Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:48:09.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Student Responses to Feedback

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2018

Edited by
Anastasiya A. Lipnevich  and
Jeffrey K. Smith
Anastasiya A. Lipnevich
Affiliation:
Queens College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York
Jeffrey K. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback , pp. 517 - 588
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In Ramachaudran, V. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, vol. 4, 71–81. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Educational Assessment: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 7–74.Google Scholar
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139–148.Google Scholar
Chappuis, J. (2015). Seven strategies of assessment for learning (2nd edn.). Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Chappuis, S., Commodore, C., & Stiggins, R. (2017). Balanced assessment systems: Leadership, quality and the role of classroom assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar
Kanter, R. M. (2004). Confidence: How winning streaks and losing streaks begin and end. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
Sadler, R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5, 77–84.Google Scholar

References

Al-Barakat, A., & Al-Hassan, O. (2009). Peer assessment as a learning tool for enhancing student teachers’ preparation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altahawi, F., Sisk, B., Poloskey, S., Hicks, C., & Dannefer, E. F. (2012). Student perspectives on assessment: Experience in a competency-based portfolio system. Medical Teacher, 34, 221–225.Google Scholar
Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multi-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baadte, C., & Schnotz, W. (2014). Feedback effects on performance, motivation and mood: Are they moderated by the learner’s self-concept? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58, 570–591.Google Scholar
Bailey, R., & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers’ reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 15, 187–198.Google Scholar
Bevan, R., Badge, J., Cann, A., Wilmott, C., & Scott, J. (2008). Seeing eye-to-eye? Staff and student views on feedback. Bioscience Education Electronic Journal, 12.Google Scholar
Bing-You, R. G., Paterson, J., & Levine, M. A. (1997). Feedback falling on deaf ears: Residents’ receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility. Medical Teacher, 19, 40–44.Google Scholar
Bounds, R., Bush, C., Aghera, A., Rodriguez, N., Stansfield, R. B., & Santeen, S. A. (2013). Emergency medicine residents’ self-assessments play a critical role when receiving feedback. Academic Emergency Medicine, 20, 1055–1061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, E., & Glover, C. (2006). Evaluating written feedback. In Bryan, C. & Clegg, K. (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 81–91). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, J. (2007). Feedback: The student perspective. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 12, 33–51.Google Scholar
Burke, D., & Pieterick, J. (2010). Giving students effective written feedback. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 395–407.Google Scholar
Cartney, P. (2010). Exploring the use of peer assessment as a vehicle for closing the gap between feedback given and feedback used. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 551–564.Google Scholar
Case, S. (2007). Reconfiguring and realigning the assessment feedback processes for an undergraduate criminology degree. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 285–299.Google Scholar
Dessner, L. E. (1991). English as a second language college writers’ revision responses to teacher-written comments. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Dohrer, G. (1991). Do teachers’ comments on students’ papers help? College Teaching, 39(2), 48–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, S. (2001). Student perceptions of what helps them learn and develop in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, P. (2011). Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 51–62.Google Scholar
Ferris, D. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnborough, C., & Truman, M. (2009). Adult beginner distance language learner perceptions and use of assignment feedback. Distance Education, 30, 399–418.Google Scholar
Handley, K., Price, M., & Millar, J. (2011). Beyond “doing time”: Investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback. Oxford Review of Education, 37, 543–560.Google Scholar
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar
Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, K., & Papageorgiou, G. (2009). Good, bad and insufficient: Students’ expectations, perceptions and uses of feedback. Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education, 8, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S. (2000). A quantitative analysis of audiotaped and written feedback produced for students’ writing and students’ perceptions of the two feedback methods. Tunghai Journal, 41, 199–232.Google Scholar
Huxham, M. (2007). Fast and effective feedback: Are model answers the answer? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 601–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 255–286.Google Scholar
Hyland, F. (2001). Providing effective support: Investigating feedback to distance language learners. Open Learning, 16, 233–247.Google Scholar
Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P., & Wells, J. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 3–25.Google Scholar
Jonsson, A. (2013). Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahu, E., Stephens, C., Leach, L., & Zepke, N. (2015). Linking academic emotions and student engagement: Mature-aged distance students’ transition to university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39, 481–497.Google Scholar
Kirschner, P. A., Van den Brink, H., & Meester, M. (1991). Audiotape feedback for essays in distance education. Innovative Higher Education, 15, 185–195.Google Scholar
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009a). The effects of differential feedback on student examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 319–333.Google Scholar
Lipnevich, A. A., Berg, D. A. G., & Smith, J. K. (2016). Toward a model of student response to feedback. In Brown, G. T. L. & Harris, L. R. (Eds.), Human factors and social conditions of assessment (pp. 169–185). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009b). “I really need feedback to learn”: Students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback messages. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunt, T., & Curran, J. (2010). “Are you listening please?” The advantages of electronic audio feedback compared to written feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 759–769.Google Scholar
MacDonald, R. B. (1991). Developmental students’ processing of teacher feedback in composition instruction. Review of Research in Developmental Education, 8(5), 1–5.Google Scholar
MacLellan, E. (2001). Assessment for learning: The differing perceptions of tutors and students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 307–318.Google Scholar
Martens, R., & Dochy, F. (1997). Assessment and feedback as student support devices. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23, 257–273.Google Scholar
McDowell, L. (2008). Students’ experiences of feedback on academic assignments in higher education: Implications for practice. In Havnes, A. & McDowell, L. (Eds.), Balancing dilemmas in assessment and learning in contemporary education (pp. 237–249). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (2011). Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 125–136.Google Scholar
Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2005). Biology students’ utilization of tutors’ formative feedback: A qualitative interview study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 369–386.Google Scholar
Panadero, E. (2016). Is it safe? Social, interpersonal, and human effects of peer assessment: A review and future directions. In Brown, G. T. L. & Harris, L. R. (Eds.), Human factors and social conditions of assessment (pp. 247–266). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). Scaffolding self-regulated learning through self-assessment and peer assessment: Guidelines for classroom implementation. In Laveault, D. & Allal, L. (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 311–326). Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
Paulus, T. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 265–289.Google Scholar
Pearce, C. G., & Ackley, R. J. (1995). Audiotaped feedback in business writing: An exploratory study. Business Communication Quarterly, 58(4), 31–34.Google Scholar
Pitt, E., & Norton, L. (2016). “Now that’s the feedback I want!” Students’ reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42 , 499–516.Google Scholar
Pokorny, H., & Pickford, P. (2010). Complexity, cues and relationships: Student perceptions of feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porte, G. (1996). When writing fails: How academic context and past learning experiences shape revision. System, 24, 107–116.Google Scholar
Price, M., Rust, C., O’Donovan, B., Handley, K., & Bryant, R. (2012). Assessment literacy: The foundation for improving student learning. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.Google Scholar
Schroth, M. L. (1992). The effects of delay of feedback on a delayed concept formation transfer task. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17(4), 78–82.Google Scholar
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.Google Scholar
Sinclair, H. K., & Cleland, J. A. (2007). Undergraduate medical students: Who seeks formative feedback? Medical Education, 41, 580–582.Google Scholar
Smith, J. K., Berg, D., Kendall-Smith, M., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2013). Response to feedback: How we perceive what we receive. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the New Zealand Association for Research in Education, Dunedin, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Taras, M. (2006). Do unto others or not: Equity in feedback for undergraduates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 365–377.Google Scholar
Treglia, M. O. (2009). Teacher-written commentary in college writing composition: How does it impact student revisions? Composition Studies, 37, 67–86.Google Scholar
Vardi, I. (2009). The relationship between feedback and change in tertiary student writing in the disciplines. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20, 350–361.Google Scholar
Walker, M. (2009). An investigation into written comments on assignments: Do students find them usable? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 67–78.Google Scholar
Whitington, V., Glover, A., & Harley, F. (2004). Preservice early childhood students’ perceptions of written feedback on their essays. Early Child Development and Care, 174, 321–337.Google Scholar
Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Williams, J. (2004). Tutoring and revision: Second language writers in the writing center. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 173–201.Google Scholar
Williams, J., & Kane, D. (2009). Assessment and feedback: Institutional experiences of student feedback, 1996 to 2007. Higher Education Quarterly, 63, 264–286.Google Scholar
Wingate, U. (2010). The impact of formative feedback on the development of academic writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 519–533.Google Scholar
Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2016). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52, 17–37.Google Scholar
Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 285–297.Google Scholar
Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 15, 3–17.Google Scholar
Zimbardi, K., Colthorpe, K., Dekker, A., Engstrom, C., Bugarcic, A., Worthy, P., Victor, R., Chunduri, P., Lluka, L., & Long, P. (2016). Are they using my feedback? The extent of students’ feedback use has a large impact on subsequent academic performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42, 625–644.Google Scholar

References

Barbalet, J. (2002). Introduction: Why emotions are crucial. In Barbalet, J. (Ed.), Emotions in sociology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Hutton, D. G., & Cairns, K. J. (1990). Negative effects of praise on skilled performance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11(2), 131–148.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., DeWall, C. N., & Zhang, L. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 167–203.Google Scholar
Becker, E. S., Keller, M. M., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., & Taxer, J. L. (2015). Antecedents of teachers’ emotions in the classroom: An intraindividual approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 635.Google Scholar
Belschak, F. D., Jacobs, G., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Feedback, emotions, and action tendencies: Emotional consequences of feedback from one’s supervisor. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 52(3), 147–152.Google Scholar
Brunswik, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401–423.Google Scholar
Cassidy, J., Ziv, Y., Mehta, T. G., & Feeney, B. C. (2003). Feedback seeking in children and adolescents: Associations with self-perceptions, attachment representations, and depression. Child Development, 74, 612–628.Google Scholar
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.) (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Covington, M. V., & Beery, R. (1976). Self-worth and school learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 9, 526–536.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (2004). Emotions and feelings: A neurobiological perspective. In Manstead, A. S. R., Frijda, N., & Fischer, A. (Eds.), Feelings and emotions (pp. 49–57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(5), 1105–1117.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.Google Scholar
Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (2007). Assessment and emotion: The impact of being assessed. In Boud, D. & Falchikov, N. (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 144–156). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fishbach, A., Eyal, T., & Finkelstein, S. R. (2010). How positive and negative feedback motivate goal pursuit. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 517–530.Google Scholar
Fong, C. J., Warner, J. R., Williams, K. M., Schallert, D. L., Chen, L. H., Williamson, Z. H., & Lin, S. (2016). Deconstructing constructive criticism: The nature of academic emotions associated with constructive, positive, and negative feedback. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 393–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.Google Scholar
Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Lüdtke, O., Pekrun, R., & Sutton, R. E. (2009). Emotional transmission in the classroom: Exploring the relationship between teacher and student enjoyment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 705–716.Google Scholar
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Durksen, T. L., Becker-Kurz, B., & Klassen, R. (2016). Measuring teachers’ enjoyment, anger, and anxiety: The Teacher Emotions Scales (TES). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 148–163.Google Scholar
Gaspard, H., Dicke, A.-L., Flunger, B., Schreier, B., Häfner, I., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2015). More value through greater differentiation: Gender differences in value beliefs about math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 663–677.Google Scholar
Goetz, T. (2004). Emotionales Erleben und selbstreguliertes Lernen bei Schülern im Fach Mathematik [Students’ emotional experiences and self-regulated learning in mathematics]. München: Utz.Google Scholar
Goetz, T., Cronjaeger, H., Frenzel, A. C., Lüdtke, O., & Hall, N. C. (2010). Academic self-concept and emotion relations: Domain specificity and age effects. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 44–58.Google Scholar
Goetz, T., Frenzel, C. A., Hall, N. C., & Pekrun, R. (2008). Antecedents of academic emotions: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model for academic enjoyment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 9–33.Google Scholar
Goetz, T., Frenzel, C. A., Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Between- and within-domain relations of students’ academic emotions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 715–733.Google Scholar
