Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:32:30.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Competitor Collaboration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Edited by
Roger D. Blair  and
D. Daniel Sokol
Roger D. Blair
Affiliation:
University of Florida
D. Daniel Sokol
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Antitrust, Intellectual Property, and High Tech , pp. 317 - 376
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

American Sales Co. v. Warner Chilcott Co., No. 14-2071 (1st Cir. filed Oct. 14, 2014).Google Scholar
Asahi Glass Co. v. Pentech Pharm., Inc., 289 F. Supp. 2d 986, 994 (N.D. Ill. 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FTC v. AbbVie Inc., 2015 WL 2114380 (E.D. Pa. May 6, 2015).Google Scholar
FTC v. Actavis, 133 S. Ct. 2223 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FTC v. Cephalon, 36 F. Supp. 3d 527, 537 (E.D. Pa. 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FTC v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, 677 F.3d 1298, 1312 (11th Cir. 2012).Google Scholar
In re Aggrenox Antitrust Litig., 2015 WL 1311352 (D. Conn. Mar. 23, 2015).Google Scholar
In re Cardizem CD Antitrust Litigation, 332 F.3d 896 (6th Cir. 2003).Google Scholar
In re Cipro Cases I & II, 2015 WL 2125291 (Cal. May 7, 2015).Google Scholar
In re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation, 544 F.3d 1323 (Fed. Cir. 2008).Google Scholar
In re Effexor XR Antitrust Litig., 2014 WL 4988410 (D.N.J. Oct. 6, 2014).Google Scholar
In re K-Dur Antitrust Litigation, 686 F.3d 197 (3d Cir. 2012), judgment vacated sub nom. Merck & Co. v. Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co., 133 S. Ct. 2849 (2013).Google Scholar
In re Lipitor Antitrust Litig., 46 F. Supp. 3d 523, 542 (D.N.J. 2014).Google Scholar
In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litig., 968 F. Supp. 2d 367 (D. Mass. 2013).Google Scholar
In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litig., 42 F. Supp. 3d 231, 272 (D. Mass. 2014).Google Scholar
In re Niaspan Antitrust Litig., 42 F. Supp. 3d 735 (E.D. Pa. 2014).Google Scholar
In re Tamoxifen Citrate Antitrust Litigation, 466 F.3d 187 (2d Cir. 2006).Google Scholar
In re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust Litig., No. 08-cv-02431 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 17, 2014).Google Scholar
Jury Verdict in Favor of Defendants Against Plaintiffs Returned, In re Nexium Antitrust Litig., No. 12-md-02409 (D. Mass. Dec. 8, 2014), ECF No. 1374.Google Scholar
King Drug Company of Florence v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation (Lamictal), 791 F.3d 388 (3d Cir. 2015).Google Scholar
King Drug Co. of Florence v. Cephalon, Inc., 2015 WL 356913, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 28, 2015).Google Scholar
Loestrin, 45 F. Supp.3d 180, 189–91, 193 (D.R.I. 2014), appeal docketed, City of Providence, RI v. Warner Chilcott Co., No. 15-1250 (1st Cir. filed Feb. 25, 2015).Google Scholar
Mylan Pharms. v. FDA, 2005 WL 2411674 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 29, 2005).Google Scholar
Schering-Plough Corp. v. FTC, 402 F.3d 1056 (11th Cir. 2005).Google Scholar
Second Amended Complaint for Injunctive and Other Equitable Relief, FTC v. Watson Pharm., Inc., No. 1:09-cv-00955-TWT (N.D. Ga. May 28, 2009).Google Scholar
Statement of the Federal Trade Commission, FTC v. Cephalon, Inc., at 2 n. 7 (May 28, 2015).Google Scholar
Teva Pharm. Indus. v. Crawford, 410 F.3d 51, 55 (D.C. Cir. 2005).Google Scholar
Teva’s Memorandum in Support of Directed Verdict Motion on Threshold Issue of a Large and Unexplained Payment, In re: Nexium (Esomeprazole Magnesium) Antitrust Litig., Case 1:12-md-02409-WGY, at 12–13 (D. Mass. Nov. 10, 2014).Google Scholar
Time Ins. Co. v. AstraZeneca, 2014 WL 4933025 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 1, 2014).Google Scholar
United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1776 v. Teikoku Pharma USA (Lidoderm), 2014 WL 6465235 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2014).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Alexiadis, Peter and Wood, David. 2012. Free Market 1: Copyright 0 – UK Premier League Loses Away from Home. Utilities Law Review, 18, 243–9.Google Scholar
Almunia, Joaquin. 2014. Statement on opening of investigation into Pay TV services. Brussels, January 13.Google Scholar
Anderman, Steven and Schmidt, Hedvig. 2011. EU Competition Law and Intellectual Property Rights: The Regulation of Innovation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aplin, Tanya. 2005. Copyright in the Digital Society. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Batchelor, Bill and Jenkins, Tom. 2012. FA Premier League: The Broader Implications for Copyright Licensing. European Competition Law Review, 33, 157–64.Google Scholar
Batchelor, Bill and Montani, Luca. 2015. Exhaustion, Essential Subject Matter and Other CJEU Judicial Tools to Update Copyright for an Online Economy. Journal of Intellectual Property & Practice, 10, 591–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bently, Lionel and Sherman, Brad. 2014. Intellectual Property Law. 4th edn. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depreeuw, Sari and Hubin, Jean-Benoit. 2014a. Of Availability, Targeting and Accessibility: Online Copyright Infringements and Jurisdiction in the EU. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 9, 750–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depreeuw, Sari and Hubin, Jean-Benoit. 2014b. Study on the Making Available Right and its Relationship with the Reproduction Right in Cross-Border Digital Transmissions. De Wolf & Partners (commissioned by DG Markt).Google Scholar
