Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:13:37.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Acquisition of Segmental Phonology in Adult Bilingualism

from Part IV - The Phonetics and Phonology of the Bilingual Adult

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2024

By
Jeffrey Steele
Edited by
Mark Amengual
Mark Amengual
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines the acquisition of vowels and consonants in perception and production during typical second language (L2) acquisition by sequential, dominant bilinguals. The acoustic and articulatory studies reviewed serve to illustrate general patterns of L2 segmental learning with a focus on four principal themes, each structured around one or two main research questions: 1) cross-linguistic influence (How does a sequential, dominant bilingual’s first language shape L2 segmental perception and production?); 2) development (Are there universal patterns to L2 segmental speech development? Are certain vocalic and consonantal phenomena acquired more easily?); 3) inter- and intralearner variability (What are the sources of differences in perception and/or production between learners and for the same learner over time and in different communicative contexts?); and 4) training effects (What are the effects of training on learning? How do variables such as task and stimuli type condition effectiveness?).

Keywords

second languagespeech productionspeech perceptionconsonantsvowelscross-linguistic influencedevelopmentvariabilityindividual differencestraining
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Phonetics and Phonology , pp. 448 - 470
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59(2), 249–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aliaga-García, C., Mora, J. C., & Cerviño-Povedano, E. (2011). L2 speech learning in adulthood and phonological short-term memory. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 47(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alispahic, S., Mulak, K. E., & Escudero, P. (2017). Acoustic properties predict perception of unfamiliar Dutch vowels by adult Australian English and Peruvian Spanish listeners. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Kendi, A. & Khattab, G. (2021). Psycho-social constraints on naturalistic adult second language acquisition. Languages, 6, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alshangiti, W. & Evans, B. G. (2014). Investigating the domain-specificity of phonetic training for second-language learning: Comparing the effects of production and perception training on the acquisition of English vowels by Arabic learners of English. In Fuchs, S., Grice, M., Hermes, A., Lancia, L., & Mücke, D., eds., Proceedings of the 10th International Seminar for Speech Production. Cologne: Cologne University, pp. 9–12.Google Scholar
Alshangiti, W. & Evans, B. G. (2015). Comparing the efficiency of vowel production training in immersion and non-immersion settings for Arabic learners of English. In Wolters, M., Livingstone, J., Beattie, B., Smith, R., MacMahon, M., Stuart-Smith, J., & Scobbie, J. M., eds., Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2015). Glasgow: Glasgow University. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/proceedings.html.Google Scholar
Baker, W. (2010). Effects of age and experience on the production of English word-final stops by Korean speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(3), 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, W. & Trofimovich, P. (2005). Interaction of native- and second-language vowel system(s) in early and late bilinguals. Language and Speech, 48(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, W. & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Lexical and segmental influences on child and adult learners’ production of second language vowels. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 1, 30–54.Google Scholar
Barlow, J. (2014). Age of acquisition and allophony in Spanish-English bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrios, S. L. & Hayes-Harb, R. (2020). Second language learning of phonological alternations with and without orthographic input: Evidence from the acquisition of a German-like voicing alternation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41, 517–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassetti, B. (2017). Orthography affects second language speech: Double letters and geminate production in English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 1835–1842.Google ScholarPubMed
Brandmeyera, A., Desain, P. W. M., & McQueen, J. M. (2012). Effects of native language on perceptual sensitivity to phonetic cues. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 23(11), 653–657.Google Scholar
Broersma, M. (2010). Perception of final fricative voicing: Native and nonnative listeners’ use of vowel duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127, 1636–1644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bu, L., Nagano, M., Harel, D., & McAllister, T. (2021). Effects of practice variability on second-language speech production training. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 73, 384–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L., Best, C. T., Kroos, C., & Tyler, M. D. (2012). Second language learners’ vocabulary expansion is associated with improved second language vowel intelligibility. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 643–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2011). Vocabulary size matters: The assimilation of second-language Australian English vowels to first-language Japanese vowel categories. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, E. & Yavas, M. (2017). Vowel reduction in word-final position by early and late Spanish-English bilinguals. PloS ONE, 12(4), e0175226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cebrian, J. (2006). Experience and the use of non-native duration in L2 vowel categorization. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 372–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cebrian, J. & Carlet, A. (2014). Second-language learners’ identification of target-language phonemes: A short-term phonetic training study. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(4), 474–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B. (2018). Perceptual attention as the locus of transfer to nonnative speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 68, 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, B., Zhang, X., Fan, S., & Zhang, Y. (2019). The role of temporal acoustic exaggeration in high variability phonetic training: A behavioral and ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, B. & Zhang, Y. (2015). Syllable structure universals and native language interference in second language perception and production: Positional asymmetry and perceptual links to accentedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, J., Kim, S., & Cho, T. (2016). Phonetic encoding of coda voicing contrast under different focus conditions in L1 vs. L2 English. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cibelli, E. (2018). Training non-native consonant production with perceptual and articulatory cues. Phonetica, 77, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, K. & Simonet, M. (2015). Adult second language learning of Spanish vowels. Hispania, 98(1), 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L., Kochetov, A., & Steele, J. (2021). Articulatory settings and L2 English coronal consonants. Phonetica, 78(4), 273–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colantoni, L., Kochetov, A., & Steele, J. (2023). L1 influence on the L2 acquisition of English word-final nasal place contrasts: An electropalatographic study of L1 Japanese and Spanish learners. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.16995/labphon.6434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L., Mascaro, O., Steele, J., & Sunara, S. (2015). Phonological and phonetic aspects of the L2 acquisition of French and Spanish stress. In Willis, E. W., ed., Selected proceedings of the 6th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Romance Phonology. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 129–144.Google Scholar
Colantoni, L. & Steele, J. (2007). Acquiring /ʁ/ in context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(3), 381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L. & Steele, J. (2008). Integrating articulatory constraints into models of second language phonological acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(3), 489–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L., Steele, J., & Escudero, P. (2015). Second Language Speech: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Đào, D. M. & Nguyễn, A.-T. T. (2018). L1 Korean vocalic transfer in adult L2 Korean learners’ production of Vietnamese monophthong vowels. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darcy, I., Mora, J. C., & Daidone, D. (2016). The role of inhibitory control in second language phonological processing. Language Learning, 66(4), 741–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, K. J. & Hao, Y.-C. (2018). Featural generalization in second language identification performance: Comparing learners with different L1s. Journal of Phonetics, 66, 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, K. J., Silbert, N. H., & Park, H. (2009). Generalization across segments in second language consonant identification. Language Learning, 59(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delvaux, V., Huet, K., Piccaluga, M., & Harmegnies, B. (2014). Phonetic compliance: A proof-of-concept study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derwing, T. M. & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation Fundamentals. Evidence-Based Perspectives for L2 Teaching and Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz, B., Baus, C., Escera, C., Costa, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2008). Brain potentials to native phoneme discrimination reveal the origin of individual differences in learning the sounds of a second language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 105(42), 16083–16088.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Díaz, B., Mitterer, H., Broersma, M., Escera, C., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2016). Variability in L2 phonemic learning originates from speech-specific capabilities: An MMN study on late bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(5), 955–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dmitrieva, O. (2019). Transferring perceptual cue-weighting from second language into first language: Cues to voicing in Russian speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 73, 128–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. & Ryan, S. (2015). The Psychology of the Language Learner Revisited. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eads, A., Khater, J., & Mielke, J. (2018). An ultrasound study of emphatics and gutturals. In Alhawary, M. T., ed., The Routledge Handbook of Arabic Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, pp. 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F. & Iverson, G. K. (2013). The role of native language phonology in the production of L2 contrasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 67–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P. (2000). Developmental patterns in the adult L2 acquisition of new contrasts: The acoustic cue weighting in the perception of Scottish tense/lax vowels by Spanish speakers. [Master’s thesis, University of Edinburgh].Google Scholar
Escudero, P. (2015). Orthography plays a limited role when learning the phonological forms of new words: The case of Spanish and English learners of novel Dutch words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Benders, T., & Lipski, S. C. (2009). Native, non-native and L2 perceptual cue weighting for Dutch vowels: The case of Dutch, German, and Spanish listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 452–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P. & Wanrooij, K. (2010). The effect of L1 orthography on non-native vowel perception. Language and Speech, 53(3), 343–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P. & Williams, D. (2012). Native dialect influences second-language vowel perception: Peruvian versus Iberian Spanish learners of Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(5), EL406–EL412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, B. E. & Alshangiti, W. (2018). The perception and production of British English vowels and consonants by Arabic learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 68, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Face, T. L. & Menke, M. R. (2009). Acquisition of the Spanish voiced spirants by second language learners. In Collentine, J., García, M., Lafford, B., & Marcos Marín, F., eds., Selected Proceedings of the 11th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 39–52.Google Scholar
