Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:19:47.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The Structure, Prevalence, and Nature of Mass Belief Systems

from Part I - Foundations of Political Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2022

By
Bert N. Bakker  and
Yphtach Lelkes
Edited by
Danny Osborne  and
Chris G. Sibley
Danny Osborne
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Chris G. Sibley
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Get access

Summary

Ideology is a central concept in political psychology. Here, we synthesise the scholarly debate's major themes. We first examine the ways in which ideology has been operationalised and discuss its prevalence (or lack thereof) in the mass public. This is followed by a discussion of the top-down and bottom-up forces that shape citizens' ideology. Top-down processes include political elites and socialisation. Bottom-up processes range from political values, basic human values, and personality to biology and genetics. Finally, we outline steps that we would welcome in the next generation of research on political ideology. These include fundamental questions about the causal relationship between different bottom-up factors and a call for more attention to measurement of key constructs and of open science practices in the study of political ideology. We hope this chapter inspires others and sets the stage for the next generation of research on political ideology.

Keywords

IdeologyStructureOriginsBottom-upTop-down
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology , pp. 89 - 103
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarøe, L. (2012). When citizens go against elite directions: Partisan cues and contrast effects on citizens’ attitudes. Party Politics, 18(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810380093Google Scholar
Aarøe, L., Petersen, M. B., & Arceneaux, K. (2017). The behavioral immune system shapes political intuitions: Why and how individual differences in disgust sensitivity underlie opposition to immigration. American Political Science Review, 111(2), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000770Google Scholar
Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051579Google Scholar
Algan, Y., Dalvit, N., Do, Q.-A., Le Chapelain, A., & Zenou, Y. (2015). How social networks shape our beliefs: A natural experiment among future French politicians [Mimeo]. Sciences Po.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, S., Rodden, J., & Snyder, J. M. (2008). The strength of issues: Using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080210Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K., & Vander Wielen, R. J. (2017). Taming intuition: How reflection minimizes partisan reasoning and promotes Democratic accountability. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108227643Google Scholar
Bakker, B. N. (2017). Personality traits, income, and economic ideology. Political Psychology, 38(6), 1025–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12349Google Scholar
Bakker, B. N., & Lelkes, Y. (2018). Selling ourselves short? How abbreviated measures of personality change the way we think about personality and politics. The Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1311–1325. https://doi.org/10.1086/698928Google Scholar
Bakker, B. N., Lelkes, Y., & Malka, A. (2020). Understanding partisan cue receptivity: Tests of predictions from the bounded rationality and expressive utility perspectives. The Journal of Politics, 82(3), 1061–1077. https://doi.org/10.1086/707616Google Scholar
Bakker, B. N., Lelkes, Y., & Malka, A. (2021). Rethinking the link between self-reported personality traits and political preferences. American Political Science Review. https://psyarxiv.com/a3jf5/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., Gothreau, C., & Arceneaux, K. (2020). Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threats. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(6), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0823-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barber, M., & Pope, J. C. (2019). Does party trump ideology? Disentangling party and ideology in America. American Political Science Review, 113(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, J., & Block, J. H. (2006). Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 734–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutyline, A., & Vaisey, S. (2017). Belief network analysis: A relational approach to understanding the structure of attitudes. American Journal of Sociology, 122(5), 1371–1447. https://doi.org/10.1086/691274Google Scholar
Brandt, M. J., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2019). What is central to political belief system networks? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(9), 1352–1364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218824354Google Scholar
Bullock, J. G. (2021). Education and attitudes toward redistribution in the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 1230–1250. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Caughey, D., O’Grady, T. O. M., & Warshaw, C. (2019). Policy ideology in European mass publics, 1981–2016. American Political Science Review, 113(3), 674–693. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000157Google Scholar
Chambers, C. (2019). The seven deadly sins of psychology: A manifesto for reforming the culture of scientific practice. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc779w5Google Scholar
Connors, E. C. (2020). The social dimension of political values. Political Behavior, 42(3), 961–982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09530-3Google Scholar
Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications. American Journal of Political Science, 25(4), 617–645. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110756Google Scholar
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass politics. Critical Review, 18(1–3), 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppock, A. (2019). Generalizing from survey experiments conducted on Mechanical Turk: A replication approach. Political Science Research and Methods, 7(3), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.10Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J. (2010). Ideology, partisanship, and democratic development. In LeDuc, L., Niemi, R. G., & Norris, P. (Eds.), Comparing democracies: Elections and voting in the 21st century (pp. 143–163). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288740.n7Google Scholar
Dawes, C. T., & Weinschenk, A. C. (2020). On the genetic basis of political orientation. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.03.012Google Scholar