Doukas, Dimitrios. 2012. The Sky Is Not the (Only) Limit: Sports Broadcasting Without Frontiers and the Court of Justice: Comment on “Murphy”. European Law Review, 37, 605–26.Google Scholar
Drexl, Josef and Di Porto, Fabiana. 2015. Competition Law as Regulation? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, Niamh. 2014. Commitment Decisions in EU Competition Law. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 10, 399–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, Niamh. 2015. Competition Law and Economic Regulation: Making and Managing Markets. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. 2016. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on copyright in the Digital Single Market. COM(2016) 593 final. 2016/0280 (COD).Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Jane C. 2014. Where Does the Act of “Making Available” Occur? In Savin, Andrej and Trzaskowski, Jan (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Internet Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 191–210.Google Scholar
Graf, Thomas. 2011. The Court of Justice Speaks on Licensing of Satellite Broadcasting. Kluwer Competition Law Blog. Available at http://kluwercompetitionlawblog.com.Google Scholar
Ibáñez Colomo, Pablo. 2014. The Commission Investigation into Pay TV Services: Open Questions. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 5, 531–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juncker, Jean-Claude. 2014. A New Start for Europe: My Agenda for Jobs, Growth, Fairness and Democratic Change: Political Guidelines for the next European Commission. Opening Statement in the European Parliament Plenary Session. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/priorities/docs/pg_en.pdf#page=7.Google Scholar
Keeling, David T. 2004. Intellectual Property Rights in EU Law. Volume 1 – Free Movement and Competition Law. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjølbye, Lars, Aresu, Alessio, and Stephanou, Sophia. 2015. The Commission’s E-Commerce Sector Inquiry: Analysis of Legal Issues and Suggested Practical Approach. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 6, 465–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langus, Gregor, Neven, Damien, and Poukens, Sophie. 2014. Economic Analysis of the Territoriality of the Making Available Right in the EU. Charles River Associates (commissioned by DG Markt).Google Scholar
Larouche, Pierre. 2000. Competition Law and Regulation in European Telecommunications. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Rosati, Eleonora. 2015. Online Copyright Exhaustion in a Post-Allposters World. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 10, 673–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Ted. 2011. Directive 2001/29/EC on Copyright in the Information Society. In Lindner, Brigitte and Shapiro, Ted (eds.), Copyright in the Information Society: A Guide to National Implementation of the European Directive. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 27–56.Google Scholar
Stothers, Christopher. 2007. Parallel Trade in Europe: Intellectual Property, Competition and Regulatory Law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Triaille, Jean Paul et al. 2013. Study on the Application of Directive 2001/29/EC on Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society (The “InfoSoc Directive”). De Wolf & Partners and CRIDS (commissioned by DG Markt).Google Scholar
Vestager, Margrethe. 2015a. Competition Policy for the Digital Single Market: Focus on e-commerce. Berlin, March 26.Google Scholar
Vestager, Margrethe. 2015b. Intellectual Property and Competition. 19th IBA Competition Conference, Florence, September 11.Google Scholar
Council Directive 93/83/EEC of 27 September 1993 on the coordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission OJ (1993) L 248/15.Google Scholar
Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society OJ (2001) L 167/10.Google Scholar
Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights OJ (2004) L 195/16.Google Scholar
Directive 2006/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property OJ (2006) L 376/28.Google Scholar
Directive 2009/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the legal protection of computer programs OJ (2009) L 111/16.Google Scholar
Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online use in the internal market OJ (2014) L 84/72.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2002. Report from the European Commission on the application of Council Directive 93/83/EEC on the coordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission. COM(2002) 430 final.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2011. Green Paper on the online distribution of audiovisual works in the European Union: opportunities and challenges towards a digital single market. COM(2011) 427 final.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2015a. A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe. COM(2015) 192 final.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2015b. EU seeks views on the Satellite and Cable Directive. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2015c. Antitrust: Commission sends Statement of Objections on cross-border provision of pay-TV services.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2015d. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on ensuring the cross-border portability of online content services in the internal market. COM(2015) 627 final.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×