SO-DIC-OR

doi:10.1017/9781316286302.033

32 - SO-DIC-OR

Simultaneous Observation of Distractions and Communication in the Operating Room

from Coordination and Coherence

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 July 2018

Sandra Keller and

Edited by

Margarete Boos and

Elisabeth Brauner: Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Margarete Boos: Affiliation:
University of Göttingen
Michaela Kolbe: Affiliation:
ETH Zürich

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis , pp. 518 - 526

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316286302.033 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Seelandt, J. C., Tschan, F., Keller, S., Beldi, G., Jenni, N., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Semmer, N. K. (2014). Assessing distractors and teamwork during surgery: Developing an event-based method for direct observation. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23, 918–929. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002860CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Secondary Sources

Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis; a method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.Google Scholar

Barsade, S. G., & Knight, A. P. (2015). Group affect. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 21–46. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111316CrossRef Google Scholar

Bedwell, W. L., Ramsay, P. S., & Salas, E. (2012). Helping fluid teams work: A research agenda for effective team adaptation in healthcare. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2(4), 504–509. doi:10.1007/s13142-012-0177-9CrossRef Google Scholar

Feuerbacher, R. L., Funk, K., Spight, D. H., Diggs, B. S., & Hunter, J. G. (2012). Realistic distractions and interruptions that impair simulated surgical performance by novice surgeons. Archives of Surgery, 147(11), 1026–1030. doi:doi:10.1001/archsurg.2012.1480CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Flin, R. (2013). Non-technical skills for anaesthetists, surgeons and scrub practitioners (ANTS, NOTSS, and SPLINTS). Retrieved February 16, 2018, from http://patientsafety.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/non_technical_skills_for_anaesthetists_surgeons_and_scrub_practitioners.pdf Google Scholar

Futoran, G. C., Kelly, J. R., & McGrath, J. E. (1989). TEMPO: A time-based system for analysis of group interaction process. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(3), 211–232. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1003_2CrossRef Google Scholar

Healey, A. N., Sevdalis, N., & Vincent, C. (2006). Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics, 49, 589–604. doi:10.1080/00140130600568899CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hodge, B., & Thompson, J. F. (1990). Noise pollution in the operating theatre. Lancet, 335(8694), 891–894. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)90486-OCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Katz, J. D. (2015). Noise in the operating room. Survey of Anesthesiology, 59(1), 60. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000319CrossRef Google Scholar

Keller, S., Tschan, F., Beldi, G., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Semmer, N. K. (2016). Noise peaks influence communication in the operating room. An observational study. Ergonomics, 59(12), 1541–1552. doi:10.1080/00140139.2016.1159736CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kolbe, M., Künzle, B., Zala-Mezo, E., Wacker, J., & Grote, G. (2009). Measuring coordination behavior in anaesthesia teams during induction of general anaesthetics. In Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Eds.), Safer surgery: Analysing behavior in the operating theatre (pp. 203–222). London, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Kurmann, A., Peter, M., Tschan, F., Muhlemann, K., Candinas, D., & Beldi, G. (2011). Adverse effect of noise in the operating theatre on surgical-site infection. British Journal of Surgery, 98(7), 1021–1025. doi:10.1002/bjs.7496CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mazzocco, K., Petitti, D. B., Fong, K. T., Bonacum, D., Brookey, J., Graham, S., Lasky, R. E., Sexton, J. B., & Thomas, E. J. (2009). Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. American Journal of Surgery, 197(5), 678–685. doi:S0002-9610(08)00459-5 [pii] 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.03.002CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sevdalis, N., Davis, R., Koutantji, M., Undre, S., Darzi, A., & Vincent, C. A. (2008). Reliability of a revised NOTECHS scale for use in surgical teams. American Journal of Surgery, 196(2), 184–190. doi:0.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.070CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sevdalis, N., Healey, A. N., & Vincent, C. A. (2007). Distracting communications in the operating theatre. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 13(3), 390–394. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00712.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sevdalis, N., Undre, S., McDermott, J., Giddie, J., Diner, L., & Smith, G. (2014). Impact of intraoperative distractions on patient safety: a prospective descriptive study using validated instruments. World Journal of Surgery, 38(4), 751–758. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2315-zCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tschan, F., Holzer, E., Semmer, N. K., Keller, S., Zimmermann, J., Huber, S. A., Beldi, G., & Stolz, M. (2016). Adjustable Field Notes – A 5$ iPad application to observe team interactions. Paper presented at the 10th International Meeting for Behavioral Science in Surgery & Acute Care Settings, November 11–12, 2016, Aberdeen.Google Scholar

Tschan, F., Seelandt, J., Keller, S., Semmer, N. K., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Beldi, G. (2015). Impact of case-relevant and case-irrelevant communication within the surgical team on surgical site infection. British Journal of Surgery. doi:10.1002/bjs.9927CrossRef Google Scholar

Undre, S., Sevdalis, N., & Vincent, C. (2009). Observing and assessing surgical teams: The Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery (OTASS). In Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Eds.), Safer surgery. Analysing behaviour in the operating theatre (pp. 83–102). London, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Wadhera, R. K., Parker, S. H., Burkhart, H. M., Greason, K. L., Neal, J. R., Levenick, K. M., Wiegmann, D. A., & Sundt, T. M. 3rd. (2010). Is the “sterile cockpit” concept applicable to cardiovascular surgery critical intervals or critical events? The impact of protocol-driven communication during cardiopulmonary bypass. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 139(2), 312–319. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.10.048CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Way, T. J., Long, A., Weihing, J., Ritchie, R., Jones, R., Bush, M., & Shinn, J. B. (2013). Effect of noise on auditory processing in the operating room. Journal of the American College of Surgery, 216(5), 933–938. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.048.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Yule, S., Flin, R., Maran, N., Rowley, D., Youngson, G., & Paterson-Brown, S. (2008). Surgeons’ non-technical skills in the operating room: Reliability testing of the NOTSS behavior rating system. World Journal of Surgery, 32(4), 548–556. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9320-zCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zheng, B., Fung, E., Fu, B., Panton, N. M., & Swanstrom, L. L. (2015). Surgical team composition differs between laparoscopic and open procedures. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 29(8), 2260–2265. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3938-3CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed