Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Religious Experience
- Cambridge Companions to Religion
- The Cambridge Companion to Religious Experience
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Characterizing Religious Experience
- Part II Religious Experience in Traditional Monotheism
- Part III Religious Experience Outside Traditional Monotheism
- Part IV Prominent Themes and Challenges
- Index
- Cambridge Companions to Religion
- References
Part I - Characterizing Religious Experience
Interdisciplinary Approaches
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 June 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Religious Experience
- Cambridge Companions to Religion
- The Cambridge Companion to Religious Experience
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Characterizing Religious Experience
- Part II Religious Experience in Traditional Monotheism
- Part III Religious Experience Outside Traditional Monotheism
- Part IV Prominent Themes and Challenges
- Index
- Cambridge Companions to Religion
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Religious Experience , pp. 23 - 96Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
References
Allport, Gordon W. The Individual and His Religion. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1950.Google Scholar
Ashar, Yoni K., Chang, Luke J., and Wager, Tor D.. “Brain Mechanisms of the Placebo Effect: An Affective Appraisal Account,” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 13 (2017): 73–98. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093015.Google Scholar
Barlev, Michael. “Implementation: Preliminary Findings,” paper presented in a session on the Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences [INOE] titled “Comparing nonordinary experiences: Surveying, validating, and mapping similarities and differences in the US and India” at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Religion, San Diego, CA, November 2019. osf.io/bvaxu.Google Scholar
Barnby, Joseph M., and Bell, Vaughan. “The Sensed Presence Questionnaire (SenPQ): Initial Psychometric Validation of a Measure of the ‘Sensed Presence’ Experience,” Peer J 5 (2017): e3149. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3149.Google Scholar
Brett, Caroline, Peters, Emmanuelle R., Johns, Louise C., Tabraham, Paul, Valmaggia, Lucia Rita, and Mcguire, Philip. “Appraisals of Anomalous Experiences Interview (AANEX): A Multidimensional Measure of Psychological Responses to Anomalies Associated with Psychosis,” Br J Psychiatry Suppl 51 (2007): s23–30. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.191.51.s23.Google ScholarPubMed
Cardeña, Etzel, Lynn, Steven J., and Krippner, Stanley (eds.). Varieties of Anomalous Experience: Examining the Scientific Evidence, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carhart-Harris, Robin L., Roseman, Leor, Haijen, Eline, Erritzoe, David, Watts, Rosalind, Branchi, Igor, and Kaelen, Mendel. “Psychedelics and the Essential Importance of Context,” Journal of Psychopharmacology 32 (7) (2018): 725–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881118754710.Google Scholar
Chen, Zhuo, Hood Jr, Ralph W., Yang, Lijun, and Watson, Paul J.. “Mystical Experience among Tibetan Buddhists: The Common Core Thesis Revisited,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 50 (2) (2011): 328–38.Google Scholar
Dy-Liacco, Gabriel S., Piedmont, Ralph L., Murray-Swank, Nichole A., Rodgerson, Thomas E., and Sherman, Martin F.. “Spirituality and Religiosity as Cross-Cultural Aspects of Human Experience,” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 1 (1) (2009): 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014937.Google Scholar
Emmons, Robert A., and Paloutzian, Raymond F.. “The Psychology of Religion,” Annual Review of Psychology 54 (1) (2003): 377–402. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Exline, Julie J., Pargament, Kenneth I., Grubbs, Joshua B., and Yali, Ann Marie. “The Religious and Spiritual Struggles Scale: Development and Initial Validation,” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 6 (3) (2014): 208–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036465.Google Scholar
Exline, Julie J., and Rose, Ephraim. “Religious and Spiritual Struggles,” in Paloutzian, Raymond F. and Park, Crystal L. (eds.), The Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Fellowes, Sam. “Symptom Modelling Can Be Influenced by Psychiatric Categories: Choices for Research Domain Criteria (RDoC),” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38 (4) (2017): 279–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017–017-9416-x.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, Heine, Steven J., and Norenzayan, Ara. “The Weirdest People in the World?,” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2–3) (2010): 61–83; discussion 83–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.Google Scholar
Hill, Peter C. “Measurement Assessment and Issues in the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality,” in Paloutzian, Raymond F. and Park, Crystal L. (eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford, 2013.Google Scholar
Hill, Peter C., and Edwards, Evonne. “Measurement in the Psychology of Religiousness and Spirituality: Existing Measures and New Frontiers,” in Pargament, Kenneth I., Exline, Julie J., and Jones, James W. (eds.), APA Handbook of Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2013.Google Scholar
