Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T00:39:41.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - The Psychology of Access-Based Consumption

from 2 - Consumer Psychology of Groups and Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2023

By
Varala Maraj  and
Fleura Bardhi
Edited by
Cait Lamberton ,
Derek D. Rucker  and
Stephen A. Spiller
Cait Lamberton
Affiliation:
Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Derek D. Rucker
Affiliation:
Kellogg School, Northwestern University, Illinois
Stephen A. Spiller
Affiliation:
Anderson School, University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

Access represents an alternative mode of consumption to ownership that may be market mediated in which no transfer of ownership takes place. We review the last ten years of marketing research on this topic and discuss access as coexisting with ownership on a continuum. Access provides distinct benefits anchored in its temporariness and freedom from the financial, social, and emotional burdens of ownership. Our review highlights individual- as well as firm-level antecedents of access. We identify four key paradoxical consequences of access-based consumption: more consumption/less attachment; “mine”/not “mine”; prosocial/pro-status signaling; and empowerment/exploitation. We conclude with future research agenda.

Keywords

liquid consumptionaccess-based consumptionsharing platformscollaborative consumptionconsumer psychology
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Psychology , pp. 445 - 471
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Airoldi, M. (2021). Digital traces of taste: Methodological pathways for consumer research. Consumption Markets & Culture, 24(1), 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, C., Brick, D. J., & Fournier, S. (2021). Doing relationship work: A theory of change in consumer–brand relationships. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(4), 610–632.Google Scholar
Arnould, E. J., & Rose, A. S. (2016). Mutuality: Critique and substitute for Belk’s ‘sharing’. Marketing Theory, 16(1), 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspara, J., & Wittkowski, K. (2019). Sharing-dominant logic? Quantifying the association between consumer intelligence and choice of social access modes. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(2), 201–222.Google Scholar
Atanasova, A., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2021). The broadening boundaries of materialism. Marketing Theory, 21(4), 481–500.Google Scholar
Atasoy, O., & Morewedge, C. K. (2018) Digital goods are valued less than physical goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1343–1357.Google Scholar
Bagozzi, R. P., & Moore, D. J. (1994). Public service advertisements: Emotions and empathy guide prosocial behavior. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 56–70.Google Scholar
Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881–898.Google Scholar
Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2017) Liquid consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 582–597.Google Scholar
Bardhi, F., Eckhardt, G. M., & Arnould, E. J. (2012). Liquid relationship to possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 510–529.Google Scholar
Bardhi, F., Eckhardt, G. M., & Samsioe, E. (2020). Liquid luxury. In Morhart, F., Wilcox, K., & Czellar, S. (Eds.). Research Handbook on Luxury Branding (pp. 22–42). Research Handbooks in Business and Management series. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Barron, K., Kung, E., & Proserpio, D. (2021). The effect of home-sharing on house prices and rents: Evidence from Airbnb. Marketing Science, 40(1), 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, C., Scherer, A., & Wangenheim, F. v. (2015). Branding access offers: The importance of product brands, ownership status, and spillover effects to parent brands. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(5), 574–588.Google Scholar
Baxter, W., & Aurisicchio, M. (2018). Ownership by design. In Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (Eds.). Psychological Ownership and Consumer Behavior (pp. 119–134). Springer.Google Scholar
Belk, R. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500.Google Scholar
Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595–1600.Google Scholar
Belk, R. W. (1988) Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.Google Scholar
Belk, R. W. (2007). Why not share rather than own? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 126–140.Google Scholar
Belk, R. W. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 715–734.Google Scholar
Belk, R. W., Eckhardt, G. M., & Bardhi, F. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of the Sharing Economy. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Brasel, S. A., & Gips, J. (2014). Tablets, touchscreens, and touchpads: How varying touch interfaces trigger psychological ownership and endowment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 226–233.Google Scholar
Buhalis, D., Andreu, L., & Gnoth, J. (2020). The dark side of the sharing economy: Balancing value co-creation and value co-destruction. Psychology & Marketing, 37(5), 689–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, M., Elliot, S., Henry, P., & O’Connor, M. (2020). The impact of political ideology on consumer perceptions of their rights and responsibilities in the sharing economy. European Journal of Marketing, 54(8), 1909–1935.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. (2009). Possession and access: Consumer desires and value perceptions regarding contemporary art collection and exhibit visits. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 925–940.Google Scholar
