Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:10:17.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - Multimedia Learning of Mathematics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Robert K. Atkinson
Edited by
Richard Mayer
Robert K. Atkinson
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Richard Mayer
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Multimedia learning of mathematics encompasses learning from instructional material – both paper- and computer-based – that combine words and pictures in the domain of mathematics. This chapter explores our current state of knowledge about this topic and is based solely on research utilizing rigorous, evidence-based methods. It also outlines several limitations associated with the research conducted to date as well as the implications of this research for cognitive theory and instructional design. Finally, the chapter concludes by proposing several productive avenues for future research.

What Is Multimedia Learning of Mathematics?

In general, multimedia learning entails learning from words and pictures (Mayer, 2001). More specifically, multimedia learning occurs when learners build coherent mental representations from instructional material containing words and pictures. According to this paradigm, words – or the verbal form of the instructional material – can be either printed or spoken, while pictures – or the pictorial form of instructional material – can encompass static graphics, such as illustrations, graphs, photos, maps, or dynamic graphics, such as animation or video.

Clearly, multimedia learning is applicable across a wide range of domains. Of particular interest is the burgeoning area of the research literature that examines multimedia learning in the domain of mathematics. Specifically, the focus of the chapter is on multimedia learning of mathematics, which entails learning in the domain mathematics from both pencil/paper and computer-based instructional material leveraging both words and pictures.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning , pp. 393 - 408
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, R. K. (2002). Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 416–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, R. K., Mayer, R. E., & Merrill, M. M. (2005). Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: Examining the impact of an animated agent's voice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 117–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy PressGoogle Scholar
Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). The effect of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeung, H., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction. Educational Psychology, 17, 329–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaput, J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In Grouws, D. A. (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers in Mathematics (pp. 515–556). New York: MacmillianGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 444–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When processing more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, M. M. (2003). The role of animated pedagogical agents in multimedia learning environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Biloxi, MS
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Multimedia-supported metaphors for meaning making in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 215–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizingirrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 319–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, M. J., Kintsch, W., & Young, E. Y. (1992). A theory of algebra-word-problem comprehension and its implications for the design of learning environments. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 329–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roncarrelli, R. (1989). The computer animation dictionary. New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 59–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P., & Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 176–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarmizi, R., & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 424–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×