13 - Robotics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2014
Summary
Introduction
Robots are popularly thought of as mechanical men – humanoid machines capable of performing many of the tasks we engage in all the time, such as walking, talking, picking things up and moving them around, as well as some of those that most of us try to avoid, such as indiscriminate acts of death and destruction. In the next section we will see that this image – and indeed the very idea of a robot – comes from the world of fiction. While it is true that these myths and dreams have seeped into the collective conscious and undoubtedly influence some of the scientific work in the field of robotics, the current reality – though full of enormous interest and potential – is a little less dramatic.
In the research community a typical working definition of a robot goes something like this: a physical device capable of autonomous or pre-programmed behavior in the world involving interactions with its environment through sensors and actuators. In contrast to machines that perform precise repetitive tasks ad nauseam (e.g., robots used in manufacturing production lines), autonomous robots are required to behave in an appropriate way in whatever circumstances they find themselves. Like biological creatures, their behavior must be self-generated, making use of sensory information to moderate their responses to the world.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence , pp. 269 - 295Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
, , and (eds.) (1990). Readings in Planning. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
, , , and (2012). A model of ant route navigation driven by scene familiarity, PLoS Computational Biology 8(1): e1002336. .CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1989). Heterogeneous neural networks for adaptive behavior in dynamic environments. In (ed.), Neural Information Processing Systems 1 (pp. 577–85). San Francisco: Morgan Kauffman.Google Scholar
, , , and (1997). Biologically inspired approaches to robotics: What can we learn from insects? Communications of the ACM 40(3): 30–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and (2005). Learning from and about others: Towards using imitation to bootstrap the social understanding of others by robots, Artificial Life 11: 31–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1986). A robust layered control system for a mobile robot, IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation 2: 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991a). Intelligence without representation, Artificial Intelligence 47: 139–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991b). Intelligence without reason, in and (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 569–95). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
(1999). Cambrian Intelligence: The Early History of the New AI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
, , , and (1999). The Cog project: Building a humanoid robot, in (ed.), Computation for Metaphors, Analogy, and Agents (LNAI 1562) (pp. 52–87). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . (1983). Landmark learning in bees, Journal of Comparative Physiology A 151: 521–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1993). Explorations in evolutionary robotics, Adaptive Behavior, 2: 73–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2001). The neurally controlled animat: Biological brains acting with simulated bodies, Autonomous Robotics 11: 305–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1994). Automatic creation of an autonomous agent: Genetic evolution of a neural-network driven robot, in , , , and (eds.), From Animals to Animats 3: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (pp. 421–30). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
and (1997). Adaptive behavior in competing co-evolving species, in and (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Artificial Life (pp. 378–87). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
and (2000). Biomimetic robot navigation, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 30: 133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (1996). Application of evolved locomotion controllers to a hexapod robot, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 19: 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1994). Seeing the light: Artificial evolution, real vision, in , , , and (eds.), From Animals to Animats 3: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (pp. 392–401). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1975). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
(2003). Exploration and high adventure: The legacy of Grey Walter, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A 361: 2085–2121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2008). The robot story: Why robots were born and how they grew up, in , , and (eds.), The Mechanical Mind in History (pp. 283–306). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1998). Running across the reality gap: Octopod locomotion evolved in a minimal simulation, in and (eds.), Evolutionary Robotics: First European Workshop, EvoRobot98 (pp. 39–58). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and (2000). A mobile robot employing insect strategies for navigation, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 30: 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1992). Genetic programming approach to the construction of a neural network for control of a walking robot, in Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 2618–23). IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000). Automatic design and manufacture of robotic lifeforms, Nature 406: 974–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1994). Mobile robot miniaturization: A tool for investigation in control algorithms, in and (eds.), Experimental Robotics III: The 3rd International Symposium (pp. 501–13). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987). Sensing versus inferring in robot control. Informal Report, .
(ed.) (1984). Shakey The Robot, Technical Note 323. Menlo Park CA: AI Center, SRI International.
, , , and (2003). Evolving controllers for a homogeneous system of physical robots: Structured cooperation with minimal sensors, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 361: 2321–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2002). Evolution of central pattern generators for bipedal walking in real-time physics environments, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6: 159–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and (2007). Linked local navigation for visual route guidance, Adaptive Behavior 15: 257–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1990). Estimating uncertain spatial relationships in robotics, in and (eds.), Autonomous Robot Vehicles (pp. 167–193). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997). Visual control of honeybee flight, EXS (Experientia Supplementum) 84: 95–113.Google ScholarPubMed
, , and (2006). Evolving the walking behaviour of a 12 DOF quadruped using a distributed neural architecture, in , , and (eds.), Biologically Inspired Approaches to Advanced Information Technology: 2nd International Workshop Bio-ADIT’2006 (LNCS vol. 3853), (pp. 5–19). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002). Information Arts: Intersections of Art, Science, and Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar