Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:46:02.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Economics of Innovation

from Part I - Economics of Antitrust-IP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Roger D. Blair
Affiliation:
University of Florida
D. Daniel Sokol
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, KJ. 1962. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 609–25.Google Scholar
Brennan, TJ. 2007. Should Innovation Rationalize Supra-Competitive Prices? A Skeptical Speculation. In Fredenberg, A. (ed.), The Pros and Cons of High Prices. Stockholm: Konkurrensverket/Swedish Competition Authority, pp. 88127.Google Scholar
Carlton, D., Gans, JS., and Waldman, M.. 2010. Why Tie a Product Consumers Do Not Use? American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2(3), 85105.Google Scholar
Department of Justice. 2010. Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Proposed. Washington, DC: Mimeo.Google Scholar
Evans, DS. and Schmalensee, R.. 2002. Some Economic Aspects of Antitrust Analysis in Dynamically Competitive Industries. In Jaffe, A.B., Lerner, J. and Stern, S. (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 2, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, chapter 1.Google Scholar
Fisher, FM. 2000. The IBM and Microsoft Cases: What’s the Difference? American Economic Review, 90(2) 180–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, JS. 2009. Negotiating for the Market. Melbourne: Mimeo.Google Scholar
Gans, J.S. 2010. When is Static Analysis a Sufficient Proxy for Dynamic Considerations? Reconsidering Innovation and Antitrust. In Lerner, J. and Stern, S. (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 11. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
Gans, J.S. 2013. Intel and Blocking Practices (2010). In Kwoka, J. and White, L. (eds.), The Antitrust Revolution, 6th edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gans, JS. and Persson, L.. 2013. Entrepreneurial Commercialization Choices and the Interaction between IPR and Competition Policy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(1), 131–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, JS. and Stern, S.. 2000. Incumbency and R&D Incentives: Licensing the Gale of Creative Destruction. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 9(4), 485511.Google Scholar
Gans, J.S. and Stern, S.. 2003. The Product Market and the “Market for Ideas”: Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 32(2), 333–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, R. 2006. Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where Are We in the Competition Innovation Debate? In Jaffe, Adam B., Lerner, Josh, and Stern, Scott (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, 6, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Gilbert, R. 2007. Holding Innovation to an Antitrust Standard. Competition Policy International, 3, 4777.Google Scholar
Gilbert, R. and Newbery, D.. 1982. Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly. American Economic Review, 72(3), 514–26.Google Scholar
Manne, G. and Wright, J.. 2009. “Innovation and the Limits of Antitrust,” George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 09–54; Lewis & Clark Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009–26. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1490849.Google Scholar
Ordover, J. and Willig, R.. 1981. An Economic Definition of Predation: Pricing and Product Innovation. Yale Law Journal, 9, 853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, E. 1988. Entry for Buyout. Journal of Industrial Economics, 36(3), 281–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinganum, J.F. 1989. On the Timing of Innovation. In Schmalansee, R. and Willig, R. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 849908.Google Scholar
Segal, I. and Whinston, M.. 2007. Antitrust in Innovative Industries. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1703–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, DJ. 1987. Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing, and Public Policy. In Teece, DJ. (ed.), The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 185220.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×