Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:54:25.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Virginia Woolf and sexuality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2010

Susan Sellers
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Get access

Summary

Language is the still unborn. I cannot say what I feel.

But I feel it! . . . I can see it. I can touch it, I cannot say it.

Nicholas to Eleanor (Draft Y5, p. 113)

Sexuality and modernism

Virginia Woolf's prominence among early twentieth-century feminist, modernist and Bloomsbury innovators is well established, her iconoclasm most often discussed in terms of her feminist, pacifist, anti-imperialist and aesthetic theories. In Virginia Woolf as Feminist, Naomi Black aptly describes Woolf's feminism as 'deeply radical', 'drastic, basic, transformational'. Woolf called for radical reinventions of gender norms - 'For the degradation of being a slave is only equalled by the degradation of being a master.' Her pacifism was equally thoroughgoing and lifelong: her 1919 vow to oppose 'any domination of one over another; any leadership, any imposition of the will' (D1, p. 256, emphasis added) produced modernist classics that expose the roots of war and empire in habits of dominance and submission instilled at every level of private and public life.

Modernism is widely associated with innovation, alienation and abrupt breaks with past traditions. As Suzette Henke notes, Woolf's name is a 'watchword' for modernist innovation. When defining herself as 'modern', Woolf speaks in terms of fundamental transformations, profound alienation from existing traditions, and unmitigated breaks with the past: thus her claim that around 1910 'human character [itself] changed', and her comparison of axes 'breaking . . . crashing . . . destr[oying]' to modernist aims. As early as 1919, at the beginning of her writing career, Woolf writes, '& as the current answers don't do, one has to grope for a new one', and she rejects the realist conventions of her literary predecessors, Arnold Bennett (1867-1931) and Thackeray (1811-63), as impossible 'if one had the least respect for one's soul' (D1, p. 259).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×