Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:55:33.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

28 - The Augmented Theory of Successful Intelligence

from Part VI - Kinds of Intelligence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2019

Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

This chapter presents an augmented theory of successful intelligence. Successful intelligence is (1) the ability to formulate, strive for, and, to the extent possible, achieve one’s goals in life, given one’s sociocultural context, (2) by capitalizing on strengths and correcting or compensating for weaknesses (3) in order to adapt to, shape, and select environments (4) through a combination of analytical, creative, and practical abilities. People who are successfully intelligent figure out what life opportunities are available or they can create, and then proceed to optimize on those opportunities. Successfully intelligent people figure out their strengths and weaknesses and then capitalize on the strengths and correct or compensate for their weaknesses.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55, 122135.Google Scholar
Barnes, M. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Social intelligence and decoding of nonverbal cues. Intelligence, 13, 263287.Google Scholar
Boring, E. G. (1923). Intelligence as the tests test it. New Republic, June 6, 3537.Google Scholar
Brody, N. (2003a). What Sternberg should have concluded. Intelligence, 31(4), 339342.Google Scholar
Brody, N. (2003b). Construct validation of the Sternberg Triarchic abilities test: Comment and reanalysis. Intelligence, 31(4), 319329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. L., & Ferrara, R. A. (1985). Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 273305). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Budoff, M. (1968). Learning potential as a supplementary assessment procedure. In Hellmuth, J. (Ed.), Learning disorders (Vol. 3, pp. 295343). Seattle, WA: Special Child.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B., & Cattell, H. E. P. (1973). Measuring intelligence with the Culture Fair Tests. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
Ceci, S. J. (1996). On intelligence (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1984). The role of insight in intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 5864.Google Scholar
Day, J. D., Engelhardt, J. L., Maxwell, S. E., & Bolig, E. E. (1997). Comparison of static and dynamic assessment procedures and their relation to independent performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 358368.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.) (1996). The road to excellence. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Feuerstein, R. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, J. R. (2016). Does your family make you smarter? Nature, nurture, and human autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frensch, P. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Expertise and intelligent thinking: When is it worse to know better? In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 157188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons in theory and practice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H., Krechevsky, M., Sternberg, R. J., & Okagaki, L. (1994). Intelligence in context: Enhancing students’ practical intelligence for school. In McGilly, K. (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp.105127). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1974). Fact, fiction, and forecast. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. (2003a). Discussion: On Sternberg’s “Reply to Gottfredson.” Intelligence, 31(4), 415424.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. (2003b). Dissecting practical intelligence theory: Its claims and evidence. Intelligence, 31(4), 343397.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L., Geissler, P. W., Prince, R., Okatcha, F., Nokes, C., Kenny, D. A., Bundy, D. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). The organization of Luo conceptions of intelligence: A study of implicit theories in a Kenyan village. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25(4), 367378.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L., Jarvin, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2002). School-based tests of the triarchic theory of intelligence: Three settings, three samples, three syllabi. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 167208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L., Meier, E., Lipka, J., Mohatt, G., Yanez, E., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Academic and practical intelligence: A case study of the Yup’ik in Alaska. Learning and Individual Differences, 14, 183207.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Dynamic testing. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 75111.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Analytical, creative, and practical intelligence as predictors of self-reported adaptive functioning: A case study in Russia. Intelligence, 29, 5773.Google Scholar
Guthke, J. (1993). Current trends in theories and assessment of intelligence. In Hamers, J. H. M., Sijtsma, K., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (Eds.), Learning potential assessment (pp. 1320). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Guyote, M. J., & Sternberg, R. J. (1981). A transitive-chain theory of syllogistic reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 461525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haywood, H. C., & Tzuriel, D. (1992). Epilogue: The status and future of interactive assessment. In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 3863). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hedlund, J., Forsythe, G. B., Horvath, J. A., Williams, W. M., Snook, S., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Identifying and assessing tacit knowledge: Understanding the practical intelligence of military leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 117140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, M. J., Davidson, J. W., & Sloboda, J. A (1998). Innate talents: Reality or myth? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 21, 399442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
“Intelligence and its measurement”: A symposium (1921). Journal of Educational Psychology, 12, 123147, 195216, 271275.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwood.Google Scholar
Lidz, C. S. (Ed.). (1987). Dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Lidz, C. S. (1991). Practitioner’s guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). An investment approach to creativity: Theory and data. In Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (Eds.), The creative cognition approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Okagaki, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1993). Parental beliefs and children’s school performance. Child Development, 64(1), 3656.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 201293.Google Scholar
Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1980a). Representation and process in linear syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 119159.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1980b). Sketch of a componential subtheory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 573584.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1981). Intelligence and nonentrenchment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 116.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Natural, unnatural, and supernatural concepts. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 451488.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1983). Components of human intelligence. Cognition, 15, 148.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1984). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 269287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1985a). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1985b). Human abilities: An information-processing approach. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1985c). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 607627.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Inside intelligence. American Scientist, 74, 137143.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1987a). Most vocabulary is learned from context. In McKeown, M. G. & Curtis, M. E. (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 89105). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1987b). The psychology of verbal comprehension. In Glaser, R. (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 97151). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1988). The triarchic mind. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1990a). Metaphors of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1990b). Understanding wisdom. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp. 39). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1993). Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test. Unpublished test.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1995). In search of the human mind. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace College.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). What does it mean to be smart? Educational Leadership, 54(6), 2024.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1998a). Abilities are forms of developing expertise. Educational Researcher, 27, 1120.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1998b). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2, 347365.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1999a). Intelligence as developing expertise. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 359375.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1999b). A propulsion model of types of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3, 83100.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1999c). Successful intelligence: Finding a balance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 436442.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2000). Handbook of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educational Psychologist, 36(4), 227245.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2003a). The anatomy of impact: What has made the great works of psychology great? (pp. 223228). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2003b). Psychologists defying the crowd: Stories of those who battled the establishment and won. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2003c). WICS: A theory of wisdom, intelligence, and creativity, synthesized. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Culture and intelligence. American Psychologist, 59(5), 325338.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The theory of successful intelligence. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 39(2), 189202.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Culture, instruction, and assessment. Comparative Education, 43(1), 522.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2008). Schools should nurture wisdom. In Presseisen, B. Z. (Ed.), Teaching for intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 6188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2009). The Rainbow and Kaleidoscope projects: A new psychological approach to undergraduate admissions. European Psychologist, 14, 279287.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2010a). College admissions for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2010b). WICS: A new model for cognitive education. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 9, 3446.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2011). The theory of successful intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, S. B. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 504527). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2014). The development of adaptive competence. Developmental Review, 34, 208224.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2015a). Archaic testing and teaching in the United States: Why do they persist? In Feuer, M. J., Berman, A. I., & Atkinson, R. C. (Eds.), Past as prologue: The National Academy of Education at 50 (pp. 265269). Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2015b). Successful intelligence: A new model for testing intelligence beyond IQ tests. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 8, 7684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejeps.2015.09.004.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2016). What universities can be: A new model for preparing students for active concerned citizenship and ethical leadership. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2018a). A triangular theory of creativityPsychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12, 5067.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2018b). The triarchic theory of successful intelligence. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (in press). Adaptive intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Bonney, C. R., Gabora, L., & Merrifield, M. (2012). WICS: A model for college and university admissions. Educational Psychologist, 47(1), 3041.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Castejón, J. L., Prieto, M. D., Hautamäki, J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sternberg triarchic abilities test in three international samples: An empirical test of the triarchic theory of intelligence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(1), 116.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1995). The triarchic model applied to identifying, teaching, and assessing gifted children. Roeper Review, 17(4), 255260.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Coffin, L. A. (2010). Admitting and developing “new leaders for a changing world.” New England Journal of Higher Education, Winter, 24, 1213.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Detterman, D. K. (Eds.). (1986). What is intelligence? Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Ferrari, M., Clinkenbeard, P. R., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1996). Identification, instruction, and assessment of gifted children: A construct validation of a triarchic model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(3), 129137.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Forsythe, G. B., Hedlund, J., Horvath, J., Snook, S., Williams, W. M., Wagner, R. K., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2000). Practical intelligence in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Gardner, M. K. (1982). A componential interpretation of the general factor in human intelligence. In Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), A model for intelligence (pp. 231254). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Gardner, M. K. (1983). Unities in inductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 80116.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Gastel, J. (1989a). Coping with novelty in human intelligence: An empirical investigation. Intelligence, 13, 187197.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Gastel, J. (1989b). If dancers ate their shoes: Inductive reasoning with factual and counterfactual premises. Memory and Cognition, 17, 110.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). The cognitive costs of physical and mental ill health: Applying the psychology of the developed world to the problems of the developing world. Eye on Psi Chi, 2(1), 2027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2007). Teaching for successful intelligence (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002a). Dynamic testing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds.). (2002b). The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., Ferrari, M., & Clinkenbeard, P. (1999). A triarchic analysis of an aptitude-treatment interaction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15(1), 111.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Kidd, K. K. (2005). Intelligence, race, and genetics. American Psychologist, 60(1), 4659.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Zhang, L.-F. (2008). Styles of learning and thinking matter in instruction and assessment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6), 486506.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., Ngrosho, D., Tantufuye, E., Mbise, A., Nokes, C., Jukes, M., & Bundy, D. A. (2002). Assessing intellectual potential in rural Tanzanian school children. Intelligence, 30, 141162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Hagen, E. S. (2018). Wisdom. In Bornstein, M. (Ed.), Sage encyclopedia of lifespan human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Hagen, E. S. (2019). Teaching for wisdom. In Sternberg, R. J. & Glueck, J. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 372406). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Hedlund, J. (2002). Practical intelligence, g, and work psychology. Human Performance, 15(1/2), 143160.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(6), 917.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Jarvin, L., Birney, D., Naples, A., Stemler, S., Newman, T., Otterbach, R., Randi, J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2014). Testing the theory of successful intelligence in teaching grade 4 language arts, mathematics, and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 881899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Jarvin, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2009). Teaching for wisdom, intelligence, creativity, and success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Kalmar, D.A. (1997). When will the milk spoil? Everyday induction in human intelligence. Intelligence, 25(3), 185203.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, S. B. (Eds.) (2011). Cambridge handbook of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34(1), 131.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677688.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Nigro, G. (1980). Developmental patterns in the solution of verbal analogies. Child Development, 51, 2738.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Nokes, K., Geissler, P. W., Prince, R., Okatcha, F., Bundy, D. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). The relationship between academic and practical intelligence: A case study in Kenya. Intelligence, 29, 401418.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Okagaki, L., & Jackson, A. (1990). Practical intelligence for success in school. Educational Leadership, 48, 3539.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Powell, J. S. (1983). Comprehending verbal comprehension. American Psychologist, 38, 878893.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Powell, J. S., & Kaye, D. B. (1983). Teaching vocabulary-building skills: A contextual approach. In Wilkinson, A. C. (Ed.), Classroom computers and cognitive science (pp. 121143). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Pretz, J. E. (Eds.). (2005). Cognition and intelligence: Identifying the mechanisms of the mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & The Rainbow Project Collaborators. (2006). The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical and creative skills. Intelligence, 34(4), 321350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Rifkin, B. (1979). The development of analogical reasoning processes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 195232.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Smith, C. (1985). Social intelligence and decoding skills in nonverbal communication. Social Cognition, 2, 168192.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2017). Measuring scientific reasoning for graduate admissions in psychology and related disciplines. Journal of Intelligence, www.mdpi.com/2079–3200/5/3/29/pdf.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Sternberg, K., & Todhunter, R. J. E. (2017). Measuring reasoning about teaching for graduate admissions in psychology and related disciplines. Journal of Intelligencewww.mdpi.com/2079–3200/5/4/34/pdf.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Torff, B., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1998a). Teaching for successful intelligence raises school achievement. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 667669.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Torff, B., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1998b). Teaching triarchically improves school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 374384.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Turner, M. E. (1981). Components of syllogistic reasoning. Acta Psychologica, 47, 245265.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (1993). The g–ocentric view of intelligence and job performance is wrong. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(1), 14.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., & Okagaki, L. (1993). Practical intelligence: The nature and role of tacit knowledge in work and at school. In Reese, H. & Puckett, J. (Eds.), Advances in lifespan development (pp. 205227). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., Williams, W. M., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). Testing common sense. American Psychologist, 50(11), 912927.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1997). Does the graduate record examination predict meaningful success in the graduate training of psychologists? A case study. American Psychologist, 52, 630641.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (2010). Educational psychology (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Tetewsky, S. J., & Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Conceptual and lexical determinants of nonentrenched thinking. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 202225.Google Scholar
Tzuriel, D. (1995). Dynamic-interactive assessment: The legacy of L. S. Vygotsky and current developments. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Vernon, P. E. (1971). The structure of human abilities. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. K. (1987). Tacit knowledge in everyday intelligent behavior. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 52(6), 12361247.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Tacit knowledge and intelligence in the everyday world. In Sternberg, R. J. & Wagner, R. K. (Eds.), Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world (pp. 5183). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, W. M., Blythe, T., White, N., Li, J., Sternberg, R. J., & Gardner, H. I. (1996). Practical intelligence for school: A handbook for teachers of grades 5–8. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Williams, W. M., Blythe, T., White, N., Li, J., Gardner, H., & Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Practical intelligence for school: Developing metacognitive sources of achievement in adolescence. Developmental Review, 22(2), 162210.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Thinking styles, abilities, and academic achievement among Hong Kong University students. Hong Kong Educational Research Association Educational Research Journal, 13, 4162.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×