Hill, Peter C., and Hood, Ralph W. (eds.). Measures of Religiosity. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Hill, Peter C., Pargament, Kenneth I., Hood, Ralph W. Jr., McCullough, Michael E., Swyers, James P., Larson, David B., and Zinnbauer, Brian J.. “Conceptualizing Religion and Spirituality: Points of Commonality, Points of Departure,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 30 (1) (2000): 51–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00119.Google Scholar
Hinton, Devon E., Howes, David, and Kirmayer, Laurence J.. “Toward a Medical Anthropology of Sensations: Definitions and Research Agenda,” Transcult Psychiatry 45 (2) (2008): 142–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461508089763.Google Scholar
Holm, Nils G. “Mysticism and Intense Experiences,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 21 (3) (1982): 268–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/1385891.Google Scholar
Hood, Ralph W. “Religious Orientation and the Report of Religious Experience,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 9 (4) (1970): 285–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/1384573.Google Scholar
Hood, Ralph W. “The Construction and Preliminary Validation of a Measure of Reported Mystical Experience,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 14 (1) (1975): 29–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/1384454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, Ralph W. (ed.) Handbook of Religious Experience. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hood, Ralph W. “Theory and Methods in the Psychological Study of Mysticism,” International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 23 (4) (2013): 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2013.795803.Google Scholar
Hood, Ralph W., and Belzen, Jacob A.. “Research Methods in the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality,” in Paloutzian, Raymond F. and Park, Crystal L. (eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, pp. 75–93. New York: Guilford Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hood, Ralph W., Ghorbani, Nima, Watson, Penny J., Ghramaleki, Ahad Framarz, Bing, Mark N., Davison, H. Kristl, Morris, Ronald J., and Williamson, W. Paul. “Dimensions of the Mysticism Scale: Confirming the Three-Factor Structure in the United States and Iran,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 40 (4) (2001): 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/0021-8294.00085.Google Scholar
Hood, Ralph W., Hill, Peter C., and Spilka, Bernard. The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach, 4th ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Hood, Ralph W., Hill, Peter C., and Spilka, Bernard. The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach, 5th ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Hood, Ralph W., and Williamson, W. Paul. “An Empirical Test of the Unity Thesis: The Structure of Mystical Descriptors in Various Faith Samples,” Journal of Psychology and Christianity 19 (2000): 222–44.Google Scholar
Hufford, David. The Terror That Comes in the Night: An Experience-Centered Study of Supernatural Assault Traditions. Publications of the American Folklore Society, v. 7. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Inge, William Ralph. Christian Mysticism; Considered in Eight Lectures Delivered before the University of Oxford. London: Methuen, 1899.Google Scholar
Irwin, Harvey J., Dagnall, Neil, and Drinkwater, Kenneth. “Parapsychological Experience as Anomalous Experience plus Paranormal Attribution: A Questionnaire Based on a New Approach to Measurement,” Journal of Parapsychology 77 (1) (2013): 39–53.Google Scholar
James, William. Essays in Psychology. The Works of William James. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
James, William. The Varieties of Religious Experience. Edited by Smith, John E.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Jonte-Pace, Diane E., and Parsons, William Barclay (eds.). Religion and Psychology: Mapping the Terrain; Contemporary Dialogues, Future Prospects, 1st ed. London: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Kendell, Robert, and Jablensky, Assen. “Distinguishing between the Validity and Utility of Psychiatric Diagnoses,” American Journal of Psychiatry 160 (1) (2003): 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.4.Google Scholar
Kohls, Niko, and Walach, Harald. “Psychological Distress, Experiences of Ego Loss and Spirituality: Exploring the Effects of Spiritual Practice,” Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 35 (10) (2007): 1301–16.Google Scholar
Lange, Rense, Thalbourne, Michael A., Houran, James, and Storm, Lance. “The Revised Transliminality Scale: Reliability and Validity Data from a Rasch Top-Down Purification Procedure,” Consciousness and Cognition 9 (4) (2000): 591–617.Google Scholar
Lange, Rense, and Thalbourne, Michael A.. “The Rasch Scaling of Mystical Experiences: Construct Validity and Correlates of the Mystical Experience Scale (MES),” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 17 (2) (2007): 121–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508610701244130.Google Scholar
