Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Prosociality
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Prosociality
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Part I Development of Prosociality
- Part II Antecedents and Mechanisms of Prosociality
- Part III Development of Prosociality in Context
- Part IV Applications
- 26 Fostering Prosociality in the Family Context
- 27 Prosociality and Civic Engagement
- 28 Prosocial Behavior, Positive Youth Development, and Character Virtues
- 29 Relational Practices of Care to Nurture Prosociality and Advance Policy
- 30 Toward a New Era of Prosociality Research
- Afterword
- Index
- References
30 - Toward a New Era of Prosociality Research
Priorities, Challenges, and Possibilities
from Part IV - Applications
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 May 2023
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Prosociality
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Prosociality
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Part I Development of Prosociality
- Part II Antecedents and Mechanisms of Prosociality
- Part III Development of Prosociality in Context
- Part IV Applications
- 26 Fostering Prosociality in the Family Context
- 27 Prosociality and Civic Engagement
- 28 Prosocial Behavior, Positive Youth Development, and Character Virtues
- 29 Relational Practices of Care to Nurture Prosociality and Advance Policy
- 30 Toward a New Era of Prosociality Research
- Afterword
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter outlines key foci for future research on prosociality and its development. It seeks to identify challenges and priorities and to delineate exciting possibilities for moving the field forward. These include the need for a useful taxonomy to help map the different dimensions and forms of prosociality across development; a call to extend the construct of prosociality by incorporating the perspectives of children and individuals from diverse cultures and backgrounds; the need to integrate knowledge from different levels of analysis; the notion that for a more complete understanding of prosociality in humans, both specificities and commonalities in processes of prosocial development must be addressed; and the need to understand major obstacles to prosocial development – how is it that, despite the human potential for prosociality, some individuals do not become prosocial? – and how to transcend such barriers. Addressing these issues, using rigorous and innovative work, will promote a new era of prosociality science.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of ProsocialityDevelopment, Mechanisms, Promotion, pp. 600 - 613Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Ben-Arieh, A. (2005). Where are the children? Children’s role in measuring and monitoring their well-being. Social Indicators Research, 74(3), 573–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-4645-6Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (2017). Empathy and its discontents. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brownell, C. A. (2013). Early development of prosocial behavior: Current perspectives. Infancy, 18(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12004Google Scholar
Bukowski, W. M., Laursen, B., & Rubin, K. H. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Buttelmann, D., & Böhm, R. (2014). The ontogeny of the motivation that underlies in-group bias. Psychological Science, 25(4), 921–927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613516802Google Scholar
Carlo, G., & Maiya, S. (2019). Methodological issues in cross-cultural research on prosocial and moral development. In Jones, N. A., Platt, M., Mize, K. D., & Hardin, J. (Eds.), Conducting research in developmental psychology: A topical guide for research methods utilized across the lifespan (pp. 171–188). Routledge.Google Scholar
Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014033032440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidov, M., Vaish, A., Knafo-Noam, A., & Hastings, P. D. (2016). The motivational foundations of prosocial behavior from a developmental perspective – Evolutionary roots and key psychological mechanisms: Introduction to the special section. Child Development, 87(6), 1655–1667. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12639Google Scholar
Davis, M. H. (1983). A mulitdimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113Google Scholar
Decety, J., & Cowell, J. M. (2014). The complex relation between morality and empathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 337–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.008Google Scholar
Devine, P. G., Plant, E. A., Amodio, D. M., Harmon-Jones, E., & Vance, S. L. (2002). The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 835–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.835CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunfield, K., Kuhlmeier, V. A., O’Connell, L., & Kelley, E. (2011). Examining the diversity of prosocial behavior: Helping, sharing, and comforting in infancy. Infancy, 16(3), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2010.00041.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, N., VanSchyndel, S. K., & Spinrad, T. L. (2016). Prosocial motivation: Inferences from an opaque body of work. Child Development, 87(6), 1668–1678. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12638Google Scholar
FitzRoy, S., & Rutlan, A. (2010). Learning to control ethnic intergroup bias in childhood. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(June 2009), 625–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejspGoogle Scholar
Garrett, M. T. (1999). Understanding the “medicine” of Native American traditional values: An integrative review. Counseling and Values, 43(2), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-007X.1999.tb00131.xGoogle Scholar
Gilead, M., & Liberman, N. (2014). We take care of our own: Caregiving salience increases out-group bias in response to out-group threat. Psychological Science, 25(7), 1380–1387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614531439Google Scholar
Gonzalez, A. M., Steele, J. R., & Baron, A. S. (2017). Reducing children’s implicit racial bias through exposure to positive out-group exemplars. Child Development, 88(1), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12582CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(11), 1337–1345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015Google Scholar
Gratani, M., Sutton, S. G., Butler, J. R. A., Bohensky, E. L., & Foale, S. (2016). Indigenous environmental values as human values. Cogent Social Sciences, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2016.1185811Google Scholar
Greener, S., & Crick, N. R. (1999). Normative beliefs about prosocial behavior in middle childhood: What does it mean to be nice? Social Development, 8(3), 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grusec, J. E., Davidov, M., & Lundell, L. J. (2002). Prosocial and helping behavior. In Smith, P. K. & Hart, C. H. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (pp. 457–474). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/9780822373780Google Scholar
Harmsworth, G. R., & Awatere, S. (2013). Indigenous Māori knowledge and perspectives of ecosystems. In Dymond, J. R. (Ed.), Ecosystem services in New Zealand – Conditions and trends (pp. 274–286). Manaaki Whenua Press.Google Scholar
Hepach, R., Vaish, A., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Young children are intrinsically motivated to see others helped. Psychological Science, 23(9), 967–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612440571Google Scholar
Hill, N. E. (2021). In search of the individual embedded in context: Applications of the specificity principle. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 75(May), 101289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101289Google Scholar
Kärtner, J., Keller, H., & Chaudhary, N. (2010). Cognitive and social influences on early prosocial behavior in two sociocultural contexts. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 905–914. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019718Google Scholar
Killen, M., Elenbaas, L., & Rizzo, M. T. (2018). Young children’s ability to recognize and challenge unfair treatment of others in group contexts. Human Development, 61(4–5), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1159/000492804Google Scholar
Killen, M., Mulvey, K. L., & Hitti, A. (2013). Social exclusion in childhood: A developmental intergroup perspective. Child Development, 84(3), 772–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Killen, M., Pisacane, K., Lee-Kim, J., & Ardila-Rey, A. (2001). Fairness or stereotypes? Young children’s priorities when evaluating group exclusion and inclusion. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.5.587Google Scholar
Knafo, A., Zahn-Waxler, C., Van Hulle, C., Robinson, J. A. L., & Rhee, S. H. (2008). The developmental origins of a disposition toward empathy: Genetic and environmental contributions. Emotion, 8(6), 737–752. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014179Google Scholar
Knafo-Noam, A., Uzefovsky, F., Israel, S., Davidov, M., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2015). The prosocial personality and its facets: Genetic and environmental architecture of mother-reported behavior of 7-year-old twins. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(Feb), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00112Google Scholar
Köster, M., Cavalcante, L., Vera Cruz de Carvalho, R., Dôgo Resende, B., & Kärtner, J. (2016). Cultural influences on toddlers’ prosocial behavior: How maternal task assignment relates to helping others. Child Development, 87(6), 1727–1738. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12636CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Litvack-Miller, W., McDougall, D., & Romney, D. M. (1997). The structure of empathy during middle childhood and its relationship to prosocial behavior. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 123(3), 303–325.Google Scholar
MacDonald, K. B. (2008). Effortful control, explicit processing, and the regulation of human evolved predispositions. Psychological Review, 115(4), 1012–1031. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013327Google Scholar
Malti, T. (2020). Children and violence: Nurturing social-emotional development to promote mental health. Social Policy Report, 33(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sop2.8Google Scholar
Malti, T., & Cheah, C. S. L. (2021). Toward complementarity: Specificity and commonality in social-emotional development: Introduction to the special section. Child Development, 92(6), e1085–e1094. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13690Google Scholar
Malti, T., Ongley, S. F., Peplak, J., Chaparro, M. P., Buchmann, M., Zuffianò, A., & Cui, L. (2016). Children’s sympathy, guilt, and moral reasoning in helping, cooperation, and sharing: A 6-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 87(6), 1783–1795. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12632Google Scholar
Malti, T., & Rubin, K. H. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of child and adolescent aggression. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557Google Scholar
Mayeroff, M. (1971). On caring. Harper & Row. https://doi.org/10.20467/1091-5710.15.2.47Google Scholar
McGrath, M. P., & Brown, B. C. (2008). Developmental differences in prosocial motives and behavior in children from low-socioeconomic status families. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 169(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.3200/GNTP.169.1.5-20Google Scholar
Miller, J. G., & Bersoff, D. M. (1994). Cultural influences on the moral status of reciprocity and the discounting of endogenous motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 592–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205015Google Scholar
Miller, J. G., Kahle, S., & Hastings, P. D. (2015). Roots and benefits of costly giving: Children who are more altruistic have greater autonomic flexibility and less family wealth. Psychological Science, 26(7), 1038–1045. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615578476Google Scholar
Newton, E. K., Thompson, R. A., & Goodman, M. (2016). Individual differences in toddlers’ prosociality: Experiences in early relationships explain variability in prosocial behavior. Child Development, 87(6), 1715–1726. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12631Google Scholar
Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Carlo, G. (Eds.). (2014). Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paulus, M. (2014). The emergence of prosocial behavior: Why do infants and toddlers help, comfort, and share? Child Development Perspectives, 8(2), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12066Google Scholar
Pitman, G. R. (2011). The evolution of human warfare. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 41(3), 352–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393110371380CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrigues, J., Ulrich, N., Mussel, P., Carlo, G., & Hewig, J. (2017). Measuring prosocial tendencies in Germany: Sources of validity and reliability of the revised prosocial tendency measure. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(Dec.), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02119Google Scholar
Roisman, G. I. (2021). Editorial: A vision of a fair and efficient, diverse and inclusive, cumulative science of child development in the best and worst of times. Child Development, 92(2), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13538Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Universalism values and the inclusiveness of our moral universe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(6), 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022107308992Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2010). Basic values: How they motivate and inhibit prosocial behavior. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 221–241). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12061-012Google Scholar
Svetlova, M., Nichols, S. R., & Brownell, C. A. (2010). Toddlers’ prosocial behavior: From instrumental to empathic to altruistic helping. Child Development, 81(6), 1814–1827. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01512.xGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. A., & Newton, E. K. (2013). Baby altruists? Examining the complexity of prosocial motivation in young children. Infancy, 18(1), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2012.00139.xGoogle Scholar
Verbos, A. K., & Humphries, M. (2014). A Native American relational ethic: An Indigenous perspective on teaching human responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 1–9. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1790-3Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by