Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:40:59.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3b - Towards a Family Process Perspective on Typical and Maladaptive Personality Characteristics: Commentary on Environmental and Sociocultural Influences on Personality Disorders

from Part I - Etiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2020

By
Patrick T. Davies  and
Morgan J. Thompson
Edited by
Carl W. Lejuez  and
Kim L. Gratz
Carl W. Lejuez
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Kim L. Gratz
Affiliation:
University of Toledo, Ohio
Get access

Summary

In their excellent review of the environmental and genetic underpinnings of personality disorders, Turner, Prud’homme, and Legg (this volume) provide compelling evidence that early family adversity (e.g., maltreatment, parenting difficulties, parental separation) is an environmental risk factor for offspring personality difficulties. However, little is known about how and why these family characteristics increase the risk for various personality disorders. Guided by evolutionary theory, the goal of this commentary is to illustrate how the synthesis of these two areas of inquiry may advance an understanding of the origins and course of typical and atypical personality characteristics in mutually informative ways. First, building on the coverage of attachment in the primary chapter, the authors address how other behavioral systems that are designed to defend against social threat and acquire resources may mediate the distinct personality sequelae experienced by children exposed to family adversity. Second, in identifying sources of heterogeneity in family risk, the authors highlight the value of expanding the conceptualization of moderators beyond diathesis-stress models. Consistent with differential susceptibility theory, they describe how temperamental, physiological, and genetic moderators may serve to heighten sensitivity to supportive as well as adverse family conditions rather than simply acting as diatheses that selective sensitize individuals to harsh socialization contexts.

Keywords

family adversitysocial defense strategiesfast life history strategytemperamentphysiologygenesdifferential susceptibilityemotional security theorylife history theory
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Disorders , pp. 68 - 71
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagby, R. M., & Widiger, T. A. (2018). Five factor model personality disorder scales: An introduction to a special section on assessment of maladaptive variants of the five factor model. Psychological Assessment, 30, 1–9.Google Scholar
Beauchaine, T. P. (2012). Physiological markers of emotion and behavior dysregulation in externalizing psychopathology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 77, 79–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., & Beaver, K. M. (2011). Cumulative-genetic plasticity, parenting, and adolescent self-regulation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 619–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2016). Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. In Cicchetti, D. (Ed.), Developmental Psychopathology, Volume 2: Developmental Neurosciences (3rd ed., pp. 59–106). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Schlomer, G. L., & Ellis, B. J. (2012). Beyond cumulative risk: Distinguishing harshness and unpredictability as determinants of parenting and early life history strategy. Developmental Psychology, 48(3), 662–673.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss, Volume 1: Attachment. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Brody, G. H., Chen, Y. F., Yu, T., Beach, S. R. H., Kogan, S. M., Simons, R. L., … Philibert, R. A. (2012). Life stress, the dopamine receptor gene, and emerging adult drug use trajectories: A longitudinal, multilevel, mediated moderation analysis. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 941–951.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (2012). Gene × environment interaction and resilience: Effects of child maltreatment and serotonin, corticotropin releasing hormone, dopamine, and oxytocin genes. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 411–427.Google Scholar
Davies, P. T., & Martin, M. J. (2013). The reformulation of emotional security theory: The role of children’s social defense in developmental psychopathology. Development & Psychopathology, 25, 1435–1454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, P. T., Martin, M. J., & Sturge-Apple, M. L. (2016). Emotional security theory and developmental psychopathology. In Cicchetti, D. (Ed.), Developmental Psychopathology, Volume 1: Theory and Methods (3rd ed., pp. 199–264). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Davies, P. T., Martin, M. J., Sturge-Apple, M., Ripple, M. T., & Cicchetti, D. (2016). The distinctive sequelae of children’s coping with interparental conflict: Testing the reformulated emotional security theory. Developmental Psychology, 52, 1646–1665.Google Scholar
De Fruyt, F., & De Clercq, B. (2014). Antecedents of personality disorder in childhood and adolescence: Toward an integrative developmental model. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 449–476.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Weisberg, Y. J., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2013). Unifying the aspects of the big five, the interpersonal circumplex, and trait affiliation. Journal of Personality, 81, 465–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hentges, R. F., Davies, P. T., & Cicchetti, D. (2015). Temperament and interparental conflict: The role of negative emotionality in predicting child behavior problems. Child Development, 86, 1333–1350.Google Scholar
Hinnant, J. B., Erath, S. A., Tu, K. M., & El-Sheikh, M. (2016). Permissive parenting, deviant peer affiliations, and delinquent behavior in adolescence: The moderating role of sympathetic nervous system reactivity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44, 1071–1081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jouriles, E. N., McDonald, R., & Kouros, C. D. (2016). Interparental conflict and child adjustment. In Cicchetti, D. (Ed.), Developmental Psychopathology, Volume 4: Risk, Resilience, and Intervention (3rd ed., pp. 608–659). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., Tackett, J. L., & MacDonald, A. (2016). Toward validation of a structural approach to conceptualizing psychopathology: A special section of the Journal of Abnormal Psychology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 1023–1026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, S., Zhou, N., Wang, Z., Liang, X., & Shi, J. (2018). Maternal life stress and subsequent Chinese toddlers’ social adjustment: The moderating role of inhibitory control. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(2), 412–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obradovic, J. (2012). How can the study of physiological reactivity contribute to our understanding of adversity and resilience processes in development? Development and Psychopathology, 24, 371–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomin, R. (2011). Commentary: Why are children in the same family so different? Non-shared environment three decades later. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40, 582–592.Google Scholar
Repetti, R. L., Robles, T. F., & Reynolds, B. (2011). Allostatic processes in the family. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 921–938.Google Scholar
Rutter, M., Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2006). Gene–environment interplay and psychopathology: Multiple varieties but real effects. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 47, 226–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Widiger, T. A., De Clercq, B., & De Fruyt, F. (2009). Childhood antecedents of personality disorder: An alternative perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 771–791.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×