Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:48:03.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Connectionism and neural networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Ron Sun
Affiliation:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Keith Frankish
Affiliation:
The Open University, Milton Keynes
William M. Ramsey
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Get access

Summary

Connectionism and neural networks have become a mainstay of artificial intelligence and cognitive science. Nowadays, conferences on neural networks from the perspective of artificial intelligence (or computational intelligence, as some would put it) are held regularly and are usually fairly well attended (such as International Joint Conferences on Neural Networks). At major cognitive science conferences, work based on connectionist models usually occupies a major place. In many engineering conferences and journals, work utilizing neural network models is commonplace. Their popularity and appeal have reached a stable state in a sense. In other words, they have become an integral part of the study and the exploration of intelligence and cognition.

In this chapter, I will first review briefly the history of connectionist models, identifying major ideas and major areas of applications, and then move on to address the issue of symbolic processing in connectionist models; finally, I will expand the discussion to hybrid connectionist models, which incorporate both connectionist and symbolic processing methods.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carpenter, G. A. and Grossberg, S. (eds.) (1992). Neural Networks for Vision and Image Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. An early collection of work on neural networks for vision and image processing.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., and the PDP Research Group (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Provides an introduction to early classic work in connectionism.Google Scholar
Sun, R. and Bookman, L. A. (eds.) (1995). Computational Architectures Integrating Neural and Symbolic Processes: A Perspective on the State of the Art. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. An anthology of work on connectionist and hybrid connectionist models.Google Scholar
Wermter, S. and Sun, R. (eds.) (2000). Hybrid Neural Systems. Berlin: Springer. A more recent collection of major work in connectionist and hybrid connectionist models.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. and Lebiere, C. (1998). The Atomic Components of Thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. and Abrahamsen, A. (1990). Connectionism and the Mind: An Introduction to Parallel Processing in Networks. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carpenter, G. A. and Grossberg, S. (eds.) (1992). Neural Networks for Vision and Image Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cleeremans, A. and McClelland, J. L. (1991). Learning the structure of event sequences, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 120: 235–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dreyfus, H. L. and Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time, Cognitive Science 14: 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. and Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis, Cognition 28: 3–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gluck, M. A. and Bower, G. H. (1988). Evaluating an adaptive network model of human learning, Journal of Memory and Language 27: 166–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holyoak, K. J. and Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction, Cognitive Science 13: 295–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruschke, J. K. (2008). Models of categorization, in Sun, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology (pp. 267–301). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., and O’Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory, Psychological Review 102: 419–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miikkulainen, R. (1993). Subsymbolic Natural Language Processing: An Integrated Model of Scripts, Lexicon, and Memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Newell, A. and Simon, H. A. (1976). Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search, Communications of the ACM 19: 113–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, K. A., Detre, G., and Polyn, S. M. (2008). Computational models of episodic memory, in Sun, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology (pp. 189–225). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. and Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition, Cognition 23: 73–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, W., Stich, S. P., and Rumelhart, D. E. (1991). Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rogers, T. T. (2008). Computational models of semantic memory, in Sun, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology (pp. 226–266). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., and the PDP Research Group (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
St. John, M. F. and McClelland, J. L. (1990). Learning and applying contextual constraints in sentence comprehension, Artificial Intelligence 46: 217–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sejnowski, T. J. and Rosenberg, C. S. (1987). Parallel networks that learn to pronounce English text, Complex Systems 1: 145–68.Google Scholar
Shastri, L. and Ajjanagadde, V. (1993). From simple associations to systematic reasoning: A connectionist representation of rules, variables, and dynamic bindings using temporal synchrony, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 417–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11: 1–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, R. (1992). On variable binding in connectionist networks. Connection Science 4: 93–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, R. (1994). Integrating Rules and Connectionism for Robust Reasoning. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Sun, R. (1999). Accounting for the computational basis of consciousness: A connectionist approach, Consciousness and Cognition 8: 529–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, R. (2002). Duality of the Mind: A Bottom-Up Approach Toward Cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sun, R. and Bookman, L. A. (eds.) (1995). Computational Architectures Integrating Neural and Symbolic Processes: A Perspective on the State of the Art. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Sun, R., Slusarz, P., and Terry, C. (2005). The interaction of the explicit and the implicit in skill learning: A dual-process approach, Psychological Review 112: 159–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, R. and Zhang, X. (2006). Accounting for a variety of reasoning data within a cognitive architecture, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 18: 169–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, R. S. and Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Touretzky, D. S. and Hinton, G. E. (1988). A distributed connectionist production system, Cognitive Science 12: 423–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, D. and Feldman, J. (eds.) (1986). Connectionist Models and Their Implications: Readings from Cognitive Science. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Wermter, S. and Sun, R. (eds.) (2000). Hybrid Neural Systems. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×