DellaPosta, D. (2020). Pluralistic collapse: The ‘oil spill’ model of mass opinion polarization. American Sociological Review, 85(3), 507–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420922989Google Scholar
Dinas, E. (2013). Why does the apple fall far from the tree? How early political socialization prompts parent-child dissimilarity. British Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 827–852. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000033Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper. https://doi.org/10.2307/444355Google Scholar
Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1861–1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.xGoogle Scholar
Eaves, L. J., & Eysenck, H. J. (1974). Genetics and the development of social attitudes. Nature, 249(5454), 288–289. https://doi.org/10.1038/249288a0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enke, B. (2019). Kinship, cooperation, and the evolution of moral systems. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(2), 953–1019. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz001Google Scholar
Erikson, R. S., & Stoker, L. (2011). Caught in the draft: The effects of Vietnam draft lottery status on political attitudes. American Political Science Review, 105(2), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000141Google Scholar
Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., & Hodson, G. (2002). Public attitudes toward immigration in the United States and Canada in response to the September 11, 2001 ‘Attack on America’. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2002.00028.xGoogle Scholar
Fasching, N., Arceneaux, K., Bakker, B. N. (2021). Childhood personality is not systematically associated with ideology in adulthood [Working Paper].Google Scholar
Federico, C. M., & Malka, A. (2018). The contingent, contextual nature of the relationship between needs for security and certainty and political preferences: Evidence and implications. Political Psychology, 39(S1), 3–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12477Google Scholar
Feldman, S., Huddy, L., Wronski, J., & Lown, P. (2020). The interplay of empathy and individualism in support for social welfare policies. Political Psychology, 41(2), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12620Google Scholar
Feldman, S., & Johnston, C. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35(3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12055Google Scholar
Fournier, P., Soroka, S., & Nir, L. (2021). Negativity biases and political ideology: A comparative test across 17 countries. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 775–791. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000131Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., Griffin, B. N., Belsky, J., & Roisman, G. I. (2012). Developmental antecedents of political ideology: A longitudinal investigation from birth to age 18 years. Psychological Science, 23(11), 1425–1431. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000131Google Scholar
Freeze, M., & Montgomery, J. M. (2015). Static stability and evolving constraint: Preference stability and ideological structure in the mass public. American Politics Research, 44(3), 415–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X15607299Google Scholar
Garrido, N. R. (2020). Can education reduce traditional gender role attitudes? Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, SA (Ivie).Google Scholar
Gerring, J. (1997). Ideology: A definitional analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 50(4), 957–994. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299705000412Google Scholar
Goren, P. (2020). Values and public opinion. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics (pp. 1–29). https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.954Google Scholar
Goren, P., Federico, C. M., & Kittilson, M. C. (2009). Source cues, partisan identities, and political value expression. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00402.xGoogle Scholar
Goren, P., Schoen, H., Reifler, J., Scotto, T., & Chittick, W. (2016). A unified theory of value-based reasoning and U.S. public opinion. Political Behavior, 38(4), 977–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109–016-9344-xGoogle Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Crabtree, C., & Smith, K. B. (2019). Ideology justifies morality: Political beliefs predict moral foundations. American Journal of Political Science, 63(4), 788–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Medland, S. E., Klemmensen, R., et al. (2014). Genetic influences on political ideologies: Twin analyses of 19 measures of political ideologies from five democracies and genome-wide findings from three populations. Behavior Genetics, 44(3), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-014-9648-8Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., & Verhulst, B. (2015). Political attitudes develop independently of personality traits. PLoS ONE, 10(3), Article e0134072. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Healy, A., & Malhotra, N. (2013). Childhood socialization and political attitudes: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Politics, 75(4), 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000996Google Scholar
Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behaviour and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 297–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13001192Google Scholar
Hillygus, D. S. (2011). The evolution of election polling in the United States. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(5), 962–981. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr054Google Scholar
Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R. G. (1968). The transmission of political values from parent to child. American Political Science Review, 62(1), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400115709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. K., Stoker, L., & Bowers, J. (2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. Journal of Politics, 71(3), 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090719Google Scholar
Johnston, C. D., Lavine, H. G., & Federico, C. M. (2017). Open versus closed: Personality, identity, and the politics of redistribution. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316341452Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339Google Scholar
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020). Uses and abuses of ideology in political psychology. Political Psychology, 41(4), 771–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandler, C., Bell, E., Shikishima, C., Yamagata, S., & Riemann, R. (2015). Genetic foundations of attitude formation. In Scott, R. A., Kosslyn, S. M., & Buchmann, M. (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource (pp. 1–21). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H., & Rehm, P. (2014). Occupations as a site of political preference formation. Comparative Political Studies, 47(12), 1670–1706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013516066Google Scholar
Knight, K. (2006). Transformations of the concept of ideology in the twentieth century. American Political Science Review, 100(4), 619–626. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062502Google Scholar
Kozlowski, A., & Murphy, J. P. (2021). Issue alignment and partisanship in the American public: Revisiting the ‘partisans without constraint’ thesis. Social Science Research, 94, Article 102498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020Google Scholar
Lavine, H., Sullivan, J. L., Borgida, E., & Thomsen, C. J. (1996). The relationship of national and personal issue salience to attitude accessibility on foreign and domestic policy issues. Political Psychology, 17(2), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791812Google Scholar
Lelkes, Y. (2020). Ancestral kinship and the origins of ideology [Working Paper].Google Scholar
Levendusky, M. S. (2010). Clearer cues, more consistent voters: A benefit of elite polarization. Political Behavior, 32(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109–009-9094-0Google Scholar
Linzer, D. A. (2008). The structure of mass ideology and its consequences for democratic governance. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 170. https://search.proquest.com/docview/304655873?accountid=35812Google Scholar
Malka, A., & Lelkes, Y. (2010). More than ideology: Conservative–liberal identity and receptivity to political cues. Social Justice Research, 23(2–3), 156–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0114-3Google Scholar
Malka, A., Lelkes, Y., & Soto, C. J. (2019). Are cultural and economic conservatism positively correlated? A large-scale cross-national test. British Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 1045–1069. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000072Google Scholar
Malka, A., Soto, C. J., Inzlicht, M., & Lelkes, Y. (2014). Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 1031–1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036170Google Scholar
Martin, G. J., & Yurukoglu, A. (2017). Bias in cable news: Persuasion and polarization. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2565–2599. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2016). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/Sl537592707071873Google Scholar
McClosky, H. (1958). Conservatism and personality. American Political Science Review, 52(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953011Google Scholar
McClosky, H. (1964). Consensus and ideology in American politics. American Political Science Review, 58(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952868Google Scholar
Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2020). Does openness to experience predict changes in conservatism? A nine-wave longitudinal investigation into the personality roots to ideology. Journal of Research in Personality, 87, Article 103979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103979Google Scholar
Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., et al. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321(5896), 1667–1670. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157627Google Scholar
Pan, J., & Xu, Y. (2018). China’s ideological spectrum. Journal of Politics, 80(1), 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1086/694255Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.xGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., et al. (2014). Basic personal values underlie and give coherence to political values: A cross national study in 15 countries. Political Behavior, 36(4), 899–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109–013-9255-zGoogle Scholar
Shafer, E. F., & Malhotra, N. (2011). The effect of a child’s sex on support for traditional gender roles. Social Forces, 90(1), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/90.1.209Google Scholar
Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Ho, A. K., Sibley, C., & Duriez, B. (2013). You’re inferior and not worth our concern: The interface between empathy and social dominance orientation. Journal of Personality, 81(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slothuus, R. (2010). When can political parties lead public opinion? Evidence from a natural experiment. Political Communication, 27(2), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584601003709381Google Scholar
Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, J. R., Martin, N. G., & Hatemi, P. K. (2017). Intuitive ethics and political orientations: Testing moral foundations as a theory of political ideology. American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12255Google Scholar
Smith, K. B., Oxley, D., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011). Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PLoS ONE, 6(10), Article e25552. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025552Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Coping with trade-offs: Psychological constraints and political implications. In Lupia, A., McCubbins, M. D., & Popkin, S. L. (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 239–263). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805813.011Google Scholar
Van den Akker, O., Weston, S. J., Campbell, L., et al. (2019). Preregistration of secondary data analysis: A template and tutorial.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Brug, W., & Van Spanje, J. (2009). Immigration, Europe and the ‘new’ cultural dimension. European Journal of Political Research, 48(3), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00841.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhulst, B., Eaves, L. J., & Hatemi, P. K. (2012). Correlation not causation: The relationship between personality traits and political ideologies. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00568.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattenberg, M. P. (2019). The changing nature of mass belief systems: The rise of concept and policy ideologues. Critical Review, 31(2), 198–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2019.1690223Google Scholar
Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 579–616. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111583Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×