Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-24T10:31:38.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The Psychology of Public Opinion

from Part I - Foundations of Political Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2022

By
Lauren C. Howe  and
Jon A. Krosnick
Edited by
Danny Osborne  and
Chris G. Sibley
Danny Osborne
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Chris G. Sibley
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Get access

Summary

What is public opinion, what factors cause it to form in particular ways, and why does it matter? In this chapter, we define public opinion as opinions on matters of public debate that have significant implications for society. Then, we provide an overview of key developments in three central topics in research on public opinion. First, we discuss research on opinionation, or when and why a person forms an opinion on a political topic. Second, we discuss directionality of opinion, or factors that shape whether a person forms a particular kind of opinion (e.g., favourable or unfavourable) on an issue. Finally, we discuss the consequences of public opinion, or how opinions shape action, with a focus how public opinion influences voting, civic activism, and government attention and action. We end by considering emerging research trends in the field of public opinion that can inspire future research on the topic.

Keywords

Public opinionOpinionationAttitudesAttitude formationPolitical action
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology , pp. 104 - 117
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abeles, A. T., Howe, L. C., Krosnick, J. A., & MacInnis, B. (2019). Perception of public opinion on global warming and the role of opinion deviance. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertson, B. L. (2011). Religious appeals and implicit attitudes. Political Psychology, 32(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00793.xGoogle Scholar
Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051579Google Scholar
Anand, S., & Krosnick, J. A. (2003). The impact of attitudes toward foreign policy goals on public preferences among presidential candidates: A study of issue publics and the attentive public in the 2000 U.S. presidential election. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 33(1), 31–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0360491802250541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. In Swanson, G. E., Newcomb, T. M., & Hartley, E. L. (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 2–11). Holt. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520313514-017Google Scholar
Barnes, S. H., & Kaase, M. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies. SAGE.Google Scholar
Bélanger, É., & Meguid, B. M. (2008). Issue salience, issue ownership, and issue-based vote choice. Electoral Studies, 27(3), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, E., Schermer, J. A., & Vernon, P. A. (2009). The origins of political attitudes and behaviours: An analysis using twins. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 855–879. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423909990060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, G. F., Oldendick, R. W., & Tuchfarber, A. J. (1980). Experiments in filtering political opinions. Political Behavior, 2(4), 339–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, G. F., Tuchfarber, A. J., & Oldendick, R. W. (1986). Opinions on fictitious issues: The pressure to answer survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50(2), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1086/268978Google Scholar
Brandt, M. J., & Wetherell, G. A. (2012). What attitudes are moral attitudes? The case of attitude heritability. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(2), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611412793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, R. A., & Page, B. I. (1972). Comment: The assessment of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 66(2), 450–458.Google Scholar
Burden, B. C., & Rice Sanberg, J. N. (2003). Budget rhetoric in presidential campaigns from 1952 to 2000. Political Behavior, 25(2), 92–118. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023825212333Google Scholar
Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600103Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979). Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.97Google Scholar
Campbell, J. E. (1983). Ambiguity in the issue positions of presidential candidates: A causal analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 27(2), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2009). National surveys via RDD telephone interviewing versus the internet: Comparing sample representativeness and response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(4), 641–678. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claassen, R. L. (2007). Ideology and evaluation in an experimental setting: Comparing the proximity and the directional models. Political Research Quarterly, 60(2), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907302050Google Scholar
Claassen, R. L. (2009). Direction versus proximity: Amassing experimental evidence. American Politics Research, 37(2), 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X08321756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, P. J. (1988). Feminists and the gender gap. The Journal of Politics, 50(4), 985–1010. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131388Google Scholar
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D. E. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). The Free Press of Glencoe. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650Google Scholar
Crespi, L. P. (1948). The interview effect in polling. Public Opinion Quarterly, 12(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1086/265924Google Scholar
Dahlgaard, J. O., Hansen, J. H., Hansen, K. M., & Larsen, M. V. (2017). How election polls shape voting behaviour. Scandinavian Political Studies, 40(3), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12094Google Scholar
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. The Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1086/257897Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Ehret, P. J., Van Boven, L., & Sherman, D. K. (2018). Partisan barriers to bipartisanship: Understanding climate policy polarization. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(3), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618758709Google Scholar
Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 416–440. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, A. R., Haider-Markel, D. P., Lewis, D. C., Miller, P. R., Tadlock, B. L., & Taylor, J. K. (2018). Challenged expectations: Mere exposure effects on attitudes about transgender people and rights. Political Psychology, 39(1), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12402Google Scholar
Fournier, P., Blais, A., Nadeau, R., Gidengil, E., & Nevitte, N. (2003). Issue importance and performance voting. Political Behavior, 25(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022952311518Google Scholar
Frankovic, K., Johnson, T., & Stavrakantonaki, M. (2017). Freedom to conduct opinion polls: A 2017 worldwide update. https://www.esomar.org/uploads/public/library/news/ESOMAR-WAPOR_Freedom-to-Conduct-Opinion-Polls.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gallup, G., & Rae, S. F. (1940). Is there a bandwagon vote? Public Opinion Quarterly, 4(2), 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1086/265397Google Scholar
Gelpi, C., Feaver, P. D., & Reifler, J. (2006). Success matters: Casualty sensitivity and the war in Iraq. International Security, 30(3), 7–46. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228805775969573Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540808009XGoogle Scholar
Gilens, M. (1996). ‘Race coding’ and White opposition to welfare. American Political Science Review, 90(3), 593–604. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082611Google Scholar
Grillo, A. (2017). Risk aversion and bandwagon effect in the pivotal voter model. Public Choice, 172(3), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-017-0457-5Google Scholar
Hansen, J. M. (1985). The political economy of group membership. American Political Science Review, 79, 79–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956120Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Gillespie, N. A., Eaves, L. J., et al. (2011). A genome-wide analysis of liberal and conservative political attitudes. Journal of Politics, 73(1), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610001015Google Scholar
Herbst, S. (1993). The meaning of public opinion: Citizens’ constructions of political reality. Media, Culture & Society, 15(3), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344393015003007Google Scholar
Herbst, S. (1998). Reading public opinion: How political actors view the Democratic process. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hildum, D. C., & Brown, R. W. (1956). Verbal reinforcement and interviewer bias. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53(1), 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040518Google Scholar
Holbrook, A. L., Krosnick, J. A., Visser, P. S., Gardner, W. L., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Attitudes toward presidential candidates and political parties: Initial optimism, inertial first impressions, and a focus on flaws. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 930–950. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669333Google Scholar
Howe, L. C., & Krosnick, J. A. (2017). Attitude strength. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033600Google Scholar
Insko, C. A. (1965). Verbal reinforcement of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(4), 621–623. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022485Google Scholar
Jarvis, W. B. G., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.172Google Scholar
Jones, P. E., Brewer, P. R., Young, D. G., Lambe, J. L., & Hoffman, L. H. (2018). Explaining public opinion toward transgender people, rights, and candidates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(2), 252–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy009Google Scholar
Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., & Riemann, R. (2012). Left or right? Sources of political orientation: The roles of genetic factors, cultural transmission, assortative mating, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 633–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025560Google Scholar
Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200106Google Scholar
Kelman, H. C. (2006). Interests, relationships, identities: Three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190156Google Scholar
Kim, Y. M. (2009). Issue publics in the new information environment: Selectivity, domain specificity, and extremity. Communication Research, 36(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208330253Google Scholar
Kinder, D. R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S. T., & Lindsey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed.; pp. 778–867). McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A. (1988). The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: A study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.196CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krosnick, J. A. (1990). Government policy and citizen passion: A study of issue publics in contemporary America. Political Behavior, 12(1), 59–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992332Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., Berent, M. K., et al. (2002). The impact of ‘no opinion’ response options on data quality: Non-attitude reduction or an invitation to satisfice? Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(3), 371–403. https://doi.org/10.1086/341394Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A., & Milburn, M. A. (1990). Psychological determinants of political opinionation. Social Cognition, 8(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1990.8.1.49Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A., Narayan, S., & Smith, W. R. (1996). Satisficing in surveys: Initial evidence. New Directions for Evaluation, 70, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1033Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In Krosnick, J. A. & Petty, R. E. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1–24). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480Google Scholar
Kuru, O., Pasek, J., & Traugott, M. W. (2017). Motivated reasoning in the perceived credibility of public opinion polls. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81(2), 422–446. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfx018Google Scholar
Lacy, D., & Paolino, P. (2010). Testing proximity versus directional voting using experiments. Electoral Studies, 29(3), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.04.008Google Scholar
