Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:22:32.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

36 - Identifying Teacher and Student Contributions during Assessment Conversations

The Elevate Coding Scheme

from Cognition and Metacognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2018

By
Erin Marie Furtak  and
Katharina Kiemer
Edited by
Elisabeth Brauner ,
Margarete Boos  and
Michaela Kolbe
Elisabeth Brauner
Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Margarete Boos
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen
Michaela Kolbe
Affiliation:
ETH Zürich
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis , pp. 556 - 564
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity-theory, research, critique (2nd edn.). London, UK: Taylor & Francis Publishers, Ltd.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109–1136. doi:10.1002/tea.20440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duschl, R. A., & Gitomer, D. H. (1997). Strategies and challenges to changing the focus of assessment and instruction in science classrooms. Educational Assessment, 4(1), 37–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea0401_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furtak, E. M., Kiemer, K., Swanson, R., DeLeon, V., Circi, R., Morrison, D., & Heredia, S. (2016). Developing teachers’ attention and response to student thinking through long-term professional development: Results of a longitudinal study. Instructional Science. 44, 267–291. doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9371-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurik, V., Gröschner, A., & Seidel, T. (2013). How student characteristics affect girls’ and boys’ verbal engagement in physics instruction. Learning and Instruction, 23, 33–42. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284. doi:0033-2909/96/S3.00CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobarg, M., & Seidel, T. (2007). Prozessorientierte Lernbegleitung-Videoanalysen im Physikunterricht der Sekundarstufe I. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 35(2), 148–168.Google Scholar
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, N. (2010). The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 1–14. doi:10.1348/000709909X479853CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michaels, S., O’Connor, M. C., & Hall, M. W. (2013). Accountable Talk sourcebook: For classroom conversation that works. Institute of Learning. University of Pittsburgh. Retrieved April 20, 2017 from ifl.pitt.edu/index.php/download/index/ats.Google Scholar
Michaels, S., O’Connor, M. C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable Talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4) 283–297. doi:10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24(4), 318–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1993.24.4.04x0063kGoogle Scholar
Pehmer, A.-K., Kiemer, K., & Gröschner, A. (2014). Produktive Lehrer-Schüler-Kommunikation: ein Kategoriensystem zur Erfassung Produktiver Gesprächsführung im Klassengespräch und in Schülerarbeitsphasen. Friedl-Schöller Endowed Chair for Teaching and Learning Research. TUM School of Education, Technische Universität München.Google Scholar
Penuel, W. R., & Shepard, L. A. (2016). Assessment and teaching. In Gitomer, D. H. & Bell, C. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (5th edn., pp. 787–850). Washington, DC.: American Educational Research Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reznitskaya, A. (2012). Dialogic teaching: Rethinking language use during literature discussions. The Reading Teacher, 65(7), 446–456. doi:10.1002/TRTR.01066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2006). Informal formative assessment and scientific inquiry: Exploring teachers’ practices and student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(3 & 4), 237–263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2006.9652991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57–84. doi:10.1002/tea.20163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidel, T., & Prenzel, M. (2006). Stability of teaching patterns in physics instruction: Findings from a video study. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 228–240. doi:0.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidel, T., Prenzel, M., Wittwer, J., & Schwindt, K. (2007). Unterricht in den Naturwissenschaften. In Prenzel, M., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Hammann, M., Klieme, E., & Pekrun, R. (Eds.), PISA-Konsortium Deutschland. PISA 2006. Die Ergebnisse der dritten internationalen Vergleichsstudie (pp. 147–180). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029007004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track: Classroom assessment and the regulation of learning. In Lester, J. F. K. (Ed.), Second handbook of mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1053–1098). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×