Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:55:33.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Theory in Environmental Sociology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2020

Edited by
Katharine Legun ,
Julie C. Keller ,
Michael Carolan  and
Michael M. Bell
Katharine Legun
Affiliation:
Wageningen University and Research, The Netherlands
Julie C. Keller
Affiliation:
University of Rhode Island
Michael Carolan
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Michael M. Bell
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Sociology , pp. 9 - 92
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Anderson, K. B. (2016). Marx at the Margins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, L. C. (2014). Theories in Environmental Sociology. In Gould, K. A. & Lewis, T. L., eds., Twenty Lessons in Environmental Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–40.Google Scholar
Becker, H., & Barnes, H. E. (1938). Social Thought from Lore to Science. Boston: Heath.Google Scholar
Beckert, S. (2015). Empire of Cotton: A Global History. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Bell, D. [1960] (2000). The End of History: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the 1950s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burkett, P. (1999). Marx and Nature: A Red and Green Perspective. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Buttel, F. H. (2002). Environmental Sociology and the Classical Sociological Tradition: Some Observations on Current Controversies. In Buttel, F. H., Dickens, P., Dunlap, R. E., & Gijswijt, A., eds., Sociological Theory and the Environment: Classical Foundations, Contemporary Insights. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., pp. 35–50.Google Scholar
Buttel, F. H., Dickens, P., Dunlap, R. E., & Gijswijt, A. (2002). Sociological Theory and the Environment: An Overview. In Buttel, F. H., Dickens, P., Dunlap, R. E., & Gijswijt, A., eds., Sociological Theory and the Environment: Classical Foundations, Contemporary Insights. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., pp. 3–34.Google Scholar
Catton, W. R. Jr., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Environmental Sociology: A New Paradigm. American Sociologist, 13(1), 41–49.Google Scholar
Catton, W. R. Jr., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-Exuberant Sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 24 (1), 15–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, B., & Foster, J. B. (2003). Land, the Color Line, and the Quest of the Golden Fleece. Organization and Environment, 16(4), 459–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, B., Auerbach, D., & Zhang, K. X. (2017). The DuBois Nexus: Intersectionality, Political Economy, and Environmental Injustice in the Peruvian Guano Trade in the 1800s. Environmental Sociology 1, 28–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2017.1381899.Google Scholar
Coleman, P. (1989). The Liberal Conspiracy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Connell, R. W. (1997). Why Is Classical Theory Classical? American Journal of Sociology, 102(6), 1511–1557.Google Scholar
Dawson, M. C. (2016). Hidden in Plain Sight. Critical Historical Studies, 3(1), 143–161.Google Scholar
DuBois, W. E. B. (1903). The Souls of Black Folk: Essays and Sketches, 3rd edition. Chicago: A.C. McClurg & Co.Google Scholar
DuBois, W. E. B.[1920] (2003). The Souls of White Folk. Monthly Review, 55(6), 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DuBois, W. E. B.[1947] (2007). The World and Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R. E. (2002). Paradigms, Theories, and Environmental Sociology. In Buttel, F. H., Dickens, P., Dunlap, R. E., & Gijswijt, A., eds., Sociological Theory and the Environment: Classical Foundations, Contemporary Insights. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., pp. 329–350.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R. E., & Catton, W. R. Jr. (1979). Environmental Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 5, 243–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, R.E. & Catton, W. R. (1994). Struggling with Human Exemptionalism: The Rise, Decline and Re-vitalization of Environmental Sociology. American Sociologist, 25, 5–30.Google Scholar
Foster, J. B. (1999). Marx’s Theory of Metabolic Rift: Classical Foundations for Environmental Sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 366–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, J. B. (2012). The Planetary Rift and the New Human Exemptionalism: A Political-Economic Critique of Ecological Modernization Theory. Organization & Environment, 25(3), 211–237.Google Scholar
Foster, J. B., & Holleman, H. (2012). Weber and the Environment: Classical Foundations for a Postexemptionalist Sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 117(6), 1625–1673.Google Scholar
Foster, J. B., Clark, B., & York, R. (2010). The Ecological Rift: Capitalism’s War on the Earth. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A., Duneier, M., Appelbaum, R. P., & Carr, D. (2016). Introduction to Sociology, 10th edition. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Gilman, N. (2003). Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Glacken, C. J. (1967). Traces on the Rhodian Shore. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, K. A., & Lewis, T. L. (2014). An Introduction to Environmental Sociology. In Gould, K. A. & Lewis, T. L., eds., Twenty Lessons in Environmental Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Grove, R. H. (1995). Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600–1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hannigan, J. (1995). Environmental Sociology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hannigan, J. (2014). Environmental Sociology, 3rd edition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holleman, H. (2015). Method in Ecological Marxism: Science and the Struggle for Change. Monthly Review, 67(5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holleman, H. (2017). De-naturalizing Ecological Disaster: Colonialism, Racism and the Global Dust Bowl of the 1930s. Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(1), 234–260.Google Scholar
Holleman, H. (2018). Dust Bowls of Empire: Imperialism, Environmental Politics, and the Injustice of “Green” Capitalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, B. (1986). Sorokin and Parsons at Harvard: Institutional Conflict and the Origin of a Hegemonic Tradition. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 22(2), 107–127.Google Scholar
Kuklick, H. (1973). A “Scientific Revolution”: Sociological Theory in the United States, 1930–1945. Sociological Inquiry, 43(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
Magdoff, H. (1978). Imperialism: From the Colonial Age to the Present. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K. [1867] (1976). Capital, vol. 1. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1981). Capital, vol. 3. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Milanovic, B. (2003). The Two Faces of Globalization: Against Globalization as We Know It. World Development, 31(4), 667–683.Google Scholar
Morris, A. D. (2015). The Scholar Denied: W. E. B. DuBois and the Birth of Modern Sociology. Oakland: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, R. (1932). The Ecological Outlook in Sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 38(3), 349–355.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, R. (1973). Indian Sociology: Historical Development and Present Problems. Sociological Bulletin, 22(1), 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Münch, R. (1993). The Contribution of German Social Theory to European Sociology. In Nedelmann, B. & Sztompka, P., eds., Sociology in Europe: In Search of Identity. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 45–66.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. [1949] (1954). Essays in Sociological Theory. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1965). Full Citizenship for the Negro American? A Sociological Problem. Daedulus, 94(4), 1009–1054.Google Scholar
Parsons, T., & Johnson, H. M. (1975). Interview with Talcott Parsons. Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales, 13(34), 81–90.Google Scholar
Pellow, D. N. (2018). What Is Critical Environmental Justice? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Pellow, D. N., & Nyseth Brehm, H. (2013). An Environmental Sociology for the Twenty-First Century. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, E. A., & Richter, L. (2008). Durkheim on the Environment: Ex Libris or Ex Cathedra? Organization and Environment, 21 (2), 182–187.Google Scholar
Said, E. W. (1993). Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Saunders, F. S. (1999). The Cultural Cold War. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Scaff, Lawrence A. (2011). Weber in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sociological Analysis. (1973). Max Weber, Dr. Alfred Ploetz, and W.E.B. Du Bois (Max Weber on Race and Society II). Sociological Analysis, 34(4), 308–312.Google Scholar
Sorokin, P. A. (1928). Contemporary Sociological Theories. New York: Harper & Bros.Google Scholar
Studholme, M. (2007). Patrick Geddes: Founder of Environmental Sociology. The Sociological Review, 55(3), 441–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studholme, M. (2008). Patrick Geddes and the History of Environmental Sociology in Britain: A Cautionary Tale. Journal of Classical Sociology, 8(3), 367–391.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. E. (2000). The Rise of the Environmental Justice Paradigm: Injustice Framing and the Social Construction of Environmental Discourses. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(4), 508–580.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. E. (2016). The Rise of the American Conservation Movement: Power, Privilege, and Environmental Protection. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. [1904] (1988). A Letter from Indian Territory. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 16(2), 133–136.Google Scholar

References

Archibugi, D., Koenig-Archibugi, M., and Marchetti, R. (eds.) (2012). Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bache, I., and Flinders, M. V. (eds.) (2004). Multi-Level Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2007). Consuming Life, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Beck, S., and Mahony, M. (2017). The IPCC and the politics of anticipation. Nature Climate Change, 7, 311–13.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (2000). What Is Globalization? Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (2009). World at Risk, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (2015). Emancipatory catastrophism: what does it mean to climate change and risk society? Current Sociology, 63(1), 75–88.Google Scholar
Berg, M., and Lidskog, R. (2018). Deliberative democracy meets democratised science: a deliberative systems approach to global environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 27(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Bhambra, G. K. (2014). Connected Sociologies, London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Bhambra, G. K., and Santos, B. de Sousa (2017). Introduction: global challenges for sociology. Sociology, 51(1), 3–10.Google Scholar
Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., and van Lente, V. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 18(3), 285–98.Google Scholar
Bullard, R. D. (2000). Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class and Environmental Quality, 3rd ed., Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Cohen, R., and Kennedy, P. (2013). Global Sociology, 3rd ed., Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Daly, I. (2018). Affective brain-computer interfacing and methods for effective state detection. In Nam, C. S., Nijholt, A., and Lotte, F., eds., Brain–Computer Interfaces Handbook. Technological and Theoretical Advances, New York: CRC Press, pp. 147–64.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S. (2006). Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
EASAC (European Academies’ Science Advisory Council) (2018). Negative Emission Technologies: What Role in Meeting Paris Agreement Targets? EASAC Policy Report 35, Halle, Germany: German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina.Google Scholar
Erikson, K. (1995). New Species of Trouble: Human Experience of Modern Disasters, New York: NortonGoogle Scholar
Gaede, J., and Meadowcroft, J. (2016). A question of authenticity: status quo bias and the International Energy Agency’s World Energy Outlook. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 18(5), 608–27.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Givens, J. E. (2018). Ecologically unequal exchange and the carbon intensity of well-being, 1990–2011. Environmental Sociology, DOI:10.1080/23251042.2018.1436878.Google Scholar
Harris, P. G. (2009). World Ethics and Climate Change: From International to Global Justice, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hatfield-Dodds, S., Schandl, H., Newth, D., Obersteiner, M., et al. (2017). Assessing global resource use and greenhouse emissions to 2050, with ambitious resource efficiency and climate mitigation policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 144, 403–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, D., and Roger, C. (eds.) (2013). Global Governance at Risk, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hulme, M. (2010). Problems with making and governing global kinds of knowledge. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 558–64.Google Scholar
ISSC and UNESCO (2013). World Social Science Report 2013: Changing Global Environments. Paris: OECD Publishing and UNESCO Publishing.Google Scholar
Kasperson, J. X., and Kasperson, R. E. (2005). Social Contours of Risk Volume I: Publics, Risk Communication and the Social Amplification of Risk. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Kelman, I. (2010). Hearing local voices from Small Island Developing States for climate change. Local Environment, 15(7), 605–19.Google Scholar
Krausmann, F., Schandl, H., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., and Jackson, T. (2017). Material flow accounting: measuring global material use for sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1), 647–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidskog, R., Mol, A., and Oosterveer, P. (2015). Towards a global environmental sociology? Legacies, trends and future directions. Current Sociology, 63(3), 339–68.Google Scholar
Lidskog, R., Soneryd, L., and Uggla, Y. (2010). Transboundary Risk Governance, London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Lidskog, R., and Waterton, C. (2016). A cautious welcome to the Anthropocene. Environmental Sociology, 2(4), 395–406.Google Scholar
Lockie, S. (2007). Deliberation and actor-networks: the ‘practical’ implications of social theory for the assessment of large dams and other interventions. Society and Natural Resources, 20(9), 785–99.Google Scholar
Lockie, S. (2014). Climate, scenario-building and governance: comprehending the temporalities of social-ecological challenges. In Lockie, S., Sonnenfeld, D., and Fisher, D., eds., The Routledge International Handbook of Social and Environmental Change, London: Routledge, pp. 95–105.Google Scholar
Lockie, S. (2015a). What is environmental sociology? Environmental Sociology, 1(3), 139–42.Google Scholar
Lockie, S. (2015b). Emergent themes? A year in the life of environmental sociology.Environmental Sociology, 1(4), 237–40.Google Scholar
Lockie, S. (2017). A better Anthropocene? Environmental Sociology, 3(3), 167–72.Google Scholar
Martell, L. (2017). The Sociology of Globalization, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Panara, C. (2015). The Sub-National Dimension of the EU: A Legal Study of Multilevel Governance, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Perdue, R. T. (2017). Superintelligence and natural resources: morality and technology in a brave new world. Society and Natural Resources, 30(8), 1026–31.Google Scholar
Prell, C., and Sun, L. (2015). Unequal carbon exchanges: understanding pollution embodied in global trade. Environmental Sociology, 1(4), 256–67.Google Scholar
Reith, G. (2017). Addictive Consumption. Capitalism, Modernity and Excess, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ritzer, G. (2011). Globalization: The Essentials, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: time-space and homogeneity-heterogenity. In Featherstone, M., Lash, S., and Robertson, R., eds., Global Modernities, London: Sage, pp. 25–44Google Scholar
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sassen, S. (2006). Sociology of Globalization, New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Schandl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., West, J., Giljum, S., et al. (2017). Global material flows and resource productivity: forty years of evidence. Journal of Industrial Ecology, doi:10.1111/jiec.12626Google Scholar
Schandl, H., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Wiedmann, T., Geschke, A., et al. (2016). Decoupling global environmental pressure and economic growth: scenarios for energy use, materials use and carbon emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 132, 45–56.Google Scholar
Schlosberg, D., and Collins, L. B. (2014). From environmental to climate justice: climate change and the discourse of environmental justice. WIREs Climate Change, 5(3), 359–74.Google Scholar
Scholte, J. A. (2005). Globalization: A Critical Introduction, 2nd ed., New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Shove, E., and Spurling, N. (eds.) (2013). Sustainable Practices: Social Theory and Climate Change, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shue, H. (2014). Climate Justice. Vulnerability and Protection, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Sousa, Santos, B. (2016). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., and McNeill, J. (2011). The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369(1938), 842–67.Google Scholar
Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., and Ludwig, C. (2015a). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98.Google Scholar
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., et al. (2015b). Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347 (6223), 1259855.Google Scholar
Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0. Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, New York: Knopf Publishing group.Google Scholar
Transhumanist Declaration (2009). Accessible at http://humanityplus.org/philosophy/transhumanist-declaration/Google Scholar
Turner, B. (1999). Classical Sociology, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walker, G. (2011). Environmental Justice: Concepts, Evidence and Politics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

References

Adam, B. (1998). Timescapes of Modernity: The Environment and Invisible Hazards, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (1973). Negative Dialectics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Agyeman, J., Cole, P., Haluza-DeLay, R., & O’Riley, P.. (eds.), (2009). Speaking for Ourselves: Environmental Justice in Canada, Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S.. (1994). Reflexive Modernization, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, M. (2004). An Invitation to Environmental Sociology, Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Bell, S. (2013). Our Roots Run Deep as Iron Weed, Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Bello, W. (2002). Deglobalization: Ideas for a New World Economy, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Bennholdt-Thomsen, V., & Mies, M.. (1999). The Subsistence Perspective, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Benton, T. (1993). Natural Relations: Ecology, Animal Rights, and Social Justice, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T.. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bernard, J. (1957). Social Problems at Midcentury: Role, Status and Stress in a Context of Abundance, New York: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Bertell, R. (2000). Planet Earth as a Weapon of War, London: Women’s Press.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, R. (1989). The Possibility of Naturalism, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, T. (ed.), (2017). Social Reproduction Theory, London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. (2012). Planetary Boundaries and Earth System Governance, Ecological Economics, 81, 4–9.Google Scholar
Bookchin, M. (1982/1991). The Ecology of Freedom, Montreal: Black Rose.Google Scholar
Brand, U., & Wissen, M.. (2012). Global Environmental Politics and the Imperial Mode of Living, Globalizations, 9, 547–60.Google Scholar
Braun, B., & Castree, N. (eds.), (1998). Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bromley, D. (2012). Environmental Governance as Stochastic Belief Updating, Ecology and Society, 17, 14.Google Scholar
Bullard, R. (1990). Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality, Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Buttel, F., Dickens, P., Dunlap, R., & Gijswijt, A. (eds.), (2002). Overview and Introduction, in Sociological Theory and the Environment, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
Carolan, M. (2005). Society, Biology, and Ecology, Organization & Environment, 18, 393–431.Google Scholar
Carroll, W., & J. Sapinski, (2016). Neoliberalism and the Transnational Capitalist Class, in Springer, S., Birch, K., & MacLeavy, J. (eds.), The Handbook of Neoliberalism, New York: Routledge, pp. 25–35.Google Scholar
Catton, W., & Dunlap, R.. (1978). Environmental Sociology: A New Paradigm, The American Sociologist, 13, 41–9.Google Scholar
Clark, B., & York, R.. (2005). Dialectical Materialism and Nature, Organization & Environment, 18, 318–38.Google Scholar
D’Alisa, G., Demaria, F., & Kallis, G. (eds.), (2014). DeGrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dalla Costa, M., & James, S.. (1972). The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community, Bristol: Falling Wall Press.Google Scholar
Dickens, P. (1995). Reconstructing Nature: Alienation, Emancipation, and the Division of Labour, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R., & Marshall, B.. (2007). Environmental Sociology, in Bryant, C., & Peck, D. (eds.), 21st Century Sociology: A Reference Handbook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 329–40.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1962). The Rules of Sociological Method, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Federici, S. (2012). Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction and Feminist Struggle, Oakland, CA: PM Press.Google Scholar
Foster, J. B. (1999). Marx’s Theory of Metabolic Rift: Classical Foundations for Environmental Sociology, American Journal of Sociology, 105, 366–405.Google Scholar
Foster, J., Clark, B., & York, R.. (2010). The Ecological Rift, New York: Monthly Review.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and Punish, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Fox Keller, E. (1985). Reflections on Gender and Science, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Freudenberg, W., Frickel, S., & Gramling, R.. (1995). Beyond the Nature/Society Divide: Learning to Think about a Mountain, Sociological Forum, 10, 361–92.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gaard, G. (1993). Ecofeminism, Women, Animals, Nature, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, S. (1979). Woman and Nature: The Roaring Inside Her, London: Women’s Press.Google Scholar
Hawken, P., Lovins, A., & Lovins, H.. (1999). Natural Capitalism, London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T.. (1944). Dialectic of Enlightenment, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Isla, A. (2009). Who Pays for Kyoto Protocol? Selling Oxygen and Selling Sex in Costa Rica, in Salleh, A. (ed.), Eco-Sufficiency & Global Justice: Women Write Political Ecology, London: Pluto Press, pp. 199–217.Google Scholar
Kothari, A., Salleh, A., Escobar, A., Demaria, F & Acosta, A. (eds.), (2019). Pluriverse: A Post-Development Dictionary, New York: Columbia University Press and New Delhi: Tulika/AuthorsUpFront.Google Scholar
Latour, H. (2004). Politics of Nature, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. (1964). One Dimensional Man, London: Abacus.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1976). Capital, New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Max-Neef, M., Elizalde, A., & Hopenhayn, M.. (1991). Human Scale Development, New York: Apex.Google Scholar
Mellor, M. (2009). Ecofeminist Political Economy and the Politics of Money, in Salleh, A. (ed.), Eco-Sufficiency & Global Justice: Women Write Political Ecology, London: Pluto Press, pp. 251–67.Google Scholar
Merchant, C. (1980). The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Merchant, C. (2005). Radical Ecology: The Search for a Livable World, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mies, M. (1986). Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Mol, A., Sonnenfeld, D., & Spaargaren, G.. (eds), (2009). Ecological Modernisation Reader, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morton, T. (2012). The Oedipal Logic of Ecological Awareness, Environmental Humanities, 1, 7–21.Google Scholar
Mujeres Manifesto. (2009). First Continental Summit of Indigenous Women, Lucha Indígena [Indigenous Struggle], 34: www.luchaindigena.com/.Google Scholar
Ollman, B. (1992). Dialectical Investigations, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pellow, D., & Nyseth Brehm, H.. (2013). An Environmental Sociology for the 21st Century, Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 229–50.Google Scholar
Rose, D. (1996). Nourishing Terrains: Australian Aboriginal Views of Landscape and Wilderness, Canberra: Australian Heritage Commission.Google Scholar
Ruddick, S. (1989). Maternal Thinking: Toward a Politics of Peace, Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone Age Economics, New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
Salleh, A. (1988). Epistemology and the Metaphors of Production: An Eco-Feminist Reading of Critical Theory, Studies in the Humanities, 15, 130–9.Google Scholar
Salleh, A. (1997/2017). Ecofeminism as Politics: Nature, Marx, and the Postmodern, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Salleh, A. (2006). Organised Irresponsibility: Contradictions in the Australian Government’s Strategy for GM Regulation, Environmental Politics, 15, 388–416.Google Scholar
Salleh, A. (2010). From Metabolic Rift to Metabolic Value: Reflections on Environmental Sociology and the Alternative Globalization Movement, Organization & Environment, 23, 205–19.Google Scholar
Salleh, A. (2015). Neoliberalism, Scientism and Earth Systems Governance, in Bryant, R. (ed.), International Handbook of Political Ecology, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 432–46.Google Scholar
Salleh, A., Goodman, J. & Hosseini, H.. (2016). From Sociological to Ecological Imagination, in Marshall, J., & Connor, L. (eds.), Environmental Change and the World’s Futures, New York: Routledge, pp. 96–109.Google Scholar
Salleh, A. (2016). The Anthropocene: Thinking in ‘Deep Geological Time’ or Deep Libidinal Time?, International Critical Thought, 6, 422–33.Google Scholar
Schnaiberg, A. (1980). The Environment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shiva, V. (1989). Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Sklair, L. (2001). The Transnational Capitalist Class, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, J., Byrd, S., Reese, E., & Smythe., E. (eds.), (2012). Handbook on World Social Forum Activism, Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Sohn-Rethel, A. (1978). Intellectual and Manual Labour: Critique of Epistemology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Solon, P. (2013). Systemic Alternatives (blog) https://systemicalternatives.org/category/english/.Google Scholar
Spitzner, M. (2009). How Global Warming Is Gendered, in Salleh, A. (ed.), Eco-Sufficiency & Global Justice: Women Write Political Ecology, London: Pluto Press, pp. 219–29.Google Scholar
Terlinden, U. (1984). Women in the Ecology Movement, in Altbach, E., Clausen, J., Schultz, D. & Stephan, N. (eds.), German Feminism, Albany: State University of New York, pp. 318–23.Google Scholar
Vaughan, G. with Kanth, R. (2018). Interview: The Gift, Ideas for Our Times: www.gift-economy.com.Google Scholar
Via Campesina. (2009). Small Scale Sustainable Farmers Are Cooling Down the Earth. Jakarta: Via Campesina Views.Google Scholar
Vogel, L. (1983). Marxism and the Oppression of Women, Chicago, IL: HaymarketGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. (1947). Theory of Social and Economic Organization, London: William Hodge.Google Scholar
Wynne, B. (1997). Methodology and Institutions of Value as Seen from the Risk Field, in Foster, J. (ed.), Valuing Nature? London: Routledge, pp. 135–45.Google Scholar
York, R. & Rosa., E. (2003). Key Challenges to Ecological Modernization Theory, Organization & Environment, 16, 273–88.Google Scholar

References

Alkire, Sabina, Chatterje, Mihika, Conconi, Adriana, Seth, Suman, and Vaz, Ana. 2014. “Poverty in rural and urban areas: Direct comparisons using the global MPI 2014.” Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Bell, Michael M. 2018. City of the Good: Nature, Religion, and the Ancient Search for What Is Right. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Michael M. 1994. Childerley: Nature and Morality in a Country Village. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Michael M. with Bauer, Donna, Jarnagin, Sue, and Peter, Greg. 2004. Farming for Us All: Practical Agriculture and the Cultivation of Sustainability. Rural Studies Series of the Rural Sociological Society. College Station, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
James, William. 1902. The Varieties of Religious Experience. London and New York: Longmans, Green & Company.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2018. Piecing Together the Poverty Puzzle: Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2018. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

References

Addams, Jane. (2001[1902]). Democracy and Social Ethics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Alexandrescu, Filip, and Baldus, Bernd. (2017). Escaping the Iron Cage of Environmental Rationalizations: Microsocial Decision-Making in Environmental Conflict. Pages 206–223 in Microsociological Perspectives for Environmental Sociology, edited by Brewster, B. H. and Puddephatt, A. J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alger, Janet M., and Alger, Steven F.. (1997). Beyond Mead: Symbolic Interaction between Humans and Felines. Society and Animals 5(1): 65–81.Google Scholar
Bell, Michael Mayerfeld. (1994). Childerley: Nature and Morality in a Country Village. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Bell, Michael Mayerfeld. (1997). The Ghosts of Place. Theory and Society 26(6): 813–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Michael Mayerfeld. (1998). An Invitation to Environmental Sociology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Michael M. (2017). Present Tense: Everyday Animism and the Politics of Possession. Pages 117–127 in Microsociological Perspectives for Environmental Sociology, edited by Brewster, B. H. and Puddephatt, A. J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bell, Michael Mayerfeld, and Ashwood, Loka L.. (2015). An Invitation to Environmental Sociology, 5th Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. (1995). Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bonham, Megan S. Albaugh. (2017). Marco-Interactions of Cosmic Proportions: Mediating Human-Cosmos Relationships in the Planetarium. Pages 17–31 in Microsociological Perspectives for Environmental Sociology, edited by Brewster, B. H. and Puddephatt, A. J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boykoff, Jules. (2011). The Leaf Blower, Capitalism, and the Atomization of Everyday Life. Capitalism Nature Socialism 22(3): 95–113.Google Scholar
Brewster, Bradley H. (2011). Environmental Reconstruction in Microsociological Theory for Microsociological Reconstruction in Environmental Sociology. Dissertation. University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Brewster, Bradley H., and Bell, Michael Mayerfeld. (2010). The Environmental Goffman: Toward an Environmental Sociology of Everyday Life. Society and Natural Resources 23(1): 45–57.Google Scholar
Brewster, Bradley H., and Puddephatt, Antony J.. (2016). George Herbert Mead as a Socio-Environmental Thinker. Pages 144–164 in The Timeliness of George Herbert Mead, edited by Joas, H. and Huebner, D. R.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brewster, Bradley H., and Puddephatt, Antony J. (eds.). (2017). Microsociological Perspectives for Environmental Sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Broto, Vanesa Castan, Burningham, Kate, Carter, Claudia, and Elghali, Lucia. (2010). Stigma and Attachment: Performance of Identity in an Environmentally Degraded Place. Society and Natural Resources 23: 952–968.Google Scholar
Buttel, Frederick H. (2002). Environmental Sociology and the Sociology of Natural Resources: Institutional Histories and Intellectual Legacies. Society and Natural Resources 15: 205–211.Google Scholar
Čapek, Stella M. (2012). Paving Paradise: Exploring an Urban “Partnership-with-Nature” Frame. Sociological Quarterly 53(4): 556–584.Google Scholar
Čapek, Stella M. (2017). Negotiating Identity, Valuing Place: Enacting “Earthcare” and Social Justice at Finca La Belle, Costa Rica. Pages 61–80 in Microsociological Perspectives for Environmental Sociology, edited by Brewster, B. H. and Puddephatt, A. J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carolan, Michael S. (2005). The Conspicuous Body: Capitalism, Consumerism, Class, and Consumption. Worldviews 9(1): 82–111.Google Scholar
Carolan, Michael S. (2007). Introducing the Concept of Tactile Space: Creating Lasting Social and Environmental Commitments. GeoForum 38: 1264–1275.Google Scholar
Carolan, Michael S. (2008). An Ecological Politics of Everyday Life: Placing Flesh on Whitehead’s Process Philosophy in Search of “Green” Possibilities. Worldviews 12: 51–73.Google Scholar
Carolan, Michael S. (2009). “I Do Therefore There Is”: Enlivening Socio-Environmental Theory. Environmental Politics 18(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Dorwin. (1979). Contemporary Social Psychology in Historical Perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly 42: 82–93.Google Scholar
Castro, Paula. (2006). Applying Social Psychology to the Study of Environmental Concern and Environmental Worldviews: Contributions from the Social Representations Approach. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 16: 247–266.Google Scholar
Catton, William, and Dunlap, Riley. (1980). A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-Exuberant Sociology. American Behavioral Scientist 24(1): 15–47.Google Scholar
Cho, Charles H., and Roberts, Robin W.. (2010). Environmental Reporting on the Internet by America’s Toxic 100: Legitimacy and Self-Presentation. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 11: 1–16.Google Scholar
Cook, Gary A. (1993). George Herbert Mead: The Making of a Social Pragmatist. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Coughenour, Milton. (2003). Innovating Conservation Agriculture: The Case of No-Till Cropping. Rural Sociology 68(2): 278–304.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Erica. (2016). A Sociology for other Animals: Analysis, Advocacy, Intervention. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 36(3/4): 242–257.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. (1988[1922]). Human Nature and Conduct. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dunlap, Riley E. (2002a). Environmental Sociology: A Personal Perspective on its First Quarter Century. Organization and Environment 15: 10–29.Google Scholar
