Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:24:28.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Anthropologies of Reproduction, Abortion, and Biopolitics

from Part Three - Resistances and Intersections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2023

By
Michele Rivkin-Fish
Edited by
Cecilia McCallum ,
Silvia Posocco  and
Martin Fotta
Cecilia McCallum
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brazil
Silvia Posocco
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Martin Fotta
Affiliation:
Institute of Ethnology, Czech Academy of Sciences
Get access

Summary

Exploring key trajectories of feminist anthropologies of reproduction, this chapter demonstrates how issues surrounding procreation and its prevention have provided the terrain for major insights about cultural and political dynamics since the very beginning of anthropology itself. The notion of stratified reproduction proved pivotal for broadening the ethnographic gaze on reproductive practices to include global processes, inspiring feminist anthropologists to highlight the multiple forms of inequality and the multiplication of inequalities within and across borders. The author focuses on theoretical debates that have both influenced the feminist anthropologies of reproduction and, in turn, been impacted by it – questions of Foucauldian biopolitics. The author begins by outlining Foucault’s notion of biopower, and then explores some of the diverse ways that feminist anthropologists have related to concepts of biopolitics in theorizing the study of reproduction. The third section illuminates anthropologies of abortion that have variously pursued feminist politics, and/or the analytical concerns of biopolitics, at times bringing them together and at others considering them to be discrete agendas. Finally, the chapter explores feminist anthropologies of abortion in state socialist and postsocialist societies, arguing that these political-economic and social contexts offer important directions for understanding reproduction, the state, and biopolitics.

Keywords

abortionbiopoliticsethnographyfeminist anthropologyreproductive governancepostsocialism
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook for the Anthropology of Gender and Sexuality , pp. 395 - 424
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, K. A. (2002). Planning the Family in Egypt: New Bodies, New Selves. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Andaya, E. (2014). Conceiving Cuba: Reproduction, Women, and the State in the Post-Soviet Era. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Andaya, E. (2019). “I’m building a wall around my uterus”: abortion politics and the politics of othering in Trump’s America. Cultural Anthropology, 34(1), 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andaya, E., and Mishtal, J. (2017). The erosion of rights to abortion care in the United States: a call for a renewed anthropological engagement with the politics of abortion. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 31(1), 40–59.Google Scholar
Benedict, R. (1934). Patterns of Culture. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Berry, N. S. (2010). Unsafe Motherhood: Mayan Maternal Mortality and Subjectivity in Post-War Guatemala, reprint ed. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., and Inhorn, M. C., eds. (2009). Assisting Reproduction, Testing Genes: Global Encounters with New Biotechnologies. London: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Bjork-James, S. (2021). The Divine Institution: White Evangelicalism’s Politics of the Family. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Bledsoe, C. H. (2002). Contingent Lives: Fertility, Time, and Aging in West Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockling, U., Krasmann, S., and Lemke, T. (2011). Governmentality: Current Issues and Challenges. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Browner, C., and Sargent, C. F., eds. (2011). Reproduction, Globalization, and the State: New Theoretical and Ethnographic Perspectives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Buchbinder, M. (2016). Scripting dissent: US abortion laws, state power, and the politics of scripted speech. American Anthropologist, 118(4), 772–83.Google Scholar
Carsten, J. (2004). After Kinship. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, J. (2011). Globalizing, reproducing, and civilizing rural subjects: population control policy and constructions of rural identity in China. In Browner, C. H. and Sargent, C. F., eds., Reproduction, Globalization, and the State: New Theoretical and Ethnographic Perspectives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 38–52.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. (2009). Islam and New Kinship: Reproductive Technology, Anthropology, and the Shari’ah in Lebanon. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Colen, S. (1995). “Like a mother to them”: stratified reproduction and West Indian childcare workers and employers in New York. In Ginsburg, F. and Rapp, R., eds., Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 78–102.Google Scholar
