Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:07:47.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 20 - Wh-Indefinites

from Part IV - Semantics and Pragmatics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2022

By
Jiwon Yun
Edited by
Sungdai Cho  and
John Whitman
Sungdai Cho
Affiliation:
Binghamton University, State University of New York
John Whitman
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

Chapter 20 investigates the longstanding and controversial topic of the indefinite reading of so-called wh-words in Korean. The chapter reviews arguments regarding their historical development, typological observation, grammatical properties, and processing strategies.

Keywords

questionsindefinitessemanticsprosody
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics , pp. 581 - 606
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldridge, Edith. 2007. Wh-indefinites and their relation to wh-in-situ. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society 43: 139–53.Google Scholar
Baek, Judy Yoo-Kyung. 1998. Negation and object shift in early child Korean. In Sauerland, Uli and Percus, Orin, eds., The Interpretive Tract. Cambridge, MA: MIT, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MITWPL, pp. 73–86.Google Scholar
Bhat, Darbhe Narayana Shankara. 2004. Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2007. Wh-in-Situ does not correlate with wh-Indefinites or question particles. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 139–66.Google Scholar
Chang, Suk-Jin. 1973. A generative study of discourse: pragmatic aspects of Korean with reference to English. Ehak yenkwu [Language Research] 9(2): (supplement).Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1991. On the typology of wh-questions. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Cho, Choon-Hak. 1975. The scope of negation in Korean. In Sohn, Ho-min, ed., The Korean Language: Its Structure and Social Projection. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Center for Korean Studies, pp. 121–32.Google Scholar
Cho, Young-mee Yu. 1990. Syntax and phrasing in Korean. In Inkelas, Sharon and Zec, Draga, eds., The Phonology-Syntax Connection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 47–62.Google Scholar
Choe, Jae-Woong. 1985. Pitch-accent and q/wh words in Korean. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 1: 113–23.Google Scholar
Choi, Jinyoung. 2007. Free choice and negative polarity: A compositional analysis of Korean polarity sensitive items. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Chung, Dae-Ho. 1996. On the representation and licensing of Q and Q-dependency. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Enç, Mürvet. 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 1–25.Google Scholar
Fodor, Janet Dean, and Sag, Ivan A.. 1982. Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 355–98.Google Scholar
Ha, Seungwan. 2004. The existential reading of wh-words and their scope relations. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society 40: 83–95.Google Scholar
Hagstrom, Paul. 2000. Phrasal movement in Korean negation. In Veselinova, Ljuba, Robinson, Susan, and Antieau, Lamont, eds., Proceedings of the 9th Student Conference in Linguistics (SCIL 9), pp. 127–42.Google Scholar
Han, Chung-hye, Lidz, Jeffrey, and Musolino, Julien. 2007. V-raising and grammar competition in Korean: Evidence from negation and quantifier scope. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 1–47.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. Diachronic sources of “all” and “every”. In Elke, Bach, Eloise, Jelinek, Angelika, Kratzer, and Barbara, H. Partee, eds., Quantification in Natural Languages. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 363–82.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns: Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Hur, Woong. 1991. Kwukeumwunhak [Korean Phonology]. Seoul: Saym Mwunhwasa.Google Scholar
Hwang, Hyun Kyung. 2011. Scope, prosody, and pitch accent: The prosodic marking of wh-scope in two varieties of Japanese and South Kyeongsang Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Im, Hong-Bin. 1998. An In-Depth Analysis of Korean Grammar 3 [in Korean]. Seoul: Payhaksa.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah. 1993. The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah, and Mira, Oh. 1996. A prosodic analysis of three types of wh-phrases in Korean. Language and Speech 39: 37–61.Google Scholar
Kadmon, Nirit, and Landman, Fred. 1993. Any. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(4): 353–422.Google Scholar
Kang, Arum. 2015. (In)definiteness, disjunction and anti-specificity in Korean: A study in the semantics-pragmatics interface. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Kang, Myung-Yoon. 1988. Topics in Korean syntax: Phrase structure, variable binding and movement. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Kim, Ae-Ryung. 2000. A derivational quantification of “wh-phrase”. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Kim, Chung-Hyo. 2000. A Study of Interrogatives and Indefinites in Korean [in Korean]. Seoul: Pakicheng.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok. 2000. The Grammar of Negation: A Constraint-Based Approach. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Kim, Min-Joo, and Kaufmann, Stefan. 2006. Domain restriction in freedom of choice: Korean “INDET-NA” items. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11: 375–89.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa. 2005. Wh-scope puzzles. Proceedings from the 35th Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS 35).Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Scope or pseudoscope? Are there wide-scope indefinites? In Rothstein, Susan, ed., Events and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 163–96.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1965. Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Kwon, Jae-Il. 2002. Korean interrogative sentences in spoken discourse [in Korean]. Hangeul 257: 167–200.Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin, Chung, Daeho, and Nam, Seungho. 2000. The semantics of amwu N-to/-irato/-ina in Korean – Arbitrary choice and concession. Language and Information 4(2): 107–23.Google Scholar
Lee, Ho-Young. 1990. Kwukewunyullon [Korean Prosody]: Seoul: Hankwukyenkwuwen [Korean Study Institute].Google Scholar
Lee, Hye-Sook. 2008. Pitch accent and its interaction with intonation: Experimental studies of North Kyeongsang Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Lee, Iksop, and Robert Ramsey, S.. 2000. The Korean Language: New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Ki Moon, Kim, Chin-Wu, and Lee, Sang Oak. 1984. Kwukeumwunlon [Korean Phonology]. Seoul: Hakyensa.Google Scholar
Lee, So-Young, and Yun, Jiwon. 2018. Influence of intonation, morphology and syntax on the semantic scope of wh-phrases in Kyeongsang Korean. Language and Information 22(3): 23–43.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. 1951. Korean phonemics. Language 27:519–33.Google Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa. 1999. On the interpretation of wide-scope indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 7: 79–134.Google Scholar
Mok, Jung-soo. 2001. The function of {jom} and its grammaticalization. Eoneohag: Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korea 28: 77–100.Google Scholar
Park, Duk-Soo. 2010. A pitch analysis of two types of wh-clauses in Korean. In Lee, S-O, ed., Contemporary Korean Linguistics: International Perspectives. Seoul: Thaehaksa Publishing Co., pp. 252–70.Google Scholar
Park, Hee-Heon. 1998. Acquisition of negation in Korean. Korean Linguistics 9: 111–31.Google Scholar
Park, Jin-Ho. 2007. The pronominal system of Korean viewed from a typological perspective [in Korean]. Journal of Korean Linguistics 50: 115–47.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet Breckenridge. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet Breckenridge, and Beckman, Mary. 1988. Japanese Tone Structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Postma, Gertjan. 1994. The indefinite reading of wh. Linguistics in the Netherlands 1994: 187–98.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1997. Quantifier scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 335–97.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 2010. Uttering Trees. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sells, Peter. 2001. Three aspects of negation in Korean. Journal of Linguistic Studies 6: 1–15.Google Scholar
Shimoyama, Junko. 2006. Indeterminate phrase quantification in Japanese. Natural Language Semantics 14: 139–73.Google Scholar
Song, Seok Choong. 1982. On interpreting the scope of negation in Korean. Language Research 18: 197–215.Google Scholar
Suh, Cheong-Soo. 1989. Interrogatives and indefinite words in Korean: With reference to Japanese. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 3: 329–40.Google Scholar
Suh, Chung-Mok. 1987. Study of Questions in Korean [in Korean]. Seoul: Tap Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Suh, Chung-Mok. 1989. Wh-constructions in Korean. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 3: 517–26.Google Scholar
Suh, Jinhee. 1989. Scope interaction in negation. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 3: 527–36.Google Scholar
Underwood, Horace Grant. 1890. An Introduction to the Korean Spoken Language. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Winter, Yoad. 1997. Choice functions and the scopal semantics of indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 399–467.Google Scholar
Yi, Sun-Woong. 2000. On the indefinite expression of “interrogative pronoun+(i)+-nka” [in Korean]. Hankwukehak [Korean Linguistics] 36: 191–219.Google Scholar
Yoon, Jeong-Me. 2005. Two historical changes in wh-constructions in Korean and their implications. Studies in Generative Grammar 15: 457–87.Google Scholar
Yun, Jiwon. 2011. On the meaning of wh-(N)-ina and wh-(N)-itun in Korean. Language Research 47: 191–218.Google Scholar
Yun, Jiwon. 2013. Wh-indefinites: Meaning and prosody. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Yun, Jiwon. 2014. Wh-indefinites and their licensing conditions. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 47: 361–72.Google Scholar
Yun, Jiwon. 2015. The influence of sentence-final intonation and phonological phrasing on the interpretation of wh-indeterminates. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 76: 25–34.Google Scholar
Yun, Jiwon. 2019. Meaning and prosody of wh-indeterminates in Korean. Linguistic Inquiry 50(3): 630–47.Google Scholar
Yun, Jiwon, and Lee, Hye-Sook (manuscript). Prosodic disambiguation of questions in Korean: Theory and processing. Korean Linguistics.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Wh-Indefinites
  • Edited by Sungdai Cho, Binghamton University, State University of New York, John Whitman, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics
  • Online publication: 30 September 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108292351.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Wh-Indefinites
  • Edited by Sungdai Cho, Binghamton University, State University of New York, John Whitman, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics
  • Online publication: 30 September 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108292351.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Wh-Indefinites
  • Edited by Sungdai Cho, Binghamton University, State University of New York, John Whitman, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics
  • Online publication: 30 September 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108292351.021
Available formats
×