Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:22:23.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Mandarin Chinese Syllable Structure and Phonological Similarity

Perception and Production Studies

from Part Three - Phonetic-phonological Issues in Chinese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2022

By
Karl David Neergaard  and
Chu-Ren Huang
Edited by
Chu-Ren Huang ,
Yen-Hwei Lin ,
I-Hsuan Chen  and
Yu-Yin Hsu
Chu-Ren Huang
Affiliation:
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Yen-Hwei Lin
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
I-Hsuan Chen
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Yu-Yin Hsu
Affiliation:
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we discuss the Mandarin syllable and recent innovations in its study. The focus will be on the segmentation of the syllable into phonological units, an area of research that features a proposal for the combination of segments into phonological units for almost every permutation possible. At the core of the new work in this area is the combined use of network science and psycholinguistic experimentation. We review exploratory work modeling the lexicon according to phonological networks, wherein words are the nodes of the network and the networks' edges are identified through the addition deletion or substitution of a single segment or lexical tone. We argue that lexical access viewed in light of syllable segmentation modelled through phonological networks sees the lexicon as multiple concurrent networks that, when given the demands of a specific task, activate connections most fit for the goals of the task.

Keywords

speech production/perceptionnetwork scienceMandarin Chinesephonological similaritysyllable segmentation
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Chinese Linguistics , pp. 245 - 274
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alario, F. X., Perre, Laetitia, Castel, Caroline, and Ziegler, Johannes C.. 2007. The role of orthography in speech production revisited. Cognition 102:464–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.02.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alderete, John, Chan, Queenie, and Yeung, Henry H.. 2019. Tone slips in Cantonese: Evidence for early phonological encoding. Cognition 191:103952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.021.Google Scholar
Ao, Benjamin X. P. 1992. The non-uniqueness condition and the segmentation of the Chinese syllable. Working Papers in Linguistics 42:1–25.Google Scholar
Arbesman, Samuel, Strogatz, Steven H., and Vitevitch, Michael S.. 2010a. Comparative analysis of networks of phonologically similar words in English and Spanish. Entropy, 12(3):327–337. https://doi.org/10.3390/e12030327.Google Scholar
Arbesman, Samuel, Strogatz, Steven H., and Vitevitch, Michael S.. 2010b. The structure of phonological networks across multiple languages. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 20(3):679–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arutiunian, Vardan, and Lopukhina, Anastasiya. 2020. The effects of phonological neighborhood density in childhood word production and recognition in Russian is opposite to English. Journal of Child Language 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000920000112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, Rolf H., Vasishth, Shravan, Kliegl, Reinhold, and Bates, Douglas. 2017. The cave of shadows: Addressing the human factor with generalized additive mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 94:206–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.11.006.Google Scholar
Bailey, Todd M., and Hahn, Ulrike. 2001. Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? Journal of Memory and Language 44:568–591. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bao, Zhiming. 1990. Fanqie languages and reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry 21(3):317–350.Google Scholar
Brennan, Christine, Cao, Fan, Pedroarena-Leal, Nicole, McNorgan, Chris, and Booth, James R.. 2013. Reading acquisition reorganizes the phonological awareness network only in alphabetic writing systems. Human Brain Mapping 34(12):3354–3368. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22147.Google Scholar
Cai, Qai, and Brysbaert, Marc. 2010. SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE 5(6):e10729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729.Google Scholar
Cai, Xiao, Yin, Yulong, and Zhang, Qingfang. 2020. The roles of syllables and phonemes during phonological encoding in Chinese spoken word production: A topographic ERP study. Neuropsychologia 140:107382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107382.Google Scholar