Lazarus, Richard S., and Folkman, Susan. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping, 1st ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1984.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, Scott O., and Treadway, Michael T.. “Clashing Diagnostic Approaches: DSM-ICD versus RDoC,” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 12 (2016): 435–63. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093122.Google Scholar
Lindahl, Jared R., Fisher, Nathan E., Cooper, David J., Rosen, Rochelle K., and Britton, Willoughby B.. “The Varieties of Contemplative Experience: A Mixed-Methods Study of Meditation-Related Challenges in Western Buddhists,” PloS One 12 (5) (2017): e0176239.Google Scholar
Maraldi, Everton de Oliveira, and Krippner, Stanley. “Cross-Cultural Research on Anomalous Experiences: Theoretical Issues and Methodological Challenges,” Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice 6 (3) (2019): 306–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000188.Google Scholar
Maraldi, Everton de Oliveira, Krippner, Stanley, Barros, Maria Cristina Monteiro, and Cunha, Alexandre. “Dissociation from a Cross-Cultural Perspective: Implications of Studies in Brazil,” The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 205 (7) (2017): 558–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000694.Google Scholar
Maul, Andrew. “Validity,” in Frey, Bruce B. (ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation, pp. 1771–75. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2018. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.Google Scholar
Mezzich, Juan E., Kirmayer, Laurence J., Kleinman, Arthur, Fabrega, Horacio Jr, Parron, Delores L., Good, Byron J., Lin, Keh-Ming, and Manson, Spero M.. “The Place of Culture in DSM-IV,” The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 187 (8) (1999): 457–64.Google Scholar
Murphy, James. “Beyond ‘Religion’ and ‘Spirituality’: Extending a ‘Meaning Systems’ Approach to Explore Lived Religion,” Archive for the Psychology of Religion 39 (2017): 1–26.Google Scholar
Oman, Doug. “Defining Religion and Spirituality,” in Paloutzian, Raymond F. and Park, Crystal L. (eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, pp. 23–47. New York: Guilford Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Paloutzian, Raymond F. “Religious Conversion and Spiritual Transformation: A Meaning-System Analysis,” in Paloutzian, Raymond F. and Park, Crystal L. (eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1st ed., pp. 331–347. New York: Guilford Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Paloutzian, Raymond F. Invitation to the Psychology of Religion, 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2017. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/qut/detail.action?docID=4715215.Google Scholar
Paloutzian, Raymond F., and Park, Crystal L. (eds.). Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. New York: Guilford Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Paloutzian, Raymond F., and Park, Crystal L. (eds.). Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Paloutzian, Raymond F., Murken, Sebastian, Streib, Heinz, and Rössler-Namini, Sussan. “Conversion, Deconversion, and Spiritual Transformation: A Multilevel Interdisciplinary View,” in Paloutzian, Raymond F. and Park, Crystal L. (eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2nd ed. , pp. 399–421. New York: Guilford, 2013.Google Scholar
Pargament, Kenneth I. “The Psychology of Religion and Spirituality? Yes and No,” International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 9 (1999): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pargament, Kenneth I. “Searching for the Sacred: Toward a Nonreductionistic Theory of Spirituality,” in Pargament, Kenneth I., Exline, Julie J., and Jones, James W. (eds.), APA Handbook of Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality (Vol 1): Context, Theory, and Research, pp. 257–73. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1037/14045-014.Google Scholar
Pargament, Kenneth I., and Mahoney, Annette. “Sacred Matters: Sanctification as a Vital Topic for the Psychology of Religion,” International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 15 (3) (2005): 179–98.Google Scholar
Pargament, Kenneth I., Exline, Julie J., and Jones, James W. (eds.). APA Handbook of Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality. APA Handbooks in Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2013.Google Scholar
Park, Crystal L. “Religion and Meaning,” in Paloutzian, Raymond F. and Park, Crystal L. (eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1st ed., pp. 295–314. New York: Guilford Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Park, Crystal L. “Making Sense of the Meaning Literature: An Integrative Review of Meaning Making and Its Effects on Adjustment to Stressful Life Events,” Psychological Bulletin 136 (2) (2010): 257–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018301.Google Scholar
Park, Crystal L., and Folkman, Susan. “Meaning in the Context of Stress and Coping,” Review of General Psychology 1 (2) (1997): 115–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.115.Google Scholar