Cosminsky, S. (1982). Childbirth and change: a Guatemalan study. In MacCormack, C. P., ed., Ethnography of Fertility and Birth. New York: Academic Press, pp. 205–29.Google Scholar
Cosminsky, S. (1987). Women and health care on a Guatemalan plantation. Social Science and Medicine, 25, 1163–73.Google Scholar
Cosminsky, S. (2016). Midwives and Mothers: The Medicalization of Childbirth on a Guatemalan Plantation. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Davis, D. (2019). Reproductive Injustice: Racism, Pregnancy, and Premature Births. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Davis-Floyd, R. (1992). Birth as an American Rite of Passage. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Davis-Floyd, R., Barclay, L., Davis, B., and Tritten, J., eds. (2006). Birth Models That Work. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Davis-Floyd, R., and Johnson, C. B., eds. (2006). Mainstreaming Midwives: The Politics of Change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davis-Floyd, R., and Sargent, C. F., eds. (1997). Childbirth and Authoritative Knowledge: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Deomampo, D. (2016). Transnational Reproduction: Race, Kinship, and Commercial Surrogacy in India. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
De Zordo, S. (2016). The biomedicalisation of illegal abortion: the double life of misoprostol in Brazil. Historia, Ciencias, Saude – Manguinhos, 23, 19–35.Google Scholar
De Zordo, S., and Marchesi, M. (2012). Irrational reproduction: new intersections of politics, gender, race, and class across the north–south divide. Special issue of Anthropology & Medicine, 19(2).Google Scholar
De Zordo, S., Mishtal, J., and Anton, L. (2016). A Fragmented Landscape: Abortion Governance and Associated Protest Logics in Europe. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Dudgeon, M. R., and Inhorn, M. C. (2003). Gender, masculinity, and reproduction: anthropological perspectives. International Journal of Men’s Health, 2(1), 31–56.Google Scholar
Dudgeon, M. R., and Inhorn, M. C. (2004). Men’s influences on women’s reproductive health: medical anthropological perspectives. Social Science & Medicine, 59, 1379–95.Google Scholar
Edu, U. F. (2018). When doctors don’t tie: hierarchical medicalization, reproduction, and sterilization in Brazil. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 32(4), 556–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eichner, M. (2020). The Free Market Family: How the Market Crushed the American Dream (And How It Can Be Restored). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, S. (2003). Post-diagnostic abortion in Germany: reproductive gone awry, again? Social Science and Medicine, 56, 1987–2001.Google Scholar
Flippen, J. B. (2011). Jimmy Carter, the Politics of the Family, and the Rise of the Religious Right. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Modern Prison. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality: Part 1. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Fraser, G. (1998). African American Midwifery in the South: Dialogues of Birth, Race, and Memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, S. (1994). Gender in the post-socialist transition: the abortion debate in Hungary. Eastern European Politics and Societies, 8, 256.Google Scholar
Gal, S., and Kligman, G. (2000). The Politics of Gender after Socialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gammeltoft, T. (2002). Between “science” and “superstition”: moral perceptions of induced abortion among young adults in Vietnam. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 26, 313–38.Google Scholar
Gammeltoft, T. (2014). Haunting Images: A Cultural Account of Selective Reproduction in Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, F. (1989). Contested Lives: The Abortion Debate in an American Community. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, F. (1993). “Saving America’s souls”: Operation Rescue’s crusade against abortion. In Marty, M. E. and Appleby, R. S., eds., Fundamentalisms and the State: Remaking Politics, Economies, and Militance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 557–88.Google Scholar