Faris, M. M., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2016). An examination of the different ways that non-native phones may be perceptually assimilated as uncategorized. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 139, EL1–EL5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faris, M. M., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2018). Discrimination of uncategorised non-native vowel contrasts is modulated by perceived overlap with native phonological categories. Journal of Phonetics, 70, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 229–273.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2009). Give input a chance! In Piske, T. & Young-Scholten, M., eds., Input Matters in SLA. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 175–190.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Shirru, C., & Mackay, I. R. A. (2003). Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems. Speech Communication, 40, 467–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatbonton, E., Trofimovich, P., & Segalowitz, N. (2011). Ethnic group affiliation and patterns of development of a phonological variable. Modern Language Journal, 95(2), 188–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgiou, G. P. (2021). Effects of phonetic training on the discrimination of second language sounds by learners with naturalistic access to the second language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50, 707–721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georgiou, G. P., Perfilieva, N. V., & Tenizi, M. (2020). Vocabulary size leads to better attunement to L2 phonetic differences: Clues from Russian learners of English. Language Learning and Development, 16(4), 382–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgiou, G. P. & Themistocleous, C. (2021). Vowel learning in diglossic settings: Evidence from Arabic-Greek learners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(1), 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghaffarvand Mokari, P. & Werner, S. (2018). Perceptual training of second-language vowels: Does musical ability play a role? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghaffarvand Mokari, P. & Werner, S. (2019). On the role of cognitive abilities in second language vowel learning. Language and Speech, 62(2), 260–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghosh, S., Fauth, C., Sini, A., & Laprie, Y. (2016). L1-L2 interference: The case of final devoicing of French voiced fricatives in final position by German learners. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2016, 3156–3160. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2016-954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnevsheva, K. (2015). Style-shifting and intra-speaker variation in the vowel production of nonnative speakers of New Zealand English. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 1(2), 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grantham O’Brien, M. & Smith, L. C. (2010). Role of first language dialect in the production of second language German vowels. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 48, 297–330.Google Scholar
Grover, V., Shafer, V. L., Campanelli, L., Whalen, D. H., & Levy, E. S. (2021). Perception of American English consonants /v/ and /w/ by Hindi speakers of English. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 7(3), 370–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, J. F., Smith, B. L., & Johnson, E. M. (2017). Utilizing electropalatography to train palatalized versus unpalatalized consonant productions by native speakers of American English learning Russian. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3(1), 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, J. F., Smith, B. L., Nissen, S. L., & Allen, H. (2016). Russian palatalized and unpalatalized coda consonants: An electropalatographic and acoustic analysis of native speaker and L2 learner productions. Journal of Phonetics, 54, 98–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J.-I., Hwang, J.-B., & Choi, T.-H. (2011). The acquisition of phonetic details: Evidence from the production of English reduced vowels by Korean learners. Second Language Research, 27(4), 535–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J.-I. & Kim, J.-Y. (2017). The influence of orthography on the production of alphabetic, second-language allophones by speakers of a non-alphabetic language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 963–982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardison, D. M. & Motohashi Saigo, M. (2010). Development of perception of second language Japanese geminates: Role of duration, sonority, and segmentation strategy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, M. (2011). The effect of perceptual training including required lexical access and meaningful linguistic context on second language phonology. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Utah].Google Scholar
Hazan, V., Sennema, A., Faulker, A., et al. (2006). The use of visual cues in the perception of non-native consonant contrasts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1740–1751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazan, V., Sennema, A., Iba, M., & Faulkner, A. (2005). Effect of audiovisual perceptual training on the perception and production of consonants by Japanese learners of English. Speech Communication, 47, 360–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, J. J. (2015a). A longitudinal study of the second language acquisition of a three-way stop contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 50, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, J. J. (2015b). Second language experience can hinder the discrimination of nonnative phonological contrasts. Phonetica, 73, 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, W., Tao, S., Li, M., & Liu, C. (2016). Distinctiveness and assimilation in vowel perception in a second language. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62, 4534–4543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huensch, A. & Tremblay, A. (2015). Effects of perceptual phonetic training on the perception and production of second language syllable structure. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inceoglu, S. (2016). Effects of perceptual training on second language vowel perception and production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 1175–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inceoglu, S. (2019). Individual differences in L2 speech perception: The role of phonological memory and lipreading ability. Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 782–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inceoglu, S. (2021). Language experience and subjective word familiarity on the multimodal perception of non-native vowels. Language and Speech, 65(1), 173–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ito, K. (2012). Perception of place-of-articulation contrasts of English word-final consonants in connected speech by Japanese adult L2 learners. [Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York].Google Scholar
