Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:49:23.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Northern Agriculture and the Westward Movement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Jeremy Atack
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University
Fred Bateman
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
William Parker
Affiliation:
Yale University
Stanley L. Engerman
Affiliation:
University of Rochester, New York
Robert E. Gallman
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Thomas Jefferson envisioned the United States as an experiment in political democracy founded upon an economy of small farms. This essay examines the geographic expansion and economic development of agriculture during the nineteenth century across the northern region, where Jefferson hoped his vision would materialize most clearly. Central to realizing this goal was transferring land in the public domain into the hands of aspiring farm families. Our theme in this chapter is the heightening tension between the political vision of a nation inhabited by self-sufficient, landowning farmers and the economic reality of increasing agricultural commercialization, tenancy, wealth inequality, and industrialization.

The century opened with an agricultural-commercial economy in which farming played the central role. It closed, however, with agriculture as a relatively diminished sector encroached upon by a rapidly advancing industrial system and by corporate business. In between, farming evolved from a simple, traditional activity into a highly productive commercial enterprise that not only fed the domestic population but exported worldwide and supplied the raw materials that fueled American industrialization. The outcome, ironically, was an increasingly productive farm sector populated by increasingly discontented farmers. These individuals, who believed that the national economy was developing at their expense, ultimately sought governmental solutions when markets did not meet their personal expectations. Nevertheless, the structural transformation progressed, becoming a driving force behind the national population’s dramatically improving economic well-being over the nineteenth century.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atack, Jeremy, “Farm and Farm-Making Costs Revisited,” Agricultural History 56 (1982).Google Scholar
Atack, Jeremy, “Tenants and Yeomen in the Nineteenth Century,” Agricultural History 62 (1988), especially.Google Scholar
Atack, Jeremy, “The Agricultural Ladder Revisited: A New Look at an Old Question with Some Data for 1860,” Agricultural History 63 (1988).Google Scholar
Barrett, Jay A., Evolution of the Ordinance of 1787 (New York, 1901).Google Scholar
Barron, Hal S., Those Who Stayed Behind (Cambridge, 1984).Google Scholar
Benton, Thomas Hart, Thirty Years’ View (New York, 1854), Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Bidwell, Percy W., “Rural Economy in New England at the Beginning of the Nineteenth Century,” Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences 20 (1916).Google Scholar
Bidwell, Percy W. and Falconer, John I., History of Agriculture in the Northern United States, 1620–1860 (Washington, DC, 1925).Google Scholar
Bogue, Allan G., From Prairie to Corn Belt: Farming on the Illinois and Iowa Praries in the Nineteenth Century (Chicago, 1963).Google Scholar
Bogue, Margaret B., Patterns from the Sod: Land Use and Tenure in the Grand Prairie, 1850–1900 (Springfield, 1959).Google Scholar
Cogswell, Seddie Jr., Tenure, Nativity and Age as Factors in Iowa Agriculture, 1850–1880 (Ames, IA, 1975).Google Scholar
Conzen, Michael, Frontier Farming in an Urban Shadow (Madison, 1971).Google Scholar
Cox, Lawanda, “Tenancy in the United States; 1865–1900: A Consideration of the Validity of the Agricultural Ladder Hypothesis,” Agricultural History 18 (1944).Google Scholar
Curti, Merle et al., The Making of An American Community: A Case Study of Democracy in a Frontier County (Stanford University Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Danhof, Clarence H., “Farm-Making Costs and the Safety Valve: 1850–1860,” Journal of Political Economy 49 (1941).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danhof, Clarence, Change in Agriculture (Cambridge, MA, 1969).Google Scholar
Dennen, R. Taylor, “Some Efficiency Effects of Nineteenth Century Land Policy: A Dynamic Analysis,” Agricultural History 51 (1977).Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas, The Public Domain (Washington, DC, 1884).Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert W. and Rutner, Jack, “The Efficiency Effects of Federal Land Policy, 1850–1900: A Report on Some Provisional Findings,” in Aydelotte, William O. et al. (eds.), The Dimensions of Quantitative Research in History (Princeton, 1972).Google Scholar
Gallaway, Lowell E. and Vedder, Richard K., “Migration and the Old Northwest,” in Klingaman, D. and Vedder, Richard K. (eds.), Essays in Nineteenth Century Economic History (Athens, OH, 1975).Google Scholar
