Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T03:39:34.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2a - Four Key Areas for Further Investigation: Commentary on Issues and New Directions in Personality Disorder Genetics

from Part I - Etiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2020

Carl W. Lejuez
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Kim L. Gratz
Affiliation:
University of Toledo, Ohio
Get access

Summary

The following commentary on Jang and Choi’s chapter Issues and New Directions in Personality Disorder (PD) Genetics (This Volume) echoes their call to harness advances in PD assessment rather than rely on politically derived "top down" nosologies. We first discuss how recent work in the joint hierarchical structure of PD traits and psychopathology, as well as, personality dynamics (i.e., how personality manifests in different situations) likely offer fruitful avenues for exploring the more nuanced role of genetics in the development and maintenance of PD. Second, we highlight the need to better understand the role of environment in PD genetics and discuss emerging models (e.g., common pathway model). Third, we stress the need for more research and larger samples in order to arrive at stronger conclusions. Fourth, we consider how advances in gene-environment research can help to determine targets for PD prevention and treatment.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Assary, E., Vincent, J. P., Keers, R., & Pluess, M. (2018). Gene–environment interaction and psychiatric disorders: Review and future directions. Seminars in Cellular and Developmental Biology, 77, 133143.Google Scholar
Back, M. D., Baumert, A., Denissen, J. J. A., Hartung, F. M., Penke, L., Schmukle, S. C., … Wrzus, C. (2011). PERSOC: A unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships. European Journal of Personality, 25, 90107.Google Scholar
Bulbena-Cabre, A., Bassir Nia, A., & Perez-Rodriguez, M. M. (2018). Current knowledge on gene–environment interactions in personality disorders: An update. Current Psychiatry Reports, 20, 74.Google Scholar
Derefinko, K. J., & Widiger, T. A. (2016). Antisocial personality disorder. In Fatemi, S. H. & Clayton, P. J., (Eds.), The Medical Basis of Psychiatry (pp. 229245). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic big five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 3358.Google Scholar
Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 8292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franić, S., Dolan, C. V., Borsboom, D., Hudziak, J. J., van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., & Boomsma, D. I. (2013). Can genetics help psychometrics? Improving dimensionality assessment through genetic factor modeling. Psychological Methods, 18, 406433.Google Scholar
Hopwood, C. J. (2018). Interpersonal dynamics in personality and personality disorders. European Journal of Personality, 32, 499524.Google Scholar
Hyde, L. W., Waller, R., Trentacosta, C. J., Shaw, D. S., Neiderhiser, J. M., Ganiban, J. M., … Leve, L. D. (2016). Heritable and nonheritable pathways to early callous-unemotional behaviors. American Journal of Psychiatry, 173, 903910.Google Scholar
Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Achenbach, T. M., Althoff, R. R., Bagby, R. M., … Zimmerman, M. (2017). The hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology: A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 454477.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 18791890.Google Scholar
Mancke, F., Herpertz, S. C., & Bertsch, K. (2015). Aggression in borderline personality disorder: A multidimensional model. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 6, 278291.Google Scholar
Markon, K. E. (2013). Epistemological pluralism and scientific development: An argument against authoritative nosologies. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27, 554579.Google Scholar
Miller, G. W., & Jones, D. P. (2014). The nature of nurture: Refining the definition of the exposome. Toxicological Sciences, 137(1), 12.Google Scholar
Perez-Perez, B., Cristobal-Narvaez, P., Sheinbaum, T., Kwapil, T. R., Ballespi, S., Pena, E., … Barrantes-Vidal, N. (2018). Interaction between FKBP5 variability and recent life events in the anxiety spectrum: Evidence for the differential susceptibility model. PLoS ONE, 13, e0193044.Google Scholar
Pincus, A. L., Hopwood, C. J., & Wright, A. G. C. (in press). The interpersonal situation: An integrative framework for the study of personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. In Rauthmann, J. F., Funder, D., & Sherman, R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Psychological Situations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
RauthmannJ. F., Gallardo-PujolD., GuillaumeE. M., ToddE., Nave, C. S., Sherman, R. A., … FunderD. C. (2014). The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 677718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenström, T., Ystrom, E., Torvik, F. A., Czajkowski, N. O., Gillespie, N. A., Aggen, S. H., … Reichborn-Kjennerud, T. (2017). Genetic and environmental structure of DSM-IV criteria for antisocial personality disorder: A twin study. Behavior Genetics, 47, 265277.Google Scholar
Steckling, N., Gotti, A., Bose-O’Reilly, S., Chapizanis, D., Costopoulou, D., De Vocht, F., … Sarigiannis, D. A. (2018). Biomarkers of exposure in environment-wide association studies: Opportunities to decode the exposome using human biomonitoring data. Environmental Research, 164, 597624.Google Scholar
Viding, E., & McCrory, E. J. (2012). Genetic and neurocognitive contributions to the development of psychopathy. Developmental Psychopathology, 24, 969983.Google Scholar
Wessels, N. M., Zimmermann, J., & Leising, D. (2016). Toward a shared understanding of important consequences of personality. Review of General Psychology, 20, 426436.Google Scholar
Wrzus, C., & Roberts, B. W. (2017). Processes of personality and development in adulthood: The TESSERA framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21, 253277.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×