Lax, J. R., & Phillips, J. H. (2009). Gay rights in the states: Public opinion and policy responsiveness. American Political Science Review, 103(3), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409990050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leviston, Z., Walker, I., & Morwinski, S. (2012). Your opinion on climate change might not be as common as you think. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 334–337. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. Harcourt, Brace and Company. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127736Google Scholar
Madonna, G. T., & Young, M. (2002). The first political poll. https://www.fandm.edu/uploads/files/271296109834777015-the-first-political-poll-6-18-2002.pdfGoogle Scholar
Mildenberger, M., & Tingley, D. (2019). Beliefs about climate beliefs: The importance of second-order opinions for climate politics. British Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 1279–1307. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000321Google Scholar
Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2004). Threat as a motivator of political activism: A field experiment. Political Psychology, 25(4), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00384.xGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. M., Krosnick, J. A., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2016). The origins of policy issue salience: Personal and national importance impact on behavioral, cognitive, and emotional issue engagement. In Krosnick, J. A., Chang, I.-C. A., & Stark, T. A. (Eds.), Political psychology: New explorations (pp. 125–171). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315445687Google Scholar
Miller, J. M., Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A., Tahk, A., & Dionne, L. (2016). The impact of policy change threat on financial contributions to interest groups. In Krosnick, J. A., Chang, I.-C. A., & Stark, T. A. (Eds.), Political psychology: New explorations (pp. 172–202). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315445687Google Scholar
Miller, R. L. (1976). Mere exposure, psychological reactance and attitude change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40(2), 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1086/268290Google Scholar
Morton, R. B., Muller, D., Page, L., & Torgler, B. (2015). Exit polls, turnout, and bandwagon voting: Evidence from a natural experiment. European Economic Review, 77, 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.03.012Google Scholar
Mueller, J. E. (1973). War, presidents, and public opinion. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Mutz, D. C. (1992). Impersonal influence: Effects of representations of public opinion on political attitudes. Political Behavior, 14(2), 89–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992237Google Scholar
O’Connor, B., Balasubramanyan, R., Routledge, B. R., & Smith, N. A. (2010). From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. ICWSM 2010 – Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM10/paper/viewFile/1536/1842Google Scholar
Oskarsson, S., Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., et al. (2015). Linking genes and political orientations: Testing the cognitive ability as mediator hypothesis. Political Psychology, 36(6), 649–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12230Google Scholar
Page, B., & Shapiro, R. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77(1), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956018Google Scholar
Peterson, B. E., Doty, R. M., & Winter, D. G. (1993). Authoritarianism and attitudes toward contemporary social issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293192006Google Scholar
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741Google Scholar
Ripberger, J. T. (2011). Capturing curiosity: Using internet search trends to measure public attentiveness. Policy Studies Journal, 39(2), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00406.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rothschild, D., & Malhotra, N. (2014). Are public opinion polls self-fulfilling prophecies? Research and Politics, 1(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168014547667Google Scholar
Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording and context. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Harper.Google Scholar
Sidanius, J., Mitchell, M., Haley, H., & Navarrete, C. D. (2006). Support for harsh criminal sanctions and criminal justice beliefs: A social dominance perspective. Social Justice Research, 19(4), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-006-0026-4Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1954). Bandwagon and underdog effects and the possibility of election predictions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 18(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1086/266513Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts. https://doi.org/10.2307/411334Google Scholar
Sniderman, P. M., Hagen, M. G., Tetlock, P. E., & Brady, H. E. (1986). Reasoning chains: Causal models of policy reasoning in mass publics. British Journal of Political Science, 16(4), 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400004506Google Scholar
Staats, A. W., & Staats, C. K. (1958). Attitudes established by classical conditioning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57(1), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042782Google Scholar
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.xGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 819–827. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.819Google Scholar
Tomz, M., & Van Houweling, R. P. (2008). Candidate positioning and voter choice. American Political Science Review, 102(3), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080301Google Scholar
Visser, P. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Simmons, J. P. (2003). Distinguishing the cognitive and behavioral consequences of attitude importance and certainty: A new approach to testing the common-factor hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(2), 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00522-XGoogle Scholar
Waterton, J., & Lievesley, D. (1987). Attrition in a panel study of attitudes. Journal of Official Statistics, 3(3), 267–282.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 224–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00154Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×