Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:56:49.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Social Justice Education and Democratic Legitimacy

from Part Two - Philosophical and Normative Foundations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2023

By
Lauren Bialystok
Edited by
Julian Culp ,
Johannes Drerup  and
Douglas Yacek
Julian Culp
Affiliation:
The American University of Paris, France
Johannes Drerup
Affiliation:
Universität Dortmund
Douglas Yacek
Affiliation:
Universität Dortmund
Get access

Summary

Social Justice Education (SJE) has become the defining orientation of many educators and educational researchers, but is not without its detractors. Because of its overt political investments, SJE has been accused of brainwashing students and violating the terms of democratic legitimacy. In this chapter, I offer a philosophical defense of some SJE. Using Canada as an example and comprehensive liberalism as a framework, I argue that many practices that we wish to protect under the banner of SJE can be defended by appeal to the foundational values that are common to liberal democracies and find expression in contemporary legislation. I suggest five criteria for distinguishing between defensible and indefensible forms of political education, allowing that not all self-proclaimed SJE will be defensible, and some less progressive education will be. I conclude by anticipating two objections to this strategy.

Keywords

social justice educationdemocratic legitimacyliberalism (political)liberalism (comprehensive)indoctrinationCanadapolitical educationneutrality
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Democratic Education , pp. 178 - 195
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Applebaum, B. (2009). Is teaching for social justice a “Liberal Bias”? Teachers College Record, 111(2), 376–408.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. (1969). Four essays on liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bialystok, L. (2014). Politics without “brainwashing”: A philosophical defence of social justice education. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(3), 413–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brighouse, H., & Swift, A. (2014). Family values: The ethics of parent-child relationships. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, B. (2008). Social justice in education: An introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Burbules, C. N. (2022). Promoting critical thinking in anti-critical thinking times: Lessons from Covid. Philosophical Inquiry in Education, 29(1), 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callan, E. (1997). Creating citizens: Political education and liberal democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Episcopal Commission for Doctrine of the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (ECDCCCB). (2011). Pastoral ministry to young people with same-sex attraction. http://www.cccb.ca/site/images/stories/pdf/ministry-ssa_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Gabriel, T., & Goldstein, D. (2021, June 1). Disputing racism’s reach, Republicans rattle American schools. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/01/us/politics/critical-race-theory.html.Google Scholar
Hackman, H. (2005). Five essential components for social justice education. Equity and Excellence in Education, 38(2), 103–09.Google Scholar
Hess, D. E. (2004, April). Controversies about controversial issues in democratic education. PSOnline, 257–61. Available at: https://people.ucsc.edu/~ktellez/hess.pdf.Google Scholar
Hess, D. E., & McAvoy, P. (2014). The political classroom. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hytten, K. (2015). Ethics in teaching for democracy and social justice. Democracy & Education, 23(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
Hytten, K., & Bettez, S. C. (2011). Understanding education for social justice. Educational Foundations, 25(1–2), 7–24.Google Scholar
Murrell, P. Jr. (2006). Toward social justice in urban education: a model of collaborative cultural inquiry in urban schools. Equity & Excellence in Education, 39(1), 81–90.Google Scholar
Neufeld, B., & Davis, G. (2010). Civic respect, civic education, and the family. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(1), 94–111.Google Scholar
North, C. (2008). What’s all this talk about “social justice”? Mapping the terrain of education’s latest catchphrase. Teachers College Record, 110(6), 1182–206.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Perfectionist liberalism and political liberalism. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 39(1), 3–45.Google Scholar
O’Leary, J. (2012, June 1). Cardinal Collins defends Catholic approach to bullying. The Catholic Register. Available at: http://www.catholicregister.org/component/k2/item/14577-cardinal-collins-defends-non-gsa-approach-to-school-bullying.Google Scholar
Ontario Catholic School Trustees Association. (2012, June 25). Respecting difference. A resource for Catholic schools in the province of Ontario. Available at: https://www.ocsta.on.ca/ocsta/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/PDF-RespectingDifference-FINAL-Jan.26.2012.pdf.Google Scholar
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2009). Ontario’s equity and inclusive education strategy. Toronto.Google Scholar
Packer, G. (2022, March 10). The grown-ups are losing it. The Atlantic. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2022/04/pandemic-politics-public-schools/622824.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1985). Justice as fairness: Political not metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14(3), 223–52.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C. (2012). Why are schools brainwashing our children? Maclean’s, 125(43), 20–23.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (1998). Liberalism and the limits of justice. 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sensoy, Ö., & DiAngelo, R. (2012). Is everyone really equal?: An introduction to key concepts in social justice education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Sopelsa, B., Bellamy-Walker, T., & Reuters, (2022, March 8). “Don’t Say Gay” bill: Florida Senate passes controversial LGBTQ school measure. NBC News. Available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/dont-say-gay-bill-florida-senate-passes-controversial-lgbtq-school-mea-rcna19133.Google Scholar
Tanchuk, N., Rocha, T., & Krus, M. (2021). Is comprehensive liberal social justice education brainwashing? Philosophy of Education, 77(2), 44–59.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). (1990). UN Commission on Human Rights, E/CN.4/RES/1990/74. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3b00f03d30.html.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (1987). Theoretical foundations of liberalism. The Philosophical Quarterly, 37(147), 127–50.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2004). Liberalism, political and comprehensive. In Gaus, G. F. & Kukathas, C., eds., The handbook of political theory. London: Sage, pp. 89–100.Google Scholar
Wise, A. E. (2006). Accreditation hearing of the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) before the U.S. Department of Education’s National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity (NACIQI). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, J., & Robertson, E. (2017). The case for contention. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×