Goven, J. (1993). Gender politics in Hungary: autonomy and antifeminism. In N. Funk and M. Mueller, eds., Gender Politics and Post-Communism. New York: Routledge, pp. 224–40.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, S. (2003). Planned births, unplanned persons: “population” in the making of Chinese modernity. American Ethnologist, 30(2), 196–215.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, S. (2008). Just One Child: Science and Policy in Deng’s China, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, S. (2010). Cultivating Global Citizens: Population in the Rise of China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, S., and Winckler, E. A. (2005). Governing China’s Population: From Leninist to Neoliberal Biopolitics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, M. (2011). Planning men out of family planning: a case study from Mexico. In Browner, C. H., Sargent, C. H., and Sargent, C. F., eds. Reproduction, Globalization, and the State: New Theoretical and Ethnographic Perspectives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 53–67.Google Scholar
Hurston, Z. N. (1978 [1935]) Mules and Men. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. 2015. Cosmopolitan Conceptions: IVF Sojourns in Global Dubai. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C., and Van Balen, F., eds. (2002). Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ivry, T. (2010). Kosher medicine and medicalized halacha: an exploration of triadic relations among Israeli rabbis, doctors, and infertility patients. American Ethnologist, 37(4), 662–80.Google Scholar
Jeffery, P., Jeffery, R., and Lyon, A. (1989). Labour Pains and Labour Power: Women and Childbearing in India. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Johnson-Hanks, J. (2002). The lesser shame: abortion among educated women in southern Cameroon. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 1337–49.Google Scholar
Johnson-Hanks, J. (2006). Uncertain Honor: Modern Motherhood in an African Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, B. (1978). Birth in Four Cultures: A Crosscultural Investigation of Childbirth in Yucatan, Holland, Sweden, and the United States, 4th ed. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, S. M. (2000). Reproducing Jews: A Cultural Account of Assisted Reproduction in Israel. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kanaaneh, R. A. (2002). Birthing the Nation: Strategies of Palestinian Women in Israel. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S., and Morgan, L. (2005). The anthropology of the beginnings and endings of life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 317–41.Google Scholar
Keys, J. (2010). Running the gauntlet: women’s use of emotion management techniques in the abortion experience. Symbolic Interaction, 33(1), 41–70.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, S. (1971a). The woman on the delivery table. In Laing, M., ed., Woman on Woman. London: Sidgewick & Jackson.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, S. (1971b). Giving Birth: The Parents’ Emotions in Childbirth. London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar
Kligman, G. (1998). The Politics of Duplicity: Controlling Reproduction in Ceausescu’s Romania. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Krause, E. L. (2004). A Crisis of Births: Population Politics and Family-Making in Italy. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Krause, E. L., and De Zordo, S. (2012). Introduction: ethnography and biopolitics: tracing “rationalities” of reproduction across the north–south divide. Anthropology & Medicine, 19(2), 137–51.Google Scholar
Kulpa, R., and Mizielinska, J. (2016). De-Centering Western Sexualities: Central and Eastern European Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Layne, L. L. (2002). Motherhood Lost: A Feminist Account of Pregnancy Loss in America. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lemke, T. (2011). Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. Trans. Eric Frederick Trump. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Lopez, I. (2008). Matters of Choice: Puerto Rican Women’s Struggle for Reproductive Freedom. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Marchesi, M. (2012). Reproducing Italians: contested biopolitics in the age of “replacement anxiety.” Anthropology & Medicine, 19(2), 171–88.Google Scholar
Marks, L. (2017). The Romani minority, coercive sterilization, and languages of denial in the Czech lands. History Workshop Journal, 84, 128–48.Google Scholar
Martin, E. (1987). The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Maternowska, M. C. (2006). Reproducing Inequities: Poverty and the Politics of Population in Haiti. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Mattalucci, C. (2012). Pro-life activism, abortion and subjectivity before birth: discursive practices and anthropological perspectives. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 109–18.Google Scholar
Maxwell, C. J. C. (2002). Pro-Life Activists in America: Meaning, Motivation, and Direct Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCallum, C., Menezes, G., and Reis, A. P. (2016). The dilemma of a practice: experiences of abortion in a public maternity hospital in the city of Salvador, Bahia. História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos, 23(1), 37–56.Google Scholar
McLaren, M. A. (2002) Feminism, Foucault, and Embodied Subjectivity. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (2001 [1928]). Coming of Age in Samoa: A Psychology Study of Primitive Youth for Western Civilization. New York: Perennial Classics.Google Scholar
Miller, B. D. (2001). Female‐selective abortion in Asia: patterns, policies, and debates. American Anthropologist, 103(4), 1083–95.Google Scholar
Mishtal, J. (2014). Reproductive governance in the New Europe: competing visions of morality, sovereignty, and supranational policy. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures, 23, 59–76.Google Scholar
Mishtal, J. (2015). The Politics of Morality: The Church, the State, and Reproductive Rights in Postsocialist Poland. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Mishtal, J. Z. (2009). Matters of “conscience”: the politics of reproductive healthcare in Poland. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 23, 161–83.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. M. (1997). Imagining the unborn in the Ecuadoran Andes. Feminist Studies, 23, 323–50.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. M. (2009). Icons of Life: A Cultural History of Human Embryos. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. M., and Roberts, E. F. (2012). Reproductive governance in Latin America. Anthropology & Medicine, 19(2), 241–54.Google Scholar
Nelson, M. K. (1983). Working‐class women, middle‐class woman, and models of childbirth. Social Problems, 30(3), 284–97.Google Scholar
Oakley, A. (1975). The trap of medicalized motherhood. New Society, 34, 639–41.Google Scholar
Oakley, A. (1979). A case of maternity: paradigms of women as maternity cases. SIGNS: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 4(4), 607–31.Google Scholar
Oakley, A. (1980). Women Confined: Towards a Sociology of Childbirth. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Oaks, L. (2002). “Abortion is part of the Irish experience; it is part of what we are”: the transformation of public discourses on Irish abortion policy. Women’s Studies International Forum, 25(3), 315–33.Google Scholar
Oaks, L. (2003). Antiabortion positions and young women’s life plans in contemporary Ireland. Social Science & Medicine, 56(9), 1973–86.Google Scholar
Ostrach, B. (2014). Did policy change work? Oregon women continue to encounter delays in Medicaid coverage for abortion. Anthropology in Action, 21, 20–30.Google Scholar
Ostrach, B., and Matthews, J. (2015). From research to policy change: addressing disparities among low-income women seeking abortion in Oregon. Practicing Anthropology, 37, 30–4.Google Scholar
Paxson, H. (2004). Making Modern Mothers: Ethics and Family Planning in Urban Greece. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Price, K. (2010). What is reproductive justice? How women of color activists are redefining the pro-choice paradigm. Meridians, 10(2), 42–65.Google Scholar
Ragone, H. (1994 ). Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the Heart. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rapp, R. (2000). Testing Women, Testing the Fetus. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rapp, R. (2001). Gender, body, biomedicine: how some feminist concerns dragged reproduction to the center of social theory. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 15(4), 466–7.Google Scholar
Rapp, R. (2011). Reproductive entanglements: body, state, and culture in the dys/regulation of childbearing. Social Research, 78(3), 693–718.Google Scholar
Rapp, R., and Ginsburg, F. D., eds. (1995). Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rivkin-Fish, M. (2004). “Change yourself and the whole world will become kinder”: Russian activists for reproductive health and the limits of claims making for women. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 18(3), 281–304.Google Scholar
Rivkin-Fish, M. (2005). Women’s Health in Post-Soviet Russia: The Politics of Intervention. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Rivkin-Fish, M. (2010). Pronatalism, gender politics, and the renewal of family support in Russia: towards a feminist anthropology of “maternity capital.” Slavic Review, 69(3), 701–24.Google Scholar