Goetz, T., Haag, L., Lipnevich, A. A., Keller, M. M., Frenzel, A. C., & Collier, A. P. M. (2014). Between-domain relations of students’ academic emotions and their judgments of school domain similarity. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goetz, T., & Hall, N. C. (2013). Emotion and achievement in the classroom. In Hattie, J. & Anderman, E. M. (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 192–195). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goetz, T., Hall, N. C., Frenzel, A. C., & Pekrun, R. (2006). A hierarchical conceptualization of enjoyment in students. Learning and Instruction, 16, 323–338.Google Scholar
Goetz, T., Preckel, F., Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. (2008). Big fish in big ponds: A multilevel analysis of test anxiety and achievement in special gifted classes. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 21(2), 185–198.Google Scholar
Goetz, T., Sticca, F., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2016). Intraindividual relations between achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: An experience sampling approach. Learning and Instruction, 41, 115–125.Google Scholar
Gogol, K., Brunner, M., Preckel, F., Goetz, T., & Martin, R. (2016). Developmental dynamics of general and school-subject-specific components of academic self-concept, academic interest, and academic anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 356.Google Scholar
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299.Google Scholar
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, E. (2013). Inquiring into children’s experiences of teacher feedback: Reconceptualising assessment for learning. Oxford Review of Education, 39, 229–246.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. R., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 96–99.Google Scholar
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar
Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58 , 47–77.Google Scholar
Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2000). How current feedback and chronic effectiveness influence motivation: Everything to gain versus everything to lose. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 583–592.Google Scholar
Ilgen, D. R., & Davis, C. A. (2000). Bearing bad news: Reactions to negative performance feedback. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 550–565.Google Scholar
Johnson, G., & Connelly, S. (2014). Negative emotions in informal feedback: The benefits of disappointment and drawbacks of anger. Human Relations, 67(10), 1265–1290.Google Scholar
Kingston, N. & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28–37.Google Scholar
Kleinginna, P. R., & Kleinginna, A. M. (1981). A categorized list of emotion definitions, with suggestions for a consensual definition. Motivation and Emotion, 5, 345–379.Google Scholar
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a metaanalysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.Google Scholar
Kluger, A. N., Lewinsohn, S., & Aiello, J. R. (1994). The influence of feedback on mood: Linear effects on pleasantness and curvilinear effects on arousal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 276–299.Google Scholar
Krannich, M., Goetz, T., Lipnevich, A. A., & Roos, A.-L. (2017, April). It’s boring I won’t do that: State and trait boredom predicting students’ career aspirations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 212–247.Google Scholar
Lewis, M., & Haviland-Jones, J. M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of emotions. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Lipnevich, A. A. (2007). Response to assessment feedback: The effects of grades, praise, and source of information. Rutgers the State University of New Jersey–New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009a). “I really need feedback to learn”: Students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback messages. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 347–367.Google Scholar
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009b). Russian and American perspectives on self-regulated learning. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 19, 83–100.Google Scholar
Ma, X. (1999). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5), 520–540.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129–149.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280–295.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (1990). Influences of internal and external frames of reference on the formation of math and English self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 107–116.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. J. (2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G., & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment (pp. 273–294). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2, 201–218.Google Scholar
Nicaise, V., Bois, J. E., Fairclough, S. J., Amorose, A. J., & Cogérino, G. (2007). Girls’ and boys’ perceptions of physical education teachers’ feedback: Effects on performance and psychological responses. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(8), 915–926.Google Scholar
Niemann, J., Wisse, B., Rus, D., Van Yperen, N. W., & Sassenberg, K. (2014). Anger and attitudinal reactions to negative feedback: The effects of emotional instability and power. Motivation and Emotion, 38(5), 687–699.Google Scholar
Núñez-Peña, M. I., Bono, R., & Suárez-Pellicioni, M. (2015). Feedback on students’ performance: A possible way of reducing the negative effect of math anxiety in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 70, 80–87.Google Scholar
Parkinson, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1992). Appraisal as a cause of emotion. In Clark, M. S. (Ed.), Emotions: Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 122–149). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., Cusack, A., Murayama, K., Elliot, A. J., & Thomas, K. (2014). The power of anticipated feedback: Effects on students’ achievement goals and achievement emotions. Learning and Instruction, 29, 115–124.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 583–597.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 115–135.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 531–549.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36–48.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Perry, R. P., Kramer, K., Hochstadt, M., & Molfenter, S. (2004). Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of the Test Emotions Questionnaire (TEQ). Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 17(3), 287–316.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Boredom and academic achievement: Testing a model of reciprocal causation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 696–710.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Marsh, H. W., Murayama, K., & Goetz, T. (2017). Achievement emotions and academic performance: Longitudinal models of reciprocal effects. Child Development, 88, 1653–1670.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1999). All life is problem solving. New York: Abingdon.Google Scholar
Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289.Google Scholar
Raftery, J. N., & Bizer, G. Y. (2009). Negative feedback and performance: The moderating effect of emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5), 481–486.Google Scholar
Rowe, A. D., Fitness, J., & Wood, L. N. (2014). The role and functionality of emotions in feedback at university: A qualitative study. Australian Educational Researcher, 41(3), 283–309.Google Scholar
Sarason, S. B., & Mandler, G. (1952). Some correlates of test anxiety. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47(4), 810–817.Google Scholar
Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D., Van Der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2008). Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13, 275–288.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In Scherer, K. R. & Ekman, P. (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293–317). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. (2000). Emotions as episodes of subsystems synchronization driven by nonlinear appraisal processes. In Lewis, M. D. & Granic, I. (Eds.), Emotion, development, and self-organization (pp. 70–99). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitz, B., & Skinner, E. A. (1993). Perceived control, effort, and academic performance: Interindividual, intraindividual, and multivariate time series analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1010–1028.Google Scholar
Seipp, B. (1991). Anxiety and academic performance: A meta-analysis of findings. Anxiety Research, 4, 27–41.Google Scholar
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.Google Scholar
Shields, S. (2015). “My work is bleeding”: Exploring students’ emotional responses to first-year assignment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(6), 614–624.Google Scholar
Shrauger, J. S., & Rosenberg, S. E. (1970). Self-esteem and the effects of success and failure feedback on performance. Journal of Personality, 38, 404–417.Google Scholar
Sticca, F., Goetz, T., Nett, U. E., Hubbard, K., & Haag, L. (2017). Short- and long-term effects of over-reporting of grades on academic self-concept and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 842–854.Google Scholar
Stough, L. M., & Emmer, E. T. (1998). Teachers’ emotions and test feedback. Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(2), 541–600.Google Scholar
Taxer, J. L., & Frenzel, A. C. (2012, July). The influence of teachers’ emotions on students’ self-concepts, attributions, expectations, persistence and emotions. Paper presented at the Junior Researchers of EARLI Conference, Regensburg, Germany.Google Scholar
Turner, J. E., & Schallert, D. L. (2001). Expectancy–value relationships of shame reactions and shame resiliency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 320–329.Google Scholar
van Doorn, E. A., van Kleef, G. A., & van der Pligt, J. (2014). How instructors’ emotional expressions shape students’ learning performance: The roles of anger, happiness, and regulatory focus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 980–984.Google Scholar
Van Kleef, G. A. (2008). Emotion in conflict and negotiation: Introducing the emotions as social information (EASI) model. In Ashkanasy, N. M. & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.), Research companion to emotion in organizations (pp. 392–404). London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 184–188.Google Scholar
Värlander, S. (2008). The role of students’ emotions in formal feedback situations. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(2), 145–156.Google Scholar
Voelkle, M. C., Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., & Lindenberger, U. (2014). Towards a unified framework for the study of between-person and within-person structures: Building a bridge between two research paradigms. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49, 193–213.Google Scholar
Voerman, L., Korthagen, F. A., Meijer, P. C., & Simons, R. J. (2014). Feedback revisited: Adding perspectives based on positive psychology. Implications for theory and classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 91–98.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, I. K., & Child, I. L. (1953). Frustration and the quality of performance. Journal of Personality, 21, 298–311.Google Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.Google Scholar
Young, P. (2000). “I might as well give up”: Self-esteem and mature students’ feelings about feedback on assignments. Journal of Further & Higher Education, 24(3), 409–418.Google Scholar
Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Zeidner, M. (2007). Test anxiety in educational contexts: Concepts, findings, and future directions. In Schutz, P. A. & Pekrun, R. (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 165–184). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (1999). The big-fish-little-pond effect for academic self concept, test anxiety, and school grades in gifted children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 305–329.Google Scholar

References

Amabile, T. M. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 221–233.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity.” Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 5–32.Google Scholar
Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 370–398.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1997). Gender differences in the effects of anticipated evaluation on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 25–31.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1998). Gender differences in the effects of extrinsic motivation on creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 18–37.Google Scholar
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 75–106.Google Scholar
Baer, M., Vadera, A. K., Leenders, R. J., & Oldham, G. R. (2014). Intergroup competition as a double-edged sword: How sex composition regulates the effects of competition on group creativity. Organization Science, 25, 892–908.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2010). Intellectual hide-and-seek: Prospective teachers’ prior experiences with creativity suppression. International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 20, 29–36.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2014). Creative mortification: An initial exploration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 266–276.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 13–79.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Intellectual estuaries: Connecting learning and creativity in programs of advanced academics. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 296–324.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Fundamentals of creativity. Educational Leadership, 70, 10–15.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25, 53–69.Google Scholar
Cesario, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2008). Making message recipients “feel right”: How nonverbal cues can increase persuasion. Psychological Science, 19, 415–420.Google Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Reichenbacher, L. (2008). Effects of personality and threat of evaluation on divergent and convergent thinking. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1095–1101.Google Scholar
Cheek, J. M., & Stahl, S. (1986). Shyness and verbal creativity. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 51–61.Google Scholar
Conti, R., & Amabile, T. M. (1995, April). Problem solving among computer science students: The effects of skill, evaluation expectation, and personality on solution quality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston.Google Scholar
Conti, R., Collins, M., & Picariello, M. (2001). The impact of competition on intrinsic motivation and creativity: Considering gender, gender segregation, and gender role orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1273–1289.Google Scholar
Cornwell, J. M., & Higgins, E. T. (2016). Eager feelings and vigilant reasons: Regulatory focus differences in judging moral wrongs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 338–355.Google Scholar
Crommelinck, M., & Anseel, F. (2013). Understanding and encouraging feedback-seeking behavior: A literature review. Medical Education, 47, 232–241.Google Scholar
Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2010). Functional creativity: Products and the generation of effective novelty. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 301–320). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cropley, D. H., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Measuring functional creativity: Empirical validation of the Creative Solution Diagnosis Scale (CSDS). Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 119–137.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 182–185.Google Scholar
de Stobbeleir, K. E., Ashford, S. J., & Buyens, D. (2011). Self-regulation of creativity at work: The role of feedback-seeking behavior in creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 811–831.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., & Shanock, L. (2003). Rewards, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: A case study of conceptual and methodological isolation. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 121–130.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.Google Scholar
Forgeard, M. J. C., & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Who cares about imagination, creativity, and innovation, and why? A review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 250–269.Google Scholar
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513–524.Google Scholar
Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the adjective check list. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398–1405.Google Scholar
Green, C. (2013, May). Improving performance review policies for managers and employees. Westchester Magazine. Retrieved from www.westchestermagazine.com/914-INC/Q2-2013/Improving-Performance-Review-Policies-for-Managers-and-Employees/.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.Google Scholar
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159–170.Google Scholar
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar
Hennessey, B. A. (2010). Intrinsic motivation and creativity in the classroom: Have we come full circle? In Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 329–361). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hennessey, B. A. (in press). Motivation and creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd edn.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1–46.Google Scholar
Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28, 95–105.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Creativity 101 (2nd Ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2002). Could Steven Spielberg manage the Yankees? Creative thinking in different domains. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 12, 5–15.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C Model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013a). Do people recognize the Four Cs? Examining layperson conceptions of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 229–236.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013b). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35, 155–165.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R A., & Watson, C. (2016). Creative metacognition and self-ratings of creative performance: A 4-C perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 394–399.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Evans, M. L., & Baer, J. (2010). The American Idol effect: Are students good judges of their creativity across domains? Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28, 3–17.Google Scholar
King, L. A., & Gurland, S. T. (2007). Creativity and experience of a creative task: Person and environment effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1252–1259.Google Scholar
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.Google Scholar
Ligon, G. S., Graham, K. A., Edwards, A., Osburn, H. K., & Hunter, S. T. (2012). Performance management: Appraising performance, providing feedback. In Mumford, M. D. (Ed.), The organizational handbook of creativity (pp. 633–666). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.Google Scholar
Miele, D. B., Finn, B., & Molden, D. C. (2011). Does easily learned mean easily remembered? It depends on your beliefs about intelligence. Psychological Science, 22, 320–324.Google Scholar
Milgram, R. M., & Rabkin, L. (1980). Developmental test of Mednick’s associative hierarchies of original thinking. Developmental Psychology, 16, 220–232.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107–120.Google Scholar
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634.Google Scholar
Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. New York: Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Puccio, G. J., & Cabra, J. F. (2010). Organizational creativity: A systems approach. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 145–173). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rietzschel, E. F., Slijkhuis, M., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2014). Close monitoring as a contextual stimulator: How need for structure affects the relation between close monitoring and work outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 394–404.Google Scholar
Ruscio, J., Whitney, D. M., & Amabile, T. M. (1998). Looking inside the fishbowl of creativity: Verbal and behavioral predictors of creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 243–263.Google Scholar
Schaffner, E., Philipp, M., & Schiefele, U. (2016). Reciprocal effects between intrinsic reading motivation and reading competence? A cross‐lagged panel model for academic track and nonacademic track students. Journal of Research in Reading, 39, 19–36.Google Scholar
Scott, G., Leritz, L., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 361–388.Google Scholar
Shalley, C. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 483–503.Google Scholar
Shalley, C. E., & Perry-Smith, J. E. (2001). Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 1–22.Google Scholar
Slijkhuis, J. M., Rietzschel, E. F., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2013). How evaluation and need for structure affect motivation and creativity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 15–25.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Stone, D., & Heen, S. (2014). Thanks for the feedback: The science and art of receiving feedback well. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Wang, L., Liu, R., & Dong, H. (2017). How expected evaluation influences creativity: Regulatory focus as moderator. Motivation and Emotion, 41, 147–157.Google Scholar
Winnie, P. H., & Butler, D. L. (1994). Student cognition in learning from teaching. In Husen, T. & Postlewaite, T. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd edn., pp. 5738–5745). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Yuan, F., & Zhou, J. (2008). Differential effects of expected external evaluation on different parts of the creative idea production process and on final product creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 391–403.Google Scholar
Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 413–422.Google Scholar
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682–696.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×