Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:34:23.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Pronunciation Teaching

from Section V - Applications of Phonetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2021

Rachael-Anne Knight
Affiliation:
City, University of London
Jane Setter
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we review phonetics in pronunciation teaching and learning from a historical perspective, before going on to look at paradigms for pronunciation and second language (L2) phonology with a focus on phonetic issues. Research identifying the importance of access to phonetic cues, auditory and visual, both in experimental and classroom settings, is presented, demonstrating the increasing emphasis on technology in this field. We then move on to recommendations for teacher training, with a review of approaches to describing intonation for pedagogic purposes. Finally, we present suggestions for the future of pronunciation teaching and learning.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

21.7 References

Aliaga-García, C. & Mora, J. C. (2009). Assessing the effects of phonetic training on L2 sound perception and production. In New Sounds 2007: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.424.6702&rep=rep1&type=pdf, last accessed 21 September 2020.Google Scholar
Aoyama, K., Guion, S. Flege, J. E., Yamada, T. & Akahane-Yamada, R. (2008). The first years in an L2-speaking environment: A comparison of Japanese children and adults learning American English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 46, 6190.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. 1995. A direct realist perspective on crosslanguage speech perception. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Timonium MD: York Press, pp. 167200.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O. & Munro, M. J., eds., Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1334.Google Scholar
Binasfour, H., Setter, J. & Aslan, E. (2017). Enhancing L2 learners’ perception and production of the Arabic emphatic sounds. In Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference, University College London, 9–11 August 2017, pp. 1620.Google Scholar
Brazil, D. (1994). Pronunciation for Advanced Learners of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brazil, D. (1997). The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brazil, D., Coulthard, M. & Johns, C. (1980). Discourse Intonation and Language Teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
British Council. (2018). The Future Demand for English in Europe: 2025 and Beyond. www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/future_demand_for_english_in_europe_2025_and_beyond_british_council_2018.pdf, last accessed 23 September 2020.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. J. & Johnson, K., eds. (1979). The Communicative Approach to Language Teaching, vol. 308. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2006). Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an international language. Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal, 3(3), 229–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cauldwell, R. (2013). Phonology for Listening: Teaching the Stream of Speech, Birmingham: Speechinaction.Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M. & Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Teaching Pronunciation: A Reference for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, M. (2007). Theory and practice of teaching discourse intonation. ELT Journal, 61(1), 311.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. (2018). The Effect of Explicit Instruction and Auditory/Audiovisual Training on Chinese Learners’ Perception of English Intonation. Unpublished PhD thesis, Newcastle University.Google Scholar
Chung, H. (2017). Review of the lingua franca core for English pronunciation teaching in Korea. In Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference, University College London, 9–11 August 2017, pp. 35–8.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1968). Equality of educational opportunity. Integrated Education, 6(5), 1928.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, C. & Seidlhofer, B. (1994). Pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 5162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demenko, G., Wagner, A. (2007), Prosody annotation for unit selection text-to-speech synthesis. Archives of Acoustics, 32(1), 2540.Google Scholar
Demenko, G., Wagner, A. & Cylwik, N. (2010). The use of speech technology in foreign language pronunciation training. Archives of Acoustics, 35(3), 309–29.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M. & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research‐based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–97.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M. & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation Fundamentals: Evidence-based Perspectives for L2 Teaching and Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deterding, D. (2013). Misunderstandings in English as a Lingua Franca: An Analysis of EFL Interactions in South-East Asia. Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31(3), 117–35.Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. & Przedlacka, J., eds. (2005). English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27(2), 315–30.Google Scholar
Edulearn (nd). English Pronunciation in a Global World. www.futurelearn.com/courses/english-pronunciation, last accessed 18 September 2020.Google Scholar
Engwall, O. (2012). Analysis of and feedback on phonetic features in pronunciation training with a virtual teacher. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 3764.Google Scholar
Engwall, O. & Bälter, O. (2007). Pronunciation feedback from real and virtual language teachers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 235–62.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. & Kayes, G. (2016). This Is A Voice: 99 Exercises to Train, Project and Harness the Power of Your Voice. London: Wellcome Collection.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Baltimore, MD: York Press, pp. 229–73.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., 1999. Age of learning and second-language speech. In Birdsong, D. P., ed., Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 101–32.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Wayland, R. (2019). The role of input in native Spanish late learners’ production and perception of English phonetic segments. Journal of Second Language Studies, 2(1), 144. http://jimflege.com/files/final_compact2.pdf, last accessed 18 September 2020.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O. S. & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437–70.Google Scholar
Garibaldi, C. L. & Bohn, O. S. (2015). Phonetic similarity predicts ultimate attainment quite well: The case of Danish /i, y, u/ and /d, t/ for native speakers of English and of Spanish. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0245.pdf, last accessed 18 September 2020.Google Scholar
Gilbert, J. (1984). Clear Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grenon, I. & White, L. (2008). Acquiring rhythm: A comparison of L1 and L2 speakers of Canadian English and Japanese. In Proceedings of the 32nd Boston University conference on language development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 155–66.Google Scholar
Hancock, M. (2017a). English Pronunciation in Use: Intermediate, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hancock, M. (2017b). PronPack 1–4. Chester: Hancock McDonald.Google Scholar
Hazan, V., Sennema, A., Iba, M. & Faulkner, A. (2005). Effect of audiovisual perceptual training on the perception and production of consonants by Japanese learners of English. Speech Communication, 47(3), 360–78.Google Scholar
Hewings, M. (2017). English Pronunciation in Use: Advanced, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hwang, H. & Lee, H. Y. (2015). The effect of high variability phonetic training on the production of English vowels and consonants. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0466.pdf, last accessed 18 September 2020.Google Scholar
International Phonetic Association. (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ioup, G. & Weinberger, S. H., eds. (1987). Interlanguage Phonology. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Iverson, P., Pinet, M. & Evans, B. G. (2012). Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(1), 145–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, S. (2002). Japanese. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, J. (2000). The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied linguistics, 23(1), 83103.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (2011). Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary, 18th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, T., ed. (2016). Pronunciation in the Classroom: The Overlooked Essential, Anapolis Junction, MD: TESOL Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, D. (2018). Mobile-assisted pronunciation training: The iPhone pronunciation app project. IATEFL Pronunciation Special Interest Group Journal, 58, 38–52.Google Scholar
Kelly, L. G. (1969). 25 Centuries of Language Teaching, Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, J. (1987). Teaching English Pronunciation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lengeris, A. & Hazan, V. (2010). The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(6), 3757–68.Google Scholar
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E. & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 874–86.Google Scholar
Macmillan Education ELT. (2011). Introduction to teaching pronunciation workshop – Adrian Underhill (COMPLETE). www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kAPHyHd7Lo&t=21s, last accessed 18 September 2020.Google Scholar
Marks, J. (2017). English Pronunciation in Use: Elementary, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miyawaki, K., Jenkins, J. J., Strange, W., Liberman, A. M., Verbrugge, R. & Fujimura, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception & Psychophysics, 18(5), 331–40.Google Scholar
Mohibul Hasan, S. M. (2017). LSC instruction on L2 pronunciation development. Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference, University College London, 9–11 August 2017, pp. 5962.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. M & Baker, A. A. (2015). History of ESL pronunciation teaching. In Reed, M. & Levis, J., eds., The Handbook of English Pronunciation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 3665.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M. G., Derwing, T. M., Cucchiarini, C., Hardison, D. M., Mixdorff, H., Thomson, R. I. et al. (2018). Directions for the future of technology in pronunciation research and teaching. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 4(2), 182207.Google Scholar
O’Connor, J. D. & Arnold, G. F. (1973). Intonation of Colloquial English, 2nd ed. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. (2008). Second language teacher education today. RELC Journal, 39(2), 158–77.Google Scholar
Roach, P. (1982). On the distinction between ‘stress-timed’ and ‘syllable-timed’ languages. In Crystal, D., ed., Linguistic Controversies: Essays in Linguistic Theory and Practice in Honour of F. R. Palmer. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 73–9.Google Scholar
Saito, K. & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form‐focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62(2), 595633.Google Scholar
Setter, J. (2005). Communicative patterns of intonation in L2 English teaching and learning. In Dziubalska-Kolaczyk, K. & Przedlacka, J., eds., English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 367–89.Google Scholar
Setter, J. (2019). Your Voice Speaks Volumes: It’s Not What You Say, but How You Say It. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Setter, J. & Jenkins, J. (2005). Pronunciation. Language Teaching, 38(1), 117.Google Scholar
Smith, R., Holmes-Elliott, S., Pettinato, M. & Knight, R. A. (2014). Cross-accent intelligibility of speech in noise: Long-term familiarity and short-term familiarization. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(3), 590608.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. (1968). Contrastive analysis and lapsed time. In Alatis, J. E., ed., Contrastive Linguistics and Its Pedagogical Implications. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 1126.Google Scholar
Swan, M. & Smith, B. (2001). Learner English, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van den Doel, R. 2008. The blind spots of Jenkins’s Lingua Franca. In Waniek-Klimczak, E., ed., Issues in Accents of English. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 140–9.Google Scholar
Walker, R. (2010). Teaching the Pronunciation of English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Spence, M. M., Jongman, A. & Sereno, J. A. (1999). Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(6), 3649–58.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Jongman, A. & Sereno, J. A. (2003). Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(2), 1033–43.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (2006). English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (2008). Longman Pronouncing Dictionary, 3rd ed. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. (1962). Psychological Differentiation. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Wong, J. W. (2014). The effects of high and low variability phonetic training on the perception and production of English vowels/e/-/æ/by Cantonese ESL learners with high and low L2 proficiency levels. HKBU Institutional Repository. https://repository.hkbu.edu.hk/hkbu_staff_publication/6234/, last accessed 18 September 2020.Google Scholar
Wright, T. (2002). Doing language awareness: Issues for language study in language teacher education. In Trappes-Lomax, H. & Ferguson, G., eds., Language in Language Teacher Education. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 113–30.Google Scholar
Zoghbor, W. S. (2018). Teaching English pronunciation to multi-dialect first language learners: The revival of the lingua franca core (LFC). System, 78, 114.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×