Rivkin-Fish, M. (2013). Conceptualizing feminist strategies for Russian reproductive politics: abortion, surrogate motherhood, and family support after socialism. SIGNS, 38(3), 569–93.Google Scholar
Rivkin-Fish, M. (2018). “Fight abortion, not women”: the moral economy underlying Russian feminist advocacy. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures, 27(2), 22–44.Google Scholar
Roberts, E. F. (2012). God’s Laboratory: Assisted Reproduction in the Andes. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, M. Z. (1980). Ilongot Notions of Self and Social Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, N. (2001). The politics of life itself. Theory, Culture, and Society, 18(6), 1–30.Google Scholar
Rose, N. (2007). The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, A., Thompson, M. S., and Sobo, E. J., eds. (2000). Contraception across Cultures: Technologies, Choices, Constraints. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Rylko-Bauer, B. (1996). Abortion from a cross-cultural perspective: an introduction. Social Science & Medicine, 42, 479–82.Google Scholar
Sanger, Carol. (2017). About Abortion: Terminating Pregnancy in Twenty-First-Century America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sargent, C. F. (2005). Counseling contraception for Malian migrants in Paris: global, state, and personal politics. Human Organization, 64(2), 147–57.Google Scholar
Sargent, C. F. (2006). Reproductive strategies and Islamic discourse. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 20(1), 31–49.Google Scholar
Sargent, C., and Cordell, D. (2003). Polygamy, disrupted reproduction, and the state: Malian migrants in Paris, France. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 1961–72.Google Scholar
Sargent, C., and Gulbas, L. (2011). Situating birth in the anthropology of reproduction. In Erickson, P. and Singer, M., eds., A Companion to Medical Anthropology. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schneider, J. C., and Schneider, P. T. (1996). Festival of the Poor: Fertility Decline and the Ideology of Class in Sicily, 1960–1980. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, V. (2018). The ultimate argument: evoking the affective powers of “happiness” in commercial surrogacy. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures, 27(2), 1–21.Google Scholar
Singer, E. O. (2017). From reproductive rights to responsibilization: fashioning liberal subjects in Mexico City’s new public sector abortion program. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 31(4), 445–63.Google Scholar
Smith-Oka, V. (2013). Shaping the Motherhood of Indigenous Mexico. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (1987). An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology. SIGNS, 12(2), 276–92.Google Scholar
Suchland, J. (2015). Economies of Violence: Transnational Feminism, Socialism, and the Politics of Sex Trafficking, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. S. (2008). The Public Life of the Fetal Sonogram: Technology, Consumption, and the Politics of Reproduction. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Temkina, A. (2015). The gynaecologist’s gaze: the inconsistent medicalisation of contraception in contemporary Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 67(10), 1527–46.Google Scholar
Temkina, A., and Rivkin-Fish, M. (2019). Creating health care consumers: the negotiation of un/official payments, power and trust in Russian maternity care. Social Theory & Health, 18(1), 340–57.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. (2005). Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tlostanova, M., Thapar-Bjorkert, S., and Koobak, R. (2019). The postsocialist “missing other” of transnational feminism? Feminist Review, 121, 81–7.Google Scholar
Twine, F. W. (2011). Outsourcing the Womb: Race, Class, and Gestational Surrogacy in a Global Market. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Hollen, C. (2003). Birth on the Threshold: Childbirth and Modernity in South India. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Van Hollen, C. (2007). Navigating HIV, pregnancy, and childbearing in South India: pragmatics and constraints in women’s decision making. Medical Anthropology, 26(1), 7–52.Google Scholar
Varley, Emma. (2012). Islamic logics, reproductive rationalities: family planning in northern Pakistan. Anthropology & Medicine, 19(2), 189–206. DOI: 10.1080/13648470.2012.675044.Google Scholar
Whiteford, L. M. (2009). Failure to protect, failure to provide: reproductive rights in refugee shelters. In Farmer, P., Rylko-Bauer, B., and Whiteford, L., eds., Global Health in Times of Violence. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press, pp. 89–112.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×