Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T23:03:54.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Semiotics and Intercultural Pragmatics

from Part III - Interface of Intercultural Pragmatics and Related Disciplines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2022

By
Marcel Danesi
Edited by
Istvan Kecskes
Istvan Kecskes
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Albany
Get access

Summary

Human conversation is an extremely intricate social ritual that involves the strategic utilization of signs and sign systems that will ultimately determine how it will unfold successfully or not. When two people speak the same language and belong to the same culture they automatically can plug into the same semiotic codes (language, facial expression, relevant cultural allusions, etc.) that ensure the flow of meaning exchanges, thus determining the outcome of the conversation. What happens when the interlocutors speak different languages and belong to different cultures, yet engage in conversation through a common language, which may or may not be spoken by either one of them as a native language? In such situations the codes that regular conversations may trigger meaning anomalies that lead to unanticipated reactions or misunderstandings. This chapter looks at the problem of intercultural communication from the perspective of semiotic method, focusing on the semiotic codes (verbal and nonverbal) involved in any interaction.

Keywords

meaning exchangesmeaning anomaliessemiotic codesemioticsconceptual metaphorssemanticssources of utterancesmeaning-bearing information
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Pragmatics , pp. 397 - 419
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, trans. V. W. Mc Gee, ed. Emerson, C. and Holquist, M.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1957) Mythologies. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1968) Elements of Semiology. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1981) Theory of the text. In Young, R., ed., Untying the Text. London: Routledge, pp. 31–47.Google Scholar
Birdwhistell, R. L. (1952). Introduction to Kinesics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Ann Arbor Press.Google Scholar
Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and Context: Essays on Body Motion Communication. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Black, M. (1962). Models and Metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933) Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Bühler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1942). Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, E. and Avieli, N. (2003). Food in tourism: Attraction and impediment. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(4), 755–778.Google Scholar
Cooren, F. (2008). Between semiotics and pragmatics: Opening language studies to textual agency. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Danesi, M. (1994). Cool: The Signs and Meanings of Adolescence. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Danesi, M. (2017). Conceptual Fluency Theory and the Teaching of Foreign Languages. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Danesi, M. (2020). The Quest for Meaning: A Guide to Semiotic Theory and Practice, 2nd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danesi, M. and Rocci, A. (2009). Global Linguistics: An Introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Derks, L. and Hollander, J. (1996). Essenties van NLP. Utrecht: Servire.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology, trans. G. C. Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1983). The scandal of metaphor: Metaphorology and semiotics. Poetics Today, 4(2), 217–257.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1982). Methods for measuring facial action. In Scherer, K. R. and Ekman, P., eds., Handbook of Methods in Nonverbal Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 45–90.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1985). Telling Lies. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions Revealed. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. (2003). Unmasking the Face. Cambridge, MA: Major Books.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Frye, N. (1981). The Great Code: The Bible and Literature. Toronto: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, E. T. (1959). The Silent Language. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Hall, E. T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. (2012). A view of pragmatics in a social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 5(3), 251–279.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, L. (1959). Essais linguistique. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Hodge, R. and Kress, G. (1988). Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Humboldt, W. von (1836). On Language: The Diversity of Human Language–Structure and Its Influence on the Mental Development of Mankind, trans. P. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jack, R. E., Garrod, O. G. B., Yu, H., Caldara, R. and Schyns, P. G. (2012). Facial expressions of emotion are not culturally universal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 109(19), 7241–7244.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T. A., ed., Style and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 34–45.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, I. (2014). Intercultural Pragmatics. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Kecskes, I. and Assimakopoulos, S. (eds.) (2017). Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kecskes, I. and Horn, L. R. (2007). Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kluykanov, I. (2005). Principles of Intercultural Communication. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Korzybski, A. (1933). Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics. Brooklyn: Institute of General Semantics.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A., eds., The Meaning of Meaning. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, Supplement 1.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). La pensée sauvage. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Ljunberg, C. (2003). Meeting the cultural other: Semiotic approaches to intercultural communication. Studies in Communication Sciences, 3(2): 59–77.Google Scholar
Lotman, Y. (1991). Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merrell, F. (1997) Peirce, Signs, and Meaning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Morris, C. W. (1938). Foundations of the Theory of Signs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Morris, D. (1969). The Human Zoo. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Morris, D., Collett, P., Marsh, P., and O’Shaughnessy, M. (1979). Gestures: Their Origins and Distributions. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Parret, H. (1983). Semiotics and Pragmatics: An Evaluative Comparison of Conceptual Frameworks. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Paolucci, C. (2021). The distinction between semantics and pragmatics: The point of view of semiotics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 18(3), 293–307.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vols. I–VIII, ed. Hartshorne, C. and Weiss., P. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. (1936). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de (1916) Cours de linguistique générale, ed. Bally, C. and Sechehaye, A.. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Sebeok, T. A. and Danesi, M. (2000). The Forms of Meaning: Modeling Systems Theory and Semiotics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thellefsen, T. and Thellefsen, M. (2005). Pragmatic semiotics and knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 31(3), 177–187.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1936). Essaie d’une théorie des oppositions phonologiques. Journal de Psychologie, 33, 5–18.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality, ed. Carroll, J. B.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×