Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:23:24.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coordination and Coherence

from Part V - Coding Schemes for Interaction Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2018

Edited by
Elisabeth Brauner ,
Margarete Boos  and
Michaela Kolbe
Elisabeth Brauner
Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Margarete Boos
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen
Michaela Kolbe
Affiliation:
ETH Zürich
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis , pp. 501 - 526
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Boos, M., & Cornelius, C. (2001). Bedeutung und Erfassung konversationaler Kohärenz in direkter und computervermittelter Kommunikation [Meaning and Measurement of Conversational Coherence in Direct and Computer-mediated Communication]. In Hesse, F.W. & Friedrich, H.F. (Eds.). Partizipation und Interaktion im virtuellen Seminar (pp. 55–80). Muenster, Germany: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Cornelius, C., & Boos, M. (2003). Enhancing mutual understanding in synchronous computer-mediated communication by training: Trade-offs in judgmental tasks. Communication Research, 30, 147–177. doi.org/10.1177/0093650202250874CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

Boos, M., Riethmüller, M., & Cornelius, C. (2013). Sozialer Einfluss in Chat‐Gruppen: Geschlechtsspezifische Auswirkungen auf konversationale Partizipation und Kohärenz [Social influence in chat groups: Gender-specific effects on conversational participation and coherence]. Gruppendynamik & Organisationsberatung, 44, 445‐460. doi.org/10.1007/s11612-013-0226-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappella, J. N. (1994). The management of conversational interaction in adults and infants. In Knapp, M. L. & Miller, G. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (pp. 380–418). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cornelius, C. (1996). Themenentwicklung in Gruppendiskussionen [Topic development in group discussions]. University of Konstanz: Unpublished Diploma Thesis.Google Scholar
Cornelius, C. (2001). Gegenseitiges Verständnis in Computerkonferenzen. Voraussetzungen und Folgen konversationaler Kohärenz in Entscheidungsfindungsgruppen im Medienvergleich [Mutual understanding in computer conferences: Conditions and effects of conversational coherence in decision-making groups]. Muenster, Germany: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Cornelius, C., & Boos, M. (1999). Es lohnt sich, kohärent zu sein! [It is worthwile to be coherent!] In Reips, U.-D. (Ed.), Aktuelle Online Forschung – Trends, Techniken, Ergebnisse [Current internet science – trends, techniques, results]. Zürich, Switzerland: Online Press. Retrieved February 12, 2018, from http://iscience.deusto.es/archive/reips/books/tband99/pdfs/a_h/cornelius.pdfGoogle Scholar
Craig, R. T., & Tracy, K. (Eds.), Conversational coherence: Form, structure, and strategy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Crow, B. K. (1983). Topic shifts in couples’ conversations. In Craig, R. T. & Tracy, K. (Eds.), Conversational coherence: Form, structure, and strategy (pp. 136–156). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Grosz, B. J. (1977). The representation and use of focus in a system for understanding dialogs. Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 67–76). Cambridge, Massachusetts. Retrieved February 12, 2018, from www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/77-1/Papers/009.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hewes, D. E. (1996). Small group communication may not influence decision making. An amplification of socio-egocentric theory. In Hirokawa, R. & Poole, M. S. (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (pp. 179–211). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1972). Einfache Sozialsysteme [Simple social systems]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 1, 51–65. doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1972-0105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcomb, T. M. (1959). Individual systems of orientation. In Koch, S. (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science, Vol. 3 (pp. 384–422). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Ng, S. H., & Bradac, J. J. (1993). Power in language: Verbal communication and social influence. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pavitt, C., & Johnson, K. K. (1999). An examination of the coherence of group discussions. Communication Research, 26, 303–321. doi.org/10.1177/009365099026003002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piontkowski, U., Oehlschlegel-Haubrock, S., & Hoelker, P. (1997). Annaeherung oder Abgrenzung? [Approximation or avoidance?] Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 26, 128–138. doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1997-0204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichman, R. (1978). Conversational coherency. Cognitive Science, 2, 283–327. doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0204_1Google Scholar
Tracy, K. (1985). Conversational coherence: A cognitively grounded rules approach. In Street, R. L. & Cappella, J. N. (Eds.), Sequence and pattern in communicative behaviour (pp. 30–49). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Tschan, F. (1995). Communication enhances small group performance if it conforms to task requirements: The concept of ideal communication cycles. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 371–393. doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1703_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Text and context. Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. New York, NY: Longmann.Google Scholar
Willke, H. (1978). Elemente einer Systemtheorie der Gruppe: Umweltbezug und Prozesssteuerung [Elements of a systems theory of groups: Environment relationship and process steering]. Soziale Welt, 29, 343–357. Retrieved February 12, 2018, from www.jstor.org/stable/40877230Google Scholar
Kolbe, M., Burtscher, M. J., & Manser, T. (2013). Co-ACT: A framework for observing coordination behaviour in acute care teams. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22, 596–605. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicchetti, D. V., & Feinstein, A. R. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 551–558. doi:org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90159-MCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinstein, A. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 543–549. doi:org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-LCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, G., Flin, R., McGeorge, P., Glavin, R., Maran, N., & Patey, R. (2004). Rating non-technical skills: Developing a behavioral marker system for use in anaesthesia. Cognition, Technology and Work, 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawande, A. A., Zinner, M. J., Studdert, D. M., & Brennan, T. A. (2003). Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery, 133, 614–621. doi:10:1067/msy.2003.169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grote, G., Kolbe, M., Zala-Mezö, E., Bienefeld-Seall, N., & Künzle, B. (2010). Adaptive coordination and heedfulness make better cockpit crews. Ergonomics, 52, 211–228. doi:10.1080/00140130903248819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolbe, M., Burtscher, M. J., & Manser, T. (2011). Analyzing communication to understand how healthcare action teams coordinate. Paper presented at the 5th International Workshop on Behavioral Science Applied to Acute Care Teams, Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Kolbe, M., Burtscher, M. J., Wacker, J., Grande, B., Nohynkova, R., Manser, T., … Grote, G. (2012). Speaking-up is related to better team performance in simulated anesthesia inductions: An observational study. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 115, 1099–1108. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e318269cd32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Waller, M. J., Wacker, J., Grande, B., Burtscher, M., & Spahn, D. (2014). Monitoring and talking to the room: Autochthonous coordination patterns in team interaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1254–1267. doi:org/10.1037/a0037877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolbe, M., Künzle, B., Zala-Mezö, E., Wacker, J., & Grote, G. (2009). Measuring coordination behaviour in anaesthesia teams during induction of general anaesthetics. In Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Eds.), Safer surgery. Analysing behaviour in the operating theatre (pp. 203–221). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observers agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manser, T., Howard, S. K., & Gaba, D. M. (2008). Adaptive coordination in cardiac anaesthesia: A study of situational changes in coordination patterns using a new observation system. Ergonomics, 51, 1153–1178. doi:10.1080/00140130801961919CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazzocco, K., Petitti, D. B., Fong, K. T., Bonacum, D., Brookey, J., Graham, S., … Thomas, E. J. (2009). Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg, 197(5), 678–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373–412. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.574506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, S. H., Yule, S., Flin, R., & McKinley, A. (2011). Towards a model of surgeons’ leadership in the operating room. BMJ Quality & Safety, 20, 570–579. doi:10.1136/bmjqs.2010.040295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundstrom, E., de Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams. Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120–133. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. J., Sexton, J. B., & Helmreich, R. L. (2004). Translating teamwork behaviours from aviation to healthcare: Development of behavioural markers for neonatal resuscitation. Qual Saf Health Care, 13(suppl 1), i57–i64. doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.009811CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Vetterli, M., Gurtner, A., Hunziker, S., & Marsch, S. U. (2011). Developing observational categories for group process research based on task and coordination-requirement analysis: Examples from research on medical emergency-driven teams. In Boos, M., Kolbe, M., Kappeler, P., & Ellwart, T. (Eds.), Coordination in human and primate groups (pp. 93–118). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Undre, S., Sevdalis, N., & Vincent, C. (2009). Observing and assessing surgical teams: The Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery (OTAS). In Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Edsr.), Safer surgery. Analysing behaviour in the operating theatre (pp. 83–101). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Weiss, M., Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Dambach, M., Marty, A., Spahn, D. R., & Grande, B. (2014). Agency and communion predict speaking up in acute care teams. Small Group Research, 45, 290–313. doi:10.1177/1046496414531495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, M., Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Spahn, D. R., & Grande, B. (2017a). We can do it! Inclusive leader language promotes voice behavior in multi-professional teams. The Leadership Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, M., Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Spahn, D. R., & Grande, B. (2017b). Why didn’t you say something? Using after-event reviews to affect voice behavior and hierarchy beliefs in multi-professional action teams. European Journal of Work and Organization Psychology, 26(1), 66–80. doi:org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1208652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A. L., Lasky, R. E., Dannemiller, J. L., Andrei, A. M., & Thomas, E. J. (2010). Teamwork behaviours and errors during neonatal resuscitation. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19(1), 60–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yule, S., Flin, R., Paterson-Brown, S., & Maran, N. (2006). Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: A review of the literature. Surgery, 139, 140–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seelandt, J. C., Tschan, F., Keller, S., Beldi, G., Jenni, N., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Semmer, N. K. (2014). Assessing distractors and teamwork during surgery: Developing an event-based method for direct observation. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23, 918–929. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002860CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis; a method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.Google Scholar
