Speech Acts, Discourse, and Clause Type

doi:10.1017/9781108580410.029

24 - Speech Acts, Discourse, and Clause Type

from Part Five - Semantics and Pragmatics

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 June 2022

Alice Corr and

Nicola Munaro

Edited by

Adam Ledgeway and

Martin Maiden

Show author details

Adam Ledgeway: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martin Maiden: Affiliation:
University of Oxford

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter considers how the Romance languages can contribute to our understanding of the encoding of discourse-oriented meaning, both structurally, at the level of the sentence, and, interpretatively, at the level of the utterance; more precisely, it focuses on the discourse-oriented meaning that interfaces between the wider extra-sentential discourse context on the one hand, and the propositional core of the utterance and the sentence-internal discourse context on the other. We present an overview of the contribution of Romance languages to a number of the key issues associated with theories of discourse at the level of the sentence/utterance, such as the grammatical expression of clause type, the codification of illocutionary force, and the mapping between form and function in the realization of speech acts, which are the communicative actions effected through the production of an utterance; in particular, we distinguish the morphosyntactic notion of clause type, meant as the formal or grammatical structure of a sentence codified through the lexicalization of dedicated functional slots within the left periphery of the clause, from that of illocutionary force, a pragmatic notion which refers to the communicative function attached to that expression.

Keywords

discourse clause type illocutionary force speech acts utterances left periphery form-function mapping grammar-discourse interface

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Romance Linguistics , pp. 728 - 762

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580410.029 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected References

Beyssade, C. and Marandin, J.-M. (2006b). ‘The speech act assignment problem revisited: disentangling speaker’s commitment from speaker’s call on addressee’. In Bonami, O. and Cabredo-Hofherr, P. (eds), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6. Paris: CSSP, 37–68.Google Scholar

Coniglio, M. and Zegrean, I. (2012). ‘Splitting up force’. In Haegeman, L., Aelbrecht, L., and Nye, R. (eds), Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 190–229.Google Scholar

Corr, A. (2017). Ibero-Romance and the Syntax of the Utterance. Doctoral thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar

Giorgi, A. (2010). About the Speaker: Towards a Syntax of Indexicality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Giurgea, I. and Remberger, E.M. (2016). ‘Illocutionary force’. In Ledgeway, A. and Maiden, M. (eds), The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 863–78.Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. and Hill, V. (2013). ‘The syntactization of discourse’. In Folli, R., Sevdali, C., and Truswell, R. (eds), Syntax and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 370–90.Google Scholar

Martins, A. M. (2014). ‘How much syntax is there in metalinguistic negation?’, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32(2): 635–72.CrossRef Google Scholar

Moro, A. (2003). ‘Notes on vocative case: a case study in clause structure’. In Quer, J., Schroten, Scorretti, M., Sleeman, P., and Verheugd, E. (eds), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 247–61.Google Scholar

Munaro, N. (2010). ‘Towards a hierarchy of clause types’. In Benincà, P. and Munaro, N. (eds), Mapping the Left Periphery. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125–62.Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. (1997). ‘The fine structure of the left periphery’. In Haegeman, L. (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281–337.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sadock, J. and Zwicky, A. (1985). ‘Speech act distinctions in syntax’. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 155–96.Google Scholar

Speas, P. and Tenny, C. (2003). ‘Configurational properties of point of view roles’. In Di Sciullo, A. M. (ed.), Asymmetry in Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 315–45.Google Scholar