Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:32:54.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - The Second Language Linguistic Perception Model

from Part II - Theoretical Models of Bilingual Phonetics and Phonology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2024

By
Paola Escudero  and
Kakeru Yazawa
Edited by
Mark Amengual
Mark Amengual
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we thoroughly describe the L2LP model, its five ingredients to explain speech development from first contact with a language or dialect (initial state) to proficiency comparable to a native speaker of the language or dialect (ultimate attainment), and its empirical, computational, and statistical method. We present recent studies comparing different types of bilinguals (simultaneous and sequential) and explaining their differential levels of ultimate attainment in different learning scenarios. We also show that although the model has the word “perception” in its name, it was designed to also explain phonological development in general, including lexical development, speech production, and orthographic effects. The chapter demonstrates that the L2LP model can be regarded as a comprehensive theoretical, computational, and probabilistic model or framework for explaining how we learn the phonetics and phonology of multiple languages (sequentially or simultaneously) with variable levels of language input throughout the life span.

Keywords

L2LP modelbilingualismcomputational modelingstatistical modelingsecond language acquisitionspeech perceptionspeech productionlexical developmentspeech comprehensionword learningphonological theoryorthographyphonetic trainingcurriculum design
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Phonetics and Phonology , pp. 173 - 195
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angwin, A. J., Armstrong, S. R., Fisher, C., & Escudero, P. (2022). Acquisition of novel word meaning via cross situational word learning: An event-related potential study. Brain and Language, 229, 105111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antoniou, M., Best, C. T., Tyler, M., & Kroos, C. (2011). Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: Asymmetries in phonetic code-switching. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 558–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bassetti, B., Escudero, P., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2015). Second language phonology at the interface between acoustic and orthographic input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. (1998). Functional Phonology: Formalizing the Interactions between Articulatory and Perceptual Drives. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam]. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. (2011). A programme for bidirectional phonology and phonetics and their acquisition and evolution. In Benz, A. & Mattausch, J., eds., Bidirectional Optimality Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 33–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. & Chládková, K. (2011). Asymmetries between speech perception and production reveal phonological structure. In Lee, W.-S. & Zee, E., eds., Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, pp. 328–331. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2011/OnlineProceedings/RegularSession/Boersma/Boersma.pdf.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Escudero, P. (2008). Learning to perceive a smaller L2 vowel inventory: An Optimality Theory account. In Avery, P., Dresher, E., & Rice, K., eds., Contrast in Phonology: Theory, Perception, Acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 271–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., Escudero, P., & Hayes, R. (2003). Learning abstract phonological from auditory phonetic categories: An integrated model for the acquisition of language-specific sound categories. In Solé, M. J., Recasens, D., & Romero, J., eds., Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona: Causal Productions, pp. 1013–1016. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2003/papers/p15_1013.pdf.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Hayes, B. (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry, 32(1), 45–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohn, O.-S. (1995). Cross-language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it all. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Speech Research. Baltimore, MD: York Press, pp. 275–300.Google Scholar
Chládková, K., Boersma, P., & Escudero, P. (2022). Unattended distributional training can shift phoneme boundaries. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(5), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chládková, K. & Escudero, P. (2012). Comparing vowel perception and production in Spanish and Portuguese: European versus Latin American dialects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(2), EL119–EL125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chládková, K., Escudero, P., & Lipski, S. C. (2015). When “aa” is long but “a” is not short: Speakers who distinguish short and long vowels in production do not necessarily encode a short–long contrast in their phonological lexicon. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 438. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L., Escudero, P., Marrero-Aguiar, V., & Steele, J. (2021). Evidence-based design principles for Spanish pronunciation teaching. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 639889. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.639889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L., Steele, J., & Escudero, P. (2015). Second Language Speech: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, S., Fennell, C., & Escudero, P. (2009). Weighting of vowel cues explains patterns of word-object associative learning. Developmental Science, 12(5), 725–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutler, A. (2012). Native Listening: Language Experience and the Recognition of Spoken Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvin, J. & Escudero, P. (2019). Cross-linguistic influence in second language speech: Implications for learning and teaching. In Gutierrez-Mangado, M. J., Martínez-Adrián, M., & Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., eds., Cross-Linguistic Influence: From Empirical Evidence to Classroom Practice. Cham: Springer International, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Elvin, J., Tuninetti, A., & Escudero, P. (2018a). Non-native dialect matters: The perception of European and Brazilian Portuguese vowels by Californian English monolinguals and Spanish-English bilinguals. Languages, 3(3), 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvin, J., Vasiliev, P., & Escudero, P. (2018b). Production and perception in the acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese. In Gibson, M. & Gil, J., eds., Romance Phonetics and Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 367–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvin, J., Williams, D., & Escudero, P. (2016). Dynamic acoustic properties of monophthongs and diphthongs in Western Sydney Australian English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(1), 576–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elvin, J., Williams, D., & Escudero, P. (2020). Australian English vs. European Spanish learners of Brazilian Portuguese: Learning to perceive, produce and recognise words in a non-native language. In Molsing, K. V., Becker Lopes Perna, C., & Tramunt Ibaños, A. M., eds., Linguistic Approaches to Portuguese as an Additional Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization [Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University]. LOT Dissertation Series. Amsterdam: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics. https://shorturl.at/GKO79.Google Scholar
Escudero, P. (2007). Second-language phonology: The role of perception. In Pennington, M. C., ed., Phonology in Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P. (2009). The linguistic perception of SIMILAR L2 sounds. In Boersma, P. & Hamann, S., eds., Phonology in Perception. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 151–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P. (2015). Orthography plays a limited role when learning the phonological forms of new words: The case of Spanish and English learners of novel Dutch words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(1), 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Benders, T., & Lipski, S. C. (2009). Native, non-native and L2 perceptual cue weighting for Dutch vowels: The case of Dutch, German, and Spanish listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 37(4), 452–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Benders, T., & Wanrooij, K. (2011). Enhanced bimodal distributions facilitate the learning of second language vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(4), EL206–EL212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P. & Boersma, P. (2002). The subset problem in L2 perceptual development: Multiple-category assimilation by Dutch learners of Spanish. In. Skarabela, B., Fish, S., & Do, A. H.-J., eds., Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 208–219.Google Scholar
Escudero, P. & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(4), 551–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Broersma, M., & Simon, E. (2013). Learning words in a third language: Effects of vowel inventory and language proficiency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(6), 746–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P. & Hayes-Harb, R. (2022). The Ontogenesis Model may provide a useful guiding framework, but lacks explanatory power for the nature and development of L2 lexical representation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(2), 212–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Hayes-Harb, R., & Mitterer, H. (2008). Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36(2), 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P. & Kalashnikova, M. (2020). Infants use phonetic detail in speech perception and word learning when detail is easy to perceive. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 190, 104714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P., Kastelein, J., Weiand, K., & van Son, R. J. J. H. (2007). Formal modelling of L1 and L2 perceptual learning: Computational linguistics versus machine learning. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. International Speech Communication Association, 1889–1892. www.isca-archive.org/interspeech_2007/escudero07_interspeech.pdf.Google Scholar
Escudero, P., Mulak, K. E., Elvin, J., & Traynor, N. M. (2018). “Mummy, keep it steady”: Phonetic variation shapes word learning at 15 and 17 months. Developmental Science, 21(5), e12640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P., Mulak, K. E., Fu, C. S. L., & Singh, L. (2016a). More limitations to monolingualism: Bilinguals outperform monolinguals in implicit word learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1218. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P., Mulak, K. E., & Vlach, H. A. (2016b). Cross-situational learning of minimal word pairs. Cognitive Science, 40(2), 455–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P., Mulak, K. E., & Vlach, H. A. (2016c). Infants encode phonetic detail during cross-situational word learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1419. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P., Simon, E., & Mitterer, H. (2012). The perception of English front vowels by North Holland and Flemish listeners: Acoustic similarity predicts and explains cross-linguistic and L2 perception. Journal of Phonetics, 40(2), 280–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Simon, E., & Mulak, K. E. (2014a). Learning words in a new language: Orthography doesn’t always help. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(2), 384–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Sisinni, B., & Grimaldi, M. (2014b). The effect of vowel inventory and acoustic properties in Salento Italian learners of Southern British English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(3), 1577–1584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P., Smit, E. A., & Angwin, A. J. (2023). Investigating orthographic versus auditory cross-situational word learning with online and lab-based testing. Language Learning, 73(2), 543–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Smit, E. A., & Mulak, K. E. (2022). Explaining L2 lexical learning in multiple scenarios: Cross-situational word learning in L1 Mandarin L2 English speakers. Brain Sciences, 12(12), 1618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P. & Vasiliev, P. (2011). Cross-language acoustic similarity predicts perceptual assimilation of Canadian English and Canadian French vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130, EL277–EL283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P. & Wanrooij, K. (2010). The effect of L1 orthography on non-native vowel perception. Language and Speech, 53(3), 343–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P. & Williams, D. (2012). Native dialect influences second-language vowel perception: Peruvian versus Iberian Spanish learners of Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(5), EL406–EL412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P. & Williams, D. (2014). Distributional learning has immediate and long-lasting effects. Cognition, 133(2), 408–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friesen, D. C., Luo, L., Luk, G., & Bialystok, E. (2015). Proficiency and control in verbal fluency performance across the lifespan for monolinguals and bilinguals. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(3), 238–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giezen, M. R., Escudero, P., & Baker, A. E. (2016). Rapid learning of minimally different words in five- to six-year-old children: Effects of acoustic salience and hearing impairment. Journal of Child Language, 43(2), 310–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golinkoff, R. M. & Alioto, A. (1995). Infant-directed speech facilitates lexical learning in adults hearing Chinese: Implications for language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 22, 703–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gollan, T. H. & Kroll, J. F. (2001). Bilingual lexical access. In Rapp, B., ed., The Handbook of Cognitive Neuropsychology: What Deficits Reveal about the Human Mind. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press, pp. 321–345.Google Scholar
Graf Estes, K. & Hurley, K. (2013). Infant-directed prosody helps infants map sounds to meanings. Infancy, 18, 797–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In Nicol, J., ed., One Mind, Two Languages: Bilingual Language Processing. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Igarashi, Y., Nishikawa, K., Tanaka, K., & Mazuka, R. (2013). Phonological theory informs the analysis of intonational exaggeration in Japanese infant-directed speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(2), 1283–1294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Junttila, K. & Ylinen, S. (2020). Intentional training with speech production supports children’s learning the meanings of foreign words: A comparison of four learning tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kondo, M., Tsubaki, H., & Sagisaka, Y. (2015). Segmental variation of Japanese speakers’ English: Analysis of “the North Wind and the Sun” in AESOP corpus. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 19(1), 3–17.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. (2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 831–843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, L. & Escudero, P. (2023). How bidialectalism interacts with cross-language phonetic similarity in nonnative speech acquisition: Evidence from Shanghai and Mandarin Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 44(6), 969–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maria, A. (1997). Introduction to modeling and simulation. In Andradóttir, S., Healy, K. J., Withers, D. H., & Nelson, B. L., eds., Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/268437.268440.Google Scholar
McClelland, J. L. & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulak, K. E., Vlach, H. A., & Escudero, P. (2019). Cross-situational learning of phonologically overlapping words across degrees of ambiguity. Cognitive Science, 43(5), e12731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(3), 299–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ong, J. H., Burnham, D., & Escudero, P. (2015). Distributional learning of lexical tones: A comparison of attended vs. unattended listening. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0133446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pino Escobar, G., Kalashnikova, M., & Escudero, P. (2018). Vocabulary matters! The relationship between verbal fluency and measures of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 170, 177–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pino Escobar, G., Tuninetti, A., Antoniou, M., & Escudero, P. (2023). Understanding preschoolers’ word learning success in different scenarios: Disambiguation meets statistical learning and eBook reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1118142. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1118142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prince, A. & Smolensky, P. ([1993] 2002). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Technical report, ROA Version 8/2002. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. https://roa.rutgers.edu/files/537-0802/537-0802-PRINCE-0-0.PDF.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, E. A., Milne, A. J., & Escudero, P. (2022). Music perception abilities and ambiguous word learning: Is there cross-domain transfer in nonmusicians? Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 801263. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.801263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, L. & Yu, C. (2008). Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics. Cognition, 106(3), 1558–1568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuninetti, A., Mulak, K. E., & Escudero, P. (2020). Cross-situational word learning in two foreign languages: Effects of native language and perceptual difficulty. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 602471. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.602471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uther, M., Knoll, M. A., & Burnham, D. (2007). Do you speak E-NG-L-I-SH? A comparison of foreigner- and infant-directed speech. Speech Communication, 49(1), 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leussen, J.-W. & Escudero, P. (2015). Learning to perceive and recognize a second language: The L2LP model revised. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1000. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wanrooij, K., Escudero, P., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2013). What do listeners learn from exposure to a vowel distribution? An analysis of listening strategies in distributional learning. Journal of Phonetics, 41(5), 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. & Escudero, P. (2014). Influences of listeners’ native and other dialects on cross-language vowel perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 01065. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D., Escudero, P., & Gafos, A. (2018). Spectral change and duration as cues in Australian English listeners’ front vowel categorization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(3), EL215–EL221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yazawa, K. (2020). Testing Second Language Linguistic Perception: A case study of Japanese, American English, and Australian English vowels [Doctoral dissertation, Waseda University]. Tokyo: Waseda University Repository. https://waseda.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/57858.Google Scholar
Yazawa, K., Konishi, T., Whang, J., Escudero, P., & Kondo, M. (2023a). Spectral and temporal implementation of Japanese speakers’ English vowel categories: A corpus-based study. Laboratory Phonology, 14(1), 1–33.Google Scholar
Yazawa, K., Whang, J., Kondo, M., & Escudero, P. (2023b). Feature-driven new sound category formation: Computational implementation with the L2LP model and beyond. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 2, 1303511. https://doi.org/10.3389/flang.2023.1303511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yazawa, K., Whang, J., Kondo, M., & Escudero, P. (2020). Language-dependent cue weighting: An investigation of perception modes in L2 learning. Second Language Research, 36(4), 557–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, C. & Smith, L. B. (2007). Rapid word learning under uncertainty via cross-situational statistics. Psychological Science, 18(5), 414–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×