Cao, Fan, Brennan, Christine, and Booth, James R.. 2015. The brain adapts to orthography with experience: Evidence from English and Chinese. Developmental Science 18(5):785–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, Matthew T., Sonderegger, Morgan, and Bane, Max. 2014. How children explore the phonological network in child-directed speech: A survival analysis of children’s first word productions. Journal of Memory and Language 75:159–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.05.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, Kit Ying, and Vitevitch, Michael S.. 2009. The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35(6):1934–1949. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016902.Google Scholar
Chan, Kit Yang, and Vitevitch, Michael S.. 2010. Network structure influences speech production. Cognitive Science 34:685–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01100.x.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuan R. 1934. The non-uniqueness of phonemic solutions of phonetic systems. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 4(4):363–398.Google Scholar
Chen, Jenn-Yeu. 1999. The representation and processing of tone in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from slips of the tongue. Applied Psycholinguistics 20(2):289–301. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0142716499002064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Jenn-Yeu. 2000. Syllable errors from naturalistic slips of the tongue in Mandarin Chinese. Psychologia 43:15–26.Google Scholar
Chen, Jenn-Yeu, Chen, Train-Min, and Dell, Gary S.. 2002. Word-form encoding in Mandarin Chinese as assessed by the implicit priming task. Journal of Memory and Language 46(4):751–781. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2825.Google Scholar
Chen, Jenn-Yeu, Lin, Wei-Chun, and Ferrand, Ludovic. 2003. Masked priming of the syllable in Mandarin Chinese speech production. Chinese Journal of Psychology 45(1):107–120.Google Scholar
Chen, Jenn-Yeu, O’Séaghdha, Padraig G., and Chen, Train-min. 2016. The primacy of abstract syllables in Chinese word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 42(5):825–836. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039911.Google Scholar
Chen, Qi, and Mirman, Daniel. 2012. Competition and cooperation among similar representations: Toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. Psychological Review 119(2):417–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027175.Google Scholar
Chen, Train-Min, and Chen, Jenn-Yeu. 2013. The syllable as the proximate unit in Mandarin Chinese word production: An intrinsic or accidental property of the production system? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 20:154–162. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423–012-0326-7.Google Scholar
Chen, Train-Min, and Chen, Jenn-Yeu. 2015. The phonological planning in Mandarin spoken production of mono- and bimorphemic words. Japanese Psychological Research 57(1):81–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Wei-Fan, Chao, Pei-Chun, Chang, Ya-Ning, Hsu, Chun-Hsien, and Lee, Chia-Ying. 2016. Effects of orthographic consistency and homophone density on Chinese spoken word recognition. Brain and Language 157:51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.04.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, Robert L. 1966. Mandarin phonological structure. Journal of Linguistics 2(2):135–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700001444.Google Scholar
The Editorial Team of the Mandarin Dictionary Compendium. 1997. Word frequency statistic report of the database for national language concise lexicon 国语辞典简编本编辑资料字词频统计报告. Taipei: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Dell, Gary S. 1986. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93(3):283. http://129.237.66.221/P800/dell1986.pdf.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dell, Gary S., and Gordon, Jean K. 2003. Neighbors in the lexicon: Friends or foes? In Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities, ed. Schiller, Niels O. and Meyer, Antje S., 9–37. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Dell, Gary S., Reed, Kristopher D., Adams, David R., and Meyer, Antje S.. 2000. Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: A study of the role of experience in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26(6):1355–1367. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1355.Google Scholar
Desroches, Amy S., Newman, Randy Lynn, and Joanisse, Marc F.. 2009. Investigating the time course of spoken word recognition: Electrophysiological evidence for the influences of phonological similarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21(10):1893–1906. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.21142.Google Scholar
