Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence
- The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Part I AI: Development and Trends
- Part II AI: Contracting and Corporate Law
- Part III AI and Liability
- Part IV AI and Physical Manifestations
- 12 Liability for Autonomous Vehicle Accidents
- 13 Interconnectivity and Liability
- 14 Liability Standards for Medical Robotics and AI
- Part V AI and Intellectual Property Law
- Part VI Ethical Framework for AI
- Part VII Future of AI
14 - Liability Standards for Medical Robotics and AI
The Price of Autonomy
from Part IV - AI and Physical Manifestations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2022
- The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence
- The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Part I AI: Development and Trends
- Part II AI: Contracting and Corporate Law
- Part III AI and Liability
- Part IV AI and Physical Manifestations
- 12 Liability for Autonomous Vehicle Accidents
- 13 Interconnectivity and Liability
- 14 Liability Standards for Medical Robotics and AI
- Part V AI and Intellectual Property Law
- Part VI Ethical Framework for AI
- Part VII Future of AI
Summary
Allocation of liability for harm caused at least partially by AI or medical robot can be based upon a binary distinction. The binary is the distinction between substitutive and complementary automation. When AI and robotics substitutes for a physician, strict liability is more appropriate than standard negligence doctrine. When the same technology merely assists a professional, a less stringent standard is appropriate. Such standards will help ensure that the deployment of advanced medical technologies is accomplished in a way that complements extant professionals’ skills, while promoting patient safety.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial IntelligenceGlobal Perspectives on Law and Ethics, pp. 200 - 212Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
- 1
- Cited by