Gates, Paul W., “The Homestead Law in an Incongruous Land System”, American Historical Review 41 (1936).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, Paul W., “Frontier Landlords and Pioneer Tenants,” Journal of the Illinois Historical Society 38 (1945).Google Scholar
Gates, Paul W., “Land Policy and Tenancy in the Prairie States,” Journal of Economic History 1 (1941).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, Paul W., “The Role of the Land Speculator in Western Development,” Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 66 (1942).Google Scholar
Gates, Paul W., The Farmer’s Age: Agriculture 1815–1860 (New York, 1960).Google Scholar
Gates, Paul W., The Illinois Central Railroad and Its Colonizing Work (Cambridge, MA, 1941).Google Scholar
Gates, Paul W., “Land Policy and Tenancy in the Prairie Counties of Indiana,” Indiana Magazine of History 35 (1939).Google Scholar
Gates, Paul Wallace, “The Homestead Law” plus his essays reprinted in Landlord and Tenants on the Prairie Frontier (Ithaca, 1973).Google Scholar
Goldenweisser, E. A. and Truesdell, Leon E., Farm Tenancy in the United States (Washington, DC, 1924).Google Scholar
Gray, L. C. et al., “Farm Ownership and Tenancy,” in United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Yearbook (Washington, DC, 1924).Google Scholar
Hibbard, Benjamin H., A History of the Public Land Policies (New York, 1924).Google Scholar
Johnson, Hildegard B., Order Upon the Land (New York, 1976).Google Scholar
Kim, Sung Bok, Landlord and Tenant in Colonial New York: Manorial Society, 1664–1775 (Chapel Hill, NC, 1978), vii.Google Scholar
LeDuc, Thomas, “Public Policy, Private Investment, and Land Use in American Agriculture, 1825–1875,” Agricultural History 37 (1963).Google Scholar
LeDuc, Thomas, “The Disposal of the Public Domain on the Trans-Mississippi Plains: Some Opportunities for Investigation,” Agricultural History 24 (1950)Google Scholar
Lemon, James T., The Best Poor Man’s County (Baltimore, 1972).Google Scholar
Lindert, Peter H., “Long-Run Trends in American Farmland Values,” Agricultural History 62 (1988).Google Scholar
Malin, James C., “The Turnover of Farm Population in Kansas,” Kansas Historical Quarterly 4 (1935).Google Scholar
,Minnesota Commissioner of Statistics, Minnesota: Its Place Among the States, Being the First Annual Report of the Commissioner of Statistics (Hartford, 1860).
Parker, Nathan H., The Iowa Handbook for 1856 (Boston, 1856).Google Scholar
Primack, Martin, “Land Clearing Under Nineteenth-Century Techniques: Some Preliminary Calculations,” Journal of Economic History 22 (1962), especially.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Roy M., Our Landed Heritage (Princeton, 1942).Google Scholar
Sakolski, A. M., The Great American Land Bubble (New York, 1932).Google Scholar
Saloutos, Theodore, “The Agricultural Problem and Nineteenth-Century Industrialism,” Agricultural History 22 (1948).Google Scholar
Saloutos, Theodore, “Land Policy and its Relation to Agricultural Production and Distribution, 1862 to 1933,” Journal of Economic History 22 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, James F. and Walton, Gary M., “Economic Change after the American Revolution,” Explorations in Economic History 13 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Socolofsky, Homer E., “William Scully: Ireland and America, 1840–1900,” Agricultural History 48 (1974).Google Scholar
Steckel, Richard, “The Economic Foundations of East-West Migration During the Nineteenth Century,” Exploration in Economic History 20 (1983).Google Scholar
Swierenga, Robert P., “Land Speculator ‘Profits’ Reconsidered: Central Iowa as a Test Case,” Journal of Economic History 26 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swierenga, Robert P., Pioneers and Profits: Land Speculation on the Iowa Frontier (Ames, IA, 1968).Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America (first published, Paris, 1835).Google Scholar
Treat, Payson J., The National Land System, 1785–1820 (New York, 1910).Google Scholar
,U.S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970 (Washington, DC, 1975), I.
,U.S. Census Office. Eighth Census, Agriculture of the United States in 1860 (Washington, DC, 1864).
,US Census Office, Report upon the Statistics of Agriculture (Washington, DC, 1883), Volume 3.
Watt, John, Pennsylvania Ledger: or the Weekly Advertiser, Oct. 29, 1777.
Winters, Donald L., “Tenancy as an Economic Institution: The Growth and Distribution of Agricultural Tenancy in Iowa, 1850–1900,” Journal of Economic History 37 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, Donald L., Farmers Without Farms: Agricultural Tenancy in Nineteenth-Century Iowa (Ames, IA, 1978).Google Scholar
Winters, Donald L., “Agricultural Tenancy in the Nineteenth Century Middle West: The Historiographical Debate,” Indiana Magazine of History 78 (1982).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×