Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Taking Stock of Explicit and Implicit Prejudice
- 1 Report from the NSF Conference on Implicit Bias
- Section I What is Implicit Bias and (How) Can We Measure It?
- Section II Do Measures of Implicit Bias Predict Cognition and Behavior?
- Section III Challenges of Research on Implicit Bias
- Section IV Improving Measurement and Theorizing About Implicit Bias
- Section V How to Change Implicit Bias?
- Introduction
- 21 Changing Implicit Bias versus Empowering People to Address the Personal Dilemma of Unintentional Bias
- 22 How Can We Change Implicit Bias toward Outgroups?
- Section VI Explicit Prejudice; Alive and Well?
- Section VII The Public’s (Mis)understanding of Implicit Bias
- Index
- References
22 - How Can We Change Implicit Bias toward Outgroups?
from Section V - How to Change Implicit Bias?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 December 2024
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Taking Stock of Explicit and Implicit Prejudice
- 1 Report from the NSF Conference on Implicit Bias
- Section I What is Implicit Bias and (How) Can We Measure It?
- Section II Do Measures of Implicit Bias Predict Cognition and Behavior?
- Section III Challenges of Research on Implicit Bias
- Section IV Improving Measurement and Theorizing About Implicit Bias
- Section V How to Change Implicit Bias?
- Introduction
- 21 Changing Implicit Bias versus Empowering People to Address the Personal Dilemma of Unintentional Bias
- 22 How Can We Change Implicit Bias toward Outgroups?
- Section VI Explicit Prejudice; Alive and Well?
- Section VII The Public’s (Mis)understanding of Implicit Bias
- Index
- References
Summary
Recent findings show that it is possible in some cases to robustly and durably change implicit impressions of novel individuals. This work presents a challenge to long-standing theoretical assumptions about implicit impressions, and raises new research directions for changing and reducing implicit bias toward outgroups. Namely, implicit impressions of newly encountered individuals and groups are more amenable to robust change and updating than previously assumed, and some of the lessons from this work point to when and how we might try to change implicit bias toward well-known and familiar stigmatized groups and individuals.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism , pp. 572 - 590Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2013). Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People. New York, NY: Delacorte Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2012). Reporting intentional rating of the primes predicts priming effects in the affective misattribution procedure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(9), 1194–1208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brannon, S. M., & Gawronski, B. (2017). A second chance for first impressions? Exploring the context-(in) dependent updating of implicit evaluations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(3), 275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broockman, D., & Kalla, J. (2016). Durably reducing transphobia: A field experiment on door-to-door canvassing. Science, 352(6282), 220–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cameron, C. D., Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., & Payne, B. K. (2012). Sequential priming measures of implicit social cognition: A meta-analysis of associations with behavior and explicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(4), 330–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, J., & Banaji, M. R. (2016). The base rate principle and the fairness principle in social judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(27), 7475–7480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlsson, R., & Agerström, J. (2016). A closer look at the discrimination outcomes in the IAT literature. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57(4), 278–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2022). The language game: How improvisation created language and changed the world. New York, NY: Basic Books and London: Bantam Press.Google Scholar
Cone, J., & Ferguson, M. J. (2015). He did what? The role of diagnosticity in revising implicit evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(1), 37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cone, J., Flaharty, K., & Ferguson, M. J. (2019). Believability of evidence matters for correcting social impressions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(20), 9802–9807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cone, J., Mann, T. C., & Ferguson, M. J. (2017). Changing our implicit minds: How, when, and why implicit evaluations can be rapidly revised. In Olson, J. M. (Ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 56, pp. 131–199). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cone, J., Kurdi, B., Mann, T. C., et al. (2023). The updating of implicit impressions of visual information. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Corneille, O., & Lush, P. (2022). Sixty years after Orne?s American Psychologist article: A conceptual analysis of “Demand Characteristics.” Review of Personality and Social Psychology.Google Scholar
Critcher, C. R., & Ferguson, M. J. (2016). “Whether I like it or not, it’s important”: Implicit importance of means predicts self-regulatory persistence and success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(6), 818–839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crocker, J., & Weber, R. (1983). Cognitive structure and stereotype change. Advances in Consumer Research, 10(1), 459–463.Google Scholar
De Houwer, J. D. (2014). A propositional model of implicit evaluation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(7), 342–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Houwer, J., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., et al. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135(3), 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Cox, W. T., et al., (2017). A gender bias habit-breaking intervention led to increased hiring of female faculty in STEM departments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 211–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., et al. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, J. A., Faber, N. S., & Crockett, M. J. (2015). The influence of social preferences and reputational concerns on intergroup prosocial behaviour in gains and losses contexts. Royal Society Open Science, 2(12), 150546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., et al. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 229–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, M. J., Mann, T. C., Cone, J., et al. (2019). When and how implicit first impressions can be updated. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, M. J., Mann, T. C., Cone, J., et al. (2023). The evaluative processes in context model. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Forscher, P. S., & Devine, P. G. (2017). Knowledge-based interventions are more likely to reduce legal disparities than are implicit bias interventions. In Redfield, S. E. (Ed.), Enhancing Justice: Reducing Bias, pp. 303–316. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Forscher, P. S., Lai, C., Axt, J., et al. (2019). A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, 522–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friese, M., Hofmann, W., & Wänke, M. (2008). When impulses take over: Moderated predictive validity of explicit and implicit attitude measures in predicting food choice and consumption behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(3), 397–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gast, A., & De Houwer, J. (2013). The influence of extinction and counterconditioning instructions on evaluative conditioning effects. Learning and Motivation, 44(4), 312–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011). The associative–propositional evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. In Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 59–127). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gawronski, B., Deutsch, R., & Banse, R. (2011). Response interference tasks as indirect measures of automatic associations. In Klauer, K. C., Voss, A., & Stahl, C. (Eds.). Cognitive Methods in Social Psychology, abridged edition. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Gawronski, B., Deutsch, R., Mbirkou, S., et al. (2008). When “just say no” is not enough: Affirmation versus negation training and the reduction of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 370–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, B., Hofmann, W., & Wilbur, C. J. (2006). Are “implicit” attitudes unconscious? Consciousness and Cognition, 15(3), 485–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, B., & LeBel, E. P. (2008). Understanding patterns of attitude change: When implicit measures show change, but explicit measures do not. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1355–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, B., LeBel, E. P., & Peters, K. R. (2007). What do implicit measures tell us? Scrutinizing the validity of three common assumptions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(2), 181–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawronski, B., Rydell, R. J., De Houwer, J., et al. (2018). Contextualized attitude change. In Gawronski, B. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 57, pp. 1–52). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2017). The implicit revolution: Reconceiving the relation between conscious and unconscious. American Psychologist, 72(9), 861–871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). Statistically small effects of the Implicit Association Test can have societally large effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(4), 553–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., et al. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., & Lai, C. K. (2020). Implicit social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 419–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregg, A. P., Seibt, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Easier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grice, H. Paul. (1975). Logic and conversation. In: P. Cole and J. Morgan, eds., Syntax and semantics, Vol. 9, 41 l–158. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hahn, A., & Gawronski, B. (2014). Do implicit evaluations reflect unconscious attitudes? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(1), 28–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, D. L. (1979). A cognitive-attributional analysis of stereotyping. In Gawronski, B., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 53–84). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1992). Achieving ‘shared reality’ in the communication game: A social action that create; meaning. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11(3), 107–131.Google Scholar
Jackson, L. A., Hunter, J. E., & Hodge, C. N. (1995). Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence: A meta-analytic review. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 108–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, J., & Rand, D. (2020). Signaling when no one is watching: A reputation heuristics account of outrage and punishment in one-shot anonymous interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(1), 57–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F., Moll, J., et al. (2000). Just say no (to stereotyping): Effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 871–888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klauer, K. C., Schmitz, F., Teige-Mocigemba, S., et al. (2010). Understanding the role of executive control in the Implicit Association Test: Why flexible people have small IAT effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(3), 595–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurdi, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2019). Attitude change via repeated evaluative pairings versus evaluative statements: Shared and unique features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(5), 681–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurdi, B., Seitchik, A. E., Axt, J. R., et al. (2019). Relationship between the Implicit Association Test and intergroup behavior: A meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 74(5),569–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurdi, B., Mann, T. C., & Ferguson, M. J. (2022). Persuading the implicit mind: Changing negative implicit evaluations with an 8-minute podcast. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(3), 688–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, C. K., Hoffman, K. M., & Nosek, B. A. (2013). Reducing implicit prejudice. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(5), 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, C. K., Marini, M., Lehr, S. A., et al. (2014). Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 1765–1785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, C. K., Skinner, A. L., Cooley, E., et al. (2016). Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(8), 1001–1016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, T. C., Cone, J., Heggeseth, B., et al. (2019). Updating implicit impressions: New evidence on intentionality and the affect misattribution procedure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(3), 349–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, T. C., & Ferguson, M. J. (2015). Can we undo our first impressions? The role of reinterpretation in reversing implicit evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 823–849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, T. C., & Ferguson, M. J. (2017). Reversing implicit first impressions through reinterpretation after a two-day delay. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 122–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, T. C., Kimball, Ahmad, & Ferguson, M. J. (2023). Reinterpretation of implicit evaluations occurs for ingroup and outgroup members. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
McConnell, A. R., & Rydell, R. J. (2014). The systems of evaluation model. In Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual-Process Theories of the Social Mind. New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 204–217.Google Scholar
McConnell, A. R., Rydell, R. J., Strain, L. M., et al. (2008). Forming implicit and explicit attitudes toward individuals: Social group association cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 792–807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moran, T., Bar‐Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2017). The effect of the validity of co‐occurrence on automatic and deliberate evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(6), 708–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nederkoorn, C., Houben, K., Hofmann, W., et al. (2010). Control yourself or just eat what you like? Weight gain over a year is predicted by an interactive effect of response inhibition and implicit preference for snack foods. Health Psychology, 29(4), 389–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosek, B. A., Hawkins, C. B., & Frazier, R. S. (2011). Implicit social cognition: From measures to mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(4), 152–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., et al. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 36–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2008). Implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: The perspective of the MODE model. In Petty, R. E., Fazio, R. H., & Briñol, P. (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the New Implicit Measures (pp. 19–63). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., et al. (2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(2), 171–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., et al. (2015). Using the IAT to predict ethnic and racial discrimination: Small effect sizes of unknown societal significance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(4), 562–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B. K., Burkley, M. A., & Stokes, M. B. (2008). Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge? The role of structural fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., et al. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 277–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B. K., Vuletich, H. A., & Lundberg, K. B. (2017). The bias of crowds: How implicit bias bridges personal and systemic prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 28(4), 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paluck, E.L., Porat, R., Clark, C., et al. (2021). Prejudice reduction: Progress and challenges. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 533–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, K. R., & Gawronski, B. (2011). Are we puppets on a string? Comparing the impact of contingency and validity on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 557–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2006). A metacognitive approach to “implicit” and “explicit” evaluations: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 740–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & DeMarree, K. G. (2007). The Meta–Cognitive Model (MCM) of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Social Cognition, 25(5), 657–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2012). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. London: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S. C., & Tormala, Z. L. (2003). Persuasion and attitude change. Handbook of Psychology, 5, 353–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudman, L. A. (2004). Sources of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(2), 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudoy, J. D., & Paller, K. A. (2009). Who can you trust? Behavioral and neural differences between perceptual and memory-based influences. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rule, N. O., Tskhay, K. O., Freeman, J. B., et al. (2014). On the interactive influence of facial appearance and explicit knowledge in social categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(6), 529–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., Strain, L. M., et al. (2007). Implicit and explicit attitudes respond differently to increasing amounts of counterattitudinal information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(5), 867–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, N. (2010). Measurement as cooperative communication: What research participants learn from questionnaires. The SAGE handbook of measurement, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, X., Mann, T. C., & Ferguson, M. J. (2020). Beware a dishonest face? Updating face-based implicit impressions using diagnostic. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 86, 103888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmack, U. (2021). The Implicit Association Test: A method in search of a construct. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(2), 396–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, S., Lowery, B. S., Hardin, C. D., et al. (2005). Social tuning of automatic racial attitudes: the role of affiliative motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 583–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mind?reading. Mind & language, 17(1–2), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stillman, P. E., Medvedev, D., & Ferguson, M. J. (2017). Resisting temptation: Tracking how self-control conflicts are successfully resolved in real time. Psychological Science, 28(9), 1240–1258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Todorov, A. (2017). Face Value: The Irresistible Influence of First Impressions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Towles-Schwen, T., & Fazio, R. H. (2006). Automatically activated racial attitudes as predictors of the success of interracial roommate relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 698–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dessel, P., Cone, J., Gast, A., & De Houwer, Jan (2020). The impact of valenced verbal information on implicit and explicit evaluation: The role of information diagnosticity, primacy, and memory cueing. Cognition and Emotion, 34(1), 74–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Dessel, P., Eder, A. B., & Hughes, S. (2018). Mechanisms underlying effects of approach-avoidance training on stimulus evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(8), 1224–1241.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Dessel, P., Ye, Y., & De Houwer, J. (2018). Changing deep-rooted implicit evaluation in the blink of an eye: Negative verbal information shifts automatic liking of gandhi. Social Psychological and Personality Science (online), 1948550617752064.Google Scholar
Van Deursen, A. J., Bolle, C. L., Hegner, S. M., et al. (2015). Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: The role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 411–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, W. (2000). Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 539–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyer, N. A. (2010). You never get a second chance to make a first (implicit) impression: The role of elaboration in the formation and revision of implicit impressions. Social Cognition, 28(1), 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyer, N. A. (2016). Easier done than undone… by some of the people, some of the time: The role of elaboration in explicit and implicit group preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanon, R., De Houwer, J., Gast, A., et al. (2014). When does relational information influence evaluative conditioning? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(11), 2105–2122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zayas, V., & Shoda, Y. (2005). Do automatic reactions elicited by thoughts of romantic partner, mother, and self relate to adult romantic attachment? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(8), 1011–1025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed