Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:18:00.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Implicit Bias: What Is It?

from Section I - What is Implicit Bias and (How) Can We Measure It?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2024

By
Russell H. Fazio ,
Javier A. Granados Samayoa ,
Shelby T. Boggs  and
Jesse Ladanyi
Edited by
Jon A. Krosnick ,
Tobias H. Stark  and
Amanda L. Scott
Jon A. Krosnick
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Tobias H. Stark
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, The Netherlands
Amanda L. Scott
Affiliation:
The Strategy Team, Columbus, Ohio
Get access

Summary

We offer a conceptual framework by which to consider implicit bias. In contrast to a far too common presumption that implicit bias involves unconscious attitudes and stereotypes, i.e., ones for which individuals lack awareness, we emphasize a view of implicit bias as an effect of attitudes of which individuals are unaware. The perspective is grounded in decades of social psychological theory and research concerning the constructive nature of perception and the potential biasing influence of attitudes on perceptions and judgments. Attitudes that are automatically activated from memory can exert such a biasing influence, without individuals’ awareness that they have been affected. We articulate the advantages of such a perspective for both the science and the politics of implicit bias. We also discuss how individuals can overcome the influence of an automatically activated attitude, given appropriate motivation and opportunity to do so, and briefly review evidence concerning the joint influence of these factors on prejudicial judgments and behavior.

Keywords

implicit biasprejudiceautomatically activated attitudesMODE modelimplicit measures
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism , pp. 75 - 96
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. (2006). See what you want to see: The impact of motivational states on visual perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 612–625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. (2010). Wishful seeing: More desired objects are seen as closer. Psychological Science, 21, 147–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., et al. (1998). Ego-Depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruner, J. S., & Goodman, C. C. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 42, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cameron, C. D., Payne, B. K., & Knobe, J. (2010). Do theories of implicit race bias change moral judgments? Social Justice Research, 23, 272–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craske, M. G., Kircanski, K., Zelikowsky, M., et al. (2008). Optimizing inhibitory learning during exposure therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Czarnecki, (2018, July 6). Timeline of a crisis: Starbucks’ racial bias training. PRWeek. Retrieved from www.prweek.com/article/1486260/timeline-crisis-starbucks-racial-bias-trainingGoogle Scholar
Daumeyer, N. M., Onyeador, I. N., Brown, X., et al. (2019). Consequences of attributing discrimination to implicit vs. explicit bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, 133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunton, B. C., & Fazio, R. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 316–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75–109). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25, 664–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., et al. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2014). The MODE model: Attitude-behavior processes as a function of motivation and opportunity. In Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual Process Theories of the Social Mind. New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 155–171.Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Powell, M. C. (1994). Attitudes, perception, and attention. In Niedenthal, P. M. & Kitayama, S. (Eds.), The Heart’s Eye: Emotional Influences in Perception and Attention. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., et al. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazio, R. H., & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forscher, P. S., Mitamura, C., Dix, E. L., et al. (2017). Breaking the prejudice habit: Mechanisms, time course, and longevity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, B. (2019). Six lessons for a cogent science of implicit bias and its criticism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 574–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glenn, N. D. (1998). The course of marital success and failure in five American 10-year marriage cohorts. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 569–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., & Lai, C. K. (2020). Implicit social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 20, 419–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1997). Emotional suppression: Physiology, self-report, and expressive behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, 970–986.Google Scholar
Hahn, A., Judd, C. M., Hirsh, H. K., et al. (2014). Awareness of implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1369–1392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, H. A., Czellar, S., Olson, M. A., et al. (2010). Malleability of attitudes or malleability of the IAT? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 286–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, H. A., Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2006). The influence of experimentally-created extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril, H. (1954). They saw a game: A case study. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hehman, E., Flake, J. K., & Calanchini, J. (2017). Disproportionate use of lethal force in policing associated with regional racial biases of residents. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 133–168.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, W., & Friese, M. (2008). Impulses got the better of me: Alcohol moderates the influence of implicit attitudes toward food cues on eating behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 420–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, W., Rauch, W., & Gawronski, B. (2007). And deplete us not into temptation: Automatic attitudes, dietary restraint, and self-regulatory resources as determinants of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, D. A., & Fazio, R. H. (1989). Biased processing as a function of attitude accessibility: Making objective judgments subjectively. Social Cognition, 7, 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, D. W., & Zanna, M. P. (1989). Need for structure in attitude formation and expression. In Pratkanis, A. R., Breckler, S. J., & Greenwald, A. G. (Eds.), Attitude Structure and Function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 383–406.Google Scholar
Koole, S. L., Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (2001). What’s in a name: Implicit self-esteem and the automatic self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 669–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S., Rogge, R. D., & Reis, H. T. (2010). Assessing the seeds of relationship decay: Using implicit evaluations to detect the early stages of disillusionment. Psychological Science, 21, 857–864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loersch, C., Bartholow, B. D., Manning, M., et al. (2015). Intoxicated prejudice: The impact of alcohol consumption on implicitly and explicitly measured racial attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 256–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConahay, J. B., Hardee, B. B., & Batts, V. (1981). Has racism declined in America? It depends on who is asking and what is asked. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25, 563–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, A. R., & Rydell, R. J. (2014). The systems of evaluation model: A dual-systems approach to attitudes. In Sherman, J., Gawronski, B., & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual Process Theories of the Social Mind. New York, NY: Guilford, pp. 204–217.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K., Olson, M. A., Meltzer, A. L., et al. (2013). Though they may be unaware, newlyweds implicitly know whether their marriage will be satisfying. Science, 342, 1119–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2004a). Trait inferences as a function of automatically-activated racial attitudes and motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2004b). Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 653–667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2007). Discordant evaluations of Blacks affect nonverbal behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1214–1224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2009). Implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: The perspective of the MODE model. In Petty, R. E., Fazio, R. H., & Briñol, P. (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the New Implicit Measures. New York, NY: Psychology Press, pp. 19–63.Google Scholar
Olson, M. A., Fazio, R. H., & Hermann, A. D. (2007). Reporting tendencies underlie discrepancies between implicit and explicit measures of self-esteem. Psychological Science, 18, 287–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B. K., Vuletich, H. A., & Lundberg, K. B. (2017). The bias of crowds: How implicit bias bridges personal and systemic prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 28, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranganath, K. A., Smith, C. T., & Nosek, B. A. (2008). Distinguishing automatic and controlled components of attitudes from direct and indirect measurement methods. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 386–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redford, L., & Ratliff, K. A. (2016). Perceived moral responsibility for attitude-based discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 279–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson-Klavehn, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1988). Measures of memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 475–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roediger, H. L. (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043–1056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1992). On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object’s attraction of visual attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 198–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1990). The role of attitudes in memory-based decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 614–622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501–518.Google Scholar
Schuette, R. A., & Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitude accessibility and motivation as determinants of biased processing: A test of the MODE model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 704–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, J., Moskowitz, G. B., Zestcott, C. A., et al. (2020). Testing active learning workshops for reducing implicit stereotyping of Hispanics by majority and minority group medical students. Stigma and Health, 5, 94–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, T. (2018, May 28). Experts: Starbucks training a first step in confronting bias. Associated Press. Retrieved from: www.apnews.com/a7afd1dc61ae4481a1ed9f5e67de1259Google Scholar
Towles-Schwen, T., & Fazio, R. H. (2003). Choosing social situations: The relation between automatically-activated racial attitudes and anticipated comfort interacting with African Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 170–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Towles-Schwen, T., & Fazio, R.H. (2006). Automatically activated racial attitudes as predictors of the success of interracial roommate relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 698–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasey, M. W., Harbaugh, C. N., Buffington, A. G et al. (2012). Predicting return of fear following exposure therapy with an implicit measure of attitudes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50, 767–774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: The role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 36–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M.C., et al. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 7780–7785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, A. I., & Fazio, R. H. (2013). Attitude accessibility as a determinant of object construal and evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 404–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×