Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II The Scope of Irony
- Part III Irony’s Impact
- Part IV Irony in Linguistic Communication
- Part V Irony, Affect, and Related Figures
- 14 Irony and Humor
- 15 Emotional Responses to Sarcasm
- 16 Irony, Exaggeration, and Hyperbole: No Embargo on the Cargo!
- 17 Irony and Its Overlap with Hyperbole and Understatement
- 18 Irony and Satire
- 19 Hypocrisy and Situational Irony
- Part VI Irony in Expressive, Nonlinguistic Media
- Index
- References
18 - Irony and Satire
from Part V - Irony, Affect, and Related Figures
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 December 2023
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II The Scope of Irony
- Part III Irony’s Impact
- Part IV Irony in Linguistic Communication
- Part V Irony, Affect, and Related Figures
- 14 Irony and Humor
- 15 Emotional Responses to Sarcasm
- 16 Irony, Exaggeration, and Hyperbole: No Embargo on the Cargo!
- 17 Irony and Its Overlap with Hyperbole and Understatement
- 18 Irony and Satire
- 19 Hypocrisy and Situational Irony
- Part VI Irony in Expressive, Nonlinguistic Media
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter examines the conceptual relations between irony and satire. Many forms of satire, usually seen as containing elements of judgment, play, laughter, and aggression, may be considered discourse-level irony (i.e., satire is more evident in stretches of discourse, rather than in single utterances). Burgers illustrates this important point, as well as how satire expresses implied criticism, through consideration of several instances of television comedy programs, literature, internet news, and political commentaries. Satire may be differently explained by several prominent theories of irony (e.g., Gricean, pretense, echoic mention), each of which reveals the discourse-level nature of satirical communication. Burgers’ chapter describes various experimental studies looking at the impact that satirical language has on people’s attitudes toward different topics. As is all cases of irony, whether satire is successful in communicating speakers’ beliefs depends on a variety of situational (e.g., the specific media) and personal (e.g., who is the speaker, the addressee, overhearers, and their particular prior beliefs about some topic) factors. Even though satire may be a global phenomenon, how it is specifically employed in different cultures, and for different personal and social reasons, is very much a topic for future research.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought , pp. 325 - 344Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Amarasingam, A. (Ed.). (2011). The Stewart/Colbert effect: Essays on the real impacts of fake news. McFarland.Google Scholar
Athanasiadou, A., & Colston, H. L. (Eds.). (2017). Irony in language use and communication. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attardo, S. (2000). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 793–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00070-3Google Scholar
Averbeck, J. M., & Hample, D. (2008). Ironic message production: How and why we produce ironic messages. Communication Monographs, 75(4), 396–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750802512389Google Scholar
Baumgartner, J. C., Morris, J. S., & Walth, N. L. (2012). The Fey effect: Young adults, political humor, and perceptions of Sarah Palin in the 2008 presidential election campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baym, G. (2005). The Daily Show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication, 22(3), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600591006492Google Scholar
Baym, G., & Jones, J. P. (2013). News parody and political satire across the globe. Routledge.Google Scholar
Becker, A. B. (2018). Live from New York, it’s Trump on Twitter! The effect of engaging with Saturday Night Live on perceptions of authenticity and the salience of trait ratings. International Journal of Communication, 12, 1736–1757.Google Scholar
Becker, A. B., & Bode, L. (2018). Satire as a source for learning? The differential impact of news versus satire exposure on net neutrality knowledge gain. Information, Communication & Society, 21(4), 612–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, A. B., & Waisanen, D. J. (2013). From funny features to entertaining effects: Connecting approaches to communication research on political comedy. Review of Communication, 13(3), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2013.826816Google Scholar
Boukes, M. (2019). Agenda-setting with satire: How political satire increased TTIP’s saliency on the public, media, and political agenda. Political Communication, 36(3), 426–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1498816Google Scholar
Boukes, M., & Hameleers, M. (2020). Shattering populists’ rhetoric with satire at elections times: The effect of humorously holding populists accountable for their lack of solutions. Journal of Communication, 70(4), 574–597. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa020Google Scholar
Brewer, P. R., & Marquardt, E. (2007). Mock news and democracy: Analyzing The Daily Show. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 15(4), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870701465315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brugman, B. C., & Burgers, C. (2021). Sounds like a funny joke: Effects of vocal pitch and speech rate on satire liking. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(2), 221–227. http://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000226Google Scholar
Brugman, B. C., Burgers, C., Beukeboom, C. J., & Konijn, E. A. (2022). Satirical news from left to right: Discursive integration in written online satire. Journalism, 23(8). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920979090Google Scholar
Buckley, C. (2020, 5 August). Are we living in a golden age of political satire? The Spectator. https://thespectator.com/topic/living-golden-age-political-satire-christopher-buckley/.Google Scholar
Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J. (2016). Figurative framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony. Communication Theory, 26(4), 410–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgers, C., & van Mulken, M. (2017). Humor markers. In Attardo, S. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 385–399). Routledge. www.doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-27Google Scholar
Che, M. (Writer), & King, D. P. (Director). (2020, April 25). Dr. Anthony Fauci Cold Open [Television series episode]. In L. Michaels (Executive producer), Saturday night live. New York: NBC. www.youtube.com/watch?v=uW56CL0pk0gGoogle Scholar
Chozik, A. (2015, 4 October). Hillary Clinton does “Saturday Night Live” with Doppelgänger. New York Times. www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/10/04/hillary-clinton-does-saturday-night-live-with-doppelgnger/Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.121Google Scholar
Colston, H. L. (1999). The pragmatic functions of rebuttal analogy. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(4), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1404_2Google Scholar
Colston, H. L. (2000). On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition, 8(2), 277–324. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.8.2.02colCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L. (2017). Irony performance and perception: What underlies verbal, situational and other ironies? In Athanasiadou, A. & Colston, H. L. (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 19–42). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.1.02colGoogle Scholar
De Speld (2020, 1 September). We vroegen Hugo de Jonge hoe hij de pandemie combineert met het vaderschap [We asked Hugo de Jonge how he combines the pandemic with fatherhood]. https://speld.nl/2020/09/01/we-vroegen-hugo-de-jonge-hoe-hij-de-pandemie-combineert-met-het-vaderschap-2/Google Scholar
Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1995). Muting the meaning: A social function of irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 10(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1001_2Google Scholar
Droog, E., Burgers, C., & Steen, G. J. (2020). How satirists alternate between discursive modes: An introduction of the Humoristic Metaphors in Satirical News (HMSN) typology. International Journal of Communication, 14, 3964–3968.Google Scholar
Dynel, M. (2016). Comparing and combining covert and overt untruthfulness: On lying, deception, irony and metaphor. Pragmatics & Cognition, 23(1), 174–208. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.1.08dynGoogle Scholar
Egelhofer, J. L., & Lecheler, S. (2019). Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: A framework and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782Google Scholar
Fonseca, P., Pascual, E., & Oakley, T. (2020). “Hi, Mr. President!”: Fictive interaction blends as a unifying rhetorical strategy in satire. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 18(1), 180–212. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00056.fonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J. R., Koloen, G., & Sahin, V. (2007). No joke: A comparison of substance in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and broadcast network television coverage of the 2004 presidential election campaign. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150701304621Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2012). Are ironic acts deliberate? Journal of Pragmatics, 44(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.11.001Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2021). “Holy cow, my irony detector just exploded!” Calling out irony during the coronavirus pandemic. Metaphor and Symbol, 36(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2020.1855944Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Bryant, G. A., & Colston, H. L. (2014). Where is the humor in verbal irony? Humor, 27(4), 575–595. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-0106Google Scholar
Gilbert, C. J. (2019). Argumentum ad carricare as a mode of character attack: Alec Baldwin as Donald Trump on Saturday Night Live. In Samoilenko, S. A., Icks, M., Keohane, J., & Shiraev, E. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of character assassination and reputation management (pp. 209–224). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315150178-16Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (2002). Logic and conversation (1975). In Levitin, D. J. (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive psychology: Core readings (pp. 719–732). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (2008). Further notes on logic and conversation (1978). In Adler, J. E. & Rips, L. J. (Eds.), Reasoning: Studies of human inference and its foundations (pp. 765–773). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holbert, R. L. (2016). Entertainment television and political campaigns: The political satire appropriateness (PSA) model. In. Benoit, W. L. (ed.), Praeger handbook of political campaigning in the United States (pp. 171–190). ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
Holbert, R. L., Hmielowski, J., Jain, P., Lather, J., & Morey, A. (2011). Adding nuance to the study of political humor effects: Experimental research on Juvenalian satire versus Horatian satire. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(3), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764210392156Google Scholar
Hurley, L. (2021, 11 January). U. S. Supreme Court shuns election-related disputes. Reuters.com. www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-election-idUSKBN29G1UFGoogle Scholar
Iwinski, G. (Writer), & Werner, C. (Director). (2020, 2 August). U.S. history [Television series episode]. In T. Carvell (Executive producer), Last Week Tonight with John Oliver. www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsxukOPEdggGoogle Scholar
Julius, R., & van den Berg, J. (2020, 25 September). Nederlandse rechter overleden, geen enkel gevolg voor verkiezingen [Dutch judge passed away, no consequences for elections whatsoever]. De Speld. https://speld.nl/2020/09/25/nederlandse-rechter-overleden-geen-enkel-gevolg-voor-verkiezingen/Google Scholar
Katz, A. N., & Pexman, P. M. (1997). Interpreting figurative statements: Speaker occupation can change metaphor to irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1201_3Google Scholar
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Lavis, S. M. (2017). Selecting serious or satirical, supporting or stirring news? Selective exposure to partisan versus mockery news online videos. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 54–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12271Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Roberts, R. M. (1993). On satire and parody: The importance of being ironic. Metaphor and Symbol, 8(2), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0802_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaMarre, H. L., Landreville, K. D., & Beam, M. A. (2009). The irony of satire: Political ideology and the motivation to see what you want to see in the Colbert Report. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(2), 212–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208330904Google Scholar
Matthes, J., & Rauchfleisch, A. (2013). The Swiss “Tina Fey effect”: The content of late-night political humor and the negative effects of political parody on the evaluation of politicians. Communication Quarterly, 61(5), 596–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2013.822405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, J., Twiss, J., & Weiner, J. (Writers). (2017, 26 February). Obamacare replacement [Television series episode]. In J. Taylor (Executive producer), Last Week Tonight with John Oliver. www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEGpriv2TAcGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, T. (2020, 19 September). Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Trump given chance to replace liberal lion with young conservative. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/law/2020/sep/19/trump-supreme-court-pick-replace-ruth-bader-ginsburgGoogle Scholar
Pearce, D. (2020, 18 April). Bank CEO reassures worried Canadians: “I’m going to be okay.” The Beaverton. www.thebeaverton.com/2020/04/bank-ceo-reassures-worried-canadians-im-going-to-be-okay/Google Scholar
Peifer, J. T., & Myrick, J. G. (2021). Risky satire: Examining how a traditional news outlet’s use of satire can affect audience perceptions and future engagement with the news source. Journalism, 22(7). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919833259Google Scholar
Poniewozik, J. (2020, 27 May). Trump said: “I have the best words.” Now they’re hers. The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2020/05/27/arts/television/trump-sarah-cooper.htmlGoogle Scholar
Popa-Wyatt, M. (2014). Pretence and echo: Towards an integrated account of verbal irony. International Review of Pragmatics, 6(1), 127–168. https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00601007Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Lozano-Palacio, I. (2019). Unraveling irony: From linguistics to literary criticism and back. Cognitive Semantics, 5(1), 147–173. https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-00501006Google Scholar
Shao, L., & Liu, D. (2019). The road to cynicism: The political consequences of online satire exposure in China. Political Studies, 67(2), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718791373Google Scholar
Skalicky, S., & Crossley, S. (2014). A statistical analysis of satirical Amazon.com product reviews. The European Journal of Humour Research, 2(3), 66–85. http://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2014.2.3.skalickiGoogle Scholar
Skalicky, S., & Crossley, S. A. (2019). Examining the online processing of satirical newspaper headlines. Discourse Processes, 56(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1368332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symons, A. (2019). Trump and satire: America’s carnivalesque President and his war on television comedians. In Happer, C., Hoskins, A., & Merrin, W. (Eds.), Trump’s media war (pp. 183–197). Palgrave Macmillan. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94069-4_12Google Scholar
The Daily Show with Trevor Noah (2020). The world’s fakest news team. www.comedycentral.co.uk/shows/wwfvz8/the-daily-show-with-trevor-noahGoogle Scholar
The Onion (2017, 26 October). Puerto Ricans without power for month can only assume this leading story across national news media. www.theonion.com/puerto-ricans-without-power-for-month-can-only-assume-t-1819877413Google Scholar
van Mulken, M., Burgers, C., & van der Plas, B. (2010). Wolves, confederates, and the happy few: The influence of comprehension, agreement, and group membership on the attitude toward irony. Discourse Processes, 48(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638531003692177Google Scholar
Waisanen, D. J. (2018). The rise of advocacy satire. In Baumgartner, J. C. & Becker, A. B. (Eds.), Political humor in a changing media landscape: A new generation of research (pp. 11–27). Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (2006). The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua, 116(10), 1722–1743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.001Google Scholar
Wolf, R. (2020, 27 October). New Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett could have immediate impact on American democracy. USA Today. https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/10/27/amy-coney-barrett-elections-health-care-abortion-await-new-justice/6041792002/Google Scholar
Young, D. G. (2019). Irony and outrage: The polarized landscape of rage, fear, and laughter in the United States. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Young, D. G., Bagozzi, B. E., Goldring, A., Poulsen, S., & Drouin, E. (2019). Psychology, political ideology, and humor appreciation: Why is satire so liberal? Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(2), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000157Google Scholar