Park, Crystal L., Riley, Kristen E., George, Login S., Gutierrez, Ian A., Hale, Amy E., Cho, Dalnim, and Braun, Tosca D.. “Assessing Disruptions in Meaning: Development of the Global Meaning Violation Scale,” Cognitive Therapy and Research 40 (6) (2016): 831–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-016-9794-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piedmont, Ralph L. “Does Spirituality Represent the Sixth Factor of Personality? Spiritual Transcendence and the Five-Factor Model,” Journal of Personality 67 (6) (1999): 985–1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00080.Google Scholar
Piedmont, Ralph L. “A Short History of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality: Providing Growth and Meaning for Division 36,” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 5 (1) (2013): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roof, Wade Clark. A Generation of Seekers: The Spiritual Journeys of the Baby Boom Generation, 1st ed. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1993.Google Scholar
Spilka, Bernard, Hood, Ralph W. Jr, Hunsberger, Bruce, and Gorsuch, Richard. The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Spilka, Bernard, Hood, Ralph W. Jr, Hunsberger, Bruce, and Gorsuch, Richard. The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach, 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Spilka, Bernard, Shaver, Phillip, and Kirkpatrick, Lee A.. “A General Attribution Theory for the Psychology of Religion,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 24 (1) (1985): 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386272.Google Scholar
Streib, Heinz, and Klein, Constantin. “Religion and Spirituality,” in Stausberg, Michael and Engler, Steven (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Study of Religion, pp. 73–83. Oxford Handbooks in Religion and Theology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Streib, Heinz, Hood, Ralph W. Jr, Keller, Barbara, Csöff, Rosina-Martha, and Silver, Christopher F.. Deconversion: Qualitative and Quantitative Results from Cross-Cultural Research in Germany and the United States of America. Research in Contemporary Religion, v. 5. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2009.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers. Ministry of Presence: Chaplaincy, Spiritual Care, and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Taves, Ann. Religious Experience Reconsidered: A Building-Block Approach to the Study of Religion and Other Special Things. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009a.Google Scholar
Taves, Ann. “William James Revisited: Rereading the Varieties of Religious Experience in Transatlantic Perspective,” Zygon 44 (2) (2009b): 415–32.Google Scholar
Taves, Ann. “What Is Nonreligion? On the Virtues of a Meaning Systems Framework for Studying Nonreligious and Religious Worldviews in the Context of Everyday Life,” Secularism and Nonreligion 7 (1) (2018): 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.104.Google Scholar
Taves, Ann. “Mystical and Other Alterations in Sense of Self: An Expanded Framework for Studying Nonordinary Experiences,” Perspectives on Psychological Science (2020). Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1745691619895047.Google Scholar
Taves, Ann, and Kinsella, Michael. “Development and Design of the INOE,” paper presented in a session on the Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences [INOE] titled “Comparing nonordinary experiences: Surveying, validating, and mapping similarities and differences in the US and India” at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Religion, San Diego, CA, November 2019. osf.io/pv5kt.Google Scholar
Taves, Ann, Barlev, Michael, and Kinsella, Michael. “What Counts as Religious Experience? The Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences as a Tool for Analysis across Cultures and Traditions,” paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the International Association for the Psychology of Religion, Hamar, Norway, August 2017. osf.io/xe8nd.Google Scholar
Thalbourne, Michael A. “The Psychology of Mystical Experience,” Exceptional Human Experience 9 (1991): 168–86.Google Scholar
Underwood, Raphael, Kumari, Veena, and Peters, Emmanuelle. “Cognitive and Neural Models of Threat Appraisal in Psychosis: A Theoretical Integration,” Psychiatry Research 239 (2016): 131–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.03.016.Google Scholar
Ward, Thomas A., Gaynor, Keith J., Hunter, Mike D., Woodruff, Peter W. R., Garety, Philippa A., and Peters, Emmanuelle R.. “Appraisals and Responses to Experimental Symptom Analogues in Clinical and Nonclinical Individuals with Psychotic Experiences,” Schizophrenia Bulletin 40 (4) (2014): 845–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbt094.Google Scholar
Wolf, Melissa Gordon, and Ihm, Elliott. “Validation Methods and Results,” paper presented in a session on the Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences [INOE] titled “Comparing nonordinary experiences: Surveying, validating, and mapping similarities and differences in the US and India” at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Religion, San Diego, CA, November 2019. osf.io/bnvmc.Google Scholar
Wolf, Melissa Gordon, Ihm, Elliott, Maul, Andrew, and Taves, Ann. “Response Process Evaluation,” in Engler, Steven and Stausberg, Michael (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, In Press.Google Scholar
Wulff, David M. Psychology of Religion: Classic and Contemporary, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1997.Google Scholar
Wulff, David M. “Psychology of Religion: An Overview,” in Jonte-Pace, Diane E. and Parsons, William Barclay (eds.), Religion and Psychology: Mapping the Terrain; Contemporary Dialogues, Future Prospects, 1st ed. London: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Yaden, David Bryce, Haidt, Jonathan, Hood, Ralph W., Vago, David R., and Newberg, Andrew B.. “The Varieties of Self-Transcendent Experience,” Review of General Psychology 21 (2) (2017): 143–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000102.Google Scholar
Zinnbauer, Brian J., Pargament, Kenneth I., and Scott, Allie B.. “The Emerging Meanings of Religiousness and Spirituality: Problems and Prospects,” Journal of Personality 67 (6) (1999): 889–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00077.Google Scholar
References
Anselm of Canterbury, St. Proslogion, www.stanselminstitute.org/files/AnselmProslogion.pdf (Accessed June 4, 2018).Google Scholar
Aquinas, St Thomas. Summa Theologiae, www.newadvent.org/summa/1002.htm#article1 (Accessed June 4, 2018).Google Scholar
Aristotle, . “On Prophesying by Dreams” (trans. J. I. Beare) in The Basic Works of Aristotle. Edited by McKeon, Richard. New York: Random House, 1966.Google Scholar
Augustine of Hippo, St, On the Trinity, www.newadvent.org/fathers/130109.htm (Accessed July 11, 2018).Google Scholar
Ayer, Alfred J. Language, Truth, and Logic, 2nd ed. New York: Dover Publications, 1946.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George. “A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge,” in The Empiricists. New York: Anchor Books, 1974 [orig. 1710].Google Scholar
Brasic, James R. “Hallucinations,” Perceptual and Motor Skills 86 (1998): 851–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchler, Justus. Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover Publications, 1955.Google Scholar
Carroll, Michael P. The Cult of the Virgin Mary: Psychological Origins. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Close, Frank, Marten, Michael, and Sutton, Christine. The Particle Explosion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Davis, Wayne. “Implicature,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 ed), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/implicature/ (Accessed June 5, 2018).Google Scholar
Decaen, Christopher A. “Aristotle’s Aether and Contemporary Science,” The Thomist 68 (2004): 375–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. “The Self as a Center of Narrative Gravity,” in Kessel, F., Cole, P., and Johnson, D. (eds.), Self and Consciousness: Multiple Perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1992.Google Scholar
Evans, C. Stephen, “Moral Arguments for the Existence of God,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 ed), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/moral-arguments-god/ (Accessed June 6, 2018).Google Scholar
Feigl, Herbert. “The ‘Orthodox’ View of Theories: Remarks in Defense as well as Critique,” in Rudner, Michael and Winokur, Stephen (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Analysis of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology, vol. IV, pp. 3–15. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Flew, Antony, and MacIntyre, Alasdair (eds.). New Essays in Philosophical Theology. London: SCM, 1955.Google Scholar
Friederich, Simon. “Fine-Tuning,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/fine-tuning/ (Accessed June 5, 2018).Google Scholar
Fulford, Kenneth W. M. Moral Theory and Medical Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl. “Problems and Changes in the Empiricist Criterion of Meaning,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4 (1950): 41–63.Google Scholar
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967 [orig. 1738–40].Google Scholar
Hume, David. Dialogues concerning Natural Religion. Edited with commentary by Pike, Nelson. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1970 [orig. 1779].Google Scholar
Jaynes, Julian. The Origins of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason. Translated by Lewis White Beck. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1956 [orig. 1788].Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. “The Autonomy of Biology: The Position of Biology among the Sciences,” The Quarterly Review of Biology 71 (1996): 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/A_System_of_Logic,_Ratiocinative_and_Inductive [orig. 1843] (Accessed June 5, 2018).Google Scholar
Moore, Sebastian. “The Resurrection: A Confusing Paradigm Shift,” The Downside Review 98 (1980): 257–66.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Kai. Philosophy and Atheism: In Defense of Atheism. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1985.Google Scholar
Paley, William. Natural Theology: Or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature. Edited by Eddy, Matthew and Knight, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006 [orig. 1802].Google Scholar
Pals, Daniel. Nine Theories of Religion, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
“Perceptual release theory of hallucinations,” http://hallucinations.enacademic.com/1415/perceptual_release_theory_of_hallucinations (Accessed July 2, 2018).Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, . The Dialogues of Plato. Translated by Jowett, B.. New York: Random House, 1937.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman. From a Logical Point of View, 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row, 1963.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman, and Ullian, Joseph S.. The Web of Belief. http://socialistica.lenin.ru/analytic/txt/q/quine_1.htm (Accessed June 5, 2018).Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, and Vattimo, Gianni. The Future of Religion. Edited by Zabala, Santiago. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Searle, John. The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1992.Google Scholar
Smart, John (Jack) Jamieson Carswell, and Haldane, John. Atheism and Theism, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar
Smart, Ninian. The World’s Religions, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Smith, Quentin. “The Metaphilosophy of Naturalism,” Philo: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (2001): 195–215.Google Scholar
Tulodziecki, Dana. “Shattering the Myth of Semmelweis,” Philosophy of Science 80 (2013): 1065–75.Google Scholar
Uebel, Thomas. “Vienna Circle,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 ed), Edward N., Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/vienna-circle/ (Accessed June 5, 2018).Google Scholar
Wiebe, Phillip H. Visions of Jesus: Direct Encounters from the New Testament to Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by Anscombe, G. E. M.. London: MacMillan, 1968.Google Scholar
References
Barnes, M. Theology and the Dialogue of Religions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Barnes, M. Interreligious Learning. Dialogue, Spirituality and the Christian Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Byrne, P. Prolegomena to Religious Pluralism: Reference and Realism in Religion. London: St Martin’s Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlot, J. “Contemporary Polynesian Thinking,” in Deutsch, Eliot and Bontekoe, Ron (eds.), A Companion to World Philosophies. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar
Clooney, F. X. Comparative Theology: Deep Learning across Religious Borders. Boston: Wiley, 2010.Google Scholar
Clooney, F. X. (ed.). The New Comparative Theology: Interreligious Insights from the Next Generation. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 2010.Google Scholar
Cornille, C. The Impossibility of Interreligious Dialogue. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company, 2008.Google Scholar
D’Costa, G. Christianity and World Religions: Disputed Questions in the Theology of Religions. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Douglas, K. B. Stand Your Ground: Black Bodies and the Justice of God. New York: Orbis Books, 2015.Google Scholar
Friday, J. “Discerning Criteria of Religious Experience in Theology of Interreligious Dialogue,” in Merrigan, T. and Friday, J. (eds.), The Past, Present, and Future of Theologies of Interreligious Dialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Griffith-Dickson, G. “Religion – A Western Invention?,” in Haring, H., Martin, J., and Wilfred, F. (eds.), Concilium Learning from Other Faiths. London: SCM Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Hedges, P. “A Reflection on Typologies: Negotiating a Fast-Moving Discussion,” in Race, A. and Hedges, P. (eds.), Christian Approaches to Other Faiths. London: SCM Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Hick, J. God and the Universe of Faiths: Essays in the Philosophy of Religion. London: Macmillan, 1973.Google Scholar
Hick, J. An Interpretation of Religion: Humanity’s Varied Response to the Transcendent. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1989.Google Scholar
Hick, J. “Theology of Religions versus Philosophy of Religions,” in Bartel, T. (ed.), Comparative Theology – Essays for Keith Ward. London: SPCK, 2003.Google Scholar
Kiblinger, K. Buddhist Inclusivism: Attitudes towards Religious Others. London: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar
Kiblinger, K. “Relating Theology of Religions and Comparative Theology,” in Clooney, F. X., (ed.), The New Comparative Theology: Interreligious Insights from the Next Generation. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 2010.Google Scholar
Pope, R. “Immediate Revelation or the Basest Idolatry? Theology and Religious Experience,” in Schmidt, B. (ed.), The Study of Religious Experience: Approaches and Methodologies. Sheffield, England: Equinox Publishing, 2016.Google Scholar
Race, A. Christians and Religious Pluralism: Patterns in the Christian Theology of Religions. London: SCM Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Race, A., and Hedges, P. (eds.). Christian Approaches to Other Faiths. London: SCM Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Leukel, P. Religious Pluralism and Interreligious Theology. New York: Orbis Books, 2017.Google Scholar
Shakman Hurd, E. Beyond Religious Freedom: The New Global Politics of Religion. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Ward, K. Religion and Revelation: A Theology of Revelation in the World’s Religions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar