Interface of Intercultural Pragmatics and Related Disciplines

Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, trans. V. W. Mc Gee, ed. Emerson, C. and Holquist, M.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1957) Mythologies. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1968) Elements of Semiology. London: Cape.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1981) Theory of the text. In Young, R., ed., Untying the Text. London: Routledge, pp. 31–47.Google Scholar

Birdwhistell, R. L. (1952). Introduction to Kinesics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Ann Arbor Press.Google Scholar

Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and Context: Essays on Body Motion Communication. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Black, M. (1962). Models and Metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bloomfield, L. (1933) Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar

Bühler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1942). Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, E. and Avieli, N. (2003). Food in tourism: Attraction and impediment. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(4), 755–778.Google Scholar

Cooren, F. (2008). Between semiotics and pragmatics: Opening language studies to textual agency. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), 1–16.CrossRef Google Scholar

Danesi, M. (1994). Cool: The Signs and Meanings of Adolescence. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Danesi, M. (2017). Conceptual Fluency Theory and the Teaching of Foreign Languages. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar

Danesi, M. (2020). The Quest for Meaning: A Guide to Semiotic Theory and Practice, 2nd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Danesi, M. and Rocci, A. (2009). Global Linguistics: An Introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef Google Scholar

Derks, L. and Hollander, J. (1996). Essenties van NLP. Utrecht: Servire.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology, trans. G. C. Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Eco, U. (1983). The scandal of metaphor: Metaphorology and semiotics. Poetics Today, 4(2), 217–257.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1982). Methods for measuring facial action. In Scherer, K. R. and Ekman, P., eds., Handbook of Methods in Nonverbal Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 45–90.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1985). Telling Lies. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions Revealed. New York: Holt.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. (2003). Unmasking the Face. Cambridge, MA: Major Books.Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic.Google Scholar

Frye, N. (1981). The Great Code: The Bible and Literature. Toronto: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hall, E. T. (1959). The Silent Language. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar

Hall, E. T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Hasan, R. (2012). A view of pragmatics in a social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 5(3), 251–279.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hjelmslev, L. (1959). Essais linguistique. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar

Hodge, R. and Kress, G. (1988). Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Humboldt, W. von (1836). On Language: The Diversity of Human Language–Structure and Its Influence on the Mental Development of Mankind, trans. P. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jack, R. E., Garrod, O. G. B., Yu, H., Caldara, R. and Schyns, P. G. (2012). Facial expressions of emotion are not culturally universal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 109(19), 7241–7244.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T. A., ed., Style and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 34–45.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2014). Intercultural Pragmatics. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. and Assimakopoulos, S. (eds.) (2017). Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. and Horn, L. R. (2007). Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kluykanov, I. (2005). Principles of Intercultural Communication. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Korzybski, A. (1933). Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics. Brooklyn: Institute of General Semantics.Google Scholar

Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic.Google Scholar

Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A., eds., The Meaning of Meaning. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, Supplement 1.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). La pensée sauvage. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar

Ljunberg, C. (2003). Meeting the cultural other: Semiotic approaches to intercultural communication. Studies in Communication Sciences, 3(2): 59–77.Google Scholar

Lotman, Y. (1991). Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Merrell, F. (1997) Peirce, Signs, and Meaning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Morris, C. W. (1938). Foundations of the Theory of Signs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Morris, D. (1969). The Human Zoo. London: Cape.Google Scholar

Morris, D., Collett, P., Marsh, P., and O’Shaughnessy, M. (1979). Gestures: Their Origins and Distributions. London: Cape.Google Scholar

Parret, H. (1983). Semiotics and Pragmatics: An Evaluative Comparison of Conceptual Frameworks. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Paolucci, C. (2021). The distinction between semantics and pragmatics: The point of view of semiotics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 18(3), 293–307.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vols. I–VIII, ed. Hartshorne, C. and Weiss., P. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Richards, I. A. (1936). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar

Saussure, F. de (1916) Cours de linguistique générale, ed. Bally, C. and Sechehaye, A.. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar

Sebeok, T. A. and Danesi, M. (2000). The Forms of Meaning: Modeling Systems Theory and Semiotics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thellefsen, T. and Thellefsen, M. (2005). Pragmatic semiotics and knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 31(3), 177–187.Google Scholar

Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1936). Essaie d’une théorie des oppositions phonologiques. Journal de Psychologie, 33, 5–18.Google Scholar

Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality, ed. Carroll, J. B.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Allwood, J. (2000). An activity based approach to pragmatics. In Bunt, H. and Black, B., eds., Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue: Studies in Computational Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 47–80.Google Scholar

Arundale, R. (2010a). Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework and interactional achievement Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2078–2105.Google Scholar

Arundale, R. (2010b). Relating. In Locher, M. and Graham, S., eds., Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 137–165.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. [1962] (1975). How to Do Things with Words, 2nd ed., ed. Urmson, J. O. and Sbisà, M.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, P. (2017). Politeness and impoliteness. In Huang, Y., ed., Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 383–399.Google Scholar

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody, E., ed., Questions and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–311.Google Scholar

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chang, W. and Haugh, M. (2011). Evaluations of im/politeness of an intercultural apology. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(3), 411–442.Google Scholar

Chang, W. and Haugh, M. (2017). Intercultural communicative competence and emotion amongst second language learners of Chinese. In Kecskes, I. and Sun, C., eds., Key Issues in Chinese as a Second Language Research. London: Routledge, pp. 269–286.Google Scholar

Cialdini, R., Reno, R., and Kallgren, C. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026.Google Scholar

Culpeper, J. (2008). Reflections on impoliteness, relational work, and power. In Bousfield, D. and Locher, M., eds., Impoliteness in Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 17–44.Google Scholar

Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Culpeper, J. (2015). Geoffrey Leech: The pragmatics legacy. In Östman, J-O and Verschueren, J., eds., Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Culpeper, J. (2021). Sociopragmatics: Roots and definition. In Haugh, M., Kádár, D., and Terkourafi, M., eds., Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–29.Google Scholar

Culpeper, J. and Haugh, M. (2021). Sociopragmatics and (im)politeness. In Haugh, M., Kádár, D., and Terkourafi, M., eds., Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 315–339.Google Scholar

Culpeper, J., Haugh, M., and Kádár, D. (eds.) (2017). Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. Basingstoke: PalgraveGoogle Scholar

Davies, B. and Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63.Google Scholar

Debray, C. and Spencer-Oatey, H. (2019). “On the same page?” Marginalisation and positioning practices in intercultural teams. Journal of Pragmatics, 144, 15–28.Google Scholar

Deutsch, M. and Gerard, H. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636.Google Scholar

Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.) (1992). Rethinking Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eelen, G. (2001). A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fetzer, A. (2010). Contexts in context. In Tanskanen, S., Helasvuo, M., Johansson, M., and Raitaneimi, M., eds., Discourses in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–32Google Scholar

Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality: On “lingua franca” English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(2), 237–259.Google Scholar

Fisher, A. and Adams, K. (1994). Interpersonal Communication: Pragmatics of Human Relationships. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2010). A genre approach to the study of im-politeness. International Review of Pragmatics, 2(1), 46–94.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Giles, H. (2008). Communication accommodation theory. In Baxter, L. and Braithwaite, D., eds., Engaging Theories in Interpersonal Communication: Multiple Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 161–173.CrossRef Google Scholar

Giles, H. (ed.) (2016). Communication Accommodation Theory: Negotiating Personal Relationships and Social Identities across Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haugh, M. (2010). Intercultural impoliteness and the micro-macro issue. In Trosborg, A., ed., Pragmatics across Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Grutyer, pp. 139–166.Google Scholar

Haugh, M. (2012). Conversational interaction. In Allan, K. and Jaszczolt, K., eds., Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 251–273.Google Scholar

Haugh, M. (2017). Intercultural pragmatics. In Kim, Y, ed., International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar

Haugh, M. (2021). Discourse and politeness. In Hyland, K., Paltridge, B., and Wong, L., eds., The Companion to Discourse Analysis, 2nd ed. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 219–232.Google Scholar

Haugh, M. (2022). (Im)politeness in video-mediated first conversations amongst speakers of English as a lingua franca. In Walkinshaw, I., ed., Pragmatics of English as a Lingua Franca. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Haugh, M. and Kádár, D. (2017). Intercultural (im)politeness. In Culpeper, J., Haugh, M. and Kádár, D., eds., Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 601–632.Google Scholar

Haugh, M., Kádár, D., and Terkourafi, M. (2021a). Introduction: Directions in sociopragmatics. In Haugh, M., Kádár, D., and Terkourafi, M., eds., Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar

Haugh, M., Kádár, D., and Terkourafi, M. (eds.) (2021b). Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haugh, M. and Pillet-Shore, D. (forthcoming). First Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haugh, M. and Watanabe, Y. (2009). Analysing Japanese “face-in-interaction”: Insights from intercultural business meetings. In Bargiela-Chiappini, F. and Haugh, M., eds., Face, Communication and Social Interaction. London: Equinox, pp. 78–95.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. (2018a). Sociolinguistics vs pragmatics: Where does the boundary lie? In Ilie, C. and Norrick, N., eds., Pragmatics and Its Interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 11–32.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. (2018b). Negotiating the culture order in New Zealand workplaces. Language in Society, 47(1), 33–56.Google Scholar

Holmes, J., Marra, M., and Vine, B. (2012). Politeness and impoliteness in ethnic varieties of New Zealand English. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(9), 1063–1076.Google Scholar

House, J. (2008). (Im)politeness in English as lingua franca discourse. In Locher, M. and Strässler, J., eds., Standards and Norms in the English Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 351–66.Google Scholar

Huang, Y. (2017). Introduction: What is pragmatics. In Huang, Y., ed., Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar

Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Lerner, G., ed., Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–23.Google Scholar

Jenks, C. (2012). Doing being reprehensible: Some interactional features of English as a lingua franca in a chat room. Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 386–405.Google Scholar

Jenks, C. (2018). Uncooperative lingua franca encounters. In Jenkins, J., Baker, W., and Dewey, M., eds., Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. London: Routledge, pp. 279–291.Google Scholar

Jucker, A. and Staley, L. (2017). (Im)politeness and developments in methodology. In. Culpeper, M., Haugh, M., and Kádár, D., eds., Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 403–429.Google Scholar

Kádár, D. and Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kappa, K. (2016). Exploring solidarity and consensus in English as a lingua franca interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 95, 16–33.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2008). Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(3), 385–406.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2012). Sociopragmatics and cross-cultural and intercultural studies. In Allan, K. and Jasczcolt, K., eds., Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 599–616.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2013). Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2015a). Intracultural communication and intercultural communication: Are they different?” International Review of Pragmatics, 7(2), 171–194.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2015b). Intercultural impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, 43–47.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2017). Context-dependency and impoliteness in intercultural communication. Journal of Politeness Research, 13(1), 7–31.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2019a). The interplay of prior experience and actual situational context in intercultural first encounters. Pragmatics and Cognition, 26(1), 112–134.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2019b). English as a Lingua Franca: The Pragmatic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Konakahara, M. (2017). Interactional management of face-threatening acts in casual ELF conversation: An analysis of third-party complaint sequences. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 6(2), 313–343.Google Scholar

Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness; or, minding your p’s and q’s’. Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 13, 292–305.Google Scholar

Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leech, G. (1977). Language and Tact. Trier: University of Trier.Google Scholar

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. (1979). Activity types and language. Linguistics, 17(5/6), 365–399.Google Scholar

Linell, P. (2010). Communication activity types as organisations in discourse and discourses in organisation. In Tanskanen, S., Helasvuo, M., Johansson, M., and Raitaniemi, M., eds., Discourses in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 33–59.Google Scholar

Marmaridou, S. (2011). Pragmalinguistics and sociopragmatics. In Bublitz, W. and Norrick, N., eds., Foundations of Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 77–106.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Y. (2014). Collaborative co-construction of humorous interaction among ELF speakers. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 3(1), 81–107.Google Scholar

McConachy, T. and Spencer-Oatey, H. (2021). Cross-cultural and intercultural pragmatics. In Haugh, M., Kádár, D., and Terkourafi, M., eds., Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 733–757.Google Scholar

Mead, G. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mey, J. (2010). Societal pragmatics. In Cummings, L., ed., The Pragmatics Encyclopedia. London: Routledge, pp. 444–446.Google Scholar

Mills, S. (2003). Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In Winston, P. H., ed., The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 211–277.Google Scholar

Pullin Stark, P. (2009). No joke – This is serious!: Power, solidarity and humor in business English as a lingua franca (BELF). In Mauranen, A. and Ranta, E., eds., English as a Lingua Franca: Studies and Findings. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 152–177.Google Scholar

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schank, R. and Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095.Google Scholar

Sifianou, M. and Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2017). (Im)politeness and cultural variation. In Culpeper, J., Haugh, M., and Kádár, D., eds., Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 571–599.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. (1996). Reconsidering power and distance. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(1), 1–24.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007). Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(4), 639–656.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In Spencer-Oatey, H., ed., Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. London: Continuum, pp. 11–47.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2011). Conceptualising the “relational” in pragmatics: Insights from metapragmatic emotion and (im)politeness comments. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(14), 3565–3578.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2013). Relating at work: Facets, dialectics and face. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 121–137.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. and Kádár, D. (2021). Intercultural Politeness: Managing Relations across Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. and Wang, J. (2020). Establishing professional intercultural relations: Chinese perceptions of behavioural success in a Sino-American exchange visit. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 49(6), 499–519.Google Scholar

Svennevig, J. (1999). Getting Acquainted in Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Terkourafi, M. (2005a). Beyond the micro-level in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(2), 237–262.Google Scholar

Terkourafi, M. (2005b). Pragmatic correlates of frequency of use: The case for a notion of ‘minimal context’. In Marmaridou, S., Nikiforidou, K. and Antonopoulou, E., eds., Reviewing Linguistic Thought: Converging Trends for the 21st Century. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 209–233.Google Scholar

Terkourafi, M. (2019a). Im/politeness: A 21st century appraisal. Foreign Language and Foreign Language Teaching [外语与外语教学] (Dalian University of Foreign Languages), 2019 (6), 1–17.Google Scholar

Terkourafi, M. (2019b). Coming to grips with variation in sociocultural interpretations: Methodological considerations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 50(10), 1198–1215.Google Scholar

Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–112.Google Scholar

van Dijk, T. (2008). Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

ViMELF. (2018). Corpus of Video-Mediated English as a Lingua Franca Conversations. Birkenfeld: Trier University of Applied Sciences. http://umwelt-campus.de/case.Google Scholar

Walkinshaw, I. (2016). Teasing in informal contexts in English as an Asian lingua franca. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 5(2), 249–271.Google Scholar

Walkinshaw, I. and Kirkpatrick, A. (2014). Mutual face preservation among Asian speakers of English as a Lingua Franca. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 3(2), 269–291.Google Scholar

Walkinshaw, I. and Kirkpatrick, A. (2021). “We want fork but no pork”: (Im)politeness in humour by Asian users of English as a lingua franca and Australian English speakers. Contrastive Pragmatics, 2(1), 52–80.Google Scholar

Wang, J. and Spencer-Oatey, H. (2015). The gains and losses of face in ongoing intercultural interaction: A case study of Chinese participant perspectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 89, 50–65.Google Scholar

Weigand, E. (2009). Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Weigand, E. (2010). Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Weigand, E. (2021). Language and dialogue in philosophy and science. Intercultural Pragmatics, 18(4), 533–561.Google Scholar

Werkmann Horvat, A., Bolognesi, M., and Kohl, K. (2021). The status of conventional metaphorical meaning in the L2 lexicon. Intercultural Pragmatics, 18(4), 447–467.Google Scholar

Baker, W. (2015). Culture and Identity through English as a Lingua Franca: Rethinking Concepts and Goals in Intercultural Communication (Developments in English as a Lingua Franca, 8). Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Baker, W. (2018). English as a lingua franca and intercultural communication. In Jenkins, J., Baker, W., and Dewey, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 25–36.Google Scholar

Björkman, B. (2018). Morphosyntactic variation in spoken English as a Lingua Franca interactions: Revisiting linguistic variety. In Jenkins, J., Baker, W., and Dewey, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 255–267.Google Scholar

Blackledge, A. and Creese, A. (2008). Contesting “language” as “heritage”: Negotiation of identities in late modernity. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 533–554.Google Scholar

Blommaert, J. (2010). The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blommaert, J. (2013). Complexity, accent, and conviviality: Concluding comments. Applied Linguistics, 34(5), 613–622.Google Scholar

Brumfit, C. (1997). How applied linguistics is the same as any other science. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 86–94.Google Scholar

Chiaruttini, D. (2020). A study of cognitive-experiential practices for promoting ELF communicative competence in Italian ELT classrooms. Lingue e Linguaggi, 38, 387–406.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cogo, A. (2018). ELF and multilingualism. In Jenkins, J., Baker, W., and Dewey, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 357–368.Google Scholar

Cogo, A. (2021). ELF and translanguaging: Covert and overt resources in a transnational workplace. In Murata, K., ed., ELF Research Methods and Approaches to Data and Analyses: Theoretical and Methodological Underpinnings. London: Routledge, pp. 38–54.Google Scholar

Cogo, A. and Dewey, M. (2012). Analysing English as a Lingua Franca: A Corpus-Driven Investigation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Cogo, A. and House, J. (2018). The pragmatics of ELF. In Jenkins, J., Baker, W., and Dewey, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 210–223.Google Scholar

Dewey, M. (2011). Accommodative ELF talk and teacher knowledge. In Archibald, A., Cogo, A., and Jenkins, J., eds., Latest Trends in ELF Research. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, pp. 205–227.Google Scholar

Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics: 1934–1951. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Franceschi, V. (2017). Plurilingual resources as an asset in ELF business interactions. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 6(1), 57–81.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk (University of Pennsylvania Pubns in Conduct and Communication). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J., eds., Syntax and Semantics, Vol. III: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar

Guido, M. G. (2019). English as a Lingua Franca in Migrants’ Trauma Narratives. London: Palgrave Macmillan Limited.Google Scholar

Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gumperz, J. J. and Cook-Gumperz, J. (2007). Discourse, cultural diversity and communication: A linguistic anthropological perspective. In Kotthoff, H. and Spencer-Oatey, H., eds., Handbook of Intercultural Communication. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, pp. 13–29.Google Scholar

Hülmbauer, C. (2009). “We don’t take the right way. We just take the way that we think you will understand”: The shifting relationship between correctness and effectiveness in ELF. In Mauranen, A. and Ranta, E., eds., English as a Lingua Franca: Studies and Findings. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, pp. 323–347.Google Scholar

Hülmbauer, C. (2011). Speaking globally: Beyond boundaries with English as a Lingua Franca. In Roka, J., ed., Globalisation, Europeanization and Other Transnational Phenomena: Budapest College of Communication and Business, pp. 407–424.Google Scholar

Hülmbauer, C. and Seidlhofer, B. (2013). English as a Lingua Franca in European multilingualism. In Berthoud, A.-C., Grin, F., and Lüdi, G., eds., Exploring the Dynamics of Multilingualism: The DYLAN Project. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 387–406.Google Scholar

Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In Pride, J. and Holmes, J., eds., Sociolinguistics: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 269–293.Google Scholar

Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the Outer Circle. In Quirk, R. and Widdowson, H. G., eds., English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2013). Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2019). English as a Lingua Franca: The Pragmatic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. and Mey, J. (2008). Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer (Mouton Series in Pragmatics, 4). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. and Zhang, F. (2009). Activating, seeking, and creating common ground. Pragmatics and Cognition, 17(2), 331–355.Google Scholar

Kimura, D. and Canagarajah, S. (2018). Translingual practice and ELF. In Jenkins, J., Baker, W., and Dewey, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 295–308.Google Scholar

Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation / Jean Lave, Etienne Wenger. In Brown, J. S., Alto, X. P., Pea, R., Heath, C., Suchman, L. A., Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Le Page, R. B. and Tabouret-Keller, A. (1985). Acts of Identity: Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Li, W. (2016). New Chinglish and the post-multilingualism challenge: Translanguaging ELF in China. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 5(1), 1–25.Google Scholar

Li, W. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30.Google Scholar

Mortensen, J. (2017). Transient multilingual communities as a field of investigation: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 27(3), 271–288.Google Scholar

Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Niedzielski, N. A. and Preston, D. R. (2000). Folk Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Pitzl, M.-L. (2016). Investigating multilingual practices in BELF meetings with VOICE: A corpus linguistic case study with methodological considerations. Waseda Working Papers in ELF, 5, 15–40.Google Scholar

Pitzl, M.-L. (2018). Transient international groups (TIGs): Exploring the group and development dimension of ELF. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 7(1), 25–58.Google Scholar

Pitzl, M.-L. (2021). Tracing the emergence of situational multilingual practices in a BELF meeting: Micro-diachronic analysis and implications of corpus design. In Murata, K., ed., ELF Research Methods and Approaches to Data and Analyses: Theoretical and Methodological Underpinnings. London: Routledge, pp. 97–125.Google Scholar

Roberts, P. (2005). Spoken English as a world language: International and intranational settings. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar

Ruesch, J. and Bateson, G. (1951). Communication: The Social Matrix of Psychiatry. New York: The Norton library.Google Scholar

Saville-Troike, M. (2003). The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction, 3rd ed. Malden, MA: Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Searle, J. A. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, B. (2002). The shape of things to come? Some basic questions about English as a lingua franca. In Knapp, K. and Meierkord, C., eds., Lingua Franca Communication. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang, pp. 269–302.Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, B. (2009a). Orientations in ELF research: Form and function. In Mauranen, A. and Ranta, E., eds., English as a Lingua Franca: Studies and Findings. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, pp. 37–59.Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, B. (2009b). Accommodation and the idiom principle in English as a Lingua Franca. Intercultural Pragmatics, 6(2), 195–215.Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a Lingua Franca (Oxford Applied Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, B. (2017). English as a Lingua Franca and multilingualism. In Cenoz, J., Gorter, D., and May, S., eds., Language Awareness and Multilingualism. New York/Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 391–404.Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, B. (2020). Communication and community: An ELF perspective on critical contexts. Lingue e Linguaggi, 38, 25–41.Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, B. (2021). Researching ELF communication focus on high-stakes encounters. In Murata, K., ed., ELF Research Methods and Approaches to Data and Analyses: Theoretical and Methodological Underpinnings. London: Routledge, pp. 29–37.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation: Describing English Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tabouret-Keller, A. (1997). Language and Identity. In Coulmas, F., ed., The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 315–326.Google Scholar

VOICE (2013). The Vienna-Oxford International Corpus of English (version 2.0 online): Director: Barbara Seidlhofer; Researchers: Angelika Breiteneder, Theresa Klimpfinger, Stefan Majewski, Ruth Osimk-Teasdale, Marie-Luise Pitzl, Michael Radeka. https://voice.acdh.oeaw.ac.at (retrieved on December 29, 2020).Google Scholar

Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., and Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Widdowson, H. (1983). Learning Purpose and Language Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Widdowson, H. (2004). Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Widdowson, H. (2007). Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Widdowson, H. (2012). ELF and the inconvenience of established concepts. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 1, 5–26.Google Scholar

Widdowson, H. (2020a). On the Subject of English: The Linguistics of Language Use and Learning. Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Widdowson, H. (2020b). The elusive concept of culture. Lingue e Linguaggi, 38, 13–23.Google Scholar

Atkinson, D. (2004). Contrasting rhetorics/contrasting cultures: Why contrasting rhetoric needs a better conceptualization of culture. Journal of English for Academic Purposes [Special Issue on Contrastive Rhetoric in EAP], 3(4), 277–289.Google Scholar

Atkinson, D. and Matsuda, P. (2008). A conversation on contrastive rhetoric: Dwight Atkinson and Paul Kei Matsuda talk about issues, conceptualizations, and the future of contrastive rhetoric. In Connor, U., Nagelhout, E., and Rozycki, W., eds., Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 277–298.Google Scholar

Atkinson, D., Crusan, D., Matsuda, P., Ortmeier-Hooper, C., Ruecker, T., Simpson, S., and Tardy, C. (2015). Clarifying the relationship between L2 writing and translingual writing: An open letter to writing studies editors and organization leaders. College English, 77(4), 383–386.Google Scholar

Bazerman, C. and Prior, P. (eds.) (2003). What Writing Does and How It Does It: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Belcher, D. and Connor, U. (2001). Reflections on Multiliterate Lives. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Belcher, D. (2014). What we need and don’t need intercultural rhetoric for: A retrospective and prospective look at an evolving research area. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25, 59–67.Google Scholar

Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Blommaert, J. (1998). Different approaches to intercultural communication: A critical survey. Plenary lecture, Lernen und Arbeiten in einer international vernetzten und multikulturellen Gesellschaft, Expertentagung Universität Bremen, Institut fur Projektmanagement und Witschaftsingformatik (IPMI), February 27–28.Google Scholar

Canagarajah, S. (2007). Lingua franca English, multilingual communities, and language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 923–939.Google Scholar

Canagarajah, S. (2008), Language shift and the family: Questions from the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12, 143–176.Google Scholar

Canagarajah, S. (2013). From intercultural rhetoric to cosmopolitan practice: Addressing new challenges in lingua franca English. In Belcher, D. and Nelson, G., eds., Critical and Corpus-Based Approaches to Intercultural Rhetoric. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 203–226.Google Scholar

Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-Cultural Aspects of Second-Language Writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Connor, U. (1999). How like you our fish? Accommodation in international business communication. In Hewings, M. and Nickerson, C., eds., Business English: Research into Practice. Harlow: Longman, pp. 115–128.Google Scholar

Connor, U. (2004). Intercultural rhetoric research: Beyond texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3, 291–304.Google Scholar

Connor, U. (2008). Mapping multidimensional aspects of research: Reaching to intercultural rhetoric. In Connor, U., Nagelhout, E., and Rozycki, W., eds., Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 115–128.Google Scholar

Connor, U. (2011). Intercultural Rhetoric in the Writing Classroom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Connor, U. and Mauranen, A. K. (1999). Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 47–62.Google Scholar

Connor, U. and Moreno, A. (2005). Tertium Comparationis: A vital component in contrastive research methodology. In Bruthiaux, P., Atkinson, D., Eggington, W. G., Grabe, W., and Ramanathan, V., eds., Directions in Applied Linguistics: Essays in Honor of Robert B. Kaplan. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 153–164.Google Scholar

Ene, E., McIntosh, K., and Connor, U. (2019). Using intercultural rhetoric to examine translingual practices of postgraduate L2 writers of English. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 105–110.Google Scholar

Enkvist, N. E. (1978). Some aspects of applications of text linguistics. In Kohonen, V. and Enkvist, N. E., eds., Text Linguistics, Cognitive Learning, and Language Teaching. Turku: Suomen Sovelletun Kielitieteen Yhdistyksen (Afinla) Julkaisuja, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Feng, H. (2008). A genre-based study of research grant proposals in China. In Connor, U., Nagelhout, E., and Rozycki, W., eds., Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 63–86.Google Scholar

Flowerdew, J. (2002a). Genre in the classroom: A linguistic approach. In Johns, A. M., ed., Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives. New York: Routledge, pp. 91–102.Google Scholar

Flowerdew, J. (ed.) (2002b). Academic Discourse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Flowerdew, J. (2007). Shaping Chinese novice scientists’ manuscripts for publication. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 100–117.Google Scholar

Flowerdew, L. (2016). A genre-inspired and lexico-grammatical approach for helping postgraduate students craft research grant proposals. English for Specific Purposes, 42, 1–12.Google Scholar

Giles, H., Coupland, N., and Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, content, and consequence. In Giles, H., Coupland, N., and Coupland, J., eds., Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolingustics. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–68.Google Scholar

Granger, S. (1993). The international corpus of learner English. In Aarts, J., de Haan, P., and Oostdijk, N., eds., English Language Corpora: Design, Analysis and Exploitation. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 57–69.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. J., eds., Syntax and Semantics, Vol. III: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar

Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Holliday, A. (1999). Small cultures. Applied Linguistics, 20, 237–264.Google Scholar

Hopkinson, J. (2021). Realizations of oppositional speech acts in English: A contrastive analysis of discourse in L1 and L2 settings. Intercultural Pragmatics, 18(2), 163–202.Google Scholar

House, J. (1977). A Model for Translation Quality Assessment. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2018). Academic writing and non-Anglophone scholars. In Mur-Dueñas, P. and Šinkūnienė, J., eds., Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 7–10.Google Scholar

Hymes, D. H. (1962). The ethnography of speaking. In Gladwin, T. and Sturtevant, W. C., eds., Anthropology and Human Behavior. Washington, DC: The Anthropology Society of Washington, pp. 13–53.Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. (2014). English as a Lingua Franca in the International University: The Politics of Academic English Language Policy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1–20.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2004). Lexical merging, conceptual blending and cultural crossing. Intercultural Pragmatics, 1(1), 1–21.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2017). Cross-cultural and intercultural pragmatics. In Huang, Y., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 400–415.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2019). English as a Lingua Franca: The Pragmatic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. (1998). Comparative Rhetoric: An Historical and Cross-cultural Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across Cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Larina, T. and Ponton, D. (2020). Tact or frankness in English and Russian blind peer reviews. Intercultural Pragmatics, 17(4), 471–496.Google Scholar

Li, Y. and Ma, X. (2018). Teaching English academic writing to non-English major graduate students in Chinese universities. In You, X., ed., Transnational Writing Education: Theory, History, and Practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 222–243.Google Scholar

Lu, M-Z. (1994). Professing multiculturalism: The politics of style in the contact zone. College Composition and Communication, 45(4), 442–458.Google Scholar

Mauranen, A. K., Carey, R. S., and Ranta, E. (2015). New answers to familiar questions: English as a lingua franca. In Biber, D., and Reppen, R., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 401–417.Google Scholar

McIntosh, K. and Connor, U. (2020). Intercultural rhetoric research in an internationalizing world. Manuscript, Department of English and Writing, University of Tampa.Google Scholar

McIntosh, K., Connor, U., and Gokpinar-Shelton, E. (2017). What intercultural rhetoric can bring to EAP/ESP writing studies in an English as a lingua franca world. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 29, 12–20.Google Scholar

Moreno, A. I. (1997). Genre constraints across languages: Causal metatext in Spanish and English RAs. English for Specific Purposes, 16(3), 161–179.Google Scholar

Moreno, A. I. (1998). The explicit signaling of premise-conclusion sequences in research articles: A contrastive framework. Text, 18, 545–585.Google Scholar

Mur-Dueñas, P. and Šinkūnienė, J. (eds.) (2018). Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Ringbom, H. (ed.) (1993). Near-Native Proficiency in English. Åbo: English Department Publications.Google Scholar

Rozycki, W. and Johnson, N. H. (2013). Non-canonical grammar in Best Paper award winners in engineering. English for Specific Purposes, 32(3), 157–169.Google Scholar

Sapir, E. (1932). Cultural anthropology and psychiatry. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 27(3), 4–8.Google Scholar

Sapir, E. (1934). The emergence of the concept of personality in a study of cultures. The Journal of Social Psychology, 5(3), 408–415.Google Scholar

Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sullivan, P. and Porter, J. E. (1997). Opening Spaces: Writing Technologies and Critical Research Practices. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar

Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Swales, J. (2004). Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Watson, M. (2021). The inevitable mess of translingualism: Its -ism and the schism of cross-disciplinary conflict. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 21(1), 83–107.Google Scholar

You, X. (ed.) (2018). Transnational Writing Education: Theory, History, and Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., and Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1037–1049.Google Scholar

Bailey, B. (1997). Communication of respect in interethnic service encounters. Language in Society, 26, 327–356.Google Scholar

Bailey, B. (2000). Communicative behavior and conflict between African-American customers and Korean immigrant retailers in Los Angeles. Discourse and Society, 11(1), 86–108.Google Scholar

Blommaert, J. (1991). How much culture is there in intercultural communication? In Blommaert, J. and Verschueren, J., eds., The Pragmatics of International and Intercultural Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–31.Google Scholar

Bond, M. H., Žegarac, V., and Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Culture as an explanatory variable: Problems and possibilities. In Spencer-Oatey, H., ed., Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures. London: Continuum, pp. 47–71.Google Scholar

Bouchara, A. (2015). The role of religion in shaping politeness in Moroccan Arabic: The case of the speech act of greeting and its place in intercultural understanding and misunderstanding. Journal of Politeness Research, 11(1), 71–98.Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development. Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chang, W.-L. M. and Haugh, M. (2011). Evaluations of im/politeness of an intercultural apology. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(3), 411–442. doi: 410.1515/IPRG.2011.1019.Google Scholar

Chen, R. (1993). Responding to compliments: A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 20, 49–75.Google Scholar

Culpeper, J. (2011). Politeness and impoliteness. In Aijmer, K. and Andersen, G., eds., Handbooks of Pragmatics, Vol. V: Pragmatics of Society (General editors Wolfram Bublitz, Andreas H. Jucker and Klaus P. Schneider). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 391–436.Google Scholar

Davies, B. L. (2018). Evaluating evaluations: What different types of metapragmatic behaviour can tell us about participants’ understandings of the moral order. Journal of Politeness Research, 14(1), 121–151. https://doi.org/110.1515/pr-2017-0037.Google Scholar

Davies, B. L., Haugh, M., and Merrison, A. J. (eds.) (2011). Situated Politeness. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Eades, D. (2003). The politics of misunderstanding in the legal system. Aboriginal English speakers in Queensland. In House, J., Kasper, G., and Ross, S., eds., Misunderstanding in Social Life: Discourse Approaches to Problematic Talk. London: Longman, pp. 199–226.Google Scholar

Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2016). Variation in evaluations of the (im)politeness of emails from L2 learners and perceptions of the personality of their senders. Journal of Pragmatics, 106, 1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.1010.1001.Google Scholar

Eelen, G. (2001). A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar

Fiksdal, S. (1990). The Right Time and Pace: A Microanalysis of Cross-Cultural Gatekeeping Interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Fischer, R. and Schwartz, S. H. (2011). Whence differences in value priorities?: Individual, cultural, or artifactual sources. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(7), 1127–1144. doi: 1110.1177/0022022110381429.Google Scholar

Fraser, B. and Nolan, W. (1981). The association of deference with linguistic form. In Walters, J., ed., The Sociolinguistics of Deference and Politeness. [Special issue of the International Journal of the Sociology of Language 128]. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 93–111.Google Scholar

Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2010). A genre approach to the study of im-politeness. International Review of Pragmatics, 2, 46–94.Google Scholar

Graham, J., Haidt, J., Motyl, M., Meindl, P., Iskiwitch, C., and Mooijman, M. (2018). Moral foundations theory. In Gray, K. and Graham, J., eds., Atlas of Moral Psychology. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 211–222.Google Scholar

Grazia Guido, M. (2004). Cross-cultural miscommunication in welfare officers’ interrogations. In Candlin, C. N. and Gotti, M., eds., Intercultural Aspects of Specialized Communication. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 127–145.Google Scholar

Grieve, A. (2010). “Aber ganz ehrlich”: Differences in episodic structure, apologies and truth- orientation in German and Australian workplace telephone discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 190–219.Google Scholar

Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Günthner, S. (2008). Negotiating rapport in German-Chinese conversation. In Spencer-Oatey, H., ed., Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. London: Continuum, pp. 207–226.Google Scholar

Haidt, J., and Kesebir, S. (2010). Morality. In Fiske, S., Gilbert, D., and Lindzey, G., eds., Handbook of Social Psychology. 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, pp. 797–852.Google Scholar

Haugh, M. (2010). Intercultural (im)politeness and the micro-macro issue. In Trosborg, A. ed., Pragmatics across Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 139–166.Google Scholar

Haugh, M. and Chang, W.-l. M. (2019). “The apology seemed (in)sincere”: Variations in the perceptions of (im)politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 142, 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.022 Google Scholar

Haugh, M., and Kádár, D. Z. (2017). Intercultural (im)politeness. In Culpeper, J., Haugh, M., and Kádár, D. Z., eds., The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 601–632.Google Scholar

Hill, B., Ide, S., Ikuta, S., Kawasaki, A., and Ogino, T. (1986). Universals of linguistic politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics, 10, 347–371.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. (2018). Negotiating the cultural order in New Zealand workplaces. Language in Society, 47(1), 33–56.Google Scholar

Holmes, J., Marra, M., and Vine, B. (2011). Leadership, Discourse, and Ethnicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

House, J. (2000). Understanding misunderstanding: A pragmatic-discourseapproach to analysing mismanaged rapport in talk across cultures. In Spencer-Oatey, H., ed., Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures. London: Continuum, pp. 145–164.Google Scholar

House, J. (2003). Misunderstanding in intercultural university encounters. In House, J., Kasper, G., and Ross, S., eds., Misunderstanding in Social Life: Discourse Approaches to Problematic Talk. London: Pearson Education, pp. 22–56.Google Scholar

Janoff-Bulman, R. and Carnes, N. C. (2018). The model of moral motives: A map of the moral domain. In Gray, K. and Graham, J., eds., Atlas of Moral Psychology. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 223–230.Google Scholar

Kádár, D. Z. and Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2014). Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kim, K. H. and Spencer-Oatey, H. (2021). Metapragmatic comments on relating across cultures: Korean students’ uncertainties over relating to UK academics. Pragmatics, 31(2), 198–224.Google Scholar

Laird, J. E., Lebiere, C., and Rosenbloom, P. S. (2017). A standard model of the mind: Toward a common computational framework across artificial intelligence, cognitive science, neuroscience, and robotics. AI Magazine, 38(4), 13–26. doi: 10.1609/aimag.v38i4.2744.Google Scholar

Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness;or, minding your p’s and q’s. Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 292–305.Google Scholar

Lakoff, R. (1989). The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse. Multilingua, 8(2–3), 101–129.Google Scholar

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lefringhausen, K., Spencer-Oatey, H., and Debray, C. (2019). Culture, norms and the assessment of communication contexts: Multidisciplinary perspectives. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 50(10), 1098–1111.Google Scholar

Locher, M. A. and Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 9–33.Google Scholar

Malle, B. F., Giuglielmo, S. and Monroe, A. E. (2014). A theory of blame. Psychological Inquiry, 25(2), 147–186. doi: 110.1080/1047840X.1042014.1877340.Google Scholar

Marriott, H. E. (1990). Intercultural business negotiations: the problem of norm discrepancy. ARAL Series S, 7, 33–65.Google Scholar

Miller, L. (1995). Two aspects of Japanese and American co-worker interaction: Giving instructions and creating rapport. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31(2), 141–161.Google Scholar

Miller, L. (2008). Negative assessments in Japanese–American workplace interaction. In Spencer-Oatey, H., ed., Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory, 2nd ed. (Vol. 31). London: Continuum, pp. 227–240.Google Scholar

Roberts, C., Davies, E., and Jupp, T. (1992). Language and Discrimination. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Ryoo, H.-K. (2005). Achieving friendly interactions: A study of service encounters between Korean shopkeepers and African-American customers. Discourse and Society, 16(1), 79–105.Google Scholar

Schnurr, S. and Zayts, O. (2017). Language and Culture at Work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Universalism values and the inclusiveness of our moral universe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(6), 711–728.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (2011). Values: Cultural and individual. In Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Chasiotis, A., and Breugelmans, S. M., eds., Fundamental Questions in Cross-Cultural Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 463–493.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. and Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(3), 268–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032003002.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., and Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663–688. https://doi.org/610.1037/a0029393.Google Scholar

Sharifian, F. (2017). Cultural Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008a). Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In Spencer-Oatey, H., ed., Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. London: Continuum, pp. 11–47.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008b). Introduction. In Spencer-Oatey, H., ed., Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. London: Continuum, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. and Franklin, P. (2009). Intercultural Interaction: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Intercultural Communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. and Kádár, D. Z. (2016). The bases of (im)politeness evaluations: Culture, the moral order and the East-West debate. East Asian Pragmatics, 1(1), 73–106. https://doi.org/110.1558/eap.v1551i1551.29084.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. and Kádár, D. Z. (2021). Intercultural Politeness: Managing Relations across Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H., Lefringhausen, K., and Debray, C. (2019). Culture, norms, and the assessment of communication contexts: Discussion and pointers for the future. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 50(10), 1216–1220.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H., Ng, P., and Dong, L. (2008). British and Chinese reactions to compliment responses. In Spencer-Oatey, H., ed., Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. London: Continuum, pp. 95–117.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. and Wang, J. (2019). Culture, context, and concerns about face: Synergistic insights from pragmatics and social psychology Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(4), 423–440.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. and Wang, J. (2020). Establishing professional intercultural relations: Chinese perceptions of behavioural success in a Sino-American exchange visit. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 49(6), 499–519. doi:10.1080/17475759.2020.1788119.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. and Xing, J. (2005). Managing talk and non-talk in intercultural interactions: Insights from two Chinese-British business meetings. Multilingua, 24, 55–74.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. and Xing, J. (2008). Issues of face in a Chinese business visit to Britain. In Spencer-Oatey, H., ed., Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. London: Continuum, pp. 258–273.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H., and Xing, J. (2019). Interdisciplinary perspectives on interpersonal relations and the evaluation process: Culture, norms and the moral order. Journal of Pragmatics, 151, 141–154. doi: 110.1016/j.pragma.2019.1002.1015.Google Scholar

Terkourafi, M. (2005). Beyond the micro-level in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research, 1, 237–262.Google Scholar

Ting-Toomey, S. and Oetzel, J. G. (2013). Culture-based situational conflict model: An update and expansion. In Oetzel, J. G. and Ting-Toomey, S., eds., The Sage Handbook of Conflict Communication, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 763–790.Google Scholar

Tyler, A. (1995). The coconstruction of cross-cultural miscommunication. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(2), 129–152.Google Scholar

Wang, J. and Spencer-Oatey, H. (2015). The gains and losses of face in ongoing intercultural interaction: A case study of Chinese participant perspectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 89, 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.09.007.Google Scholar

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Watts, R. J. (2005). Linguistic politeness research. Quo vadis? In Watts, R. J., Ide, S., and Ehlich, K., eds., Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 2nd ed. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. xi–xlvii.Google Scholar

Watts, R. J., Ide, S., and Ehlich, K. (1992). Introduction. In Watts, R. J., Ide, S., and Ehlich, K., eds., Politeness in Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar

Xing, J. (2002). Relational management in British-Chinese business interactions. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Luton (now University of Bedfordshire).Google Scholar

Žegarac, V. and Pennington, M. C. (2008). Pragmatic transfer. In Spencer-Oatey, H., ed., Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. London: Continuum, pp. 141–163.Google Scholar

Aijmer, K. and Rühlemann, C. (eds.) (2015). Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Alonso-Almeida, F. (2015). On the mitigating function of modality and evidentiality: Evidence from English and Spanish medical research papers. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12, 33–57.Google Scholar

Apresjan, V. (2013). Corpus methods in pragmatics: The case of English and Russian emotions. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10, 533–568.Google Scholar

Aronsson, B. and Fant, L. (2014). Boundary tones in non-native speech: The transfer of pragmatic strategies from L1 Swedish into L2 Spanish. Intercultural Pragmatics, 11, 159–158.Google Scholar

Barron, A. (2019). Using corpus-linguistic methods to track longitudinal development: Routine apologies in the study abroad context. Journal of Pragmatics, 146, 87–105.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, N. (2017). Pragmatics and translation/interpreting. In Barron, A., Gu, Y., and Steen, G., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 521–534.Google Scholar

Buysse, L. (2017). The pragmatic marker you know in learner Englishes. Journal of Pragmatics, 121, 40–57.Google Scholar

van Compernolle, R. A., Williams, L., and McCourt, C. (2011). A corpus-driven study of second-person pronoun variation in L2 French synchronous computer-mediated communication. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8, 67–91.Google Scholar

Cribble, L. (2020). Pascual, E. Combinations of discourse markers with repairs and repetitions in English, French and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 156, 54–67Google Scholar

Cruz Piñol, M. (2012). Lingüística de corpus y enseñanza del español como 2/L. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar

Díaz-Vera, J. E. and Caballero, R. (2013). Exploring the feeling-emotions continuum across cultures: Jealousy in English and Spanish. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10, 205–207.Google Scholar

Diskin, C. (2017). The use of the discourse-pragmatic marker “like” by native and non-native speakers of English in Ireland. Journal of Pragmatics, 120, 144–157.Google Scholar

Félix-Brasdefer, C. (2007). Pragmatic development in the Spanish as a FL classroom: A cross-sectional study of learner requests. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4, 253–286.Google Scholar

Fernández, J. and Yuldashev, A. (2011). Variation in the use of general extenders and stuff in instant messaging interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 155–167.Google Scholar

García-Gómez, A. (2020). Intercultural and interpersonal communication failures: Analyzing hostile interactions among British and Spanish university students on WhatsApp. Intercultural Pragmatics, 17, 27–51.Google Scholar

Goddard, C. (2009). Not taking yourself too seriously in Australian English: Semantic explications, cultural scripts, corpus evidence. Intercultural Pragmatics, 6, 29–53.Google Scholar

Goddard, C. and Wierzbicka, A. (2004). Cultural scripts: What are they and what are they good for? Intercultural Pragmatics, 1(2), 153–166. doi:10.1515/iprg.2004.1.2.153.Google Scholar

Harrington, K. (2017). Corpus analysis: Pragmatic conclusions. Corpus Pragmatics, 1, 297–326.Google Scholar

Holler, J., Kendrick, K. H., and Levinson, S. C. (2017). Processing language in face-to-face conversation: Questions with gestures get faster responses. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25(5), 1900–1908. doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1363-z.Google Scholar

Ifantidou, E. (2013a). Pragmatic competence and explicit instruction. In E. Ifantidou and T. Matsui, eds., Pragmatic development in L1, L2, L3: Its biological and cultural foundations. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 93–116.Google Scholar

Johansson, S. (2007). Seeing through Multilingual Corpora: On the Use of Corpora in Contrastive Studies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kaur, J. (2011). Intercultural communication in English as a lingua franca: Some sources of misunderstanding. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8, 93–116.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2014). Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. and Kirner-Ludwig, M. (2017). “It would never happen in my country I must say”: A corpus-pragmatic study on Asian English learners’ preferred uses of must and should. Corpus Pragmatics, 1, 91–134.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. and Romero-Trillo, J. (eds.) (2013). Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kontos, P. and Sidiropoulou, M. (2012). Socio-political narratives in translated English-Greek news headlines. Intercultural Pragmatics, 9, 195–224.Google Scholar

Laviosa, S. (2002). Corpus-Based Translation Studies: Theory, Findings, Applications. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Laviosa, S., Pagano, A., Kemppanen, H., and Ji, M. (2017). Textual and Contextual Analysis in Empirical Translation Studies. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar

Lin, Y-L. (2017). Co-occurrence of speech and gestures: A multimodal corpus linguistic approach to intercultural interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 117, 155–167.Google Scholar

Llinares, A. (2006). A pragmatic analysis of children’s interlanguage in EFL preschool contexts. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3, 171–193.Google Scholar

Maguire, L. and Romero-Trillo, J (2017). Adaptive management and bilingual education: A longitudinal corpus-based analysis of pragmatic markers in teacher talk. In Kecskes, Istvan and Assimakopoulos, Stavros, eds., Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 347–365.Google Scholar

Melissourgou, M. N. and Frantzi, K. T. (2018). Moving away from the implicit teaching of genres in the L2 classroom. Corpus Pragmatics, 2, 351–373.Google Scholar

Merakchi, K. and Rogers, M. (2013). The translation of culturally bound metaphors in the genre of popular science articles: A corpus-based case study from Scientific American translated into Arabic. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10, 341–372.Google Scholar

O’Halloran, K. and Smith, B. A. (eds.) (2014). Multimodal Studies: Exploring Issues and Domains. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ortaçtepe Hart, Deniz and Okkalı, Seçil. (2021). Common ground and positioning in teacher-student interactions: Second language socialization in EFL classrooms. Intercultural Pragmatics, 18(1), 53–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2021-0003.Google Scholar

Pang, Y. (2020). The cognitive saliency of word associations of verbs of speech in English as a Lingua Franca interactions. Intercultural Pragmatics, 17(4), 417–443.Google Scholar

Pérez-Paredes, P. and Bueno-Alastuey, M. C. (2019). A corpus-driven analysis of certainty stance adverbs: Obviously, really and actually in spoken native and learner English. Journal of Pragmatics, 140, 22–32.Google Scholar

van de Poel, K. and Brunfaut, T. 2010. Medical communication in L1 and L2 contexts: Comparative modification analysis. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7, 103–129.Google Scholar

Reershemius, R. (2012). Research cultures and the pragmatic functions of humor in academic research presentations: A corpus-assisted analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 863–875.Google Scholar

Romero-Trillo, J. (2002). The pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers in non-native speakers of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 769–784.Google Scholar

Romero-Trillo, J. (ed.) (2008). Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Romero-Trillo, J. (2015). Understanding vagueness: A prosodic analysis of endocentric and exocentric general extenders in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, 54–62.Google Scholar

Romero-Trillo, J. (2017). Editorial. Corpus Pragmatics, 1, 1–2.Google Scholar

Romero-Trillo, J. (2019). Prosodic pragmatics and feedback in intercultural communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 151, 91–102.Google Scholar

Romero-Trillo, J. and Espigares, T. (2012). The cognitive representation of natural landscapes in language. Pragmatics and Cognition, 20, 168–185.Google Scholar

Romero-Trillo, J. and Espigares, T. (2015). Cognitive and linguistic factors affecting the selection of landscapes in the Corpus of Language and Nature. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science, 2, 157–159.Google Scholar

Romero-Trillo, J. and Newell, J. (2012). Prosody and feedback in native and non-native speakers of English. In Romero-Trillo, J., ed., Pragmatics, Prosody and English Language Teaching. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 117–132.Google Scholar

Ronga, I., Bazzanella, C., Strudsholm, E., and Salvati, L. (2014). Black as night or as a chimney sweep? Color words and typical exemplars. Intercultural Pragmatics, 11, 485–520.Google Scholar

Shie, J-S. (2012). Conceptual metaphor as a news-story promoter: The cases of ENL and EIL headlines. Intercultural Pragmatics, 9, 1–21.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. (2016). Mock politeness and culture: Perceptions and practice in UK and Italian data. Intercultural Pragmatics, 13, 463–498.Google Scholar

Tsuchiya, K. (2017). Positioning oneself through epistemic assertion sequences: A time-aligned corpus analysis of BELF small talk. Corpus Pragmatics, 1, 159–184.Google Scholar

Tsuchiya, K. and Handford, M. (2014). A corpus-driven analysis of repair in a professional ELF meeting: Not “letting it pass.” Journal of Pragmatics, 64, 117–131.Google Scholar

Werner, V. (2017). Adversative pragmatic markers in learner language: A cross-sectional perspective. Corpus Pragmatics, 1, 135–158.Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, A. (2010). Cross-cultural communication and miscommunication: The role of cultural keywords. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7, 1–23.Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, A. (2016). Making sense of terms of address in European languages through the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM). Intercultural Pragmatics, 13, 499–527.Google Scholar

Zannetin, F., Bernardini, S., and Stewart, D. (2003). Corpora in Translator Education. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part III - Interface of Intercultural Pragmatics and Related Disciplines

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Book contents

Part III - Interface of Intercultural Pragmatics and Related Disciplines

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive