Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:39:38.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

27 - Micro-Conflict Coding Scheme

from Argument, Conflict, and Negotiations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2018

By
Susannah B. F. Paletz  and
Christian D. Schunn
Edited by
Elisabeth Brauner ,
Margarete Boos  and
Michaela Kolbe
Elisabeth Brauner
Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Margarete Boos
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen
Michaela Kolbe
Affiliation:
ETH Zürich
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis , pp. 472 - 482
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Paletz, S. B. F., Schunn, C. D., & Kim, K. H. (2011). Conflict under the microscope: Micro-conflicts in naturalistic team discussions. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 4, 314–351. doi:10.1111/j.1750-4716.2011.00085.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paletz, S. B. F., Chan, J., & Schunn, C. D. (2017). The dynamics of micro-conflicts and uncertainty in successful and unsuccessful design teams. Design Studies, 50, 39–69. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2017.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paletz, S. B. F., Sumer, A., & Miron-Spektor, E. (2017). Psychological factors surrounding disagreement in multicultural design team meetings. CoDesign. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1378685CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

Amason, A. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123–143. doi:10.2307/256633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakeman, R., Quera, V., McArthur, D., & Robinson, B. F. (1997). Detecting sequential patterns and determining their reliability with fallible observers. Psychological Methods, 2, 357–370. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.2.4.357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bales, R. F. (1951). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.Google Scholar
Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (2004). Conceptualizing the construct of interpersonal conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 216–244. doi:10.1108/eb022913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bearman, C. R., Paletz, S. B. F., Orasanu, J., & Thomas, M. J. W. (2010). The breakdown of coordinated decision making in distributed systems. Human Factors, 52, 173–188. doi:10.1177/0018720810372104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bendersky, C., Bear, J., Behfar, K. J., Weingart, L. R., Todorova, G., & Jehn, K. A. (2014). Identifying gaps between the conceptualization of conflict and its measurement. In Ashkanasy, N., Ayoko, O., & Jehn, K. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research in conflict management (pp. 79–89). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. doi:10.4337/9781781006948Google Scholar
Chan, J., Paletz, S. B. F., & Schunn, C. D. (2012). Analogy as a strategy for supporting complex problem solving under uncertainty. Memory and Cognition, 40, 1352–1365. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0227-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analysis of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of Learning Sciences, 6, 271–315. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, B. T., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The role and impact of mental simulation in design. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 327–344. doi:10.1002/acp.1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coan, J. A., & Gottman, J. M. (2007). The Specific Affect (SPAFF) coding system. In Coan, J. A. & Allen, J. J. B. (Eds.) Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 106–123), New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottman, J. M., & Notarius, C. I. (2000). Decade review: Observing marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 927–947. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00927.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530–557. doi:10.2307/2393737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 187–242. doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(03)25005-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238–251. doi:10.2307/3069453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffeld, S. (2006). Self-directed work groups and team competence. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 1–21. doi:10.1348/096317905X53237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffeld, S., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2012). Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Research, 43, 130–158. doi:10.1177/1046496411429599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T., & Poole, M. S. (2000). Do conflict management styles affect group decision making? Evidence from a longitudinal field study. Human Communication Research, 26, 558–590. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00769.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neff, R., Jankovic, S., Wolf, M., Tacey, P., Paletz, S. B. F., & Schunn, C. D. (2012). Affect and conflict in student engineering teams. Poster presented at the International Society for the Psychology of Science and Technology Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Paletz, S. B. F., Chan, J., & Schunn, C. D. (2016). Uncovering uncertainty through disagreement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 387–400. doi:10.1002/acp.3213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paletz, S. B. F., Schunn, C. D., & Kim, K. H. (2013). The interplay of conflict and analogy in multidisciplinary teams. Cognition, 126, 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved February 14, 2018, from http://liwc.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/LIWC2015_LanguageManual.pdf. doi:10.15781/T29G6Z.Google Scholar
Smith, C. P. (2000). Content analysis and narrative analysis. In Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 313–335). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Srikanth, K., Harvey, S., & Peterson, R. (2016). A dynamic perspective on diverse teams: Moving from the dual-process model to a dynamic coordination-based model of diverse team performance. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 453–493. doi:10.1080/19416520.2016.1120973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staw, B. M. (1975). Attribution of the ‘‘causes’’ of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 13, 414–432. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90060-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todorova, G., Bear, J. B., & Weingart, L. R. (2014). Can conflict be energizing? A study of task conflict, positive emotions, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 451–467. doi:10.1037/a0035134CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vuchinich, S. (1987). Starting and stopping spontaneous family conflicts. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 591–601. doi:10.2307/352204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingart, L. R., Behfar, K. J., Bendersky, C., Todorova, G., & Jehn, K. A. (2015). The directness and oppositional intensity of conflict expression. Academy of Management Review, 40, 235–262. doi:10.5465/amr.2013-0124CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×