Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:25:15.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Special Types of Meetings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2015

Edited by
Joseph A. Allen ,
Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock  and
Steven G. Rogelberg
Joseph A. Allen
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Omaha
Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Steven G. Rogelberg
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Debriefs are an effective tool for increasing learning and performance within organizations. They are regarded as “one of the most promising methods for accelerating learning from experience” (Eddy, Tannenbaum, & Mathieu, 2013, p. 976), and meta-analytic evidence supports their effectiveness (Tannenbaum & Cerasoli, 2013). Research also suggests that the success of a debrief is reliant on proper execution techniques. In this chapter, we identify and define debriefs and review scientifically supported strategies for achieving a well-executed debrief. Moreover, we present a table of recommendations based on this review of the debrief literature. Our intention is that these recommendations will serve as guidelines for the practical application of debriefs.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science , pp. 615 - 706
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Allen, J. A., Baran, B. E., & Scott, C. W. (2010). After-action reviews: A venue for the promotion of safety climate. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42, 750–757. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arafeh, J. M., Hansen, S. S., & Nichols, A. (2010). Debriefing in simulated-based learning: Facilitating a reflective discussion. Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 24, 302–309. doi:10.1097/JPN.0b013e3181f6b5ecCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, T. T. (1992). Effects of alternative modeling strategies on outcomes of interpersonal-skills training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 147–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2001). Reflections on shared cognition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 195–202. doi:10.1002/job.82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, N. J., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Stout, R. J. (2000). Measuring team knowledge. Human Factors: Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 42, 151–173. doi:10.1518/001872000779656561CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dismukes, R. K., Jobe, K. K., McDonnell, L. K. (2000). Facilitating LOFT debriefings: A critical analysis. In Dismukes, R. K. & Smith, G. M. (Eds.), Facilitation and debriefing in aviation training and operations (pp. 13–25). Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Dismukes, R. K., McDonnell, L. K., & Jobe, K. K. (2000). Facilitating LOFT debriefings: Instructor techniques and crew participation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 10, 35–57. doi:10.1207/S15327108IJAP1001_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dismukes, R. K., & Smith, G. M. (Eds.). (2000). Facilitation in aviation training and operations. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Dunn, A. M, Scott, C. W., Allen, J. A., & Bonilla, D. (2014). Quantity and quality: Increasing safety norms through after action reviews. Paper presented at the INGRoup Conference, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
Eddy, E. R., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Mathieu, J. E. (2013). Helping teams to help themselves: Comparing two team-led debriefing methods. Personnel Psychology, 66, 975–1008. doi:10.1111/peps.12041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelson, D. P., Litzinger, B., Arora, V., Walsh, D., Kim, S., Lauderdale, D. S.,…& Abella, B. S. (2008). Improving in-hospital cardiac arrest process and outcomes with performance debriefing. Archives of Internal Medicine, 168, 1063–1069. doi:10.1001/archinte.168.10.1063CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383. doi:10.2307/2666999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, S., & Davidi, I. (2005). After-event reviews: Drawing lessons from successful and failed experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 857–871. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.842CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, S., Ganzach, Y., Castle, E., & Sekely, G. (2010). The effect of filmed versus personal after-event reviews on task performance: The mediating and moderating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 122–131. doi:10.1037/a0017867CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanning, R. M., & Gaba, D. M. (2007). The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2, 115–125. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180315539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, B. (2008). Debriefing: Theory and techniques. In Riley, R. H. (Ed.), Manual of simulation in healthcare (pp. 155–170). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaba, D. M., Howard, S. K., Fish, K. J., Smith, B. E., & Sowb, Y. A. (2001). Simulation-based training in anesthesia crisis resource management (ACRM): A decade of experience. Simulation & Gaming,32, 175–193. doi:10.1177/104687810103200206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez, L. F., & Ballard, D. I. (2011). Communication for change: Transactive memory systems as dynamic capabilities. In Shani, A. B., Woodman, R. W., & Pasmore, W. A. (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 19, pp. 91–115). Binkley, UK: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Group for Organizational Effectiveness. (2011). DebriefNow. The Group for Organizational Effectiveness. Retrieved from https://www.groupoe.com/products/p-debriefnow.htmlGoogle Scholar
Halamek, L. P. (2008). The simulated delivery-room environment as the future modality for acquiring and maintaining skills in fetal and neonatal resuscitation. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine,13, 448–453. doi:10.1016/j.siny.2008.04.015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinni, T. (2003). Pride goeth before a profit. Retrieved December 30, 2008, from Harvard Business School Working Knowledge: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/3688.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376. doi:10.5465/AMR.2001.4845785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, J. E., Goodwin, G. F., Heffner, T. S., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273–283. doi:10.I037t/0021-9010.85.2.273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, J. E., & Meliza, L. L. (1999). Foundations of the after action review process (Special Report 42). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 946–953. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.91.4.946CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostroff, C., Kinicki, A. J., & Tamkins, M. (2003). Organizational culture and climate. In Borman, W. C., Ilgen, D. R., & Klimoski, R. J. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 565–594). New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2004). Improving dynamic decision making through debriefing: An empirical study. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 256–260. Finland: ICALT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roebuck, D. B., Brock, S. J., & Moodie, D. R. (2004). Using a simulation to explore the challenges of communicating in a virtual team. Business Communication Quarterly, 67, 359–367. doi:10.1177/1080569904268083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ron, N., Lipshitz, R., & Popper, M. (2002). How organizations learn: Post-flight reviews in an F 16 fighter squadron. Organization Studies, 27, 1069–1089. doi:10.1177/0170840606064567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, J. W., Simon, R., Rivard, P., Dufresne, R. L., & Raemer, D. B. (2007). Debriefing with good judgment: Combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry. Anesthesiology Clinics, 25, 361–376. doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2007.03.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salas, E., Klein, C., King, H., Salisbury, M., Augenstein, J. S., Birnbach, D. J.,…& Upshaw, C. (2008). Debriefing medical teams: 12 evidence-based best practices and tips. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 34, 518–527.Google ScholarPubMed
Salas, E., Nichols, D. R., & Driskell, J. E. (2007). Testing three team training strategies in intact teams: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 38, 471–488. doi:10.1177/1046496407304332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas, E. & Rosen, M. A. (2009). Performance assessment. In Schmorrow, D., Cohn, J., & Nicholson, D. (Eds.), The PSI handbook of virtual environments for training and education: Developments for the military and beyond (pp. 227–235). Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. (2000). The psychological life of organizations. In Ashkanasy, N. M., Wilderom, C. P. M., & Peterson, M. F. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. xvii–xxvi). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Scott, C., Allen, J. A., Bonilla, D. L., Baran, B. E., & Murphy, D. (2013). Ambiguity and freedom of dissent in post-incident discussion. Journal of Business Communication, 50, 383–402. doi:10.1177/0021943613497054Google Scholar
Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Salas, E. (2008). Guided team self-correction: Impacts on team mental models, processes, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39, 303–327. doi:10.1177/1046496408317794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Johnston, J. H., & Payne, S. C. (1998). Measuring team-related expertise in complex environments. In Cannon-Bowers, J. A. & Salas, E. (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 61–87). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Zeisig, R. L., Acton, B., & McPherson, J. A. (1998). Team dimensional training: A strategy for guided team self-correction. In Cannon-Bowers, J. A. & Salas, E. (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 271–297). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannenbaum, S. I. (2013). Using debriefs – A simple, powerful experiential learning tool. Paper presented at the meeting of the Organization Development Network, San Jose, CA.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, S. I., Beard, L. R., & Cerasoli, C. P. (2013). Conducting team debriefs that work: Lessons from research and practice. In Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Cohen, D., & Latham, G. (Eds.), Developing and enhancing teamwork in organizations (pp. 488–519). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, S. I., & Cerasoli, C. P. (2013). Do team and individual debriefs enhance performance? A meta-analysis. Human Factors, 55, 231–245. doi:10.1177/0018720812448394CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, P. J., Russ-Eft, D. F., Chan, , & D. W. L., (2005). A meta-analytic review of behavior modeling training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 692–709. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.692CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsoukas, H., & Vladimirou, E. (2001). What is organizational knowledge?. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 973–993. doi:10.1111/1467–6486.00268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villado, A. J., & Arthur, W. J. (2013). The comparative effect of subjective and objective after-action reviews on team performance on a complex task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 514–528. doi:10.1037/a0031510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimbush, J. C., & Shepard, J. M. (1994). Toward understanding of ethical climate: Its relationship to ethical behavior and supervisory influence. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 637–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Z. (2007). Human factors in project management: Concepts, tools, and techniques for inspiring teamwork and motivation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

References

Abrahamson, D. E. & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2014). Impediments to information and knowledge sharing within policing: A study of three Canadian policing organizations. Sage Open. doi:10.1177/2158244013519363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, K., & Galanes, G. (2009). Communicating in groups. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Allen, B. J. (2004). Difference matters. Long Grove, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
Allen, J. A., Baran, B. E., & Scott, C. S. (2010). After-action reviews: A venue for the promotion of safety climate. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42, 750–757. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, J. A., Beck, T., Scott, C., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2014). Understanding workplace meetings: A qualitative taxonomy of meeting purposes. Management Research Review, 37(9), 791–814. doi:10.1108/MRR-03–2013–0067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. A., Scott, C. W., Tracy, S. J., & Crowe, J. D. (2014). The signal provision of emotion: Using emotions to enhance reliability via sensemaking. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 6, 240–260. doi:10.1504/IJWOE.2014.065758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axley, S. R. (1984). Managerial and organizational communication in terms of the conduit metaphor. Academy of Management Review, 9, 428–437. doi:10.5465/AMR.1984.4279664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bantz, C. R., & Smith, D. H. (1977). A critique and experimental test of Weick's model of organizing. Communications Monographs, 44, 171–184. doi:10.1080/03637757709390129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baran, B. E., & Scott, C. W. (2010). Organizing ambiguity: A grounded theory of leadership and sensemaking within dangerous contexts. Military Psychology, 22(S1), S42–S69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baran, B. E., Shanock, L. R., Rogelberg, S. G., & Scott, C. W. (2012). Leading group meetings: Supervisors' actions, employee behaviors, and upward perceptions. Small Group Research, 43, 330–355. doi:10.1177/1046496411418252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99–112. doi:10.1111/j.1468–2958.1975.tb00258.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovating. Organization Science, 2, 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Browning, L. D. (1992). Lists and stories as organizational communication. Communication Theory, 2, 281–302. doi:10.1111/j.1468–2885.1992.tb00045.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C., & Weber, M. (1992). Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 325–370. doi:10.1007/BF00122575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9, 284–295. doi:10.5465/AMR.1984.4277657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, A., Scott, C. W., Bonilla, D. L., & Allen, J. (2014, July). Quantity and quality: Increasing safety norms through after action reviews. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Network for Group Research. Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383. doi:10.2307/2666999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, N. (1986). Altruistic emotion, cognition and behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N. (1991). Values, sympathy, and individual differences: Toward a pluralism of factors influencing altruism and empathy. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1–17. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, W. R. (1987). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, J., Slovic, P., & Mertz, C. K. (1994). Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks, Risk Analysis, 14, 1101–1108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is yours a learning organization? Harvard Business Review, 86, 109–120. doi:10.1225/R0803HGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilley, J. W., & Maycunich, A. (2000). Organizational learning, performance, and change: An introduction to strategic human resource development. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.Google Scholar
Hallett, T., Harger, B., & Eder, D. (2009). Gossip at work: Unsanctioned evaluative talk in formal school meetings. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38, 584–618. doi:10.1177/0891241609342117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Sego, D. J., Hedlund, J., Major, D. A., & Phillips, J. (1995). Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 292–316. doi:10.1037//0021–9010.80.2.292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iverson, J. O., & McPhee, R. D. (2008). Communicating knowledge through communities of practice: Exploring internal communicative processes and differences among CoPs. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 176–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, J. S. (1989). Facilitation catalyst for group problem solving. Management Communication Quarterly, 3(1), 8–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M. W. (2003). Managing uncertainty in organizational communication. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers of group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science, social equilibria, and social change. Human Relations, 1, 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, V. D., & Jablin, F. M. (1991). Information seeking during organizational entry: Influences, tactics, and a model of the process. Academy of Management Review, 16, 92–120. doi:10.5465/AMR.1991.4278997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, M. W., & Moore, P. C. (2000). The lessons we (don't) learn: Counterfactual thinking and organizational accountability after a close call. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 737–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, E. W. (2002). Information seeking within organizations. Human Communication Research, 28, 229–242. doi:10.1111/j.1468–2958.2002.tb00805.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5, 14–37. doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J. A., & Anderson, J. C. (1987). Message flow and decision making. In Jablin, F. M., Putnam, L. L., Porter, L. W., & Roberts, K. H. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 704–731). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Patriotta, G. (2003). Sensemaking on the shop floor: Narratives of knowledge in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 349–375. doi:10.1111/1467–6486.00343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1969). Knowing and being: Essays by Michael Polanyi. Chicago, IL: University of ChicagoPress.Google Scholar
Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (1990). Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context. Communication Studies, 41, 248–265. doi:10.1080/10510979009368307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter-Palmon, R., Kennel, V., Allen, J. A., Jones, K., & Skinner, A. (2004). Naturalistic decision making in after-action review meetings: The implementation of and learning from post-fall huddles. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. doi:10.1111/joop.12084Google Scholar
Rhodes, C., & Brown, A. D. (2005). Narrative, organizations, and research. Journal of Management Review, 7, 167–188. doi:10.1111/j.1468–2370.2005.00112.xGoogle Scholar
Ron, N., Lipshitz, R., & Popper, M. (2002). How organizations learn: Post-flight reviews in a F-16 fighter squadron. Organization Studies, 27, 1069–1089. doi:10.1177/0170840606064567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultze, U., & Stabell, C. (2004). Knowing what you don't know? Discourses and contradictions in knowledge management research. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 549–573. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6486.2004.00444.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, R. M. (1994). The skilled facilitator: Practical wisdom for developing effective groups. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Scott, C., Allen, J. A., Bonilla, D., Baran, B., & Murphy, D. (2013). Ambiguity and freedom of dissent in post incident discussion. Journal of Business Communication, 50(4), 383–402. doi:10.1177/0021943613497054Google Scholar
Scott, W. C., & Tretheway, A. (2008). Organizational discourse and the appraisal of occupational hazards: Interpretive reservoirs, heedful interrelating, and identity at work. Journal of Applied Communication in Research, 36, 298–317. doi:10.1080/00909880802172137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior (50th anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Stohl, C. & Putnam, L. L. (1994). Group communication in context: Implications for the study of bona fide groups. In Frey, L. (Ed.), Communication in context: Studies in naturalistic groups (pp. 285–292). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of group behavior. In Worchel, L. & Austin, W. (Eds.), The psychology of group behavior (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, S. I., & Cerasoli, C. P. (2013). Do team and individual debriefs enhance performance?: A meta-analysis. Human Factors, 55, 231–245. doi:10.1177/0018720812448394CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teboul, R. (1996). Introduction a l'oeuvre de Mane. Paris: Ellipses/Edition Marketing.Google Scholar
Thackaberry, J. A. (2004). “Discursive opening” and closing in organisational self-study culture as trap and tool in wildland firefighting safety. Management Communication Quarterly, 17(3), 319–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Army. (2011). A leader's guide to after-action reviews (Training Circular 25–20). Fort Leavenworth, KS: Author.Google Scholar
Waring, J. J. (2009). Constructing and re-constructing narratives of patient safety. Social Science & Medicine, 69, 1722–1731. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.052CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E., & Ashford, S. J. (2001). Learning in organizations. In Jablin, F. M. & Putnam, L. L. (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 704–731). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409–421. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. A. (2007). The story behind an organizational list: A genealogy of wildland firefighters' 10 Standard Fire Orders. Communication Monographs, 74, 415–442. doi:10.1080/036377507017165CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Adams, L., Toomey, L., & Churchill, E. (2006). Distributed research teams: Meeting asynchronously in virtual space. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4, 0–10. doi:10.1111/j.1083–6101.1999.tb00108.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, A. H., McEwan, R., Bal, J., & Carletta, J. (2007). Virtual team meetings: An analysis of communication and context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2558–2580. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, V., England, W., & Ward, S. (2011). Virtual teams. Research-Technology Management, 54, 62–63.Google Scholar
Brummelhuis, L. L., Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., & Keulemans, L. (2012). Do new ways of working foster work engagement? Psicothema, 24, 113–120.Google ScholarPubMed
Challenger, R., Clegg, C. W., & Robinson, M. A. (2010). Understanding crowd behaviours; Vol. 1: Practical guidance and lessons identified. London, UK: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Cichomska, K. (2013a). Chairing and attending virtual meetings: The importance of shared experience. Assessment & Development Matters, 5, 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cichomska, K. (2013b, May). Virtual meetings of the future: A socio-technical perspective for the improved management of meetings. Paper presented at the 16th Congress of the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology, Münster, Germany.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. A., Rogelberg, S. G., Allen, J. A., & Luong, A. (2011). Meeting design characteristics and attendee perceptions of staff/team meeting quality. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 15, 90–104. doi:10.1037/a0021549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curseu, P. L., Schalk, R., & Wessel, I. (2007). How do virtual teams process information? A literature review and implications for management. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 628–652. doi:10.1108/02683940810894729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daim, T. U., Ha, A., Reutiman, S., Hughes, B., Pathak, U., Bynum, W., & Bhatla, A. (2012). Exploring the communication breakdown in global virtual teams. International Journal of Project Management, 30, 199–212. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dani, S. S., Burns, N. J., Backhouse, C. D., & Kockhar, A. K. (2006). The implications of organizational culture and trust in the working of virtual teams. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 220, 951–960. doi:10.1243/09544054JEM415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frese, M. (2008). The changing nature of work. In Chmiel, N. (Ed.), An introduction to work and organizational psychology: A European perspective (pp. 397–413). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Geimer, J. L., Leach, D. J., DeSimone, J. A., Rogelberg, S. G., & Warr, P. B. (in press). Meetings at work: Perceived effectiveness and recommended improvements. Journal of Business Research.Google Scholar
Gratton, L. (2010). The future of work. Business Strategy Review, 21, 16–23. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8616.2010.00678.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosse, C. U. (2002). Managing communication within virtual intercultural teams. Business Communication Quarterly, 65, 22–38. doi:10.1177/108056990206500404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, M., Novicevic, M. M., & Garrison, G. (2004). Challenges to staffing global virtual teams. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 275–294. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69–95. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791–815. doi:10.1111/j.1083–6101.1998.tb00080.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P., Heimann, V., & O'Neill, K. (2001). The “wonderland” of virtual teams. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13, 24–29. doi:10.1108/13665620110364745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerres, M., & De Witt, C. (2003). A didactical framework for the design of blended learning arrangements, Journal of Educational Media, 28(2–3), 101–113. doi:10.1080/1358165032000165653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimble, C., Hildreth, P., & Wright, P. (2001). Communities of practice: Going virtual. In Malhotra, Y. (Ed.), Knowledge management and business model innovation (pp. 220–234). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31, 700–718. doi:10.1177/0149206305279113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, D. J., Rogelberg, S. G., Warr, P. B., & Burnfield, J. L. (2009). Perceived meeting effectiveness: The role of meeting design characteristics. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 65–76. doi:10.1007/s10869–009–9092–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lurey, J. S., & Raisinghani, M. S. (2001). An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams. Information & Management, 38, 523–544. doi:10.1016/S0378–7206(01)00074-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majchrzak, A., Rice, R. E., Malhotra, A., King, N., & Ba, S. (2000). Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 24, 569–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mark, G., Grudin, J., & Poltrock, S. E. (1999). Meeting at the desktop: An empirical study of virtually collocated teams. In Bodker, S., Kyng, M., & Schmidt, K. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 12–16 September 1999 (pp. 159–178). Copenhagen, Denmark: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 805–835. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mejias, R. J. (2007). The interaction of process losses, process gains, and meeting satisfaction within technology-supported environments. Small Group Research, 38, 156–194. doi:10.1177/1046496406297037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montoya, M. M., Masset, A. P., Hung, Y. C., & Crisp, C. B. (2009). Can you hear me now? Communication in virtual product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 139–155. doi:10.1111/j.1540–5885.2009.00342.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijholt, A., den Akker, R., & Heylen, D. (2006). Meetings and meeting modelling in smart environments. AI & Society, 20, 202–220. doi:10.1007/s00146–005–0016–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2009). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139–178. doi:10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oshri, I., Kotlarsky, J., & Willcocks, L. P. (2007). Global software development: Exploring socialization and face-to-face meetings in distributed strategic projects. Strategic Information Systems, 16, 25–49. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2007.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pape, W. R. (1997). Group insurance: Virtual teams can quickly gather the knowledge of even far-flung staff. Inc. Tech, 2, 29–32.Google Scholar
Paul, S., Seetharaman, P., Samarah, I., & Mykytyn, P. P. (2004). Impact of heterogeneity and collaborative conflict management style of the performance of synchronous global virtual teams. Information and Management, 41, 303–321. doi:10.1016/S0378–7206(03)00076–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, R. D. (2009). How executive coaching can change leader behavior and improve meeting effectiveness: An exploratory study. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 61, 298–318. doi:10.1037/a0017842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghuram, S., London, M., & Larsen, H. H. (2001). Flexible employment practices in Europe: Country versus culture. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(5), 738–753. doi:10.1080/09585190122083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoza, K. (2013). One in five Americans work from home, numbers seen rising over 60%. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2013/02/18/one-in-five-americans-work-from-home-numbers-seen-rising-over-60/Google Scholar
Shachaf, P. (2008). Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study. Information and Management, 45, 131–142. doi:10.1016/j.im.2007.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehy, N. (2008). Telework. In. Chmiel, N. (Ed.), An introduction to work and organizational psychology: A European perspective (pp. 190–208). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sinangil, H. K., & Kucakaslan, A. (2008). Mergers and acquisitions through perspectives of work and organizational psychology and management. In. Chmiel, N. (Ed.), An introduction to work and organizational psychology: A European perspective (pp. 377–394). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stough, S., Eom, S., & Buckenmyer, J. (1998). Virtual teaming: A strategy for moving your organization into the new millennium. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100(8), 370–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vartiainen, M., & Andriessen, J. H. E. (2008). Virtual team-working and collaboration technology. In. Chmiel, N. (Ed.), An introduction to work and organizational psychology: A European perspective (pp. 209–233). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vinciarelli, A., Pantic, M., & Bourland, H. (2009). Social signal processing: Survey of an emerging domain. Image and Vision Computing, 27, 1743–1759. doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2008.11.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vivacqua, A. S., Marques, L. C., Ferreira, M. S., & de Souza, J. M. (2011). Computational indicators to assist meeting facilitation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 20, 667–684. doi:10.1007/s10726–011–9235–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, J. (2003). Understanding distributed work. London, UK: Work Design Collaborative.Google Scholar
Wasson, C. (2004). Multitasking during virtual meetings. HR. Human Resource Planning, 27, 47–60.Google Scholar
Zakaria, N., Amelinckx, A., & Wilemon, D. (2004). Working together apart? Building a knowledge-sharing culture for global virtual teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, 15–29. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8691.2004.00290.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Alge, B. J., Wiethoff, C., & Klein, H. J. (2003). When does the medium matter? Knowledge-building experiences and opportunities in decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 26–37. doi:10.1016/S0749–5978(02)00524–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. A., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2013). Manager-led group meetings: A context for promoting employee engagement. Group and Organizational Management, 38, 543–569. doi:10.1177/1059601113503040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asencio, R., Carter, D. R., DeChurch, L. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Fiore, S. M. (2012). Charting a course for collaboration: A multiteam perspective. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2, 487–494. doi:10.1007/s13142–012–0170–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, M. (1981). Building united judgment: A handbook for consensus decision making. Madison, WI: Center for Conflict Resolution.Google Scholar
Bal, J., & Foster, P. (2000). Managing the virtual team and controlling effectiveness. International Journal of Production Research, 38, 4019–4032. doi:10.1080/00207540050204885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beise, C., Evaristo, R., & Niederman, F. (2003, January). Virtual meetings and tasks: from GSS to DGSS to project management. In System Sciences 2003: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference, 9.Google Scholar
Beise, C. M., Niederman, F., & Beranek, P. M. (1999). Group facilitation in a networked world. Group Facilitation, 1, 33–44.Google Scholar
Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 595–615. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.595CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burke, C. S., Shuffler, M. L., Salas, E., & Gelfand, M. (2010). Multicultural teams: Critical team processes and guidelines. In Lundby, K. & Jolton, J. (Eds.), Going global: Practical applications and recommendations for HR and OD professionals in the global workplace (pp. 46–83). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. A. (1990). Cognitive psychology and team training: Shared mental models in complex systems. Human Factors Bulletin,33, 1–4.Google Scholar
Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1217–1234.Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F. (2000). Managing a virtual workplace. Academy of Management Executive, 14, 81–90. doi.:10.5465/AME.2000.4468068Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F., & Shurygailo, S. (2003). E-leadership and virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics, 31, 362–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogliser, C. C., Gardner, W., Trank, C. Q., Gavin, M., Halbesleben, J., & Seers, A. (2013). Not all group exchange structures are created equal: Effects of forms and levels of exchange on work outcomes in virtual teams. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20, 242–251. doi:10.1177/1548051812472370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connaughton, S. L., & Shuffler, M. L. (2007). Multinational/multicultural distributed teams: A review and future research agenda. Small Group Research, 38, 387–412. doi:10.1177/1046496407301970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutu, D. L. (1998). Trust in virtual teams. Harvard Business Review, 76(3), 20–21.Google Scholar
Crawford, E. R., & Lepine, J. A. (2013). A configural theory of team processes: Accounting for the structure of taskwork and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 38, 32–48. doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In Jablin, F. M., Putnam, L. L., Roberts, K. H., & Porter, L. W. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420–443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Culture Wizard. (2010). Virtual Teams Survey Report. Retrieved from http://rw-3.com/VTSReportv7.pdfGoogle Scholar
Daim, T. U., Ha, A., Reutiman, S., Hughes, B., Pathak, U., Bynum, W., & Bhatla, A. (2012). Exploring the communication breakdown in global virtual teams. International Journal of Project Management, 30, 199–212. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2006). Leadership in team-based organizations: On the threshold of a new era. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 211–216. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBono, E. (1999). Six Thinking Hats®. Phoenix, AZ: MICA Management Resources.Google Scholar
Dickson, G. W., Patridge, J. L., & Robinson, L. H. (1993). Exploring Modes of Facilitative Support for GDSS Technology. MIS Quarterly, 17, 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Innocenzo, L., Mathieu, J. E., & Kukenberger, M. R. (in press). A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadership-team performance relations. Journal of Management. doi:10.1177/0149206314525205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinwoodie, D. L. (2005). Solving the dilemma: A leader's guide to managing diversity. Leadership in Action, 25, 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earley, P. C., Gibson, C. B., & Chen, C. C. (1999). “How did I do?” versus “how did we do?” Cultural contrasts of performance feedback use and self-efficacy. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 594–619. doi:10.1177/0022022199030005003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 26–49. doi:10.2307/1556384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebrahim, N. A., Ahmed, S., & Taha, Z. (2009). Virtual teams: A literature review. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3, 2653–2669.Google Scholar
Elron, E. 1997. Top management teams within multinational corporations: Effects of cultural heterogeneity. Leadership Quarterly, 8, 393–412. doi:10.1016/S1048–9843(97)90021–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elron, E., & Vigoda, E. (2003). Influence and political processes in virtual teams. In Gibson, C. B. & Cohen, S. G. (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 317–334). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Fisher, K., Rayner, S., Belgard, W., & Armstrong, J. (1995). Tips for teams: A ready reference for solving common team problems. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Forsyth, D. R. (1999). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
George, J. F., Dennis, A. R., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). An experimental investigation of facilitation in an EMS decision room. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1, 57–70. doi:10.1007/BF00562690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, C. B. (1999). Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 138–152. doi:10.2307/257089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, C. B., & Cohen, S. G. (2003). The last word: Conclusions and implications. In Gibson, C. B. & Cohen, S. G. (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 403–420). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. B., & Cohen, S. G. (Eds.). (2003). Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., Collins, K. M., & Shaw, J. D. (2003). The relation between work-family balance and quality of life. Journal Of Vocational Behavior, 63, 510–531. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00042-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosse, C. U. (2002). Managing communication within virtual intercultural teams. Business Communication Quarterly, 65, 22–38. doi:10.1177/108056990206500404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guastello, S. J., & Guastello, D. D. (1998). Origins of coordination and team effectiveness: A perspective from game theory and nonlinear dynamics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 423–437. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.83.3.423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambley, L. A., O'Neill, T. A., & Kline, T. J. B. (2007). Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 1–20. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, G. L., McKinnon, J. L., Wu, A., & Chow, C. W. (2000). Cultural influences on adaptation to fluid workgroups and teams. Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 489–505. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henttonen, K., & Blomqvist, K. (2005). Managing distance in a global virtual team: The evolution of trust through technology-mediated relational communication. Strategic Change, 14, 107–119. doi:10.1002/jsc.714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69–95. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, P. J., & Weisband, S. P. (2003). Knowledge sharing and shared understanding in virtual teams. In Gibson, C. B. & Cohen, S. G. (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 21–36). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Holton, J. A. (2001). Building trust and collaboration in a virtual team. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 7, 36–47. doi:10.1108/13527590110395621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724. doi:10.2307/256287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karsh, B. T. (2004). Beyond usability: Designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13, 388–394. doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.010322CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kauffeld, S., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2012). Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational Success. Small Group Research, 43, 130–158. doi:10.1177/1046496411429599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayser, T. A. (1994). Building team power. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
Kayworth, T., & Leidner, D. (2000). The global virtual manager: A prescription for success. European Management Journal, 18, 183–194. doi:10.1016/S0263–2373(99)0009000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyton, J. (2011). Communication and organizational culture: A key to understanding work experiences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kirchmeyer, C., & Cohen, A. (1992). Multicultural groups: Their performance and reactions with constructive conflict. Group & Organization Management, 17, 153–170. doi: 10.1177/1059601192172004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31, 700–718. doi: 10.1177/0149206305279113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Gibson, C. B., Tesluk, P. E., & McPherson, S. O. (2002). Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from Sabre, Inc. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 67–79. doi:10.5465/AME.2002.8540322Google Scholar
Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2001). The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: The mediating role of employee resistance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 557–569. doi:10.2307/3069370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, T., Cramton, C. D., & Hinds, P. J. (2012). The meeting genre across cultures: Insights from three German–American collaborations. Small Group Research, 43, 159–185. doi:10.1177/1046496411429600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, D. J., Rogelberg, S. G., Warr, P. B., & Burnfield, J. L. (2009). Perceived meeting effectiveness: The role of design characteristics. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 65–76. doi:10.1007/s10869–009–9092–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 794–813. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luong, A., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2005). Meetings and more meetings: The relationship between meeting load and the daily well-being of employees. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9, 58–67. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.9.1.58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundby, K. & Jolton, J. (2010). Going global: Practical applications and recommendations for HR and OD professionals in the global workplace. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., & Rosen, B. (2007). Leading virtual teams. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 60–70. doi:10.5465/AMP.2007.24286164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Man, D. C., & Lam, S. S. (2003). The effects of job complexity and autonomy on cohesiveness in collectivistic and individualistic work groups: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 979–1001. doi:10.1002/job.227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, J. E., & Rapp, T. L. (2009). Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 90. doi:10.1037/a0013257CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matveev, A. V., & Nelson, P. E. (2004). Cross cultural communication competence and multicultural team performance perceptions of American and Russian managers. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 4, 253–270. doi:10.1177/1470595804044752Google Scholar
Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Rapp, T. L., & Gilson, L. L. (2012). Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 342–365. doi:10.1002/job.1772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., DeChurch, L. A., Jimenez, M. J., Wildman, J., & Shuffler, M. (2011). A meta-analytic examination of virtuality and information sharing in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 214–225. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, H.-D. (1993). The cultural gap in long-term international work groups: A German-American case study. European Management Journal, 11, 93–101. doi:10.1016/0263–2373(93)90029-hCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittleman, D. D., Briggs, R. O., Nunamaker, J. F. Jr., & Romano, N. C. (2000). Best practices in facilitating virtual meetings: Some notes from initial experiences. Group Facilitation: A Research & Applications Journal, 2, 6–15.Google Scholar
Niederman, F., & Volkema, R. (1999). The effects of facilitator characteristics on meeting preparation, set up and implementation. Small Group Research, 30, 330–360. doi:10.1177/104649649903000304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocker, R., Fjermestad, J., Hiltz, S. R., & Johnson, K. (1998). Effects of four modes of group communication on the outcomes of software requirements determination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Leary, M. B., Mortensen, M., & Woolley, A. W. (2011). Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Academy of Management Review, 36, 461–478. doi:10.5465/AMR.2011.61031807Google Scholar
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2002). Groupware and computer-supported cooperative work. The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications (pp. 583–595). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pauleen, D., & Yoong, P. (2001). Facilitating virtual team relationships via internet and conventional communication channels. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policies, 11, 190–202. doi:10.1108/10662240110396450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35, 6–36. doi:10.1145/968464.968467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, R. E., & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated network. Communication Research, 14, 85–108. doi:10.1177/009365087014001005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rico, R., Sanchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C. B. (2008). Team coordination processes: A team knowledge-based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33, 163–185. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.27751276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riopelle, K., Gluesing, J. C., Alcordo, T. C., Baba, M., Britt, D., McKether, W., … Wagner, K. H. (2003). Context, task, and the evolution of technology use in global virtual teams. In Gibson, C. B. & Cohen, S. G. (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 239–264). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Rogelberg, S. G., Leach, D. J., Warr, P. B., & Burnfield, J. L. (2006). ‘Not another meeting!’ Are meeting time demands related to employee well-being? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 86–96. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.91.1.83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogelberg, S. G., Shanock, L. R., & Scott, C. W. (2011). Wasted time and money in meetings: Increasing return on investment. Small Group Research, 43, 236–245. doi:10.1177/1046496411429170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, N. C., Nunamaker, J. F. Jr., & Briggs, R. O. (1999). Distributed GSS facilitation and participation: Field action research. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Maui.Google Scholar
Rusman, E., van Bruggen, J., Sloep, P. B., Valcke, M., & Koper, R. (2013). The mind's eye on personal profiles: A cognitive perspective on profile elements that inform initial trustworthiness assessments and social awareness in virtual project teams. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 22, 159–179. doi:10.1007/s10606–012–9171–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, R., & Mahoney, J. T. (1996). Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, 71, 63–76. doi:10.1002/smj.4250171107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, C., Van Slyke, C., & Vogel, D. R. (2004). My time or yours? Managing time visions in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 19–31. doi:10.5465/AME.2004.12691177Google Scholar
Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Shuffler, M. L., Wiese, C. W., Salas, E., & Burke, C. S., (2010). Leading one another across time and space: Exploring shared leadership functions in virtual teams. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26, 3–17. doi:10.5093/tr2010v26n1a1Google Scholar
Sims, D. E., & Salas, E. (2007). When teams fail in organizations: What creates teamwork breakdowns? In Langan-Fox, J., Cooper, C. L., & Klimoski, R. J. (Eds.), Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: Management challenges and symptoms (pp. 302–317). Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.Google Scholar
Spencer, J., & Pruss, A. (1992). Managing your team: How to organise people for maximum results. London, UK: Piatkus.Google Scholar
Suchan, J., & Hayzak, G. (2001). The communication characteristics of virtual teams: A case study. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 44, 174–186. doi:10.1109/47.946463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyran, K. L., Tyran, C. K., & Shepherd, M. (2003). Exploring emerging leadership in virtual teams. In Gibson, C. B. & Cohen, S. G. (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 183–195). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Von Glinow, M. A., Shapiro, D. I., & Brett, J. M. (2004). Can we talk and should we? Managing emotional conflict in multicultural teams. Academy of Management Review, 29, 578–592. doi:10.5465/AMR.2004.14497611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warkentin, M. E., & Beranek, P. M. (1999). Training to improve virtual team communication. Information Systems Journal, 9, 271–289. doi:10.1046/j.1365–2575.1999.00065.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warkentin, M. E., Sayeed, L., & Hightower, R. (1997). Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: An exploratory study of a web-based conference system. Decision Sciences, 28, 975–996. doi:10.1111/j.15405915.1997.tb01338.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (1999). Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organization Science, 10, 777–790. doi:10.1111/j.1083–6101.1998.tb00081.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaccaro, S. J., & DeChurch, L. A. (2011). Leadership forms and functions in multiteam systems. In Zaccaro, S. J., Marks, M. A., & DeChurch, L. A. (eds.), Multiteam systems: An organizational form for dynamic and complex environments. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×