Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:07:34.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Sex Differences in Intelligence

from Part III - Intelligence and Group Differences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2019

By
Diane F. Halpern  and
Jonathan Wai
Edited by
Robert J. Sternberg
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

The ways in which women and men differ in intelligence and specific cognitive abilities are among psychology’s most heated controversies. Massive amounts of data show that although there are some on average differences in specific cognitive abilities, there is considerable overlap in the male and female distributions. There are no sex differences in general intelligence – standardized IQ tests were written to show no differences, and separate assessments that were not written with this criterion show no differences in general intelligence. There are more males in some categories of mental disability that are genetically linked, but there are no genetic explanations for differential achievement at the high end of the distributions. Average between-sex differences on specific cognitive abilities – notably reading and writing (female advantage) and some mathematical and visuospatial abilities (male advantage) – often show considerable cross-cultural variation in effect size. Additionally, there have been changes over time so that any conclusions about this controversial topic that we make today may need to be revised in the future.

Keywords

cognitive sex differencescoeducational schoolingsex differences in intelligenceverbal abilitiesmathematical abilitiesvisuospatial abilitiesdevelopmental sex difference
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence , pp. 317 - 345
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, L. L. (Ed.) (1993). International handbook on gender roles. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W., Vernon, P. E., & Lindzey, G. (1970). Manual for the study of values (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
American Association of University Women. (1992). The AAUW report: How schools shortchange girls. New York: Marlowe.Google Scholar
Arden, R., & Plomin, R. (2006). Sex differences in variance of intelligence across childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 39–48.Google Scholar
Baker, D. P., & Jones, D. P. (1992). Opportunity and performance: A sociological explanation for gender differences in academic mathematics. In Wrigley, J. (Ed.), Education and gender equality (pp. 193–206). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Bakhiet, S. F. A., & Lynn, R. (2015). Sex differences on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – III in Bahrain and the United States. Psychological Reports, 117, 794–798.Google Scholar
Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science, 222, 1029–1030.Google Scholar
Berenbaum, S. A., Bryk, K. K., & Beltz, A. M. (2012). Early androgen effects on spatial and mechanical abilities: Evidence from congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Behavioral Neuroscience, 126, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026652Google Scholar
Berenbaum, S. A., Korman, K., & Leveroni, C. (1995). Early hormones and sex differences in cognitive abilities. Special issue, Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 303–321.Google Scholar
Bjornholm, L., Nikkinen, J., Kiviniemi, V., Nordstrom, T., Niemela, S., Drakesmith, M., et al. (2017). Structural properties of the human corpus callosum: Multimodal assessment and sex differences. Neuroimage, 152, 108–118.Google Scholar
Blackburn, C. C. (2004). Developing exceptional talent: Descriptive characteristics of highly precocious mathematical and verbal reasoners. Paper presented at the Seventh Biennial Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development, University of Iowa, Iowa City, May.Google Scholar
Blair, C., Granger, D., & Razzam, R. P. (2005). Cortisol reactivity is positively related to executive function in preschool children attending Head Start. Child Development, 76, 554–567.Google Scholar
Blair, I. V., & Banaji, M. R. (1996). Automatic controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1142–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, K. V. N., Christensen, D., Doernberg, N., Schieve, L., Rice, C., Wiggins, L., et al. (2015). Trends in the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, hearing loss, intellectual disability, and vision impairment, Metropolitan Atlanta, 1991–2010. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124120Google Scholar
Brody, N. (1992). Intelligence (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1995). Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. American Psychologist, 50, 164–168.Google Scholar
Cahill, L. (Ed.) (2017). An issue whose time has come: Sex/gender influence on nervous system function. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95, 1–791.Google Scholar
Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 924–976.Google Scholar
Cherney, I. D. (2008). Mom, let me play more computer games: They improve my mental rotation skills. Sex Roles, 59, 776–786.Google Scholar
Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049/fullGoogle Scholar
Collaer, M. L., & Hines, M. (1995). Human behavioral sex differences: A role for gonadal hormones during early development? Psychological Bulletin, 118, 55–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
College Board. (2015). 2015 college-bound seniors: Total group profile report. media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/sat/total-group-2015.pdfGoogle Scholar
Colom, R., Juan-Espinosa, M., Abad, F., & García, L. F. (2000). Negligible sex differences in general intelligence. Intelligence, 28, 57–68.Google Scholar
Corbett, C., Hill, C., & St. Rose, A. (2008). Where the girls are: The facts about gender equity in education. Washington: American Association of University Women.Google Scholar
Davies, A. P. C., & Sheckelford, T. K. (2006). An evolutionary psychological perspective on gender similarities and differences. American Psychologist, 61, 641–642.Google Scholar
Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276–287.Google Scholar
Dickens, W. T., & Flynn, J. R. (2001). Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: The IQ paradox. Psychological Review, 108, 346–369.Google Scholar
Doyle, R. A., & Voyer, D. (2016). Stereotype manipulation effects on math and spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 103–116.Google Scholar
Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumontheil, I. (2016). Adolescent brain development. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dykiert, D., Gale, C. R., & Deary, I. J. (2008). Are apparent sex differences in mean IQ scores created in part by sample restriction and increased male variance? Intelligence, 37, 42–47.Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135–172.Google Scholar
Else-Quest, N. M., & Grabe, S. (2012). The political is personal: Measurement and application of national-level indicators of gender equity in psychological research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 131–144.Google Scholar
Feng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18, 850–855.Google Scholar
Fine, C. (2017). Testosterone rex: Myths of sex, science, and society. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Flore, P. C., & Wicherts, J. M. (2015). Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 53, 25–44.Google Scholar
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Girls and mathematics – A “hopeless” issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 497–514.Google Scholar
Frick, A., & Mohring, W. (2013). Mental object rotation and motor development in 8- and 10-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 708–720.Google Scholar
Ganley, C. M., Mingle, L. A., Ryan, A. M., Ryan, K., Vasilyeva, M., & Perry, M. (2013). An examination of stereotype threat effects on girls’ mathematics performance. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1886–1897.Google Scholar
Geary, D. C. (1996). Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 229–284.Google Scholar
Geary, D. C. (2007). Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology. In Carlson, J. S. & Levin, J. R. (Eds.), Educating the evolved mind (pp. 1–100). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
Geary, D. C. (2017). Evolutionary framework for identifying sex- and species-specific vulnerabilities in brain development and functions. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95, 355–361.Google Scholar
Geiser, C., Lehmann, W., & Eid, M. (2008). A note on sex differences in mental rotation in different age groups. Intelligence, 36, 556–563.Google Scholar
Gerstorf, D., Herlitz, A., & Smith, J. (2006). Stability of sex differences in cognition in advanced old age: The role of education and attrition. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61, 245–249.Google Scholar
Giedd, J. N., Castellanos, F. X., Rajapakse, J. C., Vaituzis, A. C., & Rapoport, J. L. (1997). Sexual dimorphism of the developing human brain. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 21, 1185–1901.Google Scholar
Grau, S. L., & Zotos, Y. C. (2016). Gender stereotypes in advertising: A review of current research. International Journal of Marketing, 35, 761–770.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.Google Scholar
Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Culture, gender, and math. Science, 320, 1164–1165.Google Scholar
Haier, R. J., Jung, R. E., Yeo, R. A., Head, K., & Alkire, M. T. (2005). The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: Sex matters. NeuroImage, 25, 320–327.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F. (2011). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C., Geary, D., Gur, D., Hyde, J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex-differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1–52.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F., Eliot, L., Bigler, R. S., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., Hyde, J., et al. (2011). The pseudoscience of single-sex schooling. Science, 333, 1706–1707.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F., & Tan, U. (2001). Stereotypes and steroids: Using a psychobiosocial model to understand cognitive sex differences. Brain and Cognition, 45, 392–414.Google Scholar
Hampson, E. (1990). Estrogen-related variations in human spatial and articulatory-motor skills. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 15, 97–111.Google Scholar
Hampson, E., & Kimura, D. (1988). Reciprocal effects of hormonal fluctuations on human motor and perceptual-spatial skills. Behavioral Neuroscience, 102, 456–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, A. R., Pahlke, E. E., & Bigler, R. S. (2011). The efficacy of single-sex education: Testing for selection and peer quality effects. Sex Roles, 65, 693–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heil, M., & Jansen-Osmann, P. (2008). Gender differences in math and mental rotation accuracy but not in mental rotation speed in 8-years-old children. International Journal of Developmental Science, 2, 190–196.Google Scholar
Herlitz, A., Reuterskiöld, L., Lovén, J., Thilers, P. P., & Rehnman, J. (2013). Cognitive sex differences are not magnified as a function of age, sex hormones, or puberty development during early adolescence. Developmental Neuropsychology, 38, 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2012.759580Google Scholar
Hunt, E., & Madhyastha, T. (2008). Recruitment modeling: An analysis and an application to the study of male-female differences in intelligence. Intelligence, 36, 653–663.Google Scholar
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarity hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.Google Scholar
Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 373–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494–495.Google Scholar
Imperato-McGinley, J., Pichardo, M., Gautier, T., Voyer, D., & Bryden, M. P. (1991). Cognitive abilities in androgen insensitive subjects – Comparison with control males and females from the same kindred. Clinical Endocrinology, 34, 341–347.Google Scholar
Innocenti, G. M. (1994). Some new trends in the study of the corpus callosum. Behavioral and Brain Research, 64, 1–8.Google Scholar
Irwing, P., & Lynn, R. (2005). Intelligence: Is there a difference in IQ scores? Nature, 438, 31–32.Google Scholar
Jancke, L., & Steinmetz, H. (1994). Interhemispheric-transfer time and corpus callosum size. Neuroreport, 5, 2385–2388.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Joel, D., Berman, Z., Tavor, I., Wexler, N., Gaber, O., Stein, Y., et al. (2015). Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 15468–15473.Google Scholar
Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J. (2006). Sex differences in mental abilities: g masks the dimensions on which they lie. Intelligence, 35, 23–59.Google Scholar
Johnson, W., Carothers, A., & Deary, I. J. (2008). Sex differences in variability in general intelligence: A new look at an old question. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 518–531.Google Scholar
Johnson, W., Carothers, A., & Deary, I. J. (2009). A role for the X chromosome in sex differences in variability in general intelligence? Perspectives in Psychological Science, 4, 598–611.Google Scholar
Karpiak, C. P., Buchanan, J. P., Hosey, M., & Smith., A. (2007). University students from single-sex and coeducational high schools: Differences in majors and attitudes at a Catholic university. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 282–289.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B. (2007). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity? Intelligence, 35, 211–223.Google Scholar
Kiefer, A. K., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2007). Implicit stereotypes, gender identification, and math-related outcomes: A prospective study of female college students. Psychological Science, 18, 13–18.Google Scholar
Kimball, M. M. (1989). A new perspective on women’s mathematics achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 198–214.Google Scholar
Kotsopoulos, D., Zambrzycka, J., & Makosz, S. (2017). Gender differences in toddlers’ visual-spatial skills. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 19, 167–180.Google Scholar
Lakin, J. M. (2013). Sex differences in reasoning abilities: Surprising evidence that male-female ratios in the tails of the quantitative reasoning distribution have increased. Intelligence, 41, 263–274.Google Scholar
Lauermann, F., Tsai, Y., & Eccles, J. S. (2017). Math-related career aspirations and choices within Eccles et al.’s expectancy-value theory of achievement-related behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 53, 1540–1559.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, E. S., Janowsky, J., Chan, B. K., & Nelson, H. D. (2001). Hormone replacement therapy and cognition: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of American Medical Association, 285, 1489–1499.Google Scholar
Levine, S. C., Huttenlocher, J., Taylor, A., & Langrock, A. (1999). Early sex differences in spatial skill. Developmental Psychology, 35, 940–949.Google Scholar
Levy, R., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (2000). Segregation of working memory functions within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 23–32.Google Scholar
Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.Google Scholar
Lippa, R. A., Collaer, M. L., & Peters, M. (2010). Sex differences in mental rotation and line angle judgments are positively associated with gender equality and economic development across 53 nations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(4), 990–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9460-8Google Scholar
Locklear, M. N., Cohen, A. B., Jone, A., & Kritzer, M. F. (2016). Sex differences distinguish intracortical glutamate receptor-mediated regulation of extracellular dopamine levels in the prefrontal cortex of adult rats. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 599–610.Google Scholar
Loewen, J. W., Rosser, P., & Katzman, J. (1988). Gender bias in SAT items. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April 5–9.Google Scholar
Loring-Meier, S., & Halpern, D. F. (1999). Sex differences in visual-spatial working memory: Components of cognitive processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 464–471.Google Scholar
Lott, B., & Maluso, D. (1993). The social learning of gender. In Beall, A. E. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 99–123). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Low, L.-F., & Ansley, K. J. (2006). Hormone replacement therapy and cognitive performance in postmenopausal women – a review by cognitive domain. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 66–84.Google Scholar
Lubinski, D., Schmidt, D. B., & Benbow, C. P. (1996). A 20-year stability analysis of the Study of Values for intellectually gifted individuals from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 443–451.Google Scholar
Luine, V. N. (2008). Sex steroids and cognitive function. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 20, 866–872.Google Scholar
Lutchamaya, S., Baron-Cohen, S., & Raggatt, P. (2002). Foetal testosterone and vocabulary size in 18- and 24-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 24, 418–424.Google Scholar
Maguire, E. A., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (1997). Recalling routes around London: Activation of the right hippocampus in taxi drivers. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 7103–7110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., Ashburner, C. D., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 97, 4398–4403.Google Scholar
Maitland, S. B., Intrieri, R. C., Schaie, K. W., & Willis, S. L. (2000). Gender differences and changes in cognitive abilities across the adult life span. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 7, 32–53.Google Scholar
Makel, M. C., Wai, J., Peairs, K. F., & Putallaz, M. (2016). Sex differences in the right tail of cognitive abilities: An update and cross cultural extension. Intelligence, 59, 8–15.Google Scholar
Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2014). Reducing adolescent girls’ concerns about STEM stereotypes: When do female teachers matter? International Review of Social Psychology, 27, 79–102.Google Scholar
McCarrey, A. C., An, Y., Kitner-Triolo, M. H., Ferrucci, L., & Resnick, S. M. (2016). Sex differences in cognitive trajectories in clinically normal older adults. Psychology and Aging, 31, 166–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, D. I., Eagly, A. H., & Linn, M. C. (2015). Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 631–644.Google Scholar
Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2012). Can spatial training improve long-term outcomes for gifted STEM undergraduates? Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 141–152.Google Scholar
Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2014). The new science of cognitive sex differences. Trends in Cognitive Science, 18, 37–45.Google Scholar
Moore, D. S., & Johnson, S. P. (2008). Mental rotation in human infants: A sex difference. Psychological Science, 19, 1063–1066.Google Scholar
Moore, D. S., & Johnson, S. P. (2011). Mental rotation of dynamic, three-dimensional stimuli by 3-month-old infants. Infancy, 16, 435–445.Google Scholar
Mueller, S. C., Temple, V., Oh, E., VanRyzin, C., Williams, A., Cornwell, B., et al. (2008). Early androgen exposure modulates spatial cognition in congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 33, 973–980.Google Scholar
National Science Board. (2010). Preparing the next generation of STEM innovators: Identifying and developing our nation’s human capital. www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2010/nsb1033.pdfGoogle Scholar
National Science Foundation. (2014). STEM education data and trends 2014. How do US 15-year-olds compare with students from other countries in math and science? www.nsf.gov/nsb/sei/edTool/data/highschool-08.htmlGoogle Scholar
Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Linder, N. M., Devos, T. A., Thierry, A., et al. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 106, 10593–10597.Google Scholar
Nyborg, H. (2005). Sex-related differences in general intelligence g, brain size, and social status. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 497–509.Google Scholar
Pahlke, E., Hyde, J. S., & Allison, C. M. (2014). The effects of single-sex compared with coeducational schooling on students’ performance and attitudes: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1042–1072.Google Scholar
Paus, T., Wong, A. P-Y., Syme, C., & Pausova, Z. (2017). Sex differences in the adolescent brain and body: Findings from the Saguenay youth study. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95, 362–370.Google Scholar
Perry, M. J. (2015). 2015 SAT test results confirm pattern that’s persisted for 40+ years – high school boys are better at math than girls. AEIdeas. www.aei.org/publication/2015-sat-test-results-confirm-pattern-thats-persisted-for-40-years-high-school-boys-are-better-at-math-than-girlsGoogle Scholar
Posner, M. I., & Raichle, M. E. (1994). Images of mind. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Puts, D. A., McDaniel, M. A., Jordan, C. L., & Breedlove, S. M. (2008). Spatial ability and prenatal androgens: Meta-analyses of congenital adrenal hyperplasia and digit ratio (2D:4D) studies. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 100–111.Google Scholar
Quinn, P. C., & Liben, L. S. (2008). A sex difference in mental rotation in young infants. Psychological Science, 19, 1067–1070.Google Scholar
Quinn, P. C., & Liben, L. S. (2014). A sex difference in mental rotation in infants: Convergent evidence. Infancy, 19, 103–116.Google Scholar
Rampey, B. D., Dion, G. S., & Donahue, P. L. (2009). NAEP trends in academic progress (NCES 2009–479). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, Washington.Google Scholar
Reynolds, M. R., Scheiber, C., Hajovsky, D. B., Schwartz, B., & Kaufman, A. S. (2015). Gender differences in academic achievement: Is writing an exception to the gender similarities hypothesis? Journal of Genetic Psychology, 176, 211–234.Google Scholar
Ritchie, S. J., Cox, S. R., Shen, X., Lombardo, M. V., Reus, L. M., Alloza, C., et al. (2018). Sex differences in the adult human brain: Evidence from 5,216 UK Biobank participants. Cerebral Cortex, 28(8), 2959–2975.Google Scholar
Ritchie, S. J., Tucker-Drob, E. M., Cox, S. R., Corley, J., Dykiert, D., Redmond, P., et al. (2016). Predictors of ageing-related decline across multiple cognitive functions. Intelligence, 59, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.08.007Google Scholar
Ruigrok, A. N. V., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Lai, M-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Lombardo, M. V., Tait, R. J., & Suckling, J. (2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 39, 34–50.Google Scholar
Ryan, J., Carriere, I., Scali, J., Ritchie, K., & Ancelin, M-L. (2009). Life-time estrogen exposure and cognitive functioning in later life. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 287–298.Google Scholar
Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1995). Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, 185–211.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 162–173.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., Realo, A., Voracek, M., & Allik, J. (2015). Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168.Google Scholar
Schwarzer, G., Freitag, C., Buckel, R., & Lofruthe, A. (2013). Crawling is associated with mental rotation ability by 9-month-old infants. Infancy, 18, 432–441.Google Scholar
Sherwin, B. (2003). Estrogen and cognitive functioning in women. Endocrine Reviews, 24, 133–151.Google Scholar
Shipstead, Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2012). Is working memory training effective? Psychological Bulletin, 138, 628–654.Google Scholar
Simonsen, H. G., Kristoffersen, K. E., Bleses, D., Wehberg, S., & Jørgensen, R. N. (2014). The Norwegian Communicative Development Inventories: Reliability, main developmental trends and gender differences. First Language, 34(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723713510997Google Scholar
Skuse, D. (2005). X-linked genes and mental functioning. Human Molecular Genetics, 14, R27–R32.Google Scholar
Snow, P. J. (2016). The structural and functional organization of cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00501Google Scholar
Snyder, T. D., Dillow, S. A., & Hoffman, C. M. (2009). Digest of Education Statistics 2008 (NCES 2009–020). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Educational Sciences, US Department of Education, Washington.Google Scholar
Sommers, C. H. (2000). The war against boys. The Atlantic. www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2000/05/the-war-against-boys/304659Google Scholar
Sorby, S. J., & Baartmans, B. J. (1996). The development and assessment of a course for enhancing the 3-D spatial visualization skills of first year engineering students. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 60, 13–20.Google Scholar
Spaak, E., Watanabe, K., Funahashi, S., & Stokes, M. G. (2017). Stable and dynamic coding for working memory in primate prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 6503–6516.Google Scholar
Spelke, E. S. (2005). Sex difference in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? A critical review. American Psychologist, 60, 950–958.Google Scholar
Spinath, F. M., Spinath, B., & Plomin, R. (2008). The nature and nurture of intelligence and motivation in the origins of sex differences in elementary school achievement. European Journal of Personality, 22, 211–229.Google Scholar
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.Google Scholar
Steele, J. R., & Ambady, N. (2006). “Math is hard!” The effect of gender priming on women’s attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 428–436. http://dx.doi.org.ccl.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.06.003Google Scholar
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.Google Scholar
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2012). Can stereotype threat explain the gender gap in mathematics performance and achievement? Review of General Psychology, 16, 93–102.Google Scholar
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2013). Sex differences in mathematics and reading achievement are inversely related: Within and across-nation assessment of 10 years of PISA data. PLoS One, 8, e57988.Google Scholar
Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859–884.Google Scholar
Tan, A., Ma, W., Vira, A., Marwha, D., & Eliot, L. (2016). The human hippocampus is not sexually-dimorphic: Meta-analysis of structural MRI volumes. Neuroimage, 124(Part A). 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimageGoogle Scholar
Tapp, A. L., Maybery, M. T., & Whitehouse, A. O. (2011). Evaluating the twin testosterone transfer hypothesis: A review of the empirical evidence. Hormones and Behavior, 60, 713–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terlecki, M. S. (2005). The effects of long-term practice and training on mental rotation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 65(10–B), 5434.Google Scholar
Torres, A., Gómez-Gil, E., Vidal, A., Puig, O., Boget, T., & Salamero, M. (2006). Gender differences in cognitive functions and the influence of sex hormones. Actas Españolas de Psyiquiatria, 34, 408–415.Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E., & Halpern, D. F. (2009). Sex differences in variability for cognitive measures: Do the ends justify the genes? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 612–614.Google Scholar
United Nations Human Rights. (2014). The harms of gender stereotyping. www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/GenderStereotyping.aspxGoogle Scholar
US Department of Education. (1997). National assessment of educational progress (Indicator 32: Writing Proficiency; prepared by the Educational Testing Service). Washington: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
US Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Research. (2005). Single-sex versus coeducational schooling: A systematic review. Washington: Author.Google Scholar
US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). The Condition of Education 2017 (NCES 2017–144). https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017144.pdfGoogle Scholar
Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., et al. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 352–402.Google Scholar
Viner, K. (1994). Live Issues. Cosmopolitan, p. 105.Google Scholar
Voyer, D., & Voyer, S. D. (2014). Gender differences in scholastic achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1174–1204.Google Scholar
Voyer, D., Voyer, S. D., & Saint-Aubin, J. (2016). Sex differences in visual-spatial working memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24, 307–334.Google Scholar
Wai, J., Cacchio, M., Putallaz, M., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Sex differences in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 30-year examination. Intelligence, 38, 412–423.Google Scholar
Wai, J., Makel, M. C., & Hodges, J. (2018). Sex differences in ability tilt in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 35-year examination. Intelligence, 67, 76–83.Google Scholar
Weaver, J. (2014). How brain circuits adapt to changes in sensory experience. PLoS Biol, 12, e1001802.Google Scholar
Williams, W. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2014). National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 5360–5365.Google Scholar
Willingham, W. W., & Cole, N. S. (1997). Gender and fair assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Yeap, B. B. (2014). Hormonal changes and their impact on cognition and mental health of ageing men. Maturitas, 79, 227–235.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×