Iverson, P., Ekanayake, D., Hamann, S., Sennema, A., & Evans, B. G. (2008). Category and perceptual interference in second-language phoneme learning: An examination of English /w/-/v/ learning by Sinhala, German, and Dutch speakers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1305–1316.Google Scholar
Iverson, P., Pinet, M., & Evans, B. G. (2011). Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakoby, H., Goldstein, A., & Faust, M. (2011). Electrophysiological correlates of speech perception mechanisms and individual differences in second language attainment. Psychophysiology, 48, 1516–1530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jekiel, M. & Malarski, K. (2021). Musical hearing and musical experience in second language English vowel acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64, 1666–1682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kachlickaa, M., Saito, K., & Tierney, A. (2019). Successful second language learning is tied to robust domain-general auditory processing and stable neural representation of sound. Brain and Language, 192, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kar-man Shum, K., Au, T. K., Romo, L. F., & Jun, S.-A. (2021). Learning challenging L2 sounds via computer training: High-variability perceptual training for children and adults. Language Learning and Development, 17(4), 327–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kartushina, N. & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2014). On the effects of L2 perception and of individual differences in L1 production on L2 pronunciation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kartushina, N., Hervais-Adelman, A., Frauenfelder, U., & Golestani, N. (2015). The effect of phonetic production training with visual feedback on the perception and production of foreign speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(2), 817–832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kartushina, N. & Martin, C. D. (2019). Third-language learning affects bilinguals’ production in both their native languages: A longitudinal study of dynamic changes in L1, L2 and L3 vowel production. Journal of Phonetics, 77, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D., Clayards, M., & Goad, H. (2017). Individual differences in second language speech perception across tasks and contrasts: The case of English vowel contrasts by Korean learners. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(1), 20160025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D., Clayards, M., & Goad, H. (2018). A longitudinal study of individual differences in the acquisition of new vowel contrasts. Journal of Phonetics, 67, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. H. & Hazan, V. (2010). Individual variability in the perceptual learning of L2 speech sounds and its cognitive correlates. In Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., Wrembel, M., & Kul, M., eds., Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, New Sounds 2010. Poznan: Poznan University, pp. 251–256.Google Scholar
Kivistö-de Souza, H., Carlet, A., Julkowska, I. A., & Rato, A. (2020). Vowel inventory size matters: Assessing cue-weighting in L2 vowel perception. Ilha do Desterro, 70(3), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kkese, E. & Petinou, K. (2017). Perception abilities of L1 Cypriot Greek listeners – Types of errors involving plosive consonants in L2 English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lababidi, Z. (2016). The L2 perceptual mapping of Arabic and English consonants by American English listeners. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee].Google Scholar
Lai, Y.-H. (2012). Perceptual processing of Mandarin nasals by L1 and L2 Mandarin speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41, 237–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, A. H. & Lyster, R. (2016). Effects of different types of corrective feedback on receptive skills in a second language: A speech perception training study. Language Learning, 66(4), 809–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, A. H. & Lyster, R. (2017). Can corrective feedback on second language speech perception errors affect production accuracy? Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lengeris, A. (2018). Computer-based auditory training improves second-language vowel production in spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(3), EL165–EL171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lengeris, A. & Hazan, V. (2010). The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(6), 3757–3768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerdpaisalwong, S. (2015). Perception training of Thai learners: American English consonants and vowels. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee].Google Scholar
Levy, E. S. & Law II, F. F. (2010). Production of French vowels by American-English learners of French: Language experience, consonantal context, and the perception-production relationship. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(3), 1290–1305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, E. S. & Strange, W. (2008). Perception of French vowels by American English adults with and without French language experience. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J. J., Ayala, S., Harrel, D., Shiller, D. M., & McAllister, T. (2019). Individual predictors of response to biofeedback training for second-language production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146(6), 4625–4643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Y., Best, C., Cao, C., & Zhang, J. (2019). Hybrid perceptual training to facilitate the learning of nasal final contrasts by highly proficient Japanese learners of Mandarin. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P., eds., Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association, pp. 2567–2571.Google Scholar
Lin, S., Cychosz, M., Shen., A., & Cibelli, E. (2019). The effects of phonetic training and visual feedback on novel contrast production. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P., eds., Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association, pp. 899–903.Google Scholar
Linebaugh, G. & Roche, T. (2015). Evidence that L2 production training can enhance perception. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 9(1), A1–A17.Google Scholar
Lopez-Soto, T. & Kewley-Port, D. (2009). Relation of perception training to production of codas in English as a second language. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 6, 062003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinescu, I. (2013). Native dialect effects in non-native production: Cuban and Peninsular learners of English. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 58(3), 415–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, R. M., Goad, H., & Dow, M. (2023). L1 phonological effects on L2 (non-)naïve vowel perception: A cross-language investigation of the oral-nasal vowel contrast in Brazilian Portuguese. Second Language Research, 39(2), 387–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, L. (2016). The influence of foreign scripts on the acquisition of a second language phonological contrast. Second Language Research, 32(2), 145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menke, M. R. & Face, T. L. (2010). Second language Spanish vowel production: An acoustic analysis. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 3(1), 181–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorman, C. M. (2017). Individual differences and linguistic factors in the development of mid vowels in L2 Spanish learners: A longitudinal study. [Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University].Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (2013). Foreign Accent: The Phenomenon of Non-native Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J. & Derwing, T. M. (2008). Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58(3), 479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagle, C. (2017). Individual developmental trajectories in the L2 acquisition of Spanish spirantization. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3(2), 218–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimz, K. & Khattab, G. (2020). On the role of orthography in L2 vowel production: The case of Polish learners of German. Second Language Research, 36(4), 623–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okuno, T. & Hardison, D. H. (2016). Perception-production link in L2 Japanese vowel duration: Training with technology. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 61–80.Google Scholar
Olson, D. J. (2019). Feature acquisition in second language phonetic development: Evidence from phonetic training. Language Learning, 69(2), 366–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, H. & de Jong, K. J. (2008). Perceptual category mapping between English and Korean prevocalic obstruents: Evidence from mapping effects in second language identification skills. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 704–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, H. & de Jong, K. J. (2017). Perceptual category mapping between English and Korean obstruents in non-CV positions: Prosodic location effects in second language identification skills. Journal of Phonetics, 62, 12–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patience, M. (2022). Articulatory difficulty in L2 Spanish. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto].Google Scholar
Patience, M. & Steele, J. (2023). Relative difficulty in the acquisition of the phonetic parameters of obstruent coda voicing: Evidence from Mandarin-speaking learners of French. Language and Speech, 66(3), 625–651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rallo Fabra, L. (2015). Can nonnative speakers reduce English vowels in a native-like fashion? Evidence from L1-Spanish L2-English bilinguals. Phonetica, 72, 162–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rato, A. (2014). Effects of perceptual training on the identification of English vowels by native speakers of European Portuguese. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech: Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 529–546. https://doe.concordia.ca/copal/documents/34_Rato_Vol5.pdf.Google Scholar
Rau, D. V., Chang, H.-H. A., & Tarone, E. (2009). Think or sink: Chinese learners’ acquisition of the English voiceless interdental fricative. Language Learning, 59(3), 581–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanelli, S., Menegotto, A., & Smyth, R. (2018). Stress-induced acoustic variation in L2 and L1 Spanish vowels. Phonetica, 75, 190–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roon, K. D., Kang, J., & Whalen, D. H. (2020). Effects of ultrasound familiarization on production and perception of nonnative contrasts. Phonetica, 77, 350–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saito, K. & Munro, M. (2014). The early phase of /ɹ/ production: Development in adult Japanese learners of English. Language and Speech, 57(4), 451–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saito, K. & Plonsky, L. (2019). Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, 69(3), 652–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakai, M. & Moorman, C. (2018). Can perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of perception training research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(1), 187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayako Earle, F. & Meyers, E. B. (2015). Sleep and native language interference affect non-native speech sound learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(6), 1680–1695.Google Scholar
Schertz, J., Cho, T., Lotto, A., & Warner, N. (2015). Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 183–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schertz, J. & Clare, E. J. (2019). Phonetic cue weighting in perception and production. WIREs Cognitive Science, 11, e1521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, A. M. (2012). Effects of EPG treatment for English consonant contrasts on L2 perception and production. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 26(11–12), 909–925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shea, C. (2021). Spanish speakers’ English schwar production: Does orthography play a role? Applied Psycholinguistics, 42, 1377–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, C. E. & Curtin, S. (2011). Experience, representations and the production of second language allophones. Second Language Research, 27(2), 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, C. & Rannaud, J. (2013). L2 perception of Spanish palatal variants across different tasks. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(1), 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shehata, A. (2015). Talker variability and second language word recognition: A new training study. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 6(2), 209–230.Google Scholar