Do, Youngah, and Lai, Ryan K. Y.. 2021. Accounting for lexical tones when modeling phonological distance. Language 97(1):e39–e67. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duanmu, San. 2000. The phonology of standard Chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duanmu, San. 2007. The phonology of standard Chinese, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duanmu, San. 2011. Chinese syllable structure. In The Blackwell companion to phonology, ed. van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth V., and Rice, Keren, 1–14. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Duanmu, San. 2017. From non-uniqueness to the best solution in phonemic analysis: evidence from Chengdu Chinese. Lingua Sinica, 3(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40655–017-0030-7.Google Scholar
Dufour, Sophie, and Peereman, Ronald. 2003. Lexical competition in phonological priming: Assessing the role of phonological match and mismatch lengths between primes and targets. Memory and Cognition 31(8):1271–1283. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, Nick C. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2):143–188. https://doi.org/10.1017.S0272263102002024.Google Scholar
Feng, Chen, Yue, Yuan, and Zhang, Qingfang. 2019. Syllables are retrieved before segments in the spoken production of Mandarin Chinese: An ERP study. Scientific Reports 9(11773):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598–019-48033-3.Google Scholar
Gahl, Susanne, Yao, Yao, and Johnson, Keith. 2012. Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language 66(4):789–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.006.Google Scholar
Gandour, Jackson T., Yisheng, Xu, Donald, Wong, Mario, Dzemidzic, Mark, Lowe, Xiaojian, Li, and Yunxia, Tong. 2003. Neural correlates of segmental and tonal information in speech perception. Human Brain Mapping 20(4):185–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10137.Google Scholar
Gordon, Jean K., and Dell, Gary S.. 2001. Phonological neighborhood effects: Evidence from aphasia and connectionist modeling. Brain and Language 79:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2574.Google Scholar
Goswami, Usha. 2003. Phonology, learning to read and dyslexia: A cross-linguistic analysis. In Dyslexia: Different brain, different behavior, neuropsychology and cognition, ed. Csépe, Valéria, 1–40. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
Grainger, Jonathan, Muneaux, Mathilde, Farioli, Fernand, and Ziegler, Johannes C.. 2005. Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 58(6):981–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gruenenfelder, Thomas M., and Pisoni, David B.. 2009. The lexical restructuring hypothesis and graph theoretic analysis of networks based on random lexicons. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52(3):596–609. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388.Google Scholar
Holliday, Jeffrey J., Turnbull, Rory, and Eychenne, Julien. 2017. K-SPAN: A lexical database of Korean surface phonetic forms and phonological neighborhood density statistics. Behavior Research Methods 49(5):1939–1950. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428–016-0836-8.Google Scholar
Huang, Hsu-Wen, Lee, Chia-Ying, Tsai, Jie-Li, Lee, Chia-Lin, Hung, Daisy L., and Tzeng, Ovid J. L.. 2006. Orthographic neighborhood effects in reading Chinese two-character words. Neuroreport 17(10):1061–65.Google Scholar
Huang, Xianjun, and Yang, Jin-Chen. 2016. The time course of lexical competition during spoken word recognition in Mandarin Chinese. Neuroreport 27(2):67–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, Xianjun, Yang, Jin-Chen, Chang, Ruohan, and Guo, Chunyan. 2016. Task modulation of disyllabic spoken word recognition in Mandarin Chinese: A unimodal ERP study. Scientific Reports 6:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25916.Google Scholar
Huang, Xianjun, Yang, Jin-Chen, Zhang, Qin, and Guo, Chunyan. 2014. The time course of spoken word recognition in Mandarin Chinese: A unimodal ERP study. Neuropsychologia 63:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.015.Google Scholar
Kureta, Yoichi, Fushimi, Takao, and Tatsumi, Itaru F.. 2006. The functional unit in phonological encoding: Evidence for moraic representation in native Japanese speakers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32(5):1102–1119.Google ScholarPubMed
Levelt, Willem J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, Chuchu, and Wang, Min. 2017. The influence of orthographic experience on the development of phonological preparation in spoken word production. Memory & Cognition 45:956–973. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421–017-0712-5.Google Scholar
Li, Chuchu, Wang, Min, and Idsardi, William. 2015. The effect of orthographic form-cuing on the phonological preparation unit in spoken word production. Memory & Cognition, 43:563–578. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421–014-0484-0.Google Scholar
Li, Mengfeng, Lin, Wei-Chun, Chou, Tai-Li, Yang, Fu-Ling, and Jei-Tun, Wu. 2015. The role of orthographic neighborhood size effects in Chinese word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 44:219–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936–014-9340-4.Google Scholar
