Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I (Con)Textualizing Discourses
- Part II Perspectives and Modes of Analysis
- Part III Discourse Materialities and Embodiment
- Part IV (Trans)Locations and Intersections
- 17 Transnationalism, Globalization and Superdiversity
- 18 Translanguaging and Momentarity in Social Interaction
- 19 Intersectionality, Affect and Discourse
- 20 Expanding Academic Discourses: Diverse Englishes, Modalities and Spatial Repertoires
- Part V Ethics, Inequality and Inclusion
- Part VI Discourses, Publics and Mediatization
- Index
- References
17 - Transnationalism, Globalization and Superdiversity
from Part IV - (Trans)Locations and Intersections
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 September 2020
By
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I (Con)Textualizing Discourses
- Part II Perspectives and Modes of Analysis
- Part III Discourse Materialities and Embodiment
- Part IV (Trans)Locations and Intersections
- 17 Transnationalism, Globalization and Superdiversity
- 18 Translanguaging and Momentarity in Social Interaction
- 19 Intersectionality, Affect and Discourse
- 20 Expanding Academic Discourses: Diverse Englishes, Modalities and Spatial Repertoires
- Part V Ethics, Inequality and Inclusion
- Part VI Discourses, Publics and Mediatization
- Index
- References
Summary
Transnationalism, globalization and superdiversity are constructs used for thinking about flows of people, information, capital, texts and ideas, how they are connected and the effects of these flows on social relations. While there are many differences in these constructs, this entry highlights commonalities of focus, intellectual roots and methods used to analyze flows and connectivity. I start by noting that much of the work carried out in this area was done by sociologists, anthropologists and those working in cultural studies, most of whom had little interest in how communicative activity figured in generating and sustaining flows, what such communicative activity looked like or how the communicative repertoires of mobile people opened or closed future life world potentials. I then go on to point out that, within sociolinguistics, the use of these concepts and the study of the phenomena they refer to have been characterized by a constant drive to understand connections between communicative events that are part of these flows, how and why different communicative events are valued, and how and why such differences can create inequality. In doing so, I point out that much of this scholarship has led to the creation of new concepts and invitations to reconceptualize how we think about language in social life.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies , pp. 377 - 393Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Further Reading
This provides a comprehensive discussion of contemporary semiotics.
This explores the sociolinguistics of superdiversity, as do the two works that follow (Arnaut et al. 2016; Blommaert and Varis 2015).
For a survey of recent directions and conceptual work being undertaken in the area of language and transnationalism, see this special edition, in particular the article on transnational identity.
This discusses the sociolinguistics of superdiversity.
This deals with the area of language and globalization as it relates to centers and peripheries.
This also explores the sociolinguistics of superdiversity.
This looks at language and globalization relative to centers and peripheries.
Agha, A. (2007). Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arnaut, K., Blommaert, J., Rampton, B. and Spotti, M. (eds.) (2015). Language and Superdiversity. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnaut, K., Karrebæk, M., Spotti, M. and Blommaert, J. (eds.) (2016). Engaging Superdiversity: Recombining Spaces, Times and Language Practices. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. and Varis, P. (2015). The Importance of Unimportant Language. Multilingual Margins 2(1): 4–9.Google Scholar
De Fina, A. and Perrino, S. (2013). Transnational Identities. Applied Linguistics [Special Issue: Transnational Identities] 34(5): 509–15.Google Scholar
Faudree, P. and Schulthies, B. (2015). Introduction: “Diversity Talk” and Its Others. Language & Communication 44: 1–6.Google Scholar
Kroon, S. and Swanenberg, J. (eds.) (2018). Language and Culture on the Margins: Global/Local Interactions. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lønsmann, D., Hazel, S. and Haberland, H. (2017). Introduction to Special Issue on Transience: Emerging Norms of Language Use. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 27(3): 264–70.Google Scholar
Pietikäinen, S., Kelly-Holmes, H., Jaffe, A. and Coupland, N. (2016). Sociolinguistics from the Periphery: Small Languages in New Circumstances. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
References
Agar, M. (1996). The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Agha, A. (2007). Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez-Cáccamo, C. (1998). From “Switching Code” to Code-Switching. In Auer, P. (ed.) Code-Switching in Conversation: Language, Interaction and Identity. New York: Routledge. 29–48.Google Scholar
Ang, I. (2003). Together-in-Difference: Beyond Diaspora into Hybridity. Asian Studies Review 27: 141–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Arnaut, K., Blommaert, J., Rampton, B. and Spotti, M. (eds.) (2015). Language and Superdiversity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arnaut, K., Karrebæk, M., Spotti, M. and Blommaert, J. (eds.) (2016). Engaging Superdiversity: Recombining Spaces, Times and Language Practices. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2010). The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. and Varis, P. (2015). The Importance of Unimportant Language. Multilingual Margins 2(1): 4–9.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press in association with Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2004). Theorizing Identity in Language and Sexuality Research. Language in Society 33(4): 469–515.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2008). All of the Above: New Coalitions in Sociocultural Linguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4): 401–31. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00382.x.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. (eds.) (1986). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
De Fina, A. and Perrino, S. (2011). Introduction: Interviews vs. “Natural” Contexts: A False Dilemma. Language in Society 40(Special Issue 1): 1–11.Google Scholar
De Fina, A. and Perrino, S. (2013). Transnational Identities. Applied Linguistics 34(5): 509–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovchin, S. (2018). Language, Media and Globalization in the Periphery: The Linguascapes of Popular Music in Mongolia. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Faudree, P. and Schulthies, B. (2015). Introduction: “Diversity Talk” and Its Others. Language & Communication 44: 1–6.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. and Gupta, A. (2002). Spatializing States: Toward an Ethnography of Neoliberal Governmentality. American Ethnologist 29(4): 981–1002.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction, trans. by Hurley, R.. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Garcia, O. and Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Glick Schiller, N., Basch, L. and Blanc-Szanton, C. (1992). Towards a Definition of Transnationalism: Introductory Remarks and Research Questions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 645: ix–xiv.Google Scholar
Goebel, Z. (2010a). Identity and Social Conduct in a Transient Multilingual Setting. Language in Society 39(2): 203–40.Google Scholar
Goebel, Z. (2010b). Language, Migration and Identity: Neighborhood Talk in Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goebel, Z. (2015). Language and Superdiversity: Indonesians Knowledging at Home and Abroad. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goebel, Z. (2018). Reconfiguring the Nation: Re-territorialisation and the Changing Social Value of Ethnic Languages in Indonesia. In Kroon, S. and Swanenberg, J. (eds.) Language and Culture on the Margins: Global/Local Interactions. New York: Routledge. 27–52.Google Scholar
Goebel, Z. (2020). Global Leadership Talk: Constructing Good Governance in Indonesia. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goebel, Z., Cole, D. and Manns, H. (eds.) (2020). Contact Talk: The Discursive Organization of Contact and Boundaries in Indonesia. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. ([1959]1969). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Allen Lane/Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heller, M., Bell, L., Daveluy, M., McLaughlin, M. and Noel, H. (2015). Sustaining the Nation: The Making and Moving of Language and Nation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1996). Ethnography, Linguistics, Narrative Inequality: Toward an Understanding of Voice. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Jacquemet, M. (2011). Crosstalk 2.0: Asylum and Communicative Breakdowns. Text & Talk 31(4): 475–97.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J. N. (2012). Ideologies and Norms in Language and Education Policies in Europe and Their Relationship with Everyday Language Behaviours. Language, Culture and Curriculum 25(1): 57–71.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J. N., Karrebæk, M. S., Madsen, L. M. and Møller, J. S. (2011). Polylanguaging in Superdiversity. Diversities 13(2): 22–37.Google Scholar
Kroon, S. and Swanenberg, J. (eds.) (2018). Language and Culture on the Margins: Global/Local Interactions. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lønsmann, D., Hazel, S. and Haberland, H. (2017). Introduction to Special Issue on Transience: Emerging Norms of Language Use. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 27(3): 264–70.Google Scholar
Lorente, B. (2018). Scripts of Servitude: Language, Labour Migration and Transnational Domestic Work. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. (1995). Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. (1998). Ethnography through Thick and Thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Meeuwis, M. and Blommaert, J. (1994). The “Markedness Model” and the Absence of Society: Remarks on Codeswitching. Multilingua 13(4): 387–423.Google Scholar
Park, J. (2017). Transnationalism as Interdiscursivity: Korean Managers of Multinational Corporations Talking about Mobility. Language in Society 46(Special Issue 1): 23–38.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2017). Superdiversity and Why It Isn’t: Reflections on Terminological Innovation and Academic Branding. In Breidbach, S., Küster, L. and Schmenk, B. (eds.) Sloganizations in Language Education Discourse. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. and Otsuji, E. (2015). Metrolingualism: Language in the City. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pietikäinen, S. and Kelly-Holmes, H. (eds.) (2013). Multilingualism and the Periphery. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietikäinen, S., Kelly-Holmes, H., Jaffe, A. and Coupland, N. (2016). Sociolinguistics from the Periphery: Small Languages in New Circumstances. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Portes, A., Guarnizo, L. and Landolt, P. (1999). The Study of Transnationalism: Pitfalls and Promise of an Emergent Research Field. Ethnic and Racial Studies 22(2): 217–37.Google Scholar
Poynting, S., Noble, G., Tabar, P. and Collins, J. (2004). Bin Laden in the Suburbs: Criminalising the Arab Other. Sydney: Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (1995). Crossing: Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (1998). Language Crossing and the Redefinition of Reality. In Auer, P. (ed.) Code-Switching in Conversation: Language, Interaction and Identity. London: Routledge. 290–317.Google Scholar
Rampton, B., Tusting, K., Maybin, J., Barwell, R., Creese, A. and Lytr, V. (2004). UK Linguistic Ethnography: A Discussion Paper. Coordinating Committee of the UK Linguistic Ethnography Forum. London.Google Scholar
Reyes, A. (2014). Linguistic Anthropology in 2013: Super-New-Big. American Anthropologist 116(2): 366–78.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language 50: 696–735.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. (1981). Narrative, Literacy, and Face in Interethnic Communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1976). Shifters, Linguistics Categories, and Cultural Description. In Basso, K. and Selby, H. (eds.) Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. 11–56.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1992). The Indeterminacy of Contextualization: When Is Enough Enough? In Auer, P. and di Luzio, A. (eds.) The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 55–76.Google Scholar
Sultana, S. (2015). Transglossic Language Practices: Young Adults Transgressing Language and Identity in Bangladesh. Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 1(2): 202–32.Google Scholar
Tsing, A. (2005). Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tsuda, T. (2003). Strangers in the Ethnic Homeland: Japanese Brazilian Return Migration in Transnational Perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Vertovec, S. (1999). Conceiving and Researching Transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies 22(2): 447–62.Google Scholar
Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-Diversity and Its Implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30(6): 1024–53.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Q. and Stroud, C. (2013). Multilingualism in Transformative Spaces: Contact and Conviviality. Language Policy 12(4): 289–311.Google Scholar
Wortham, S. (2006). Learning Identity: The Joint Emergence of Social Identification and Academic Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wortham, S. and Rhodes, C. (2013). Life as a Chord: Heterogeneous Resources in the Social Identification of One Migrant Girl. Applied Linguistics,34(5): 536–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by