Barsade, S. G., & Knight, A. P. (2015). Group affect. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 21–46. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedwell, W. L., Ramsay, P. S., & Salas, E. (2012). Helping fluid teams work: A research agenda for effective team adaptation in healthcare. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2(4), 504–509. doi:10.1007/s13142-012-0177-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feuerbacher, R. L., Funk, K., Spight, D. H., Diggs, B. S., & Hunter, J. G. (2012). Realistic distractions and interruptions that impair simulated surgical performance by novice surgeons. Archives of Surgery, 147(11), 1026–1030. doi:doi:10.1001/archsurg.2012.1480CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flin, R. (2013). Non-technical skills for anaesthetists, surgeons and scrub practitioners (ANTS, NOTSS, and SPLINTS). Retrieved February 16, 2018, from http://patientsafety.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/non_technical_skills_for_anaesthetists_surgeons_and_scrub_practitioners.pdfGoogle Scholar
Futoran, G. C., Kelly, J. R., & McGrath, J. E. (1989). TEMPO: A time-based system for analysis of group interaction process. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(3), 211–232. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1003_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healey, A. N., Sevdalis, N., & Vincent, C. (2006). Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics, 49, 589–604. doi:10.1080/00140130600568899CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodge, B., & Thompson, J. F. (1990). Noise pollution in the operating theatre. Lancet, 335(8694), 891–894. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)90486-OCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, J. D. (2015). Noise in the operating room. Survey of Anesthesiology, 59(1), 60. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, S., Tschan, F., Beldi, G., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Semmer, N. K. (2016). Noise peaks influence communication in the operating room. An observational study. Ergonomics, 59(12), 1541–1552. doi:10.1080/00140139.2016.1159736CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolbe, M., Künzle, B., Zala-Mezo, E., Wacker, J., & Grote, G. (2009). Measuring coordination behavior in anaesthesia teams during induction of general anaesthetics. In Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Eds.), Safer surgery: Analysing behavior in the operating theatre (pp. 203–222). London, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kurmann, A., Peter, M., Tschan, F., Muhlemann, K., Candinas, D., & Beldi, G. (2011). Adverse effect of noise in the operating theatre on surgical-site infection. British Journal of Surgery, 98(7), 1021–1025. doi:10.1002/bjs.7496CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazzocco, K., Petitti, D. B., Fong, K. T., Bonacum, D., Brookey, J., Graham, S., Lasky, R. E., Sexton, J. B., & Thomas, E. J. (2009). Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. American Journal of Surgery, 197(5), 678–685. doi:S0002-9610(08)00459-5 [pii] 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.03.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sevdalis, N., Davis, R., Koutantji, M., Undre, S., Darzi, A., & Vincent, C. A. (2008). Reliability of a revised NOTECHS scale for use in surgical teams. American Journal of Surgery, 196(2), 184–190. doi:0.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.070CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sevdalis, N., Healey, A. N., & Vincent, C. A. (2007). Distracting communications in the operating theatre. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 13(3), 390–394. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00712.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sevdalis, N., Undre, S., McDermott, J., Giddie, J., Diner, L., & Smith, G. (2014). Impact of intraoperative distractions on patient safety: a prospective descriptive study using validated instruments. World Journal of Surgery, 38(4), 751–758. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2315-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tschan, F., Holzer, E., Semmer, N. K., Keller, S., Zimmermann, J., Huber, S. A., Beldi, G., & Stolz, M. (2016). Adjustable Field Notes – A 5$ iPad application to observe team interactions. Paper presented at the 10th International Meeting for Behavioral Science in Surgery & Acute Care Settings, November 11–12, 2016, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Tschan, F., Seelandt, J., Keller, S., Semmer, N. K., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Beldi, G. (2015). Impact of case-relevant and case-irrelevant communication within the surgical team on surgical site infection. British Journal of Surgery. doi:10.1002/bjs.9927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Undre, S., Sevdalis, N., & Vincent, C. (2009). Observing and assessing surgical teams: The Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery (OTASS). In Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Eds.), Safer surgery. Analysing behaviour in the operating theatre (pp. 83–102). London, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Wadhera, R. K., Parker, S. H., Burkhart, H. M., Greason, K. L., Neal, J. R., Levenick, K. M., Wiegmann, D. A., & Sundt, T. M. 3rd. (2010). Is the “sterile cockpit” concept applicable to cardiovascular surgery critical intervals or critical events? The impact of protocol-driven communication during cardiopulmonary bypass. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 139(2), 312–319. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.10.048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Way, T. J., Long, A., Weihing, J., Ritchie, R., Jones, R., Bush, M., & Shinn, J. B. (2013). Effect of noise on auditory processing in the operating room. Journal of the American College of Surgery, 216(5), 933–938. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yule, S., Flin, R., Maran, N., Rowley, D., Youngson, G., & Paterson-Brown, S. (2008). Surgeons’ non-technical skills in the operating room: Reliability testing of the NOTSS behavior rating system. World Journal of Surgery, 32(4), 548–556. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9320-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, B., Fung, E., Fu, B., Panton, N. M., & Swanstrom, L. L. (2015). Surgical team composition differs between laparoscopic and open procedures. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 29(8), 2260–2265. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3938-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×