Liben-Nowell, David, Strand, Julia F., Sharp, Alexa, Wexler, Tom, and Woods, Kevin. 2019. The danger of testing by selecting controlled subsets, with applications to spoken-word recognition. Journal of Cognition 2(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.51.Google Scholar
Lin, Yen-Hwei. 1989. Autosegmental treatment of segmental processes in Chinese phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Lin, Yen-Hwei. 2007. The sounds of Chinese with audio CD. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luce, Paul A., Goldinger, Stephen D., Auer, Edward T., and Vitevitch, Michael S.. 2000. Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN. Perception & Psychophysics 62(3):615–625. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212113.Google Scholar
Luce, Paul A., Pisoni, David B.. 1998. Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 19(1):1–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181a15ae8.Screening.Google Scholar
Malins, Jeffrey G., Gao, Danqi, Tao, Ran, Booth, James R., Shu, Hua, Joanisse, Marc F., Liu, Li, and Desroches, Amy S.. 2014. Developmental differences in the influence of phonological similarity on spoken word processing in Mandarin Chinese. Brain and Language 138:38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.09.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malins, Jeffrey G., and Joanisse, Marc F.. 2010. The roles of tonal and segmental information in Mandarin spoken word recognition: An eyetracking study. Journal of Memory and Language 62(4):407–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.004.Google Scholar
Malins, Jeffrey G., and Joanisse, Marc F.. 2012. Setting the tone: An ERP investigation of the influences of phonological similarity on spoken word recognition in Mandarin Chinese. Neuropsychologia 50(8):2032–2043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.002.Google Scholar
McClelland, James L., and Elman, Jeffrey L.. 1986. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18(1):1–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0.Google Scholar
Meyer, Antje S., and Schriefers, Herbert. 1991. Phonological facilitation in picture–word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 17(6):1146–1160. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.6.1146.Google Scholar
Mok, Peggy P. K. 2009. On the syllable-timing of Cantonese and Beijing Mandarin. Chinese Journal of Phonetics 2:148–154. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1964.2.1.155.Google Scholar
Montant, Marie, Daniele, Schön, Jean-luc, Anton, and Johannes C, Ziegler. 2011. Orthographic contamination of Broca’s area. Frontiers in Psychology 2: Article 378. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00378.Google Scholar
Myers, James. 2002. An analogical approach to the Mandarin syllabary. Journal of Chinese Phonology 11:163–190.Google Scholar
Myers, James, and Tsay, Jane. 2005. The processing of phonological acceptability judgments. In Proceedings of Symposium on 90-92 NSC Projects, Taipei, 26–45.Google Scholar
Nakayama, Mariko, Kinoshita, Sachiko, and Verdonschot, Rinus G.. 2016. The emergence of a phoneme-sized unit in L2 speech production: Evidence from Japanese–English bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 7:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00175.Google Scholar
Neergaard, Karl D. 2018. Phonological segmentation neighborhoods. Doctoral dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Neergaard, Karl D., James, Britton, and Chu-Ren, Huang. 2019. Neighborhood in decay: Working memory modulates effect of phonological similarity on lexical access. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Montreal, 2447–2453. https://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2019/papers/0423/0423.pdf.Google Scholar
Neergaard, Karl D., and Huang, Chu-Ren. 2016. Graph theoretic approach to Mandarin syllable segmentation. In Proceedings of The 15th International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics (IsCLL-15). Hsinchu: Hsinchu University of Education.Google Scholar
Neergaard, Karl D., and Huang, Chu-Ren. 2019. Constructing the Mandarin phonological network: Novel syllable inventory used to identify schematic segmentation. Complexity 2019:Article 6979830. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6979830.Google Scholar
Neergaard, Karl D., Luo, Jin, and Huang, Chu-Ren. 2019. Phonological network fluency identifies phonological restructuring through mental search. Scientific Reports 9:15984. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52433-w.Google Scholar
Neergaard, Karl D., Hongzhi, Xu, James, German and Huang, Chu-Ren. 2021. Database of word-level statistics for Mandarin Chinese (DoWLS-MAN). Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01620-7.Google Scholar
Neergaard, Karl D., Hongzhi, Xu, and Huang, Chu-Ren. 2016. Database of Mandarin neighborhood statistics. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2016, Portorož, 4032–4036. www.aclweb.org/anthology/L16-1636/.Google Scholar
Neergaard, Karl D., Hongzhi, Xu, and Huang, Chu-Ren. 2020. Database of word level statistics – Mandarin LDC2020L01 (Web Download). Linguistic Data Consortium. http://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/LDC2020L01.Google Scholar
O’Séaghdha, Padraig G. 2015. Across the great divide: Proximate units at the lexical–phonological interface. Japanese Psychological Research 57(1):4–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12074.Google Scholar
O’Séaghdha, Padraig G., Chen, Jenn-Yeu, and Chen, Train-min. 2010. Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English. Cognition 115(2):282–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.001.Proximate.Google Scholar
Pattamadilok, Chotiga, Morais, José, Ventura, Paulo, and Kolinsky, Régine. 2007. The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition: Further evidence from French. Language and Cognitive Processes 22(5):700–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960601049628.Google Scholar
Pattamadilok, Chotiga, Perre, Laetitia, and Ziegler, Johannes C.. 2011. Beyond rhyme or reason: ERPs reveal task-specific activation of orthography on spoken language. Brain and Language 116(3):116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.12.002.Google Scholar
Peeva, Maya G., Guenther, Frank H., Tourville, Jason A., Nieto-Castanon, Alfonso, Anton, Jean-Luc, Nazarian, Bruno, and Alario, Francois X.. 2011. Distinct representations of phonemes, syllables, and supra-syllabic sequences in the speech production network Maya. NeuroImage 50(2):626–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.065.Distinct.Google Scholar
Perre, Laetitia, Midgley, Katherine, and Ziegler, Johannes C.. 2009. When beef primes reef more than leaf: Orthographic information affects phonological priming in spoken word recognition. Psychophysiology 46:739–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00813.x.Google Scholar
Perre, Laetitia, Pattamadilok, Chotiga, Montant, Marie, and Ziegler, Johannes C.. 2009. Orthographic effects in spoken language: On-line activation or phonological restructuring? Brain Research 1275:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.04.018.Google Scholar
Qu, Qingqing, Damian, Markus F., and Kazanina, Nina 2012. Sound-sized segments are significant for Mandarin speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109(35):14265–14270. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200632109.Google Scholar
Roelofs, Ardi. 2015. Modeling of phonological encoding in spoken word production: From Germanic languages to Mandarin Chinese and Japanese. Japanese. Psychological Research 57(1):22–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12050.Google Scholar
Sadat, Jasmin, Martin, Clara D., Costa, Albert, and Alario, Francois X.. 2014. Reconciling phonological neighborhood effects in speech production through single trial analysis. Cognitive Psychology 68:33–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.10.001.Google Scholar
Schiller, Niels O. 2000. Single word production in English: The role of subsyllabic units during phonological encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26(2):512–528. https://doi.org/10.10371/0278-7393.26.2.512.Google Scholar
Schiller, Niels O. 2004. The onset effect in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language 50:477–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.004.Google Scholar
Sharma, Bhamini. 2020. The effect of phonological neighbors and homophones on spoken word recognition in Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stephanie. 1979. Speech errors as evidence for a serial-ordering mechanism in sentence production. In Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett, ed. Cooper, William E. and Walker, Edward C. T., 295–342. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shuai, Lan, and Malins, Jeffrey G.. 2016. Encoding lexical tones in jTRACE: A simulation of monosyllabic spoken word recognition in Mandarin Chinese. Behavior Research Methods 49(1):230–241. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428–015-0690-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siew, Cynthia S. Q. 2013. Community structure in the phonological network. Frontiers in Psychology 4:553. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00553.Google Scholar
Siew, Cynthia. S. Q. 2017. The influence of 2-hop network density on spoken word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24:496–502. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423–016-1103-9.Google Scholar
