Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:24:01.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies

from Part II - Perspectives and Modes of Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2020

By
Clyde Ancarno
Edited by
Anna De Fina  and
Alexandra Georgakopoulou
Anna De Fina
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Alexandra Georgakopoulou
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

This chapter provides practical and theoretical insights into corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS), an increasingly popular framework for studying language-in-use. By drawing upon both discourse analysis and corpus linguistics, CADS combines methods of text analysis commonly perceived as qualitative and quantitative, respectively. Despite challenges, the main appeal lies in CADS’ ability to reconcile close linguistic analyses with the more broad-ranging analyses made possible by using corpus linguistic methods to analyse language. In addition to providing theoretical insights into CADS, this chapter examines what CADS involves from a practical point of view, e.g. by discussing specific corpus outputs, examples of ways in which qualitative and quantitative approaches to discourse analysis are synergized and triangulated, and the extent to which CADS differs from other kinds of discourse analysis relying on one or more non-corpus-informed approaches in discourse analysis. Interdisciplinary applications in CADS are also considered.

Keywords

Corpus linguisticsdiscourse analysisdiscourse studiescorpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS)interdisciplinaritymixed methods
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies , pp. 165 - 185
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

This textbook assumes no prior knowledge of corpus linguistics. It is a useful introduction to how corpus tools can be used in discourse analysis.

This is a substantial edited book comprising thirteen independent studies where corpus linguistics and discourse analytic methodologies are practically combined.

This complements the previous two books in that it encourages students and researchers to critically reflect on CADS research.

Baker, P. (2008). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Baker, P. and McEnery, T. (eds.) (2015). Corpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora. Palgrave Advances in Language and Linguistics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. and Marchi, A. (eds.) (2018). Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

References

Ancarno, C. (2018). Interdisciplinary Approaches in Corpus Linguistics and CADS. In Taylor, C. and Marchi, A. (eds.) Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review. London/New York: Routledge. 130–56.Google Scholar
Anthony, L. (2016, February). Arguments For and Against DIY Corpus Tools Creation: A Debate about Programming. Keynote lecture given at the Corpus Statistics Group Launch Event, Department of English Language and Applied Linguistics, University of Birmingham, UK.Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2004). Querying Keywords: Questions of Difference, Frequency, and Sense in Keywords Analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 3: 346–59.Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2018a). Conclusion: Reflecting on Reflective Research. In Taylor, C. and Marchi, A. (eds.) Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review. 281–92.Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2018b). Which Techniques of Down-Sampling Best Complement a Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis? A Case Study on Press Representations of Obesity.Google Scholar
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, T. and Wodak, R. (2008). A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press. Discourse & Society 19: 273–306.Google Scholar
Brezina, V. (2018). Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookes, G. and Baker, P. (2017). What Does Patient Feedback Reveal about the NHS? A Mixed Methods Study of Comments Posted to the NHS Choices Online Service. British Medical Journal Open 7.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2009). Keyness: Words, Parts-of-Speech and Semantic Categories in the Character-Talk of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14: 29–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drasovean, A. (2017). A Cross Linguistic Corpus-Assisted Study of the Representation of Animals in Romanian and British Online Newspapers. Unpublished PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, L. (1998). Corpus Linguistic Techniques Applied to Textlinguistics. System 26: 541–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, I. N. and Hardie, A. (2011). Visual GISting: Bringing Together Corpus Linguistics and Geographical Information Systems. Lit Linguist Computing 26: 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T. (2010). Corpus Linguistics and Theoretical Linguistics: A Love–Hate Relationship? Not Necessarily …. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15: 327–43.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (2005). Computational and Quantitative Studies, ed. by Webster, J. J.. Collected Works of Halliday, M. A. K., Vol. 6. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hardt-Mautner, G. (1995). “Only Connect”: Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics. UCREL Technical Paper 6. Lancaster: University of Lancaster. 1–31.Google Scholar
Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivankova, N. V. and Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mixed Methods. In Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.135–61.Google Scholar
Kilgariff, A. (2009). Simple Maths for Keywords. In Mahlberg, M., González Díaz, V. and Smith, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference (CL2009). University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Kilgariff, A. (2012). Getting to Know Your Corpus. In Sojka, P., Horak, A., Kopecek, I. and Pala, K. (eds.) Proceedings of Text, Speech, Dialogue (TSD2012). SpringerLink. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-32790-2.Google Scholar
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Delhi: New Age International.Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, N. and di Cristofaro, M. (2018). “I Know This Whole Market Is Based on the Trust You Put in Me and I Don’t Take That Lightly”: Trust, Community and Discourse in Crypto-drug Markets. Discourse & Communication 12: 608–26.Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, N., Izura, C. and Pérez-Tattam, R. (2016). Understanding Grooming Discourse in Computer-Mediated Environments. Discourse, Context & Media 12: 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchi, A. (2010). “The Moral in the Story”: A Diachronic Investigation of Lexicalised Morality in the UK Press. Corpora 5: 161–89.Google Scholar
Marchi, A. and Taylor, C. (2018). Introduction: Partiality and Reflexivity. In Taylor, C. and Marchi, A. (eds.) Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review. London/New York: Routledge. 1–15.Google Scholar
Mautner, G. (2016). Checks and Balances: How Corpus Linguistics Can Contribute to CDA. In Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Sage Publications. 154–79.Google Scholar
McEnery, T. and Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, T. and Hardie, A. (2013). The History of Corpus Linguistics. In Allan, K. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 725–45.Google Scholar
Nolte, I., Ancarno, C. and Jones, R. (2018). Inter-religious Relations in Yorubaland, Nigeria: Corpus Methods and Anthropological Survey Data. Corpora 13: 27–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, K. (2017). Posthumanism and Deconstructing Arguments: Corpora and Digitally-Driven Critical Analysis. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partington, A. (2009). Evaluating Evaluation and Some Concluding Thoughts on CADS. In Morley, J. and Bayley, P. (eds.) Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies on the Iraq Conflict: Wording the War. London/New York: Routledge. 261–304.Google Scholar
Partington, A. (2010). Modern Diachronic Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (MD-CADS) on UK Newspapers: An Overview of the Project. Corpora 5: 83–108.Google Scholar
Samaie, M. and Malmir, B. (2017). US News Media Portrayal of Islam and Muslims: A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis. Educational Philosophy and Theory 49: 1351–66.Google Scholar
Scott, M. (2001). Comparing Corpora and Identifying Key Words, Collocations, and Frequency Distributions through the WordSmith Tools Suite of Computer Programs. In Ghadessy, M., Henry, A. and Roseberry, R. L. (eds.) Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. (2009). In Search of a Bad Reference Corpus. In Archer, D. (ed.) What’s in A Word-List? Investigating Word Frequency and Keyword Extraction. London/New York: Routledge. 99–112.Google Scholar
Sealey, A. and Charles, N. (2013). “What Do Animals Mean to You?”: Naming and Relating to Nonhuman Animals. Anthrozoös 26: 485–503.Google Scholar
Sealey, A. and Pak, C. (2018). First Catch Your Corpus: Methodological Challenges in Constructing a Thematic Corpus. Corpora 13: 229–54.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M. (2004). Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, M. (1993). British Traditions in Text Analysis: From Firth to Sinclair. In Baker, M., Francis, G. and Tognini-Bonelli, E. (eds.) Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–36.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2008). What Is Corpus Linguistics? What the Data Says. ICAME Journal 32: 179–200.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. and Marchi, A. (eds.) (2018). Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. and Hunston, S. (2006). System and Corpus: Exploring Connections. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus Linguistics at Work. Studies in Corpus Linguistics, Vol. 6. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wright, D. and Brookes, G. (2019). “This Is England, Speak English!”: A Corpus-Assisted Critical Study of Language Ideologies in the Right-Leaning British Press. Critical Discourse Studies 16: 56–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×