Dunlap, Riley E. (2002b). Paradigms, Theories, and Environmental Sociology. Pages 329–350 in Sociological Theory and the Environment: Classical Foundations, Classical Foundations, Contemporary Insights, edited by Dunlap, R. E., Buttel, F. H., Dickens, P., and Gijswijt, A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Dunlap, Riley E., and Catton, William R. Jr. (1983). What Environmental Sociologists Have in Common (Whether Concerned with “Built” or “Natural” Environments). Sociological Inquiry 53(2,3): 113–135.Google Scholar
Farr, Robert M. (1996). The Roots of Modern Social Psychology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Field, Donald R., Luloff, A. E., and Krannich, Richard S.. (2002). Revisiting the Origins of and Distinctions Between Natural Resource Sociology and Environmental Sociology. Society and Natural Resources 15(3): 213–227.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, William R. (2005). Privileged Access, Privileged Accounts: Toward a Socially Structured Theory of Resources and Discourses. Social Forces 84(1): 89–114.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, William R., and Gramling, Robert. (1989). The Emergence of Environmental Sociology: Contributions of Riley E. Dunlap and William R. Catton, Jr. Sociological Inquiry 59(4): 439–452.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, William R., Frickel, Scott, and Gramling, Robert. (1995). Beyond the Nature/Society Divide: Learning to Think about a Mountain. Sociological Forum 10(3): 361–392.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. (2011). The Politics of Climate Change, 2nd Edition. UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. (1953). Communication Conduct in an Island Community. PhD dissertation. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. (1961). Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. (1963). Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organizations of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. (1964). The Neglected Situation. American Anthropologist, New Series, 66(6): 133–136.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. (1969). Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. (1971). Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. (1983). The Interaction Order. American Sociological Review 48(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Grahame, Peter R. (2017). “This is not Sea World”: Spectacle and Insight in Nature Tourism. Pages 32–47 in Microsociological Perspectives for Environmental Sociology, edited by Brewster, B. H. and Puddephatt, A. J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gross, Mathias. (2005). Classical Sociology and the Restoration of Nature. Organization and Environment 13(3): 277–291.Google Scholar
Gross, Matthias, and Horta, Ana. (2017). Dog Shit Happens: Human–Canine Interactions and the Immediacy of Excremental Presence. Pages 143–160 in Microsociological Perspectives for Environmental Sociology, edited by Brewster, B. H. and Puddephatt, A. J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, Tom. (2015). Interacting for the Environment: Engaging Goffman in Pro-Environmental Action. Society and Natural Resources 29(1): 53–67.Google Scholar
Horta, Ana, Wilhite, Harold, Schmidt, Luisa, and Bartiaux, Francois. (2014). Sociotechnical and Cultural Approaches to Energy Consumption. Nature and Culture 9(2): 115–121.Google Scholar
Irvine, Leslie. (2017). Wild Selves. Pages 128–142 in Microsociological Perspectives for Environmental Sociology, edited by Brewster, B. H. and Puddephatt, A. J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jensen, Mette, and Blok, Anders. (2008). Pesticides in the Risk Society: The View from Everyday Life. Current Sociology 56(5): 757–778.Google Scholar
Jerolmack, Colin. (2009). Humans, Animals, and Play: Theorizing Interaction when Intersubjectivity is Problematic. Sociological Theory 27(4): 371–389.Google Scholar
Jerolmack, Colin, and Tavory, Iddo. (2014). Molds and Totems: Nonhumans and the Constitution of the Social Self. Sociological Theory 32(1): 67–77.Google Scholar
Johnston, Hank. (1995). A Methodology for Frame Analysis: From Discourse to Cognitive Schemata. Pages 217–246 in Social Movements and Culture, Social Movements, Protests, and Contention, Vol. 4, edited by Johnston, H. and Klandermans, B.. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Kelly, Benjamin. (2017). The Social Psychology of Compromised Negotiations: Constructing Asymmetrical Boundary Objects Between Science. Pages 192–205 in Microsociological Perspectives for Environmental Sociology, edited by Brewster, B. H. and Puddephatt, A. J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, Karin. (1995). Laboratory Studies: The Cultural Approach to the Study of Science. Pages 140–166 in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Jasanoff., S. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kuklick, Henricka. (1984). The Ecology of Sociology. American Journal of Sociology 89(6): 1433–1440.Google Scholar
Larsen, Larissa, and Harlan, Sharon L.. (2005). Desert Dreamscapes: Residential Landscape Preference and Behavior. Landscape and Urban Planning 78: 85–100.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. (1987). Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. (1999). Give me a Laboratory and I will Raise the World. Pages 258–275 in The Science Studies Reader, edited by Biagioli., M. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. (2004). Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leap, Brandon. (2015). Redefining the Refuge: Symbolic Interactionism and the Emergent Meanings of Environmentally Variable Spaces. Symbolic Interaction 38(4): 521–538.Google Scholar
Leap, Brandon. (2018). Seasonal Masculinities: The Seasonal Contingencies of Doing Gender. Men and Masculinities. Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1097184X18756710.Google Scholar
Leopold, Aldo. (1949). A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar
Lewin, Kurt. (1946). Action Research and Minority Problems. Journal of Social Issues 2(4): 34–46.Google Scholar
Lorenzen, Janet. (2012). Going Green: The Process of Lifestyle Change. Sociological Forum 27(1): 94–116.Google Scholar
Lorenzen, Janet. (2017). Green Lifestyles and Micropolitics: Pragmatist Action Theory and the Connection between Lifestyle Change and Collective Action. Pages 81–97 in Microsociological Perspectives for Environmental Sociology, edited by Brewster, B. H. and Puddephatt, A. J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Machum, Susan. (2017). Sorting the Trash: Competing Constructions and Instructions for Handling Household Waste. Pages 161–177 in Microsociological Perspectives for Environmental Sociology, edited by Brewster, B. H. and Puddephatt, A. J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Macnaghten, Phil. (2003). Embodying the Environment in Everyday Life Practices. The Sociological Review 51(1): 63–84.Google Scholar
Manfredo, Michael J. (2008). Who Cares About Wildlife? Social Science Concepts for Exploring Human-Wildlife Relationships and Conservation Issues. New York, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. (1932). Philosophy of the Present. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, ed. Morris, C. W.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. (1938). Philosophy of the Act. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Jonathan. (2001). Ecologising Sociology: Actor-Network Theory, Co-Construction and the Problem of Human Exemptionalism. Sociology 35: 111–133.Google Scholar
Murphy, Raymond. (1995). Sociology as if Nature Does Not Matter: An Ecological Critique. British Journal of Sociology 46(4): 688–707.Google Scholar
Norgaard, Richard B. (1995). Beyond Materialism: A Coevolutionary Reinterpretation of the Environmental Crisis. Review of Social Economy 43(4): 475–492.Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew. (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Puddephatt, Antony. (2005). Mead has Never Been Modern: Using Meadian Theory to Extend the Constructionist Study of Technology. Social Epistemology 19(4): 357–380.Google Scholar
Reser, Joseph P. (2003). Thinking Through “Conservation Psychology”: Prospects and Challenges. Human Ecology Review 10(2):167–174.Google Scholar
Sanders, Clinton R. (2007). Mind, Self, and Human–Animal Joint Action. Sociological Focus 40: 320–336.Google Scholar
Saunders, Carol D. (2003). The Emerging Field of Conservation Psychology. Human Ecology Review 10(2): 137–149.Google Scholar
Shove, Elizabeth. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change. Environment and Planning A 42: 1273–1285.Google Scholar
Sismondo, Sergio. (1996). Science without Myth: On Constructions, Reality, and Social Knowledge. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Sodero, Stephanie. (2015). Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Pine Beetles and Humans: The Ecologically Mediated Development of British Columbia’s Carbon Tax. Canadian Journal of Sociology 40(3): 309–330.Google Scholar
Sommer, Robert. (2003). Action Research and Big Fuzzy Concepts. Human Ecology Review 10(2):176–177.Google Scholar
Stern, Paul C. (2000). Psychology and the Science of Human-Environment Interactions. American Psychologist 55(5): 523–530.Google Scholar
Stets, Jan E., and Biga, Chris F.. (2003). Bringing Identity Theory into Environmental Sociology. Sociological Theory 21(4): 398–423.Google Scholar
Strauss, Anselm. (1991). Mead’s Multiple Conceptions of Time and Evolution: Their Contexts and Their Consequences for Theory. International Sociology 6(4): 411–426.Google Scholar
Tyson, C. Ben. (2003). Applying Psychology to Conservation. Human Ecology Review 10(2):182–183.Google Scholar
Vannini, Phillip. (2017). How to Climb Mount Fuji (at Your Earliest Convenience): A Non-Representational Approach. Pages 48–60 in Microsociological Perspectives for Environmental Sociology, edited by Brewster, B. H. and Puddephatt, A. J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weigert, A. J. (1991a). Imagining the Environment in Transverse Interaction: Toward an Ecological Attitude. Journal of Mental Imagery 15: 163–166.Google Scholar
Weigert, A. J. (1991b). Transverse Interaction: A Pragmatic Perspective on Environment as Other. Symbolic Interaction 14: 353–363.Google Scholar
Weigert, A. J. (1994). Lawns of Weeds: Status in Opposition to Life. American Sociologist 25: 80–96.Google Scholar
Weigert, A. J. (1997a). Definitional and Responsive Environmental Meanings: A Meadian Look at Landscapes and Drought. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 27: 65–91.Google Scholar
Weigert, A. J. (1997b). Self, Interaction, and Natural Environment: Refocusing Our Eyesight. Albany, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
White, Robert, and Hanson, Dallas. (2002). Corporate Self, Corporate Reputation, and Corporate Annual Reports: Re-Enrolling Goffman. Scandinavian Journal of Management 18(3): 285–301.Google Scholar
Williams, Jerry. (2017). The Utility of Phenomenology in Understanding and Addressing Human-Caused Environmental Problems. Pages 178–191 in Microsociological Perspectives for Environmental Sociology, edited by Brewster, B. H. and Puddephatt, A. J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zavestoski, Stephen. (2003). Constructing and Maintaining Ecological Identities: The Strategies of Deep Ecologists. Pages 297–315 in Identity and the Natural Environment, edited by Clayton, S. and Opotow, S.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zavestoski, Stephen and Weigert, Andrew. (2017). Mead, Interactionism, and the Improbability of Ecological Selves: Toward a Meta-Environmental Microsociological Theory. Pages 98–116 in Microsociological Perspectives for Environmental Sociology, edited by Brewster, B. H. and Puddephatt, A. J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×