Siew, Cynthia S. Q., and Vitevitch, Michael S.. 2019. The phonographic language network: Using network science to investigate the phonological and orthographic similarity structure of language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 148(3):475–500.Google Scholar
Stella, Massimo, Nicole M, Beckage, and Markus, Brede. 2017. Multiplex lexical networks reveal patterns in early word acquisition in children. Scientific Reports 7: Article 46730. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46730.Google Scholar
Stella, Massimo, and Brede, Markus. 2015. Patterns in the English language: Phonological networks, percolation and assembly models. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2015: P05006.Google Scholar
Sun, Chaofen. 2006. Chinese: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tsai, Chih-Hao. 2000. Mandarin syllable frequency counts for Chinese characters. http://technology.chtsai.org/syllable/.Google Scholar
Tsai, Jie-Li, Lee, Chia-Ying, Lin, Ying-Chun, Tzeng, Ovid J. L., and Hung, Daisy L.. 2006. Neighborhood size effects of Chinese words in lexical decision and reading. Language and Linguistics 7(3):659–675.Google Scholar
Tsai, Pei-Tzu. 2007. The effects of phonological neighborhoods on spoken word recognition in Mandarin Chinese. Master’s dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Tsang, Yiu-Kei, Huang, Jian, Lui, Ming, Xue, Mingfeng, Chan, Yin-Wah Fiona, Wang, Suiping, and Chen, Hsuan-Chih. 2018. MELD-SCH: A Megastudy of Lexical Decision in Simplified Chinese. Behavior Research Methods 50:1763–1777.Google Scholar
Turnbull, Rory, and Sharon, Peperkamp. 2016. What governs a language’s lexicon? Determining the organizing principles of phonological neighbourhood networks. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Complex Networks and their Applications (COMPLEX NETWORKS 2016), ed. Cherifi, Hocine, Gaito, Sabrina, Quattrociocchi, Walter, and Sala, Alessandra, 83–94. Cham: Springer. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-50901-3.Google Scholar
Ventura, Paulo, Morais, José, Pattamadilok, Chotiga, and Kolinsky, Régine. 2004. The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 19(1):57–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000134.Google Scholar
Verdonschot, Rinus G., Kiyama, Sachiko, Tamaoka, Katsuo, Kinoshita, Sachiko, La Heij, Wido, and Schiller, Neils O.. 2011. The functional unit of Japanese word naming: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37(6):1458–1473. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024491.Google Scholar
Verdonschot, Rinus G., Nakayama, Mariko, Zhang, Qingfang, Tamaoka, Katsuo, and Schiller, Neils O.. 2013. The proximate phonological unit of Chinese-English bilinguals: Proficiency matters. PLoS ONE 8(4): e61454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061454.Google Scholar
Vitevitch, Michael S. 2002. The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28(4):735–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.735.Google Scholar
Vitevitch, Michael S. 2008. What can graph theory tell us about word learning and lexical retrieval? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 51:408–422.Google Scholar
Vitevitch, Michael S., and Luce, Paul A.. 2016. Phonological neighborhood effects in spoken word perception and production. Annual Review of Linguistics 8(2):75–94. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124832.Google Scholar
Vitevitch, Michael S., and Rodríguez, Eva. 2004. Neighborhood density effects in spoken word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 3(1):64–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14769670400027332.Neighborhood.Google Scholar
Vitevitch, Michael S., and Sommers, Mitchell S.. 2003. The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition 31(4):491–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2011.02.012.Investigations.Google Scholar
Vitevitch, Michael S., and Stamer, Melissa K.. 2006. The curious case of competition in Spanish speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes 21(6):760–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960500287196.Google Scholar
Wan, I-Ping. 2006. A psycholinguistic study of postnuclear glides and coda nasals in Mandarin. Journal of Language and Linguistics 5(2):158–176.Google Scholar
Wang, H. S. 1998. An experimental study on the phonetic constraints of Mandarin Chinese. In Studia linguistica serica, ed. Tsou, Benjamin K., 259–268. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Language Information Sciences Research Center.Google Scholar
Wang, Jie, Wong, Andus W.-K., Wang, Suiping, and Hsuan-Chih, Chen. 2017. Primary phonological planning units in spoken word production are language-specific: Evidence from an ERP study. Scientific Reports 7:5815. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598–017-06186-z.Google Scholar
Wang, Wenna, Li, Xiaojian, Ning, Ning, and Zhang, John X.. 2012. The nature of the homophone density effect: An ERP study with Chinese spoken monosyllable homophones. Neuroscience Letters 516(1):67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.059.Google Scholar
Wiener, Seth, and Turnbull, Rory. 2016. Constraints of tones, vowels and consonants on lexical selection in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Speech 59(1):59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830915578000.Google Scholar
Wong, Andus W.-K., and Chen, Hsuan-Chih. 2008. Processing segmental and prosodic information in Cantonese word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34(5):1172–1190. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013000.Google Scholar
Wong, Andus W.-K., and Chen, Hsuan-Chih. 2009. What are effective phonological units in Cantonese spoken word planning? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16(5):888–892. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, Andus W.-K., Chiu, Ho-Ching, Wang, Jie, Wong, Siu-San, and Chen, Hsuan-Chih. 2019. Electrophysiological evidence for the time course of syllabic and sub-syllabic encoding in Cantonese spoken word production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 34(6):677–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1562559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Andus W.-K., Huang, Jian, and Chen, Hsuan-Chih. 2012. Phonological units in spoken word production: Insights from Cantonese. PLoS ONE 7(11):e48776. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048776.Google Scholar
Wu, Jei-Tun, Yang, Fu-Ling, and Jin, Wei-Chun. 2013. Beyond Phonology Matters in Character Recognition. Chinese Journal of Psychology 55(3):289–318.Google Scholar
Xu, Shirong 徐世荣. 1980. Phonology of standard Chinese 普通话语音知识. Beijing: Wenzi Gaige Publishing.Google Scholar
Yao, Yao. 2009. Phonological neighbourhood development in children’s lexicons. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report (2009) 5(5):44–63.Google Scholar
Yao, Yao, and Sharma, Bhamini. 2017. What is in the neighborhood of a tonal syllable? Evidence from auditory lexical decision in Mandarin Chinese. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 2:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v2i0.4090.Google Scholar
Yates, Mark. 2005. Phonological neighbors speed visual word processing: Evidence from multiple tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 31(6):1385–1397.Google Scholar
You, Rujie, Qian, Nairong, and Gao, Zhengxia 游汝杰, 钱乃荣, 高钲夏. 1980. On the phonemic system of standard Chinese 论普通话的音位系统. Studies of the Chinese language 中国语文 5(158):328–334.Google Scholar
You, Wenping, Zhang, Qingfang, and Verdonschot, Rinus G.. 2012. Masked syllable priming effects in word and picture naming in Chinese. PLoS ONE 7(10): e46595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046595.Google Scholar
Yu, Mengxia, Mo, Ce, Li, You, and Mo, Lei. 2015. Distinct representations of syllables and phonemes in Chinese production: Evidence from fMRI adaptation. Neuropsychologia 77:253–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.027.Google Scholar
Yu, Mengxia, Mo, Ce, and Mo, Lei. 2014. The role of phoneme in Mandarin Chinese production: Evidence from ERPs. PLoS ONE 9(9):e106486. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106486.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jie,and Lai, Yuwen. 2010. Testing the role of phonetic knowledge in Mandarin tone sandhi. Phonology 27:153–201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675710000060.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qingfang, and Markus, F. Damian, M. 2019. Syllables constitute proximate units for Mandarin speakers: Electrophysiological evidence from a masked priming task. Psychophysiology 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13317.Google Scholar
Zhao, Jingjing, Guo, Jingjing, Zhou, Fengying, and Shu, Hua. 2011. Time course of Chinese monosyllabic spoken word recognition: Evidence from ERP analyses. Neuropsychologia 49:1761–1770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.054.Google Scholar
Zhao, Xiaowei, and Li, Ping. 2009. An online database of phonological representations for Mandarin Chinese. Behavior Research Methods 41(2):575–583. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.575.Google Scholar
Zhou, Xiaolin, and Marslen-Wilson, William D.. 1994. Words, morphemes and syllables in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 9(3):393–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402125.Google Scholar
Zhou, Youguang. 2003. The historical evolution of Chinese languages and scripts. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University National East Asian Languages Resource Center.Google Scholar
Ziegler, Johannes C., Muneaux, Mathilde, and Grainger, Jonathan. 2003. Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(4):779–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749–596X(03)00006-8.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×