Costello, J. P., & Reczek, R. W. (2020). Providers versus platforms: Marketing communications in the sharing economy. Journal of Marketing, 84(6), 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cova, B., & Dalli, D. (2009). Working consumers: The next step in marketing theory? Marketing Theory, 9(3), 315–339.Google Scholar
Cova, B., Dalli, D., & Zwick, D. (2011). Critical perspectives on consumers’ role as ‘producers’: Broadening the debate on value co-creation in marketing processes. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 231–241.Google Scholar
Datta, H., Knox, G., & Bronnenberg, B. J. (2017). Changing their tune: How consumers’ adoption of online streaming affects music consumption and discovery. Available at SSRN, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2782911Google Scholar
Datta, H., Knox, G., & Bronnenberg, B. J. (2018). Changing their tune: How consumers’ adoption of online streaming affects music consumption and discovery. Marketing Science, 37(1), 5–21.Google Scholar
Davies, I., Oates, C. J., Tynan, C., et. al. (2020). Seeking sustainable futures in marketing and consumer research. European Journal of Marketing, 54(11), 2911–2939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckhardt, G. M., & Bardhi, F. (2016). The relationship between access practices and economic systems. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1(2), 210–225.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, G. M., & Bardhi, F. (2020). New dynamics of social status and distinction. Marketing Theory, 20(1), 85–102.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, G. M., Houston, M. B., Jiang, B., Lamberton, C., Rindfleisch, A., & Zervas, G. (2019). Marketing in the sharing economy. Journal of Marketing, 83(5), 5–27.Google Scholar
Ericson, K., & Fuster, A. (2011). Expectations as endowments: Evidence on reference-dependent preferences from exchange and valuation experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1879–1907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueiredo, B., & Scaraboto, D. (2016). The systemic creation of value through circulation in collaborative consumer networks. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(4), 509–533.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, B., & Uncles, M. (2015). Moving across time and space: Temporal management and structuration of consumption in conditions of global mobility. Consumption Markets & Culture, 18(1), 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firat, A. F., & Venkatesh, A. (1995). Liberatory postmodernism and the reenchantment of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 239–267.Google Scholar
Furby, L. (1991). Understanding the psychology of possession and ownership: A personal memoir and an appraisal of our progress. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6(6), 457–463.Google Scholar
Furby, L. (1980). Collective possession and ownership: A study of its judged feasibility and desirability. Social Behavior and Personality, 8(2), 165–184.Google Scholar
Giesler, M. (2006). Consumer gift systems. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), 283–290.Google Scholar
Graul, A. R. H., & Brough, A. R. (2020). Why we don’t rent what others love: The role of product attachment in consumer-to-consumer transactions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(2), 329–341.Google Scholar
Gruen, A. (2017). Design and the creation of meaningful consumption practices in access-based consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(3–4), 226–243.Google Scholar
Guyader, H. (2018). No one rides for free! Three styles of collaborative consumption. Journal of Services Marketing, 32(6), 692–714.Google Scholar
Harding, R. D., Hildebrand, D., Kramer, T., & Lasaleta, J. D. (2019). The impact of acquisition mode on expected speed of product mastery and subsequent consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(1), 140–158.Google Scholar
Hartl, B., Kamleitner, B., & Holub, S. (2020). Take me on a ride: The role of environmentalist identity for carpooling. Psychology & Marketing, 37(5), 663–676.Google Scholar
Hazée, S., Delcourt, C., & Van Vaerenbergh, Y. (2017). Burdens of access: Understanding customer barriers and barrier-attenuating practices in access-based services. Journal of Service Research, 20(4), 441–456.Google Scholar
Hellwig, K., Morhart, F., Girardin, F., & Hauser, M. (2015). Exploring different types of sharing: A proposed segmentation of the market for ‘sharing’ businesses. Psychology & Marketing, 32(9), 891–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmond, A. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 2056305115603080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennig-Thurau, T., Henning, V., & Sattler, H. (2007). Consumer file sharing of motion pictures. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 1–8.Google Scholar
Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., et al. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hill, R. P., Cunningham, D., & Gentlemen, G. (2016). Dehumanization and restriction inside a maximum security prison: Novel insights about consumer acquisition and ownership. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1(2), 295–313.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R., Molesworth, M., & Scullion, R. (2014). The messy social lives of objects: Inter-personal borrowing and the ambiguity of possession and ownership. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(2), 131–139.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.Google Scholar
Karahanna, E., Agarwal, R., & Angst, C. (2006). Reconceptualizing compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 781–804.Google Scholar
Kirk, C. P., Peck, J., & Swain, S. D. (2018). Property lines in the mind: Consumers’ psychological ownership and their territorial responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1), 148–168.Google Scholar
Kleijnen, M., Lee, N., & Wetzels, M. (2009). An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3), 344–357.Google Scholar
Kozinets, R. V., Ferreira, D. A., & Chimenti, P. (2021). How do platforms empower consumers? Insights from the affordances and constraints of Reclame Aqui. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(3), 428–455.Google Scholar
Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior. Journal of consumer psychology, 22(3), 332–351.Google Scholar
Labrecque, L., vor dem Esche, J., Mathwick, C., Novak, T., & Hofacker, C. (2013) Consumer power: Evolution in the digital age. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(4), 257–269.Google Scholar
Lamberton, C., & Goldsmith, K. (2020). Ownership: A perennial prize or a fading goal? A curation, framework, and agenda for future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(2), 301–309.Google Scholar
Lawson, S. J., Gleim, M. R., Perren, R., & Hwang, J. (2016). Freedom from ownership: An exploration of access-based consumption. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2615–2623.Google Scholar
Li, H., & Srinivasan, K. (2019). Competitive dynamics in the sharing economy: An analysis in the context of Airbnb and hotels. Marketing Science, 38(3), 365–391.Google Scholar
Lin, M., Miao, L., Wei, W., & Moon, H. (2019). Peer engagement behaviors: Conceptualization and research directions. Journal of Service Research, 22(4), 388–403.Google Scholar
Lovelock, C., & Gummesson, E. (2004). Whither services marketing? In search of a new paradigm and fresh perspectives. Journal of Services Research, 7(1), 20–41.Google Scholar
MacInnis, D. J., & Folkes, V. S. (2010). The disciplinary status of consumer behavior: A sociology of science perspective on key controversies. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 899–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkar, M., Yap, S-F., & Belk, R. (2020). Stabilising collaborative consumer networks: How technological mediation shapes relational work. European Journal of Marketing, 55(5), 1385–1410.Google Scholar
Mick, D. G., & Fournier, S. (1998) Paradoxes of technology: Consumer cognizance, emotions, and coping strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 123–143.Google Scholar
Moeller, S., & Wittkowski, K. (2010). The burdens of ownership: Reasons for preferring renting. Managing Service Quality, 20(2), 176–191.Google Scholar
Molesworth, M., Watkins, R., & Denegri-Knott, J. (2016). Possession work on hosted digital consumption objects as consumer ensnarement. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1(2), 246–261.Google Scholar
Moncef, B., & Dupuy, M. M. (2021). Last-mile logistics in the sharing economy: Sustainability paradoxes. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 51(5), 508–527.Google Scholar
Morewedge, C. K., & Giblin, C. E. (2015). Explanations of the endowment effect: An integrative review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(6), 339–348.Google Scholar
Morewedge, C. K., Monga, A., Palmatier, R. W. Shu, S. B., & Small, D. A. (2021) Evolution of consumption: A psychological ownership framework. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), 196–218.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, A., & Kadiyali, V. (2011). Modeling multichannel home video demand in the U.S. motion picture industry. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(6), 985–995.Google Scholar
Osman, H., D’Acunto, D., & Johns, N. (2019) Home and away: Why do consumers shy away from reporting negative experiences in the peer-to-peer realms? Psychology & Marketing, 36(12), 1162–1175.Google Scholar
Osterhus, T. L. (1997) Pro-social consumer influence strategies: When and how do they work?. Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 16–29.Google Scholar
Oyedele, A., & Simpson, P. (2017) Emerging adulthood, sharing utilities and intention to use sharing services. Journal of Services Marketing, 32(2), 161–174.Google Scholar
Ozanne, L. K., & Ballantine, P. W. (2010) Sharing as a form of anti-consumption? An examination of toy library users. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 485–498.Google Scholar
Ozanne, L. K., & Ozanne, J. L. (2011). A child’s right to play: The social construction of civic virtues in toy libraries. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(2), 264–278.Google Scholar
Pantano, E., & Stylos, N. (2020). The Cinderella moment: Exploring consumers’ motivations to engage with renting as collaborative luxury consumption mode. Psychology & Marketing, 37(5), 740–753.Google Scholar
Papies, D., Eggers, F., & Wlömert, N. (2011). Music for free? How free ad-funded downloads affect consumer choice. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(5), 777–794.Google Scholar
Peck, J., Barger, V. A., & Webb, A. (2013). In search of a surrogate for touch: The effect of haptic imagery on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2), 189–196.Google Scholar
Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003). Individual differences in haptic information processing: The ‘Need for Touch’ scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 430–342.Google Scholar
Peck, J., Kirk, C. P., Luangrath, A. W., & Shu, S. B. (2021). Caring for the commons: Using psychological ownership to enhance stewardship behavior for public goods. Journal of Marketing, 85(2), 33–49.Google Scholar
Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 434–447.Google Scholar
Perren, R., & Kozinets, R. V. (2018). Lateral exchange markets: How social platforms operate in a networked economy. Journal of Marketing, 82(1), 20–36.Google Scholar
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84–107.Google Scholar
Price, L. L., & Belk, R. W. (2016) Consumer ownership and sharing: Introduction to the issue. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1(2), 193–197.Google Scholar
Quinn, P. (2022). Global Consumer Media Usage Forecast 2021–2025. PQ Media, 9th annual. www.pqmedia.com/product/global-consumer-media-usage-forecast-2021-2025Google Scholar
Richins, M. L. (1994). Special possessions and the expression of material values. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 522–533.Google Scholar
Richins, M. L. (2017). Materialism pathways: The processes that create and perpetuate materialism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(4), 480–499.Google Scholar
Rodgers, M., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., et al. (2009). Testing methodological guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: Effectiveness of interventions to promote smoke alarm ownership and function. Evaluation, 15(1), 49–73.Google Scholar
Roos, D., & Hahn, R. (2017). Does shared consumption affect consumers’ values, attitudes, and norms? A panel study. Journal of Business Research, 77, 113–123.Google Scholar
Rudmin, F., & Berry, J. (1987). Semantics of ownership: A free-recall study of property. The Psychological Record, 37(2), 257–268.Google Scholar
Scaraboto, D. (2015). Selling, sharing, and everything in between: The hybrid economies of collaborative networks. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 152–176.Google Scholar
Scaraboto, D., & Figueiredo, B. (2022). How consumer orchestration work creates value in the sharing economy. Journal of Marketing, 86(2), 29–47.Google Scholar
Schaefers, T., Lawson, S. J., & Kukar-Kinney, M. (2016). How the burdens of ownership promote consumer usage of access-based services. Marketing Letters, 27(3), 569–577.Google Scholar
Schaefers, T., Wittkowski, K., Benoit, S., & Ferraro, R. (2016). Contagious effects of customer misbehavior in access-based services. Journal of Service Research, 19(1), 3–21.Google Scholar
Schafers, T., Narayanamurthy, G., Moser, R., & Leban, M. (2021). The sharing economy at the base of the economic pyramid: How access-based services can help overcome ownership risks. Psychology & Marketing, 38(11), 2073–2088.Google Scholar
Sharifonnasabi, Z., Bardhi, F., & Luedicke, M. K. (2020). How globalization affects consumers: Insights from 30 years of CCT globalization research. Marketing Theory, 20(3), 273–298.Google Scholar
Sinclair, G., & Tinson, J. (2017). Psychological ownership and music streaming consumption. Journal of Business Research, 71, 1–9.Google Scholar
Snare, F. (1972). The concept of property. American Philosophical Quarterly, 9(2), 200–206.Google Scholar
Stofberg, N., & Bridoux, F. (2019). Consumers’ choice among peer-to-peer sharing platforms: The other side of the coin. Psychology & Marketing, 36(12), 1176–1195.Google Scholar
Styvén, M. E., & Mariani, M. M. (2020). Understanding the intention to buy secondhand clothing on sharing economy platforms: The influence of sustainability, distance from the consumption system, and economic motivations. Psychology & Marketing, 37(5), 724–739.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. J., Henry, P. C., & Bardhi, F. (2018). Theorizing reactive reflexivity: Lifestyle displacement and discordant performances of taste. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), 571–594.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061.Google Scholar
Verboven, H., & Vanherck, L. (2016). The sustainability paradox of the sharing economy. UmweltWirtschaftsForum, 24(4), 303–314.Google Scholar
Viglia, G. (2020). The sharing economy: Psychological mechanisms that affect collaborative consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 37(5), 627–629.Google Scholar
von Richthofen, G., & Fischer, E. (2019). Airbnb and hybridized logics of commerce and hospitality. In Belk, R. W., Eckhardt, G. M., & Bardhi, F. (Eds.). Handbook of the Sharing Economy (pp. 193–207). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., John, D. R., & Griskevicious, V. (2021). Does the devil wear Prada? Luxury product experiences can affect prosocial behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38(1), 104–119.Google Scholar
Watkins, R., & Molesworth, M. (2012). Attachment to digital virtual possessions in videogames. In Belk, R. W., Askegaard, S., & Scott, L. (Eds.). Research in Consumer Behavior (pp. 153–170). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Ellard, J. H. (2012). Belief in a just world: Consumer intentions and behaviors toward ethical products. Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 103–118.Google Scholar
Wlömert, N., & Papies, D. (2016). On-demand streaming services and music industry revenues – Insights from Spotify’s market entry. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(2), 314–327.Google Scholar
Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., & Byers, J. W. (2017). The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel Industry. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(5), 687–705.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×