Shinohara, Y. & Iverson, P. (2018). High variability identification and discrimination training for Japanese speakers learning English /r/–/l/. Journal of Phonetics, 66, 242–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinohara, Y. & Iverson, P. (2021). The effect of age on English /r/-/l/ perceptual training outcomes for Japanese speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 89, 101108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, E., Debaene, M., & Van Herreweghe, M. (2015). The effect of L1 regional variation on the perception and production of standard L1 and L2 vowels. Folia Linguistica, 49(2), 521–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, E. & D’Hulster, T. (2012). The effect of experience on the acquisition of a non-native vowel contrast. Language Sciences, 34, 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. & Hayes-Harb, R. (2012). Individual differences in the perception of final consonant voicing among native and non-native speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. L., Hayes-Harb, R., Bruss, M., & Harker, A. (2009). Production and perception of voicing and devoicing in similar German and English word pairs by native speakers of German. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolović-Perović, M., Bassetti, B., & Dillon, S. (2019). English orthographic forms affect L2 English speech production in native users of a non-alphabetic writing system. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 23, 591–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solier, C., Perret, C., Baqué, L., & Soum-Favaro, C. (2019). Written training tasks are better than oral training tasks at improving L2 learners’ speech production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40, 1455–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solon, M. (2017). Do learners lighten up? Phonetic and allophonic acquisition of Spanish /l/ by English-speaking learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 801–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solon, M., Long, A.-Y., & Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2017). Task complexity, language-related episodes, and production of L2 Spanish vowels. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 347–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart Morrison, G. (2008). L1-Spanish speakers’ acquisition of the English /i/–/ɪ/ contrast: Duration-based perception is not the initial developmental stage. Language and Speech, 54(1), 285–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stölten, K., Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2014). Effects of age of learning on voice onset time: Categorical perception of Swedish stops by near-native L2 speakers. Language and Speech, 57(4), 425–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stölten, K., Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2015). Effects of age and speaking rate on voice onset time: The production of voiceless stops by near-native L2 speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suemitsu, A., Dang, J., Ito, T., & Tiede, M. (2015). A real-time articulatory visual feedback approach with target presentation for second language pronunciation learning. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(4), EL382–EL387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Święciński, R. (2013). An EMA study of articulatory settings in Polish speakers of English. In Waniek-Klimczak, E. & Shockey, L. R., eds., Teaching and Researching English Accents in Native and Non-native Speakers. Berlin: Springer, pp. 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tateishi, M. & Winters, S. (2013). Does ultrasound training lead to improved perception of a nonnative sound contrast? Evidence from Japanese learners of English. In Luo, S., ed., Proceedings of the 2013 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Ottawa: Canadian Linguistics Association, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Thomson, R. I. (2012). Improving L2 listeners’ perception of English vowels: A computer-mediated approach. Language Learning, 62(4), 1231–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, R. I. & Isaacs, T. (2009). Within-category variation in L2 English vowel learning. Canadian Acoustics, 37(3), 138–139.Google Scholar
Tsukada, K. (2009). Durational characteristics of English vowels produced by Japanese and Thai second language (L2) learners. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 29(2), 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, K. O. C. & Baker-Smemoe, W. (2013). An investigation of the production of ejectives by native (L1) and second (L2) language speakers of Q’eqchi’ Mayan. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanrooij, K., Escudero, P., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2013). What do listeners learn from exposure to a vowel distribution? An analysis of listening strategies in distributional learning. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, I. & Kanada, S. (2014). Pre-speech postures of second-language versus first-language speakers. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 18(2), 106–109.Google Scholar
Yang, C. & Lu, A. C. L. (2019). The acquisition of Mandarin affricates by American second language learners. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 17(2), 91–122.Google Scholar
Yang, Y. & Chen, X. (2019). Within-organ contrast in second language perception: The perception of Russian initial /r-l/ contrast by Chinese learners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146, EL117–EL123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Y., Chen, X., & Xiao, Q. (2022). Cross-linguistic similarity in L2 speech learning: Evidence from the acquisition of Russian stop contrasts by Mandarin speakers. Second Language Research, 38(1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yazawa, K., Whang, J., Kondo, M., & Escudero, P. (2020). Language-dependent cue weighting: An investigation of perception modes in L2 learning. Second Language Research, 36(4), 557–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ylinen, S., Uther, M., Latvala, A., et al. (2010). Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: A study of Finnish second-language users of English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(6), 1319–1332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, X., Cheng, B., & Zhang, Y. (2021). The role of talker variability in nonnative phonetic learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64, 4802–4825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×