philosophy, Rights and Natural Law: Essays in Honour of Knud Haakonssen, ed. Hunter, Ian and Whatmore, Richard. Edinburgh, 2019, 241–77.Google Scholar
Seidler, Michael J.. ‘Introductory essay’, in Samuel Pufendorf’s On the Natural State of Men. The 1678 Latin Edition and English Translation, ed. and trans. Seidler, Michael J.. Lewiston, NY, 1990, 1–69.Google Scholar
Seidler, Michael J.. ‘“Monstrous” Pufendorf: sovereignty and system in the Dissertations’, in Monarchism and Absolutism in Early Modern Europe, ed. Burgess, Glenn and Cuttica, Cesare. London, 2011, 159–76.Google Scholar
Seidler, Michael J.. ‘Natural law and history. Pufendorf’s philosophical historiography’, in History and the Disciplines. The Reclassification of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe, ed. Kelley, Donald R.. Rochester, NY, 1997, 203–22.Google Scholar
Seidler, Michael J.. ‘The politics of self-preservation: toleration and identity in Pufendorf and Locke’, in Early Modern Natural Law Theories, ed. T. J. Hochstrasser and Peter Schröder (Dordrecht, 2003), 227–55.Google Scholar
Seidler, Michael J.. ‘Pufendorf and the politics of recognition’, in Natural Law and Civil Sovereignty: Moral Right and State Authority in Early Modern Political Thought, ed. Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David. Basingstoke, 2002, 235–51.Google Scholar
Seidler, Michael J.. ‘Pufendorf’s moral and political philosophy’, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford, CA, 2015. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pufendorf-moral/.Google Scholar
Seidler, Michael J.. ‘Qualification and standing in Pufendorf’s two English revolutions’, in Widerstandsrecht in der frühen Neuzeit. Erträge und Perspektiven der Forschung im deutsch-britischen Vergleich, ed. von Friedeburg, Robert. Berlin, 2001, 329–51.Google Scholar
Seidler, Michael J.. ‘“Turkish judgment” and the English Revolution: Pufendorf on the right of resistance’, in Samuel Pufendorf und die europäische Frühaufklärung. Werk und Einfluß eines deutschen Bürgers der Gelehrtenrepublik nach 300 Jahren (1694–1994), ed. Palladini, Fiammetta and Hartung, Gerald. Berlin, 1996, 83–104.Google Scholar
Seidler, Michael J.. ‘“Wer mir gutes thut, den liebe ich.” Pufendorf on patriotism and political loyalty’, in ‘Patria’ und Patrioten vor dem Patriotismus. Pflichten, Rechte, Glauben und die Rekonfigurierung europäischer Gemeinswesen im 17. Jahrhundert, ed. von Friedeburg, Robert. Wiesbaden, 2005, 335–65.Google Scholar
Silnizki, Michael. Geschichte des gelehrten Rechts in Rußland. ‘Jurisprudencija’ an den Universitäten des Russischen Reiches 1700–1835. Frankfurt am Main, 1997.Google Scholar
Silvestrini, Gabriella. ‘Rousseau, Pufendorf and the eighteenth-century natural law tradition’, History of European Ideas, 36 (2010): 280–301.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. From Humanism to Hobbes: Studies in Rhetoric and Politics. Cambridge, 2018.Google Scholar
Sommer, Wolfgang. Politik, Theologie und Frömmigkeit im Luthertum der Frühen Neuzeit. Göttingen, 1999.Google Scholar
Sparn, Walter. ‘Das Bekenntnis des Philosophen. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz als Philosoph und Theologe’, Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie, 28 (1986): 139–78.Google Scholar
Sparn, Walter. ‘Die fundamentaltheologische Fixierung des Anticalvinismus’, in Calvinismus, ed. Selderhuis, Herman J.. Göttingen, 2013, 127–50.Google Scholar
Sparn, Walter. ‘Menschsein: Substanz und Modus: Balthasar Meisners Anthropologia sacra im interkonfessionellen Kontext’, in De homine. Anthropologien in der Frühen Neuzeit, ed. Sascha Salatowsky and Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann. Stuttgart Wiesbaden, 2021, 217–36.Google Scholar
Sparn, Walter. ‘Religiöse Toleranz am Maß politischer Klugheit. Johann Gerhard und Theophil Lessing zur staatlichen Religionspolitik’, in Dulding religiöser Vielfalt — Sorge um die wahre Religion. Toleranzdebatten in der Frühen Neuzeit, ed. Salatowsky, Sascha and Schröder, Winfried. Stuttgart, 2016, 39–57.Google Scholar
Sparn, Walter. ‘Theologie [Leibniz]’, in Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Band 4: Das heilige Römische Reich deutscher Nation, Nord- und Ostmitteleuropa, ed. Holzhey, Helmut and Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm. Basel, 2001, 1079–90.Google Scholar
Sparn, Walter. Wiederkehr der Metaphysik. Die ontologische Frage in der lutherischen Theologie des frühen 17. Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart, 1976.Google Scholar
Sprenger, Gerhard. ‘Der Einfluß der Naturwissenschaften auf das Denken Samuel Pufendorfs’, in Samuel Pufendorf und seine Wirkungen bis auf die heutige Zeit, ed. Geyer, Bodo and Helmut, Goerlich. Baden-Baden, 1996, 165–93.Google Scholar
Sreedhar, Susanne. ‘Pufendorf on patriarchy’, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 31 (2014): 209–27.Google Scholar
Stade, Arne. Erik Dahlberg och Carl X Gustafs krigshistoria. Stockholm, 1967.Google Scholar
Stanglin, Keith G. Beyond Dordt and ‘De Auxiliis’. The Dynamics of Protestant and Catholic Soteriology in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Leiden, 2019.Google Scholar
Stegmann, Andreas. ‘Das Lehrstück der benevolentia universalis in den Textgattungen des akademischen Unterrichts im Luthertum des 17. Jh.’, in Prädestination und Willensfreiheit, ed. Härle, Wilfried. Leipzig, 2009, 125–34.Google Scholar
Steiger, Johann Anselm. ‘The development of the Reformation legacy. Hermeneutics and interpretation of Sacred Scripture in the age of orthodoxy’, in Hebrew Bible / Old Testament. The History of its Interpretation, ed. Sæbø, Magne, 2 vols. Göttingen, 2000–8, vol. 2, 691–757.Google Scholar
Steiger, Johann Anselm. Philologia sacra. Zur Exegese der Heiligen Schrift im Protestantismus des 16.–18. Jahrhunderts. Neukirchen-Vluyn, 2011.Google Scholar
Stephenson, John. ‘Sacraments in Lutheranism, 1600–1800’, in The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern Theology, ed. Lehner, Ulrich L. et al. Oxford, 2016, 341–58.Google Scholar
Stern, Robert. Kantian Ethics: Value, Agency and Obligation. Oxford, 2015.Google Scholar
Stolleis, Michael. ‘The legitimation of law through God, tradition, will, nature and constitution’, in Natural Law and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Europe: Jurisprudence, Theology, Moral and Natural Philosophy, ed. Daston, Lorraine and Stolleis, Michael. Farnham, 2008, 45–56.Google Scholar
Stolleis, Michael. Geschichte des öffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland, 4 vols. Munich, 1988–2012. Vol. 1: 1600–1800.Google Scholar
Stolleis, Michael (ed.). Hermann Conring (1606–1681). Beiträge zu Leben und Werk. Berlin, 1983.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. Liberty and Law. The Idea of Permissive Natural Law 1000–1800. Washington, DC, 2014.Google Scholar
Toyoda, Tetsuya. Theory and Politics of the Law of Nations: Political Bias in International Law Discourse of Seven German Court Councilors in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Leiden, 2011.Google Scholar
Treitschke, Heinrich von. ‘Samuel von Pufendorf I’, Preußische Jahrbücher, 35 (1875): 614–55.Google Scholar
Treitschke, Heinrich von. ‘Samuel von Pufendorf II’, Preußische Jahrbücher, 36 (1876): 61–109.Google Scholar
Treitschke, Heinrich von. Deutsche Geschichte im neunzehnten Jahrhundert, 5 vols. Leipzig, 1879–94.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford, 1999.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy. Cambridge, 2015.Google Scholar
Tully, James. A Discourse on Property: John Locke and his Adversaries. Cambridge, 1980.Google Scholar
Varella, Laura Beck. ‘Between Rome and Azcapotzalco: Catholic readings of Heineccius’s Elementa iuris naturae et gentium’, in Love as the Principle of Natural Law. The Natural Law of Johann Gottlieb Heineccius and Its Contexts, ed. Grunert, Frank and Haakonssen, Knud. Leiden, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Vogel, Ursula. ‘Political philosophers and the trouble with polygamy: patriarchal reasoning in modern natural law’, History of Political Thought, 12 (1991): 229–51.Google Scholar
Vogel, Ursula. ‘Private contract and public institution: the peculiar case of marriage’, in Public and Private: Legal, Political and Philosophical Perspectives, ed. Passerin d’Entrèves, Maurizio and Vogel, Ursula. London, 2000, 177–99.Google Scholar
Waldmann, Felix. ‘Natural law and the chair of ethics in the University of Naples, 1703–1769’, Modern Intellectual History, 19 (2022): 54–80.Google Scholar
Wall, Heinrich de. Die Staatslehre Johann Friedrich Horns. Aalen, 1992.Google Scholar
Warmholtz, Carl Gustav. Bibliotheca Historica Sveo-Gothica, vol. 9: Rikets Historia under K. K. Carl Gustaf, och Carl XI. Uppsala, 1803.Google Scholar
Welzel, Hans. Die Naturrechtslehre Samuel Pufendorfs: Ein Beitrag zur Ideengeschichte des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts. Berlin, 1958.Google Scholar
Whaley, Joachim. ‘Hier existiert noch das alte heilige deutsche Reich: the legacy of the Holy Roman Empire and the unity of Germany’, Publications of the English Goethe Society, 83 (2014): 1–21.Google Scholar
Whaley, Joachim. ‘The old Reich in modern memory: recent controversies concerning the “relevance” of early modern German history’, in German History, Literature and the Nation, ed. Midgley, David and Emden, Christian. Oxford, 2004, 25–49.Google Scholar
Whaley, Joachim. Germany and the Holy Roman Empire, 2 vols. Oxford, 2012. Volume I: Maximilian I to the Peace of Westphalia 1493–1648. Volume II: The Peace of Westphalia to the Dissolution of the Reich 1648–1806.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q. The Legacy of Roman Law in the German Romantic Era. Princeton, NJ, 1990.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q.. The Verdict of Battle: The Law of Victory and the Making of Modern War. Cambridge, MA, 2012.Google Scholar
Willoweit, Dietmar. ‘Hermann Conring’, in Staatsdenker im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert: Reichspublizistik – Politik – Naturrecht, ed. Stolleis, Michael. Frankfurt am Main, 1987, 129–47.Google Scholar
Wilson, Peter. ‘Still a monstrosity? Some reflections on early modern German statehood’, The Historical Journal, 49 (2006): 565–76.Google Scholar
Witt, Christian. Protestanten. Das Werden eines Integrationsbegriffs in der Frühen Neuzeit. Tübingen, 2011.Google Scholar
Witte, John Jr. Church, State, and Family: Reconciling Traditional Teachings and Modern Liberties. Cambridge, 2019.Google Scholar
Witte, John. The Western Case for Monogamy Over Polygamy. Cambridge, 2015.Google Scholar
Wokler, Robert. ‘Rousseau’s Pufendorf: natural law and the foundations of commercial society’, History of Political Thought, 15 (1994): 373–402.Google Scholar
Wyduckel, Dieter. ‘Die Vertragslehre Pufendorfs und ihre rechts- und staatstheoretischen Grundlagen’, in Samuel Pufendorf und die europäische Frühaufklärung. Werk und Einfluß eines deutschen Bürgers der Gelehrtenrepublik nach 300 Jahren (1694–1994), ed. Palladini, Fiammetta and Hartung, Gerald. Berlin, 1996, 147–65.Google Scholar
Zurbuchen, Simone. ‘Dignity and equality in Pufendorf’s natural law theory’, in Philosophy, Rights and Natural Law: Essays in Honour of Knud Haakonssen, ed. Hunter, Ian and Whatmore, Richard. Edinburgh, 2019, 147–68.Google Scholar
Zurbuchen, Simone. ‘Gewissensfreiheit und Toleranz: Zur Pufendorf-Rezeption bei Christian Thomasius’, in Samuel Pufendorf und die europäische Frühaufklärung: Werk und Einfluß eines deutschen Bürgers der Gelehrtenrepublik nach 300 Jahren (1694–1994), ed. Palladini, Fiammetta and Hartung, Gerald. Berlin, 1996, 169–80.Google Scholar
Zurbuchen, Simone. ‘The state of nature, the family, and the state’, in The State of Nature: Histories of an Idea, ed. Peters, Anne and Somos, Mark. Leiden, 2021, 216–45.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Knud Haakonssen, University of St Andrews, Scotland, Ian Hunter, University of Queensland
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Pufendorf
  • Online publication: 25 November 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108561006.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Knud Haakonssen, University of St Andrews, Scotland, Ian Hunter, University of Queensland
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Pufendorf
  • Online publication: 25 November 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108561006.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Knud Haakonssen, University of St Andrews, Scotland, Ian Hunter, University of Queensland
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Pufendorf
  • Online publication: 25 November 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108561006.015
Available formats
×